Preprint
Brief Report

Association between Rheumatic Disease Therapies and Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with HIV

Altmetrics

Downloads

83

Views

40

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

10 September 2024

Posted:

11 September 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Introduction: Inflammation is a significant contributor to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in people with HIV (PWH), who face twice the risk of CVD compared to the general population. The presence of co-existing rheumatic disease (RD) may further exacerbate inflammation and increase the incidence of CVD events in this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using electronic health record (EHR) data from the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Atlanta, covering the period from 2000 to 2019. The study included 3,930 veterans with HIV, and assessed the impact of rheumatic disease therapies (RDT) on CVD outcomes. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of a CVD event. Results: Rheumatic disease was significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD events (OR = 2.67; p < 0.001). Additionally, exposure to multiple RDTs (aHR = 2.121, p = 0.047), NSAIDs (aHR = 1.694, p = 0.003), glucocorticoids (aHR = 2.332, p < 0.0001), and hypouricemic agents and colchicine (aHR = 3.445, p < 0.0001) were all significantly associated with increased CVD events. Conclusion: The co-existence of HIV infection and rheumatic disease, along with the use of RDTs, may amplify the risk of CVD events in PWH. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the relationship between RD, RDTs, and CVD risk in larger, controlled studies, given the potential implications for treatment decisions in this patient population.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases

1. Introduction

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved clinical outcomes for people with HIV (PWH). Chronic inflammation and immunologic dysregulation associated with HIV-infection and prolonged lifespan as a benefit of ART use, predisposes patients in this population to a higher burden of chronic diseases and comorbidities [1]. Several clinical studies have assessed targeting inflammation as a way of mitigating the overall cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile and comorbidities for PWH [2], with limited success. Through related mechanisms, rheumatic diseases (RD) are also independently associated with an increased risk for CVD [3], which is not fully explained by traditional risk factors. Co-existent RD and HIV has the potential to exacerbate chronic inflammation with implications for poor cardiovascular outcomes. Rheumatologic disease therapies (RDT) are directed at reducing inflammation and targeting specific immunologic pathways that drive disease. These therefore have the potential to indirectly impact atherogenesis and cardiovascular outcomes through their effects on inflammation. The aims of this study were to explore the association of RD and RDT on CVD events among PWH in a retrospective cohort of U.S. Veterans.

2. Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study based on electronic health record (EHR) data collected from the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW). A total of 5,000 patients aged 20-87 years diagnosed with HIV and receiving care at the Atlanta VAMC between 2000-2019 were eligible for this analysis. The Emory University institutional review board and VAMC Research and Development Committee approved this study and a consent waiver. Fully anonymized patient data were abstracted between January 2021-December 2022. Individuals who had experienced a cardiovascular event before their HIV diagnosis, those who experienced a cardiovascular event during the two-year exposure period, and those who died prior to the year 2000 or during the exposure period were excluded (appendix 1 and appendix 8). The international classification for disease (ICD)9/10 codes for RD diagnoses were used to identify eligible participants with RD (appendix 4). Twenty randomly selected charts (selected from the 362 charts identified as participants with RD) were reviewed to confirm that ICD codes adequately captured participants with RD having concordance of 95% (19/20 charts). Baseline covariates included race, ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, low dose aspirin, ART and the Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index (VACS index), a validated disease burden index for PWH (incorporating: CD4+ T cell count, HIV viral load, Platelet count, HCV status and age) [4]. The exposure variable, ever use of RDT (appendix 5), was categorized into six groups: 1) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 2) glucocorticoids 3) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) 4) hypouricemic agents and colchicine, 5) multiple RDTs—participants who received concurrent or sequential medications from multiple classes and 6) no RDT. The primary outcome was first occurrence of a CVD event occurring at least two-years after HIV diagnosis, identified by ICD9/10 codes and categorized as: 1) myocardial infarction (MI), 2) stroke, 3) congestive heart failure (CHF) and 4) peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (appendix 6).

Statistical Analyses

A chi-squared test was applied to determine the association between CVD events and RD and the odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Competing risks modelling (Fine and Gray) was used to identify multivariate predictors of time to CVD events among the proposed covariates, with the first occurrence of a CVD event as the endpoint and RDT category as the main exposure. Event free survival was calculated two-years after the date of HIV diagnosis to the date of the most recent CD4+ T cell count result (last date recorded in the EHR), the date of CVD diagnosis, or the date of death from any cause. We also stratified by RD status. Cumulative incidence curves were compared by exposure group for CVD events using Gray’s test [5] appendix 2). For all tests described a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4.

