Preprint

Article

Organizing the Chaos: Novel Insights into the Regulation of Z-3-Hexenal Production in Damaged Maize Leaves

Altmetrics

Downloads

Views

Comments

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Samantha Selman,Marie Engelberth,

Jurgen Engelberth^*

Samantha Selman,Marie Engelberth,

Jurgen Engelberth^*

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

01 September 2024

Posted:

03 September 2024

Read the latest preprint version here

Alerts

Abstract

Green leaf volatiles (GLV) are important signaling compounds that help to regulate plant defenses against pests and pathogens. Made through the hydroperoxide lyase (HPL) pathway, they are rapidly produced upon damage and can signal this to other parts of the same plant or even plants nearby, where they can induce rapid defense responses directly or prime them against the impending danger. In this primed state plants can respond faster and/or stronger should pests or pathogens attack. However, while all proteins and genes involved in the biosynthesis of GLV have been identified, little is still known about how the first two steps in the pathway, e.g., oxygenation by a lipoxygenase (LOX) and subsequent cleavage by HPL are facilitated within the damaged tissue, resulting in the production of Z-3-hexenal (Z3al) as the first committed product of the pathway. Here, we provide evidence that several factors might be involved in the production of Z3al including pH, Ca2+, and an environment that is highly hydrophobic. We present a model in which the extraordinary circumstances that are present at the site of Z3al production are considered and shine new light on potential regulatory mechanisms.

Keywords:

Subject: Biology and Life Sciences - Plant Sciences

1. Introduction

Green leaf volatiles (GLV) are a ubiquitous group of plant compounds that have been known for more than 100 years [1]. However, while originally considered to be metabolic shunt, they have come to our attention as potent inducers of plant-protective measures, covering both microbes and herbivores [2,3]. In more recent years they have further been found to also protects against a range of abiotic stresses including drought, cold, high light, and heat [4]. Common to all these threats is that they can cause significant damage to the plant, which is also the main contributor to the production and release of GLV.

The biosynthesis of GLV starts with a lipoxygenase (LOX), which inserts molecular oxygen into a fatty acid, in case of GLV in position 13 [5,6]. While this can be a free fatty acid, it has been demonstrated that lipid-bound fatty acid can also serve as a substrate [7]. The hydroperoxyl fatty acid, which is usually linolenic or linoleic acid, is then further processed by a hydroperoxide lyase (HPL) and cleaved into a 6-carbon unit and a 12-carbon unit. While the 12-carbon unit can be transformed into traumatin (12-oxo-trans-10-dodecenoic acid) [8], the 6-carbon unit, which is either Z-3-hexenal (Z3al, from linolenic acid) or hexanal (Hal, from linoleic acid), represents the first GLV compound in the pathway. Z3al in particular can be produced in large quantities from damaged plant tissue, while Hal is usually a minor compound [9]. Both can be further processed into the corresponding alcohols by an alcohol dehydrogenase and eventually esters thereof by an acetyl transferase [5,6]. Some plants also have an isomerase, which converts Z3al into E-2-hexenal (E2al) [10,11]. E2al can also be reduced to the corresponding alcohol and esterified. The productions of the aldehydes including the isomerase reaction occurs in damaged tissues, while the biosynthesis of the alcohols and esters requires intact cells [12].

However, GLV are also released from undamaged plants under certain biotic and abiotic stresses. For example, it was shown that drought and high temperatures can cause the release of significant amounts of these compounds from intact plants, which are therefore mainly found in the form of the corresponding alcohols and esters [13]. Others have observed a burst of GLV from intact plants right after the onset of darkness, again mainly as the alcohols and esters [14,15]. Also, plants experiencing either insect herbivory or pathogen infections often release GLV from distal or systemic undamaged parts, although usually with some delay [16].

To date no receptors for GLV have been identified. However, progress has been made in the characterization of signaling events activated by these compounds. Several signaling pathways related to GLV activities have already been elucidated. Among those were rapid changes in membrane potential and altered cytosolic Ca²⁺ levels. An array of transcription factors that are induced by exposure to GLV have been identified [19,20,21]. It is however unclear if these are GLV-specific and what the downstream targets for these are. Most recently, in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) a MAP kinase pathway was characterized that responded to GLV treatment [22]. Interestingly, the same MAP kinase pathway is also recruited upon pathogen infection. Z-3-hexenol (Z3ol) can also be conjugated to other cellular molecules, in particular sugars. Several different forms of this conjugation have been identified and were also shown to have anti-herbivore properties [23]. Also, GLV-glycosides can easily become hydrolyzed again to release Z3ol again. Treatment with Z-3-hexenyl acetate (Z3ac) results in the formation of these glycosides, suggesting that Z3ac first has to be cleaved into Z3ol before conjugation. This suggests that Z3ol may also be the active compound among the GLV, which was confirmed by [24] in showing that mutations in the hydrolyzing enzymes reduced the activity of Z3ac significantly. In contrast, E2al has been found to become conjugated to glutathione, a reaction that suggests a detoxification rather than storage [25].

Since physical damage to green plant tissues can cause the production and release of these compounds almost instantly, they are ideal volatile messengers to report the damage not only to distant, yet undamaged parts of the same plant, but also to other plants nearby, thereby alerting them to the possibility of impending damage [2, and references therein]. Adding to this is the ability of many plants to produce large quantities of GLV, which may reach several µg per gram fresh weight [9]. GLV can further be produced in different isomers. While some plants mainly produce the Z-3 isomers, other produce predominantly the E-2 isomers [9]. And even within one plant species the quality and quantity of produced GLV can vary significantly depending on environmental factors and developmental stages [26]. This diversity of GLV production and release contributes to the complexity of their biology and implies that ecophysiological factors may have played an important role in the evolutionary shaping of GLV production [9].

