The expanding disturbance on natural ecosystems via mining, logging, grazing, and wildfires need promptly restoration as they are not adequately protected or managed. thus, restoration proposals are addressed to integrate native species, creating ecosystem functions to mitigate soil erosion, floodings among other ecosystem services. Ecological restoration is a multiphase procedure, with different stages: to assess to the site and conditions, to identify and analyze the causes of disturbance and methods for stop them, are evaluated. It is also required to prepare objectives for the biota, and microbiota and continuously comparation to reference sites (similar pristine adjacent ecosystems) It is also required to check for historical pre-disturbance communities, and species best adapted to changing climate conditions; besides eliminate sources of disturbance. It is also needed to control livestock and invasive plant species in riparian areas, despite to checking soil properties (pH, Organic Matter, Base saturation, P content, which are crucial to facilitate nutrient cycles.[
1]. These days, it is more accepted to restore landscapes with ecologically sustainable plant covers. As plants affect the soil physical and chemical properties, modifying the soil microbiota (especially the symbiotic microorganisms). With increased mining and ecosystem degradation, mechanisms for restoration of degraded ecosystems have been renovated [
2]. In parallel with the increasing estimation of biodiversity, which has been disclosed longtime, active restoration has been recognized as the best method to restore forests [
3]; however, the high-cost active restoration requires planting seedlings, direct seeding, root inoculation of microorganisms or mitigation of disturbances, which aid the recovery process despite monitoring plants. On the other hand, the spontaneous recovery of trees that colonize and establish in abandoned fields or natural disturbances, named natural regeneration, is less targeted and can require more time to achieve results. There is also pronounced research on the microorganisms associated to native plants in undisturbed ecosystems (considered a reference) [
4,
5]. Additionally, Holl and Aide [
6] have recommended to evaluate some analyses, such as possibility of passive restoration, specific goals of the project, available resources, and landscape type, before selecting the most suitable restoration method. The use of arbuscular mycorrhizae (AMF) in restoration of degraded ecosystems provides a source of data for restoration programs; however, plant symbiosis remains inadequately manipulated as ecological restoration was for a long time most phytocentric, disregarding belowground [
7] and the intricated soil ecology [
8]. Additionally, the brief restoration projects are generally insufficient to evaluate complete plant progress and associated microbial changes, while the soil properties are also imperceptibly modified. Fortunately, rhizosphere engineering has emerged as a biotechnological approach, using microbial biofertilizers, and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to increase plant productivity and survival, as pointed by Yadav et al., 2023) [
9], In parallel, restoration practices need to include these advances for improvement of sustainable plant covers. Restoration science needs continue scientific evidence, as projects need to deal with conservation and reintroduction of rare species, required for ecological, and economic health, thus, relevant for conservation of the higher biodiverse terrestrial biomes [
10]. Also, appropriate environmental conditions for native fauna, preserving wildlife diversity enhancing the conservation of trees and other organisms present in the ecosystems; however, the management of restored sites has supplied scientific information from few species [
11]. Thus, active restoration needs effective strategies for conservation of biodiversity, including endangered endemic species, exclusive habitats and landscapes, hotspots, and biota with relevant ecosystem services [
12]. While areas of priority for habitat restoration were reported [
13], habitat indicators relevant for restoration have not been fully recognized. In the present study, we surveyed the current information on ecological restoration, with respect to the benefits of plant rhizosphere engineering. as there is a need for more scientific information on restoration practices of specific strategic sites, priority areas need to be recomposed and compared to one or more reference sites to involve some common variations. In this sense, researchers continue to debate on the effective specific techniques to evaluate the restoration success [
14]. It was also shown that wider spacing can increase growth of native species in restored forests. However, studies on tree species used in forest recovery are incipient as little is known about the characteristics of growth of native species. In Brazil, the selection of fast-growing symbiotic trees has resulted in successful restoration [
15]. Also mined sites in degraded rupestrian fields (
Figure 1) deserve urgent conservation, and restoration through plantations of endemic endangered native species [
16]
. Fragmented sites presented low resilience, restricting the viable restored populations. In this sense, Pagano et al. [
5]. showed that the use of AMF in restored sites, for recovering riparian forests together with, the soil aggregation is relevant in restoration approaches as the stability of soil macroaggregates depend on the growth and decomposition of roots and mycorrhizas, improving soil aggregation as investigated by Rillig et al. [
17]. Moreover, some indicators of soil health and thus, of restored soils, include soil organic matter, soil organic carbon (SOC), soil nutrients, and soil microbial communities. Increasing native species richness can be a viable strategy for restoration, which also benefit from grasses and forbs to address functional roles of herbaceous species [
19]. Moreover, it was also stressed the need of better understanding the interactions between vegetation, fauna, soil microbiota and soil properties, soil microbes, which are crucial for plant species establishment and stability; however, required information remain unknown. Restoration can be improved by reintroducing mycorrhizal fungi from the native plant microbiomes, such as in grassy ecosystems [
20]. have compiled the current information of ecological restoration in Brazil. Despite the great demand for restoration of different ecosystems, few analyses were carried out in the megadiverse biomes. (Guerra et al., 2020) [
21]. Plantations provide goods and services, improving financial benefits, from wood and other products [
22]. Additionally, AMF (spores and hyphae) also provide C input in the restored soils with woody species through environmental services as incremented C fixation with mycorrhizal inoculation of the seedlings used for revegetation [
23].