3. Results

Baseline Characteristics

Of the 5000 eligible screened, 3,930 participants were included in our analyses (appendix 8). The median follow-up time was 7.59 (SD: 3.26–13.52) years. The median age of the cohort was 44 (IQR: 36-52) years. The study population was 96.6% male, 70% African American/Black and 20% Caucasian. The median VACS index score was 23 (IQR:12-40). Descriptive statistics are summarized in Table 1.
Of the participants included in the study, 362 (9.2%) had a RD diagnosis. Of note, 21.7% of participants had a smoking history, 19.9% had a diagnosis of hypertension and 9% had a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia. A total of 660 first CVD events were observed in the cohort: 264 MI (40%), 110 stroke (16.7%), 180 CHF (27.3%), and 160 PAD (16.1%). There was a statistically significant association between RD and having a first CVD event (OR = 2.67; p<0.001). In the overall group, based on Gray’s test, there were significant differences between the RDT groups (p<0.001) and risk for a first CVD event (appendix 2). A multivariate Fine and Gray model was used to identify independent predictors of time to CVD events. Compared to the no RDT group, participants exposed to multiple RDTs (HR=2.121, 95% CI 1.26-3.6), NSAIDs (HR=1.694,95%CI 1.2-2.4)), glucocorticoids (HR=2.332, 95% CI 1.58-3.45), or hypouricemic agents (HR=3.445, 95%CI 2.14-5.55) were significantly more likely to experience a CVD event after adjusting for RD status and key covariates (gender, race, ART, VACS index, RD status, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and baby aspirin use). The effect of the DMARD group was not statistically significant (Table 2).
After stratifying by presence of RD, the significant association between RDT and CVD events persisted only in PWH without RD (i.e., people with HIV who received RDT for indications besides rheumatologic disease): multiple RDTs (HR=1.97, 95% CI 1.03-3.77), NSAIDs (HR=1.75, 95% CI 1.22-2.51), glucocorticoids (HR=2.46, 95% CI 1.64-3.7), hypouricemic agents and colchicine (HR=2.96) (appendix 3).

4. Discussion

In this retrospective study, the impact of RDT on incident CVD events among PWH was examined for the first time. Our results showed that use of multiple RDTs, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, and hypouricemic agents and colchicine were associated with an increased hazard for CVD events compared to no RD medications. Glucocorticoids are a frequently prescribed but have a wide range of metabolic effects relevant for CVD. In one study using a general practice research database of individuals without HIV, Souverein et.al matched 50,656 cases to an equivalent number of aged-matched controls and reported that oral glucocorticoids increased the odds for CHF (OR 2.66; CI 2.46-2.87) and to a lesser degree atherosclerosis and cerebrovascular disease [6]. Non-selective and cyclooxygenase-2 NSAIDs also increase the risk for CVD events in the general population [7,8,9]. Their use has been associated with cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke. Glucocorticoids and NSAIDS are frequently prescribed for a variety of indications besides rheumatologic conditions for PWH but no previous studies have examined how these therapies impact the overall CVD risk and CVD events in this population. Our results suggest that glucocorticoid and NSAIDs were significantly associated with CVD events in PWH, and this may need to be considered when prescribing these medications for this population.
Hypouricemic agents and colchicine have garnered interest as potentially useful strategies for reducing CVD risk [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Allopurinol, in a small randomized-controlled trial (RCT) reduced nitric oxide levels and endothelial damage [11]. Colchicine—an anti-inflammatory drug frequently combined with hypouricemic agents in the treatment of gout, has been shown in multiple RCTs to reduce the risk for CVD events in patients with coronary artery disease [12,13,16]. In our study, hypouricemic agents and colchicine were considered together as a medication group and found to be associated with an increased hazard for CVD events. Due to small numbers in this RDT group, we were limited in our ability to evaluate each medication separately. One possible explanation is confounding by indication since individuals with hyperuricemia are more likely to have CVD events. Another possibility is that the mechanisms by which HIV mediates CVD risk may not be impacted by uric acid lowering drugs or colchicine in the same way as in HIV-negative cohorts. Only 17 individuals received treatment with a synthetic or biologic DMARD and among these, 6 had a diagnosis of RD, suggesting some patients may have been treated for other related conditions. Although the aHR for CVD events was increased, this association was not statistically significant. The infrequent use of DMARD in this cohort of PWH may reflect prescription practices which tend to avoid use of these medications in people who have underlying immunocompromised states, given limited experience and increased risk of interactions with ART [17,18]. As are a result we could speculate that suboptimal control of concurrent RD may contribute to increased risk for CVD events in PWH.

