Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Exploring the Interplay of Bud Load and Pruning Type in Shaping 'Xinomavro' (V. vinifera L.) Vine Growth, Yield, and Berry Composition

Version 1 : Received: 22 September 2024 / Approved: 23 September 2024 / Online: 23 September 2024 (12:53:12 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 15 October 2024 / Approved: 15 October 2024 / Online: 16 October 2024 (09:37:31 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Theocharis, S.; Gkrimpizis, T.; Karadimou, C.; Nikolaou, K.-E.; Koundouras, S.; Taskos, D. Exploring the Interplay of Bud Load and Pruning Type in Shaping ‘Xinomavro’ (Vitis vinifera L.) Vine Growth, Yield, and Berry Composition. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1111. Theocharis, S.; Gkrimpizis, T.; Karadimou, C.; Nikolaou, K.-E.; Koundouras, S.; Taskos, D. Exploring the Interplay of Bud Load and Pruning Type in Shaping ‘Xinomavro’ (Vitis vinifera L.) Vine Growth, Yield, and Berry Composition. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1111.

Abstract

'Xinomavro' (V. vinifera L.) is an important native red wine grape variety in Northern Greece, particularly in PDO regions. Despite its significance, there is limited research on the effects of pruning type and severity on 'Xinomavro' vine physiology, yield, and berry quality across diverse environmental conditions. This study aims to address this knowledge gap and provide growers with crucial information for optimizing vineyard management practices. The study was conducted over two consecutive years (2016 and 2017) in a vineyard in Thessaloniki, Northern Greece. Four treatments ( B12: 12 buds on 6 spurs; B24: 24 buds on 12 spurs; M12: 12 buds on 2 canes; M24: 24 buds on 4 canes) combining two bud load levels (12 or 24 count nodes) and two pruning types (short spurs or long canes) were applied to 'Xinomavro' vines in complete block randomized design. Measurements included vine water status, gas exchange, canopy characteristics, yield components, and berry composition. Bud load and pruning type significantly influenced vine canopy development, microclimate, and yield components. Short pruning with high bud load (B24) resulted in denser canopies and higher yields, while cane pruning (M12 and M24) led to more open canopies and improved berry quality indicators. Treatment effects on berry composition were inconsistent across years but showed a tendency for higher anthocyanin and total phenol content in cane-pruned vines. The study demonstrates that pruning type (short or long fruiting units) may have a greater impact on vine growth, yield, and berry composition than bud load alone in 'Xinomavro' vines. Cane pruning appears to be a more effective strategy for achieving vine balance and potentially improving grape quality under the given experimental conditions.

Keywords

Xinomavro; Bud load; Pruning type; Vine balance; Canopy management; Berry composition; Grape yield; Viticulture practices; Winegrape quality

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Agricultural Science and Agronomy

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.