Regarding the benefits of soil microbiota as biofertilizers and soil amendments, it has been shown that AMF are supported by both terrestrial and aquatic plants and that most plants in natural and managed ecosystems depend on the mycorrhizal fungi, being of high interest for ecological restoration and conservation of natural ecosystems. AMF can increase the uptake of phosphorus (P), nitrogen and other nutrients by the plant [
24]. Some reports have compiled the potential of soil amendments (compost, biochar, and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) for restoration of disturbed sites, pointing out the rhizosphere as “hot spot” of microbial activity, as investigated by Nannipieri et al. [
24], Thus, linking plant and soil microbiota is fundamental for rehabilitation efforts in most biomes. Moreover, non-nutritional properties of this symbiosis, such as reducing plant diseases, modifying water relationships, as informed Subramanian et al. [
25]; or stabilizing soil structure receive more recent attention motivated on their contribution to soil structure, improving soil aggregation, due to their contribution in aggregate stabilization [
26]). As AMF are specialized to both their biotic and abiotic environments soil properties and plant species need to be studied in restoration projects, to improve the management of AMF in field situations. Initially, mycorrhizae were commonly used in restoration due to their benefit for plant growth [
27], then, their role in reinforcing soil structure in both physical-chemical way, as the extraradical hyphae involve soil and particles, which stabilize soil aggregates, was highlighted receiving more attention. Biotic (disease, herbivory and/or the presence of competitors) and abiotic stresses (nutrient deficiency and drought) can affect both plant and microbial fitness. As soil microorganisms are influenced by abiotic conditions (soil type and soil water content) to perform soil analysis is crucial for predicting their establishment and design possible long-term interactions. Firstly, a diagnostic procedure aids to identify anthropogenic disturbances in degraded sites. Then, to enhance soils and control invasive species, weeds, ants and grazer fauna is crucial for the success of restoration. In general, native plants are known to be more mycotrophic (dependent on mycorrhiza). Diagnostic protocols identify barriers to ecological succession being the basics for repairing degraded soils. To check the suitability of the microsites for native plant establishment and growth [
17], the Presence of barriers, such as soil or substrate degradation, exotic aggressive grasses, and/or intense herbivory or seed predation; besides presence of soil seed bank, sprouts, seedlings and saplings of native tree and shrub species is prioritized; Also, relative abundance levels of life forms (e.g., herbs, shrubs, trees), successional groups (pioneer or non-pioneer) and presence of adjacent forest fragments and seed rain can be estimated. It was also pointed the necessity to include different life forms, restoration techniques and studies using reference areas to measure restoration success [
21]). In this sense, the presence of different types of plant functional groups as well as different plant symbioses (such as mycorrhiza,
Rhizobium, etc.) and their combinations is crucial for the development of restoration practices. However, there are other fungal species living in soil presenting good capacity for soil restoration such as
Trichoderma sp.,
Aspergillus spp.,
Mucor sp., as well as some mushrooms. The use AMF can influence plant growth, seedling survival, rhizosphere effect, being of most priority to select species for restoration objectives. Regarding ecological restoration in Brazil, the treated biome Atlantic Forest is the most investigated(with the highest number of papers reported). This is due to its high biodiversity and priority for restoration. In this context, it is useful to investigate natural and synthetic soil microbial communities, for successful plant growth under different scenarios [
28]. In the present work we explore current needs for microbial solutions (specially, mycorrhizae) in disturbed ecosystems, how these solutions are being developed and applied, and the potential for new biotechnology advances to adapt and target microbes for restoration. In this regard, it was estimated that mycorrhizal inoculation can increase plant species richness of restored sites by 30%, promoting establishment of target species in a rapid establishment of the vegetation cover [
29]. Plant composition commonly differs markedly between reference and restored sites, typically (lower plant diversity and specific plant functional groups in restored sites. The State of Minas Gerais is characterized by a hilly relief with elevations ranging to 2,890 m, and its natural vegetation needs urgent strategies for conservation as this fragile region has suffered human impacts on a large scale, and its conservation actions must be developed to protect fauna and flora. Highland fields, also termed rupestrian fields, have shrubby, tortuous and sclerophyllous vegetation or open grasslands and replace the Cerrado (savanna) vegetation at 1,000 m altitude, where plants grow in stones, in sandy soils and present adapted vegetation. Typical transition forests composed predominantly of
Eremanthus spp. (Asteraceae) are commonly found.