2.1.1. Rationale

2.1.2. Methodology

• Study Design: Longitudinal panel study.
• Participants: Pregnant women in their first trimester (gestational age < 13 weeks).
• Data Collection:

  −

  Initial Phase: Data collection begins in the first trimester, with demographic and reproductive characteristics recorded, followed by assessments using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (SSTAI). If time permits, additional assessments such as the Social Support Appraisal (SSA), Adult Attachment Scale (AAS), and Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) are administered.

  −

  Second Trimester: The BDI and SSTAI are reassessed, and the Cranley’s Maternal-Fetal Attachment Scale (CMFAS) is introduced after the mother feels fetal movement.

  −

  Third Trimester: The same questionnaires used in the second trimester are administered again.

  −

  Follow-up: Data collection continues at multiple points post-delivery, specifically during the first visit after birth, and at two, four, and six months later.

2.1.3. Significance

2.1.4. Strengths

• Longitudinal Design: The study’s longitudinal approach allows for a comprehensive analysis of the evolving relationship between mother and child, capturing data at critical stages during pregnancy and early postpartum.
• Multiple Assessment Tools: The use of various validated tools, such as BDI, SSTAI, SSA, AAS, PBI, and CMFAS, strengthens the study’s ability to assess different dimensions of maternal attachment and psychological well-being.

2.1.5. Limitations

• Participant Retention: Longitudinal studies often face challenges related to participant retention over time, which could affect the study’s outcomes.
• Time and Resource Intensive: The study requires significant time and resources to follow participants through multiple stages of pregnancy and postpartum.

2.1.6. Conclusion

2.2.1. Study Overview

2.2.2. Research Objectives and Design

2.2.3. Key Findings

• Impact of Pregnancy Intendedness: The results confirm that unintended or unwanted pregnancies are linked to lower levels of maternal-infant bonding post-birth. This finding aligns with existing research that suggests unintended pregnancies can disrupt maternal-infant relationships, leading to adverse long-term outcomes for both the mother and child.
• Role of Prenatal Maternal-Fetal Bonding: The study demonstrates that higher levels of prenatal MFB are associated with better postnatal maternal-infant bonding. This supports the idea that prenatal bonding has a significant, positive effect on the mother-infant relationship after birth.
• Protective Effect of Prenatal Bonding: Notably, the study finds that prenatal MFB can buffer the negative effects of unintended pregnancies on postnatal bonding. For women who reported their pregnancies as unintended or unwanted, higher levels of prenatal bonding were associated with better postnatal bonding outcomes. This suggests that enhancing prenatal bonding could mitigate some risks associated with unintended pregnancies.

2.2.4. Methodological Strengths

• Longitudinal Approach:The use of a longitudinal design is a significant strength, as it provides a temporal perspective on how bonding evolves and how prenatal experiences influence postnatal outcomes. This approach helps overcome recall bias, offering a more accurate assessment of the relationships between pregnancy intendedness, prenatal bonding, and postnatal bonding.
• Comprehensive Data Collection: The study’s data collection at multiple points during pregnancy and postpartum allows for a detailed analysis of the factors affecting maternal-infant bonding. This comprehensive approach enhances the reliability of the findings.

2.2.5. Areas for Improvement

• Sample Diversity:The review notes that the sample includes a significant proportion of women from a metropolitan city in the South-Central U.S. and mentions that scores were lower among Black women. More information on how the sample’s socio-demographic characteristics might influence the findings would be beneficial. Including a more diverse sample could provide a broader perspective on the generalizability of the results.
• Absence of Significant Association Between Intendedness and MFB: The study finds no significant direct relationship between pregnancy intendedness and MFB, which might seem counterintuitive given the known impacts of intendedness on maternal experiences. Further investigation into this aspect could clarify whether other unexamined variables might be influencing this relationship.
• Intervention Strategies: While the study identifies prenatal bonding as a promising target for intervention, it would be helpful to detail specific intervention strategies or programs that could be implemented to enhance prenatal bonding. Additionally, exploring how these interventions might be tailored to different populations or levels of unintendedness could provide practical insights for improving maternal and child health.