5. Limitations

The lack of an HIV-negative comparator group limits our ability to interpret these findings in the context of the general population. Secondly, the cohort is predominantly male, consequently results cannot be extrapolated to women with HIV. Thirdly, the sample size limited our ability to fully evaluate the impact of DMARDs on CVD outcomes. Lastly, due to the study design, we could not examine the impact of sequential use of RDT groups and RD severity on CVD events.

6. Conclusions

Our study found that co-morbid RD in PWH may by associated with increased CVD events, and provides initial data examining the relationship between RDT and CVD risk for PWH with and without RD. These findings highlight the need to further explore the relationship between RD, RDTs and CVD risk in larger, controlled studies given possible implications for treatment choices in this patient population.

Author Contributions

BKT—Study design, data analysis, initial draft, and revision of manuscript; SN -Data analysis and editing of manuscript. JG—Data analysis plan, overview of data analysis, biostatistics support and editing of manuscript. XC- Review of data analysis plan and editing of manuscript. JH—Input on study design and editing of manuscript. EH—Input on study design and editing of manuscript. VCM—Overview of study design, data analysis plan and manuscript revision.

Funding

V.C.M. received support from the Emory CFAR (P30AI050409). BKT received funding from Emory CFAR (P30 AI050409) and is supported by the NIH BIRCWH Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Patient consent for publication—not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

This study was approved by the Emory University institutional review board and VAMC Research and Development Committee.

Data Availability Statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article and its appendices. Request for additional data is subject to review by the VAMC Research and Development Committee.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our study participants.

Conflicts of Interest

BKT- Has received consulting fees from the non-profit CRITICA. SN, JG, XC, JH, EH—declare no conflicts. Unrelated to the current work, V.C.M. has also received investigator-initiated research grants (to the institution) and consultation fees from Eli Lilly, Bayer, Gilead Sciences and ViiV.

References

  1. Lerner, A.M.; Eisinger, R.W.; Fauci, A.S. Comorbidities in Persons With HIV: The Lingering Challenge. JAMA 2020, 323, 19–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Titanji, B.; Gavegnano, C.; Hsue, P.; Schinazi, R.; Marconi, V.C. Targeting Inflammation to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in People With HIV Infection. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2020, 9, e014873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Turesson, C.; Jacobsson, L.T.; Matteson, E.L. Cardiovascular co-morbidity in rheumatic diseases. Vasc. Heal. Risk Manag. 2008, 4, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Justice, A.C.; Modur, S.P.; Tate, J.P.; Althoff, K.N.; Jacobson, L.P.; Gebo, K.A.; et al. Predictive accuracy of the Veterans Aging Cohort Study index for mortality with HIV infection: a North American cross cohort analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013, 62, 149–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dignam, J.J.; Kocherginsky, M.N. Choice and Interpretation of Statistical Tests Used When Competing Risks Are Present. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 4027–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Souverein, P.C.; Berard, A.; Van Staa, T.P.; Cooper, C.; Egberts, A.C.G.; Leufkens, H.G.M.; Walker, B.R. Use of oral glucocorticoids and risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in a population based case-control study. Heart 2004, 90, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kearney, P.M.; Baigent, C.; Godwin, J.; Halls, H.; Emberson, J.R.; Patrono, C. Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2006, 332, 1302–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. McGettigan, P.; Henry, D. Cardiovascular risk and inhibition of cyclooxygenase: a systematic review of the observational studies of selective and nonselective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase 2. Jama 2006, 296, 1633–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Trelle, S.; Reichenbach, S.; Wandel, S.; Hildebrand, P.; Tschannen, B.; Villiger, P.M.; Egger, M.; Jüni, P. Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: network meta-analysis. BMJ 2011, 342, c7086–c7086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gupta, M.K.; Singh, J.A. Cardiovascular Disease in Gout and the Protective Effect of Treatments Including Urate-Lowering Therapy. Drugs 2019, 79, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Meléndez-Ramírez, G.; Pérez-Méndez, O.; López-Osorio, C.; Kuri-Alfaro, J.; Espinola-Zavaleta, N. Effect of the Treatment with Allopurinol on the Endothelial Function in Patients with Hyperuricemia. Endocr. Res. 2011, 37, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bouabdallaoui, N.; Tardif, J.-C.; Waters, D.D.; Pinto, F.J.; Maggioni, A.P.; Diaz, R.; Berry, C.; Koenig, W.; Lopez-Sendon, J.; Gamra, H.; et al. Time-to-treatment initiation of colchicine and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction in the Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT). Eur. Hear. J. 2020, 41, 4092–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nidorf, S.M.; Fiolet, A.T.L.; Mosterd, A.; Eikelboom, J.W.; Schut, A.; Opstal, T.S.J.; et al. Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2020, 383, 1838–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Roubille, F.; Kritikou, E.; Busseuil, D.; Barrere-Lemaire, S.; Tardif, J.C. Colchicine: an old wine in a new bottle? Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem. 2013, 12, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Roubille, F.; Tardif, J.-C. Colchicine for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention in Coronary Disease. Circulation 2020, 142, 1901–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tardif, J.-C.; Kouz, S.; Waters, D.D.; Bertrand, O.F.; Diaz, R.; Maggioni, A.P.; Pinto, F.J.; Ibrahim, R.; Gamra, H.; Kiwan, G.S.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 2497–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Carroll, M.B.; Fields, J.; Clerc, P. Rheumatoid arthritis in patients with HIV: management challenges. Open Access Rheumatol. Res. Rev. 2016, 8, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hanberg, J.S.; Hsieh, E.; Akgün, K.M.; Weinstein, E.; Fraenkel, L.; Justice, A.C.; the VACS Project Team. Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis in HIV Infection: Epidemiology and Treatment. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021, 73, 2189–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics.