Common to the events that cause the release of GLV is the association with tissue damage. Therefore, the starting point for the biosynthesis of GLV lies in the damaged tissue with Z3al being the first product of the pathway. This implies a mechanism that allows LOX (in corn LOX10 [27]) and HPL (for maize [28]) in particular to become active in damaged cells, either by eliminating spatial separation normally found in intact cells, or by changing the general reaction conditions. Also, within the damaged tissue both enzymes need access to their substrates, which can either be found in the form of vesicles, individual lipids, or free fatty acids. However, little is known about these processes. We therefore started an investigation with the aim to identify factors that may help to facilitate the rapid production of Z3al as the first distinct compound of the pathway. Multiple parameters like pH, specific ions, pharmacological inhibitors, as well as the presence or absence of polar and unpolar components were investigated. Furthermore, we performed a proteomics analysis of thylakoid membranes isolated from maize chloroplasts and stroma to determine the major location of LOX10 and HPL. Together, a picture emerges that helps to explain how plants may regulate GLV production in damaged tissues without the constraints of strict spatial separation.

2. Results and Discussion

Identification of LOX10 and HPL in thylakoid membranes of maize chloroplasts

LOX10 in maize has been thoroughly characterized [27,29], while HPL had been much more elusive. Only recently did [28] identify and characterized the HPL gene from maize. But while both, LOX10 and HPL were predicted to be in chloroplasts, the precise location within those was still unknown. To find out more about the localization of LOX10 and HPL in maize chloroplasts we isolated these first, followed by an enrichment of thylakoid membranes. Enriched thylakoid samples were then analyzed in the Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Core at UTSA (https://research.utsa.edu/cores/mspc/). As expected, while almost all proteins identified in the enriched thylakoid sample were involved in photosynthesis, only a few other proteins with no direct involvement in photosynthesis were identified, among them LOX10 and HPL with LOX10 showing a slightly higher abundance (emPAI 0.45) as HPL (emPAI 0.4). We also identified a lipase in the thylakoid fraction, although at a much lower abundance (emPAI 0.09). We did not identify any other proteins involved for example in oxylipin metabolism in the thylakoids, suggesting that those are mostly localized either in the stroma or the outer membrane areas. The data strongly support the notion that LOX10 and HPL are co-localized in the thylakoid membrane system of maize. This is in accordance with previous results on the localization of these enzymes. For example, while HPL in potato was also found in thylakoid membranes [30], other HPLs (e.g. spinach, tomato, and Arabidopsis) have been found in the envelope membrane system [31,32,33]. Likewise, LOX enzymes can be localized in different compartments at the cell and organelle level as well [34,35,36]. Nonetheless, in maize both enzymes appear to be co-localized in thylakoids, which might be the key to their rapid activation upon damage or other stressful events [2].

The identified lipase appears to belong to the phospholipase A type family with similarities to the Arabidopsis DAD1 lipase [37] and might be involved in the release of traumatin from these membranes as reported in [7] since no other oxylipin-related enzymes were identified.

But although LOX10 and HPL appear to be co-localized within the thylakoid membrane system in maize chloroplasts, it does not explain how they become activated upon damage.

Z3al production strongly depends on the pH of the environment

We first determined the dependency of Z3al production on pH in damaged maize leaf tissues. We used a potassium phosphate (KPi) buffer system since it covers most of the expected pH range. We found maximum production activity for the combined LOX10/HPL system at acidic pH levels of 5 (20,142 ± 4,095 ng/gFW) and 6 (19,347 ± 6,272 ng/gFW). Beginning at pH 6.5 activity started to decline rapidly and at pH 8 less than 10% (1,531 ± 181 ng/gFW) of the initial activity was detected (Figure 1).

This is in accordance with pH measurements of damaged tissue from corn leaves, which were found to be between pH 5 and pH 6. Therefore, the optimum pH to produce Z3al coincides well with what is found within the special context of damage. As such pH appears to be an important factor in the activation of the LOX10/HPL system. However, the optimum pH for LOX10 was reported to be around pH 8, although a significant activity was still measured at lower pH, indicating a certain biosynthetic plasticity regarding this parameter [27,29].

HPLs quite often appear to have a pH optimum between 5 and 6 [30,38,39,40]. While this does suggest that HPL is the key enzyme in this enzymatic complex upon tissue damage, which mainly becomes activated by the rapid change in pH, a prominent role for LOX10 despite the different pH optimum cannot be ruled out since it may also depend on other factors, e.g. substrate availability, substrate affinity, effectiveness of the reactive center and others. It is therefore necessary in future experiments to further investigate the individual enzymatic parameters for both enzymes in more detail and study their potential for direct interactions as well.

The observed acidic optimum for the production of Z3al also sheds further light on findings that describe how insect herbivores suppress the production of Z3al while feeding on plants [41,42,43,44,45]. Among the mechanisms described were enzymes, that eliminated the substrate for HPL, a yet to be identified molecule that appears to bind Z3al, and an isomerase, that rapidly transforms Z3al into E2al. All insect herbivores studies to date have at least one of these mechanisms abundant in their saliva and can thus apply them immediately to the freshly eaten plant material [45] to suppress Z3al production. However, in most cases this saliva was also found to be very basic (pH around 9 and higher), and this alone would already suppress the activity of the LOX10/HPL system, thereby reducing the amount of Z3al produced in the freshly ingested tissue.

The effects of pH on GLV biosynthesis may also explain why at least some plants, when placed in the dark, quickly release a burst of GLV [14,15]. Darkness may quickly change the pH gradient across the thylakoid membrane due to the inactivation of PSII and may therefore result in a more acidic region on the stroma side due to halted influx of protons into the thylakoid lumen and the simultaneous outflow of H⁺ through the ATP-synthase complex, resulting in a spatial and transitional acidification. This change in pH then activates LOX10/HPL complex resulting in a sharp burst of GLV emissions. However, further evidence is needed to prove this hypothesis, but the results clearly demonstrate that pH is an important factor for the activation of the LOX10/HPL system. Therefore, all further experiments were performed at pH 6.

Phenidone is an effective inhibitor of Z3al production

While HPL in the HPL/LOX10 system appears to fit better into the pH response, we used a pharmacological approach to further assess the role of LOX10 in the process of producing Z3al in damaged tissue. Phenidone is an effective inhibitor of lipoxygenase activity and has been shown to significantly reduce jasmonic acid biosynthesis in maize [46] and other plants [47,48,49]. Since it inhibits all lipoxygenases including LOX10, we expected it to negatively affect the production of Z3al when added to our assay. We used concentrations ranging from 0.5mM to 2mM as well as a buffer control for testing. We found a significant effect of phenidone on Z3al production in our in-vitro assay. A concentration of 0.5mM phenidone in buffer already reduced the activity of the system by more than 50% (buffer only 110,260 ± 23,175 ng/gFW, 0.5mM phenidone 44,064 ± 8,095 ng/gFW) (Figure 2). However, higher concentrations (1mM and 2mM) leveled out at 75% inhibition.

The significant reduction of Z3al production by phenidone suggest a de novo synthesis of GLV upon damage, which was also found by Pare et al. [50] in maize leaves challenged by insect herbivores. By using labelled CO₂ they found that while most terpene volatiles are actually synthesized de novo, GLVs appear to be produced from pre-existing precursors as indicated by the lack of labelling. Our results further suggest that LOX10 is the main rate-limiting factor in the biosynthesis of Z3al despite its pH optimum in the more basic range. However, some oxygenated fatty acids may already be abundant in the damaged leaf as indicated by the 25% rest activity in phenidone-treated samples. Since maize contains 13 lipoxygenases, 6 of which are 13-lipoxygenases [51], some background activity cannot be excluded.

Effect of ions on Z-3-hexenal production in maize

Ca²⁺ has been previously implied to play a role in the activation of the initial steps of GLV biosynthesis [52] by binding to the lipoxygenase and facilitating its association with membranes [53]. To test the hypothesis of Ca²⁺ being relevant for this process in maize we used several different assays including the addition of Ca²⁺ to our assays as well as complexing and thus removing it through the addition of EGTA. We also tested for effects of other ions including Mg²⁺ and Na⁺. Divalent ions were added to the reaction mix at different concentrations, but ultimately 10mM were used for treatments. We found that Ca²⁺ had no effect on the capacity to produce Z3al when compared to control assays (41,437 ± 7,888 ng/gFW vs 40,142 ± 8,892 ng/gFW) (Figure 3A). While this was surprising, it is also worth noting that disrupted plant tissue may contain significant amounts of Ca²⁺, which is usually strictly compartmentalized. However, once released by damage, the overall concentration could be sufficient to activate LOX10. In contrast, Mg²⁺caused a 40% reduction in Z3al production (26,985 ± 7,795 ng/gFW) (Figure 3A). Using higher concentrations of Mg²⁺ in the assays did not change this ratio (data not shown).

To further study the effects of divalent ions on GLV production in damaged maize leaf tissue we used ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to remove these ions from the reaction mix [52]. EGTA has a higher preference for Ca²⁺ ion, while EDTA prefers Mg²⁺ [54,55]. We found that by adding 100mM of EDTA the capacity to produce Z3al was increased by almost 100%, indirectly confirming the inhibitory activity of Mg²⁺ on the reaction (H₂O control 24,690 ± 2,494 ng/gFW; EDTA 48,310 ± 10,410 ng/gFW) (Figure 3B). In contrast, adding the same concentration of EGTA caused a significant reduction of Z3al production by more than 70% (7,005 ± 893 ng/gFW). In contrast to our finding that added Ca²⁺ does not affect the biosynthesis of Z3al, the removal of Ca²⁺ did have an inhibitory effect. As stated before, it might still be the case that endogenous Ca²⁺ is sufficient to saturate the activating process by causing the association of LOX10 and/or HPL to membranes, and any further added Ca²⁺ is no longer providing any additional activation of the system. However, when we analyzed LOX10 and HPL for potential ion binding sites at IonCom (https://zhanggroup.org/IonCom/) [56], we were not able to detect any binding sites for Ca²⁺ or Mg²⁺ on either protein. We can therefore only assume that Ca²⁺ might be more involved in the association of membranes in the damaged tissue, which may lead to an increased supply of membrane lipids to the Z3al-producing complex. Ca²⁺ is well known to be a regulator om membrane assembly and it might be that this is the main reason why Ca²⁺ is one of the factors that regulate or even stimulate Z3al production [52].

We further tested the effects of Na⁺ as a monovalent ion on the production of GLV. We found that Na⁺ at concentrations similar to those used for Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ had no effect on the activity of the Z3al-producing system (48,689 ± 8,054 ng/gFW in control vs 45,107 ± 5,660 ng/gFW in Na⁺ treated samples) (Figure 4). However, increasing the concentration of Na⁺ to 1.5m had a significant effect. Z3al increased from 48,689 ± 8,054 ng/FW to 71,284 ± 18,239 ng/gFW, an increase of 46%. We do not attribute this increase to a specific effect of the Na⁺ ion, but rather hypothesize that a concentration this high may force lipids, fatty acids, and the LOX10/HPL complex closer together resulting in a hydrophobic complex or cluster that allows for an increased activity of the system.

Effects of fatty acids and detergent on GLV production

To further test the hypothesis that hydrophobic cluster formation around the LOX10/HPL complex is an important part of the biosynthetic effectiveness of the system, we added free fatty acids to the reaction mix. Since fatty acids with a double bond in position 13 may also serve as substrates, we selected both, γ-linolenic acid and stearic acid, which is a 18:0 fatty acid, in our assays. Both fatty acids were used at a final concentration of 1ug/ul and were added just before the plant tissue was damaged. We found that both fatty acids significantly increased the amount of Z3al by 96 % for γ-linolenic acid (60,927 ± 20,626 ng/gFW) and 66 % for stearic acid 51,579 ± 8,416 ng/gFw) when compared to the control (31,041 ± 5,161 ng/gFW) (Figure 5A). Since γ-linolenic would also yield hexanal in the reaction, we monitored this compound too. While levels were significantly higher in γ-linolenic samples (8,847 ± 5,156 ng/gFW compared to control 2,133 ± 472 ng/gFW), only minor increases were found for stearic acid (3,669 ± 1,669) (Figure 5A). It can therefore be concluded that although γ-linolenic increased hexanal production, its addition also stimulated Z3al production directly as did stearic acid, suggesting that these fatty acids have a more general effect on the reaction.

The results support our hypothesis that the creation of a hydrophobic environment together with a sufficient supply of substrate might be essential for the amount of GLV that can be produced. And while thylakoid membranes are very rich in lipids and thus, fatty acids, this may ensure that sufficient amounts of those are being available for the reaction by potentially clustering together. To further test this hypothesis, we used a detergent (Triton X-100) in a similar assay. Adding a detergent should cause the dissociation of such a hydrophobic clustering and thus, reduce Z3al production significantly. As expected, when added at a final concentration of 0.1%, Triton X-100 reduced the activity of the Z3al-producing system significantly by more than 60% (25,081 ± 5,176 ng/gFW control, 9,366 ± 1,739 g/gFW Triton X100) (Figure 5B). This finding strongly supports our hypothesis that hydrophobic clusters are being formed in the damaged tissue, which ensure that a sufficient amount of substrates are available for the reactions leading to Z3al production in damaged maize leaves.

3. Summary

The co-localization of LOX10 and HPL in thylakoids was confirmed by a proteomics approach with isolated thylakoid membranes. Aside from a yet to be characterized lipase no other proteins not involved in photosynthesis were detected.

Damaged maize leaf tissues provide an optimized environment for the production of GLV through their acidic pH, which allows them to serve as a volatile signal for other parts of the plant or even plants nearby, which can provide far-reaching protection to those plants against damaging stresses including herbivory and pathogen infections [2], and a great variety of abiotic stresses like cold, drought, and light [4].

For insect herbivores, the strong dependency of Z3al-biosynthesis in damaged maize leaves on an acidic environment provides another path towards blocking the production of GLV. Since most insect herbivores appear to have a very basic pH in their spit and gut system, this may add to their arsenal of countermeasures aimed towards a reduction in GLV biosynthesis and thus, eliminating a signal that eavesdropping plants nearby could use to prime their defenses.

While Ca²⁺ clearly affects the production of Z3al we have no further evidence for potential Ca²⁺-binding sites on either protein. This makes it unlikely for Ca² to act as a regulator for the association of LOX10 or HPL to membranes or for the activation of any one of those enzymes. However, Ca²⁺ has been found to be involved in the regulation of membrane assembly [57] and we may therefore speculate that Ca²⁺ may instead assist in the assembly of hydrophobic structures or complexes that allow LOX10 and HPL to have access to more substrates

Adding free fatty acids to the reaction stimulates the biosynthesis of Z3al in damaged plant tissue. But while some fatty acids like g-LnA may also serve as a substrate, results with stearic acid clearly demonstrate that the abundance rather than substrate availability is a factor that determines the effectiveness of the Z3al producing system. This is further supported by the effect of Triton X100, which as a detergent would disrupt these hydrophobic complexes.

To summarize, we have separated factors that stimulate Z3al biosynthesis. Based on our findings, we hypothesize that a combination of pH, Ca²⁺- abundance and hydrophobic cluster formation are important factors that aid in the massive production of Z3al in damaged leaf tissue in maize.

Figure 6. Effects of Ca²⁺, fatty acids, and high salt concentrations on the production of Z-3-hexenal. Rings of different colors indicate membranes from different sources which can still contribute to the production of Z-3-hexenal in this model.

While these clusters may primarily be comprised of thylakoid membranes, other membranes within the damaged plant tissue may also contribute to the overall production of Z3al. However, since Z3al is the most prominent aldehyde compound produced in damaged maize leaf tissue, a certain preference for a-linolenic acid or related omega 3 fatty acids seems to be highly probable. And while high salt concentrations appear to further activate the system and support our hypothesis of hydrophobic cluster formation, the required concentrations of these and related ions are rather unlikely to constitute within damaged leaf tissues.

Together, our results describe potential regulatory principles that may help to partially organize the otherwise chaotic mixture of cellular components as it occurs upon tissue damage in plant.

4. Materials and Methods

Chemicals

(E)-2-hexen-1-al (E2al), was provided by Bedoukian (Bedoukian Research, Danbury, CT, USA). All other chemicals (e.g. (Z)-3-hexen-1-al (Z3al), n-Hexanal (nHal), nonyl acetate, Ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA), Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Percoll, Triton X100, and sorbitol) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All solvents used were analytical grade.

Plant Material

Maize (Zea mays) plants were grown in Sungro Horticulture Professional Growing Mix (Sun Gro Horticulture Canada Ltd., Seba Beach, Canada) in a growth chamber under a 12 h photoperiod at 26 °C with 60% relative humidity. Light intensity was set to ca. 150 μmol m² s⁻¹. Maize plants used for the analysis of aldehyde GLV production capacity were between 2 and 3 weeks old and in the V2 to V3 stage. We used segments from the middle of the leaves for all experiments.

4.1. Experimental Setups

Chloroplast isolation and thylakoid enrichment

In a first step, intact chloroplasts were isolated by following a method of Bhattacharya et al. [58] with minor modifications. During the preparation all materials were kept on ice. We first harvested 25 g of leaf material from 2-week-old maize plants, added 95 ml of 1x grinding buffer (GB buffer, (2x-GB buffer 100 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.3, 660 mM sorbitol, 2 mM MgCl2, 4 mM EDTA, 0.2% BSA (w/v)), and homogenized the mixture in a blender with sharpened blades. After homogenization the mixture was filtered through several layers of cheesecloth in a funnel. The crude chloroplast extract was then centrifuged at 3,000xg in a swinging bucket rotor for 5 min at 4ºC. The pellet was gently resuspended with 1 ml of 1xGB buffer and kept on ice. The Percoll gradient consisted of a 80% Percoll layer at the bottom with a 40% Percoll layer on top. Percoll was mixed with 1xGB buffer to final concentration. The chloroplast pellet was then carefully layered on top of the Percoll gradient and centrifuged at 10,000 xg in a swinging bucket rotor for 10 min at 4ºC with brakes off. The resulting band between the 80% and 40% Percoll layer was then carefully taken out, diluted in resuspension buffer (RB, 50 mM HEPES-KOH pH8, 330 mM sorbitol) at a 1:4 ratio and centrifuged at 4,500 xg in a swinging bucket rotor for 5 min at 4 ºC. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet resuspended in RB buffer and centrifuged again. The final pellet was resuspended again in 1xGB buffer and used for thylakoid isolation.

Thylakoid membranes were prepared by hypotonic lysis of the intact chloroplasts following the protocol of Bouchnak et al [59] with modifications. Chloroplasts were centrifuged as before (1,800xg, 5min, 4ºC) and then mixed with 3 ml of the lysis buffer (MOPS (10 mM, pH 7.8), MgCl₂ (4 mM), PMSF (1 mM)) and incubated on ice for 15 min. Vortex repeatedly during the incubation. After lysis, 3 ml of the incubation solution were placed on a sucrose gradient. The gradient consists of 3 layers, 3 mL of 0.93 M at the bottom, then 2.5 mL of 0.6 M, and 2 mL of 0.3 M sucrose. Sucrose was dissolved in lysis buffer. The samples were then centrifuged at 70,000xg at 4ºC for 1h. The resulting green pellet at the bottom contained the thylakoid and was carefully removed and diluted with lysis buffer at 1:10 and centrifuged again at 110,000xg at 4ºC for 1h. After removing the supernatant, the remaining pellet was diluted in 10 μl lysis buffer and stored at -80ºC.

Mass spectrometer analysis of thylakoid samples

Protein complement of samples was isolated using SDS-PAGE by loading onto the resolving gel for only 1 cm. The protein complement was visualized by Coomassie staining and excised for proteomics analysis. The excised band were destained, followed by disulfide reduction and carbamidomethylation of cysteine residues using iodoacetamide. Proteins were digested in-gel using proteomics-grade trypsin and analyzed on a nano- reversed-phase liquid chromatography (LC) electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (MS) system that consists of an UltiMate 3000 Nano LC System and an LTQ-Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA). Chromatography was performed using a 20 cm × 75 μm ID column packed with XBridgeTM BEH C18 beads (2.5 μm, 130 Å). Resultant data was processed using Mascot software on our in-house Mascot server.

GLV assays

GLV assays were performed as described in [60] with several modifications. For the determination of the effect of pH on the activity of the LOX10/HPL complex we used potassium phosphate (KPi) buffers adjusted to the desired pH. After establishing an optimum at pH 5-6 all further experiments were performed at pH 6. Phenidone was pre-diluted in ethanol and added to the final concentration indicated in Figure 2. Ethanol was kept at the same level in all samples including controls at 10%. Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ were used as the corresponding chloride salt and used at 10mM. EGTA and EDTA were also used at a final concentration of 10mM. Both were pre-dissolved at pH 9 and after being dissolved slowly titrated down to pH 6. Fatty acids (y-linolenic acid and stearic acid) were dissolved in ethanol and then added to a final concentration of 1ug/ul with ethanol not exceeding 10%. Controls were assayed with similar ethanol concentrations.

GLV analysis

For each experiment similar segments from leaves at the same developmental stages were used. The segments were between 30 and 50 mg fresh weight and immediately placed in 2-ml screw-cap vials in liquid N₂. After adding buffer (containing different effectors as described above) directly into the frozen vial and to allow them to freeze, we added about 600 mg of beads. By not being frozen in the buffer, beads can move freely in the vials and disrupt tissues when placed in a PreCellys homogenizer set to 5600 shakes per minute for 25 s. The 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes were then unscrewed without removing the cap and immediately dropped into a 30 mL glass container while also releasing the cap into the glass container to avoid significant losses in volatiles. The glass containers were immediately capped. Volatile emissions were collected immediately from the tissue homogenate by inserting a volatile collection filter packed with 30-mg Hayesep Q absorbent (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) coupled to a vacuum at 0.3 L/min for 1h as described previously [60,61]. Filters were then removed and eluted with 150 µL dichloromethane and 1000 ng of internal standard (nonyl acetate) was added. The analysis of damage-induced GLV production was performed on a Varian 3900 gas chromatograph coupled to Varian Saturn 2200 mass spectrometer equipped with split–splitless capillary injector systems in electron impact mode (EI). Injection volume was 1 µL. The data collection, storage, and subsequent analysis were performed by using the Varian MS Workstation software. Helium at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min was used as a carrier gas. The analyses of volatiles were performed on a fused silica capillary column (Equity™ 30 m × 0.25 mm inner diameter with a 0.25-µm-thick film of bonded methyl silicone). The GC was programmed as follows: 40 °C for 2 min, then at 15 °C/min to 250 °C. All of the injections were made in the split-mode (1:20 split ratio). Compounds were identified by comparison to authentic standards (retention time and fragmentation). Due to the strong co-elution of Z3al and nHal, we used a selected ion (m/z 56) for stronger separation of the two compounds within a single peak area as described in [61]. We then estimated the percentage of this ion in both compounds and used the calculated multiplication factor to determine the precise peak area. As a control we also used the calculated area for nHal and subtracted it from the total peak area for both compounds.

Statistical Analysis

At least 4 biological replicates were performed per plant and per assay. Averages and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for each of the analyzed leaf segments. For pairwise comparisons, Students t-test was used, while for multiple comparisons, one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test were applied.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.E., M.E., and S.S.; methodology, J.E., M.E., and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.E.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Funding

This research was funded in part by USDA, NIFA, grant number 2020-65114- 30767 to JE. The authors also wish to Thank the Department of Integrative Biology and the College of Science at UTSA for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Curtius, T.; Franzen, H. Über die chemischen Bestandteile grüner Pflanzen. Über den Blätteraldehyd. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1912, 390, 89–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Matsui, K.; Engelberth, J. Green leaf volatiles-the forefront of plant responses against biotic attack. Plant Cell Physiol 2022, 63, 1378–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scala, A.; Allmann, S.; Mirabella, R.; Haring, M.A.; Schuurink, R.C. Green leaf volatiles: A plant’s multifunctional weapon against herbivores and pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 17781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Engelberth, J. Green Leaf Volatiles: A New Player in the Protection against Abiotic Stresses? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hatanaka, A. The biogeneration of green odour by green leaves. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 1201–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Matsui, K. Green leaf volatiles: Hydroperoxide lyase pathway of oxylipin metabolism. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nakashima, A.; von Reuss, S.H.; Tasaka, H.; Nomura, M.; Mochizuki, S.; Iijima, Y.; Aoki, K.; Shibata, D.; Boland, W.; Takabayashi, J.; Matsui, K. Traumatin- and dinortraumatin-containing galactolipids in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 26078–26088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zimmerman, D.C.; Coudron, C.A. Identification of traumatin, a wound hormone, as 12-oxo-trans-10-dodecenoic acid. Plant Physiol 1979, 63, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Engelberth, M.; Engelberth, J. Variability in the capacity to produce damage-induced aldehyde green leaf volatiles among different plant species provides novel insights into biosynthetic diversity. Plants 2020, 9, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kunishima, M.; Yamauchi, Y.; Mizutani, M.; Kuse, M.; Takikawa, H.; Sugimoto, Y. Identification of (Z)-3:(E)-2-hexenal isomerase essential to the production of the leaf aldehyde in plants. J Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 14023–14033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Spyropoulou, E.A.; Dekker, H.L.; Steemers, L.; van Maarseveen, J.H.; de Koster, C.G.; Haring, M.A.; Schuurink, R.C.; Allmann, S. Identification and Characterization of (3Z):(2E)-Hexenal Isomerases from Cucumber. Front Plant Sci 2017, 8, 1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Matsui, K.; Sugimoto, K.; Mano, J.; Ozawa, R.; Takabayashi, J. Differential metabolism of green leaf volatiles in injured and intact parts of a wounded leaf meet distinct ecophysiological requirements. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jardine, K.J.; Chambers, J.Q.; Holm, J.; Jardine, A.B.; Fontes, C.G.; Zorzanelli, R.F.; Meyers, K.T.; Fernandez de Souza, V.; Garcia, S.; Giminez, B.O.; et al. Green leaf volatile emissions during high temperature and drought stress in a Central Amazon rainforest. Plants 2015, 4, 678–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jardine, K.; Barron-Gafford, G.A.; Norman, J.P.; Abrell, L.; Monson, R.K.; Meyers, K.T.; Pavao-Zuckerman, M.; Dontsova, K.; Kleist, E.; Werner, C.; Huxman, T.E. Green leaf volatiles and oxygenated metabolite emission bursts from mesquite branches following light–dark transitions. Photosynth Res 2012, 113, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chamberlain, K.; Khan, Z.R.; Pickett, J.A.; Toshova, T.; Wadhams, L.J. Diel periodicity in the production of green leaf volatiles by wild and cultivated host plants of stemborer moths, Chilo partellus and Busseola fusca. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006, 32, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Röse, U.S.R.; Tumlinson, J.H. Systemic induction of volatile release in cotton: How specific is the signal to herbivory? Planta 2005, 222, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zebelo, S.A.; Matsui, K.; Ozawa, R.; Maffei, M.E. Plasma membrane potential depolarization and cytosolic calcium flux are early events involved in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon) plant-to-plant communication. Plant Sci 2012, 196, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Aratani, Y.; Uemura, T.; Hagihara, T.; Matsui, K.; Toyota, M. Green leaf volatile sensory calcium transduction in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 2023, 14, 6236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Engelberth, J.; Contreras, C.F.; Dalvi, C.; Li, T.; Engelberth, M. Early transcriptome analyses of Z-3-hexenol-treated Zea mays revealed distinct transcriptional networks and anti-herbivore defense potential of green leaf volatiles. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yamauchi, Y.; Kunishima, M.; Mizutani, M.; Sugimotot, Y. Reactive short-chain leaf volatiles act as powerful inducers of abiotic stress-related gene expression. Sci Rep 2015, 5, 8030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yamauchi, Y.; Matsuda, A.; Matsuura, N.; Mizutani, M.; Sugimoto, Y. Transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana with green leaf volatiles: Possible role of green leaf volatiles as self-made damage-associated patterns. J. Pestic. Sci. 2018, 43, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tanarsuwongkul, S.; Fisher, K.W.; Mullis, B.T.; Negi, H.; Roberts, J.; Tomlin, F.; Wang, Q.; Stratmann, J.W. Green leaf volatiles co-opt proteins involved in molecular pattern signalling in plant cells. Plant Cell Environ 2024, 47, 928–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ohgami, S.; Ono, E.; Horiwaka, M.; Murata, J.; Totsuka, K.; Toyonaga, H.; Ohba, Y.; Dohra, H.; Asai, T.; Matsui, K.; Mizutani, M.; Watanabe, N.; Ohnishi, T. Volatile glycosylation in tea plants: Sequential glycosylations for the biosynthesis of aroma b-primeverosides are catalyzed by two Camellia sinensis glycosyltransferases. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 464–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cofer, T.M.; Erb, M.; Tumlinson, J.H. The Arabidopsis thaliana carboxylesterase AtCXE12 converts volatile (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate to (Z)-3-hexenol. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar]
Mano, J.; Kanameda, S.; Kuramitsu, R.; Matsuura, N.; Yamauchi, Y. Detoxification of Reactive Carbonyl Species by Glutathione Transferase Tau Isozymes. Front Plant Sci 2019, 10, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Engelberth, J.; Engelberth, M. Developmental stages affect the capacity to produce aldehyde green leaf volatiles in Zea mays and Vigna radiata. Plants 2022, 11, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Christensen, S.A.; Nemchenko, A.; Borrego, E.; Murray, I.; Sobhy, I.S.; Bosak, L.; DeBlasio, S.; Erb, M.; Robert, C.A.M.; Vaughn, K.A.; Herrfurth, C.; Tumlinson, J.; Feussner, I.; Jackso, D.; Turlings, T.C.J.; Engelberth, J.; Nansen, C.; Meeley, R.; Kolomiets, M.V. The maize lipoxygenase, ZmLOX10, mediates green leaf volatile, jasmonate and herbivore-induced plant volatile production for defense against insect attack. Plant J. 2013, 74, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Yactayo-Chang, J.P.; Hunter, C.T.; Alborn, H.T.; Christensen, S.A.; Block, A.K. Production of the Green Leaf Volatile (Z)-3-Hexenal by a Zea maysHydroperoxide Lyase. Plants 2022, 11, 2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nemchenko, A.; Kunze, S.; Feussner, I.; Kolomiets, M. Duplicate maize 13-lipoxygenase genes are differentially regulated by circadian rhythm, cold stress, wounding, pathogen infection, and hormonal treatments. J Exp Bot 2006, 57, 3767–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Farmaki, T.; Sanmartin, M.; Jiminez, P.; Paneque, M.; Sanz, C.; Vancanneyt, G.; Leon, J.; Sanchez-Serrano, J.J. Differential distribution of the lipoxygenase pathway enzymes within potato chloroplasts. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Blee, E.; Joyard, J. Envelope membranes from spinach chloroplasts are a site of metabolism of fatty acid hydroperoxides. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Froehlich, J.E.; Itoh, A.; Howe, G.A. Tomato allene oxide synthase and fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase, two cytochrome P450s involved in oxylipins metabolism, are targeted to different membranes of chloroplast envelope. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rustgi, S.; Springer, A.; Kang, C.; von Wettstein, D.; Reinbothe, C.; Reinbothe, S.; Pollmann, S. Allene oxide synthase and hydroperoxide lyase, two non-canonical cytochrome p450s in Arabidopsis thaliana and their different roles in plant defense. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Demchenko, K.; Zdyb, A.; Feussner, I.; Pawlowski, K. Analysis of the subcellular localization of lipoxygenase in legume and actinorhizal nodules. Plant. Biol. 2012, 14, 46–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhang, C.; Cao, S.; Jin, Y.; Chen, Q.; Xing, Q.; Qi, H. Melon 13-lipoxygenase CmLOX18 may be involved in C6 volatile biosynthesis in fruit. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2816. [Google Scholar]
Weichert, H.; Kolbe, A.; Kraus, A.; Wasternack, C.; Feussner, I. Metabolic profiling of oxylipins in germinating cucumber seedlings—Lipoxygenase-dependent degradation of triacylglycerols and biosynthesis of volatile aldehydes. Planta 2002, 215, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ishiguro, S.; Kawai-Oda, A.; Ueda, J.; Nishida, I.; Okada, K. The DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCIENCE gene encodes a novel phospholipase A1 catalyzing the initial step of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, which synchronizes pollen maturation, anther dehiscence, and flower opening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2191–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Matsui, K. Properties and structures of fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase. Belg. J. Bot. 1998, 131, 50–62. [Google Scholar]
Hornostaj, A.R.; Robinson, D.S. Purification of hydroperoxide lyase from cucumber. Food Chem. 1999, 66, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
De Domenico, S.; Tsesmetzis, N.; Di Sansebastiano, G.P.; Hughes, R.K.; Casey, R.; Santino, A. Subcellular localization of Medicago truncatula 9/13-hydroperoxide lyase reveal a new localization pattern and activation mechanism for CYP74C enzymes. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Savchenko, T.; Pearse, I.S.; Ignatia, L.; Karban, R.; Dehesh, K. Insect herbivores selectively suppress the HPL branch of the oxylipin pathway in host plants. Plant J. 2012, 73, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Savchenko, T.; Dehesh, K. Insect herbivores selectively mute GLV production in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e24136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Takai, H.; Ozawa, R.; Takabayashi, J.; Fujii, S.; Arai, K.; Ichiki, R.T.; Koeduka, T.; Dohra, H.; Ohnishi, T.; Taketazu, S.; et al. Silkworms suppress the release of green leaf volatiles by mulberry leaves with an enzyme from their spinnerets. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jones, A.C.; Seidl-Adams, I.; Engelberth, J.; Hunter, C.T.; Alborn, H.; Tumlinson, J.H. Herbivorous caterpillars can utilize three different mechanisms to alter green leaf volatile emissions. Environ. Entomol. 2019, 48, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jones, A.; Cofer, T.M.; Engelberth, J.; Tumlinson, J.H. (2022) Herbivorous caterpillars and the green leaf volatile (GLV) quandary. J Chem Ecol 2022, 48, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Engelberth, J. Selective inhibition of jasmonic acid accumulation by a small α, β-unsaturated carbonyl and phenidone reveals different modes of octadecanoid signalling activation in response to insect elicitors and green leaf volatiles in Zea mays. BMC Res Notes 2011, 4, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bruinsma, M.; van Broekhoven, S.; Poelman, E.H.; Posthumus, M.A.; Müller, M.J.; van Loon, J.J.; Dicke, M. Inhibition of lipoxygenase affects induction of both direct and indirect plant defences against herbivorous insects. Oecologia 2010, 162, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agut, B.; Gamir, J.; Jacas, J.A.; Hurtado, M.; Flors, V. Different metabolic and genetic responses in citrus may explain relative susceptibility to Tetranychus urticae. Pest Manag Sci 2014, 70, 1728–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Engelberth, J.; Koch, T.; Schüler, G.; Bachmann, N.; Rechtenbach, J.; Boland, W. Ion channel-forming alamethicin is a potent elicitor of volatile biosynthesis and tendril coiling. Cross talk between jasmonate and salicylate signaling in lima bean. Plant Physiol 2001, 125, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pare, P.W.; Tumlinson, J.H. De Novo Biosynthesis of Volatiles Induced by Insect Herbivory in Cotton Plants. Plant Physiol 1997, 114, 1161–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ogunola, O.F.; Hawkins, L.K.; Mylroie, E.; Kolomiets, M.V.; Borrego, E.; Tang, J.D.; Williams, W.P.; Warburton, M.L. Characterization of the maize lipoxygenase gene family in relation to aflatoxin accumulation resistance. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mochizuki, S.; Matsui, K. Green leaf volatile-burst in Arabidopsis is governed by galactolipid oxygenation by a lipoxygenase that is under control of calcium ion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 2018, 505, 939–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Newcomer, M.E.; Brash, A.R. The structural basis for specificity in lipoxygenase catalysis. Protein Sci 2014, 24, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jethva, D.; Shruthi, P.; Patel, S.; Karbhari, N.; Savaliya, N. Comparison of Magnesium by EDTA and EGTA as chelating agent. Int J Clinical Biochem 2022, 7, 3. [Google Scholar]
Holleman, A.F.; Wiberg, E. (2001). Inorganic Chemistry. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hu, X.; Dong, Q.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y. Recognizing metal and acid radical ion binding sites by integrating ab initio modeling with template-based transferals. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 3260–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shimizu, Y.; Sato, K.; Kinbara, K. Calcium-induced reversible assembly of phosphorylated amphiphile within lipid bilayer membranes. Chem Commun 2021, 57, 4106–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bhattacharya, O.; Ortiz, I.; Walling, L.L. Methodology: An optimized, high yield tomato leaf chloroplast isolation and stroma extraction protocol for proteomics analyses and identification of chloroplast co-localizing proteins. Plant Methods 2020, 16, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bouchnak, I.; Moyet, L.; Salvi, D.; Kuntz, M.; Rolland, N. Preparation of Chloroplast Sub- compartments from Arabidopsis for the Analysis of Protein Localization by Immunoblotting or Proteomics. JoVE 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Engelberth, M.; Engelberth, J. Variability in the capacity to produce damage-induced aldehyde green leaf volatiles among different plant species provides novel insights into biosynthetic diversity. Plants 2020, 9, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Engelberth, J.; Engelberth, M. Developmental stages affect the capacity to produce aldehyde green leaf volatiles in Zea mays and Vigna radiata. Plants 2022, 11, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. The effect of pH on the production of Z-3-hexenal in a cell extract. Plant material was taken from the same leaves of different maize plants of the same age (12 days) and developmental stage (V2, second leaf was used). Different letters above each bar indicate statistical difference determined by ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey tests where appropriate (p < 0.05). N = 4, error bars represent standard deviation.

Figure 2. Phenidone reduces the production of Z-3-hexenal in a cell extract. Plant material was taken from the same leaves (3^rd) of different maize plants of the same age (16 days) and developmental stage (V3). Phenidone was pre-dissolved in ethanol and then added to the final concentration indicated in the graph. Control samples received similar an identical concentration of ethanol only. Different letters above each bar indicate statistical difference determined by ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey tests where appropriate (p < 0.05). N = 4, error bars represent standard deviation.

Figure 3. Effects of divalent ions and chelators on Z-3-Hexenal production. Plant material was taken from the same leaves (3^rd) of different maize plants of the same age (14 days) and developmental stage (V3). A, divalent ions were added to a final concentration of 10 mM in phosphate buffer at pH 6. B, chelators were dissolved at a basic pH and then titrated down to pH 6. They were added to the sample to a final concentration of 10 mM. Different letters above each bar indicate statistical difference determined by ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey tests where appropriate (p < 0.05). N = 4, error bars represent standard deviation.

Figure 4. Effects of low and high sodium chloride (NaCl) concentrations on the production of Z-3-hexenal in a cell extract. Plant material was taken from the same leaves of different maize plants of the same age (16 days) and developmental stage (V3, third leaf was used). Different letters above each bar indicate statistical difference determined by ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey tests where appropriate (p < 0.05). N = 4, error bars represent standard deviation.

Figure 5. Effects of fatty acids and a detergent (TritonX100) on the production of Z-3-hexenal in a cell extract. A, fatty acid (gamma linolenic acid (yLnA) and stearic acid (StA) were added to a final concentration of 1ug/ul. B, Triton X100 was added at 0.1% to the samples before tissue disruption. Different letters above each bar indicate statistical difference determined by ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey tests where appropriate (p < 0.05) (A). A t-test was used for pairwise comparison (B). N = 4, error bars represent standard deviation.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.