2.2.6. Conclusion

2.3.1. Research Objectives and Design

2.3.2. Key Findings

• Associations with Antenatal Depression: The study finds that sense of coherence and perceived social support are negatively associated with antenatal depression, aligning with existing literature that highlights the protective role of these factors against depressive symptoms. Maternal-fetal attachment, while positively related to psychological well-being, does not uniquely contribute to the variance in antenatal depression.
• Influence on Well-Being: Both maternal-fetal attachment and sense of coherence are positively associated with antenatal well-being. The results show that sense of coherence and maternal-fetal attachment uniquely contribute to variance in well-being scores, suggesting that these factors play a crucial role in enhancing overall antenatal mental health.
• Perceived Social Support:High levels of perceived social support are associated with lower levels of depression and higher well-being. The study theorizes that greater social support may help expecting mothers maintain a higher sense of coherence, which in turn contributes to better mental health outcomes.

2.3.3. Methodological Strengths

• Innovative Focus: This study is notable for its focus on psychosocial factors in an Indian context, which is relatively underexplored. The integration of sense of coherence, maternal-fetal attachment, and perceived social support into a single study provides a comprehensive view of these factors’ influence on antenatal mental health
• Online Data Collection: Using online surveys allows for a broad reach and convenience in data collection. This approach is particularly useful in urban settings where internet access is prevalent.

2.3.4. Areas for Improvement

• Cross-Sectional Design: The cross-sectional nature of the study limits the ability to draw causal inferences. Longitudinal studies would provide more insight into how these psychosocial factors evolve over time and their causal relationships with mental health outcomes.
• Sample Bias: The sample may not be fully representative of the broader Indian population due to self-selection bias and socio-economic homogeneity. Future research should aim for a more diverse sample to improve generalizability.
• Self-Report Measures: Data collected through self-report questionnaires may introduce biases based on participants’ subjective perceptions. Incorporating objective measures or multiple data sources could provide a more comprehensive assessment of antenatal mental health.

2.3.5. Implications for Practice and Research

• Clinical Practice: The findings underscore the importance of addressing psychosocial factors such as perceived social support and sense of coherence in antenatal care. Interventions aimed at enhancing these factors could improve mental health outcomes for expecting mothers.
• Future Research: Further studies should utilize longitudinal designs to better understand the causal relationships between psychosocial factors and antenatal mental health. Additionally, expanding research to include diverse populations and incorporating both subjective and objective measures will enrich the understanding of antenatal mental health in different contexts.

2.3.6. Conclusion

2.4.1. Strengths

• Comprehensive Approach: The review follows the PRISMA guidelines, ensuring a thorough and systematic approach to literature synthesis. The inclusion of multiple databases and the broad search strategy provide a robust foundation for the review.
• Focus on Critical Periods: By examining both the antenatal and early postpartum periods, the review offers valuable insights into how maternal psychological wellbeing impacts MFA and bonding over time. This longitudinal perspective is crucial for understanding the dynamic nature of these relationships.
• Detailed Analysis of Variables: The review breaks down the impact of various psychological factors—depression, anxiety, stress, and social support—on MFA and postpartum bonding. This detailed analysis helps clarify how specific aspects of maternal mental health influence attachment and bonding.
• Identification of Gaps: The review effectively identifies key gaps in the literature, such as the lack of a unified theoretical framework for MFA and inconsistencies in how maternal mental health is measured. Highlighting these gaps is important for guiding future research.

2.4.2. Weakness

• Inconsistent Findings: The review reveals substantial variability in study findings regarding the relationship between maternal mental health and MFA. This inconsistency, coupled with varied methodologies and definitions, underscores the need for standardization in future research.
• Reliance on Self-Report Data: The heavy reliance on self-report questionnaires, while practical, may introduce biases and limit the reliability of the findings. Incorporating clinical assessments and validated screening tools could strengthen the conclusions drawn.
• Limited Focus on Certain Variables: While the review covers a range of psychological factors, some relevant domains like body dissatisfaction and disordered eating are underexplored, particularly in relation to postpartum bonding.
• Lack of Standardized Data Collection: The absence of standardized data collection points across studies may lead to overgeneralization of results. Consistent data collection intervals could improve the accuracy and comparability of findings.

2.4.3. Recommendations

• Develop Theoretical Frameworks: Future research should focus on developing and validating comprehensive theoretical frameworks for MFA that can accommodate its multi-dimensional nature and guide consistent measurement.
• Standardize Measurements: The field would benefit from standardized, validated tools for assessing maternal mental health and MFA, including clinical diagnostic measures to complement self-report data.
• Broaden Research Scope: Further studies should explore additional variables such as body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in relation to both MFA and postpartum bonding to provide a more holistic understanding of maternal mental health.
• Implement Longitudinal Studies: To better capture the fluid nature of pregnancy and postpartum periods, longitudinal studies with consistent data collection points should be conducted. This approach will help in understanding the continuity and changes in MFA and bonding over time.

2.4.4. Conclusion

2.5.1. Research Objectives and Design

2.5.2. Key Findings

• Predictors of Infant Development

  −

  Maternal–Fetal Attachment: Higher levels of maternal–fetal attachment were associated with more favorable maternal-reported adaptive behavior in infants. This supports previous research indicating that a strong emotional bond with the fetus positively influences perceptions of the infant’s development.

  −

  Adult Attachment Patterns: More secure and less anxious maternal adult attachment was linked to better maternal-reported adaptive behavior in infants. This suggests that a mother’s internal attachment patterns play a role in her perceptions of her infant’s development.

  −

  Maternal Well-Being: Better maternal well-being correlated with more favorable maternal-reported adaptive behavior. This aligns with existing literature on the impact of maternal mental health on infant development.

  −

  Perinatal Loss: Infants of women with a history of perinatal loss scored lower on cognitive development as rated by external observers, but this did not affect maternal reports of adaptive behavior.

• Developmetal Domains

  −

  The study found no significant associations between maternal–fetal attachment, adult attachment, or maternal well-being with infant cognition, motor skills, language, or social-emotional development as assessed by Bayley-III. This indicates that while these factors influence adaptive behavior, they may not directly impact other specific developmental domains.

2.5.3. Methodological Strengths

• Comprehensive Assessment: The use of both maternal self-report and external observer-rated measures provides a well-rounded view of infant development, addressing the limitations of relying solely on maternal reports.
• Focus on Prenatal Factors: By examining multiple prenatal factors and their effects on a range of developmental outcomes, this study offers a nuanced understanding of how early maternal experiences can shape infant development.

2.5.4. Areas for Improvement

• Sample Size and Power: The relatively small sample size (40 dyads) limits the study’s power and generalizability. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and enhance their applicability across different populations.
• Drop-Out and Selection Bias: The high drop-out rate between the two time points and potential selection bias due to voluntary participation may affect the representativeness of the sample. Future research should address these issues to improve the reliability and generalizability of results.
• Measurement Limitations:The external rater’s knowledge of participants’ perinatal loss status may have introduced bias into the developmental assessments. Blinding raters to such information could mitigate this risk in future studies.

2.5.5. Implications For Practice and Research

• Sample Size and Power: The relatively small sample size (40 dyads) limits the study’s power and generalizability. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and enhance their applicability across different populations.
• Drop-Out and Selection Bias: The high drop-out rate between the two time points and potential selection bias due to voluntary participation may affect the representativeness of the sample. Future research should address these issues to improve the reliability and generalizability of results.
• Measurement Limitations: The external rater’s knowledge of participants’ perinatal loss status may have introduced bias into the developmental assessments. Blinding raters to such information could mitigate this risk in future studies.

2.5.6. Conclusion