Variable

Sub-category
Participants N (%)
N=3930
Median Age (IQR)-yr 44 (36-52)
Gender
Male 3800 (96.6)
Female 130 (3.3)
Race




Asian 3 (0.08)
African American 2877 (73.2)
Native Hawaiian 12 (0.31)
Unknown 229 (5.8)
White 796 (20.2)
American Indian or Alaska 13 (0.33)
Antiretroviral drug








NRTI 926 (28.1)
NNRTI 180 (5.4)
PI 494 (15.0)
INSTI 238 (7.2)
Gp41 antagonist 1 (0.03)
CCR5 antagonist 5 (0.15)
NRTI/NNRTI 317 (9.6)
NRTI/PI 21 (0.64)
NRTI/INSTI 1078 (32.7)
NNRTI/INSTI 34 (1.03)
Hypertension Yes 744 (19.9)
No 2986 (80.0)
Hyperlipidemia Yes 337 (9.0)
No 3393 (90.9)
Smoking Yes 811(21.7)
No 2919 (78.2)
Low dose aspirin Yes 124 (3.3)
No 3606 (96.6)
Diabetes Yes 80 (2.1)
No 3568 (9.8)
RD Yes 362 (9.2)
No 3595(90.8)
VACS score (IQR) 23(12-40)
Yes 124 (3.3)
Abbreviations: IQR-Interquartile range, RD-rheumatic disease, Gp-glycoprotein, CCR- cellular chemokine receptor, VACS—Veterans aging cohort study, PI-protease inhibitor, NNSTI-non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, NRTI-Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor.
Table 2. Adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR) for CVD outcomes associated with RDT exposure and. CVD risk factors from the multivariate Fine and Gray model.
Table 2. Adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR) for CVD outcomes associated with RDT exposure and. CVD risk factors from the multivariate Fine and Gray model.
Variable No. HR 95%CI p-value
RDT category
(Reference group = no RDT)
Multiple RDT 210 2.121 1.259 3.575 0.0047
NSAIDs 2216 1.694 1.196 2.400 0.0030
Glucocorticoids 585 2.332 1.575 3.452 <0.0001
   DMARD 17 1.539 0.392 6.041 0.5368
Hypouricemic agents and colchicine 105 3.445 2.137 5.553 <0.0001
Covariates
   RD 362 1.154 0.823 1.620 0.4048
Smoking 811 2.212 1.581 3.095 <0.0001
Hypertension 744 1.257 0.924 1.712 0.1372
Hyperlipidemia 337 0.779 0.487 1.248 0.2939
Diabetes 80 2.352 0.967 5.747 0.0591
Aspirin 124 2.127 1.212 3.731 0.0077
VACS Index 3930 1.014 1.010 1.019 <0.0001
   Male sex 3800 1.257 0.6337 2.493 0.5120
Abbreviations—RD-rheumatic disease, VACS-Veterans aging cohort study, DMARD-disease modifying anti-rheumatic medication, NSAIDS- non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, HR-hazard ratio, CI-confidence interval, No.- number.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated