3.1. Analysis of Phase and Surface Morphology
Figure 1a illustrates the XRD patterns of as-cast alloy,
Figure 1b illustrates the XRD patterns of annealed alloy. As shown in the
Figure 1a, the addition of Al and Ti caused the appearance of BCC phase diffraction peaks and the precipitation of ordered phases B2 and L21. The presence of σ phase was observed when the Al and Ti content was A8T4 and A4T8, indicating that the dual-element alloying of Al and Ti caused the crystal structure change from FCC phase to FCC+BCC phase, resulted in a significant increase in precipitated phase. After annealing at 800 °C, besides the aforementioned transformation, the L12 phase was also separated out. The Ni3Al intermetallic phase was formed when the Al and Ti content was A8T4 and A4T8. The diffraction peaks of each crystal plane demonstrated good agreement, suggesting that the long-time annealing treatment provided sufficient energy for the proliferation of alloying elements and relieved lattice distortion.
Figure 2 exhibits the OM images of cast samples with various compositions. It can be noticed that the cast samples presents a classic dendrite structure, as depicted in
Figure 2a–d. The dendrite structure becomes finer with increasing Ti content.
Figure 3 exhibits the OM images of alloy samples with different compositions after annealing at 800 °C. In comparison to the as-cast alloy, the dendrite structure of A9T3, A6T6, and A3T9 remains after annealing. However, a considerable number of black, bar-like phases are evident within the light-colored phase, indicating the formation of a new phase because of the annealing heat treatment.
Figure 4 displays the SEM-BSE image of the cast alloy after exposure to corrosion. All alloy compositions exhibit a dendrite structure, labeled as A phase (interdendritic structure) and B phase (dendritic structure). The black elongated phase, referred to as C phase, is a precipitated phase found between the dendrites and is primarily located within the A phase. The average size of the dendrite structure in each composition was calculated using ImageJ software, with the average dendrite sizes in A9T3, A8T4, A6T6, A4T8, and A3T9 alloys being 78, 28, 52, 24, and 74 μm, respectively. The A4T8 alloy had the smallest dendritic structure, while the dendrite structure in the A3T9 alloy appeared abnormally coarse when the T content reached 9%.
Figure 5 presents a surface scan diagram of the element distribution in the as-cast alloy, indicating that the A phase has a large content of Ni and Fe elements, the B phase has a large content of Cr and Fe elements, and the C phase has a large content of Al, Ti, and Ni elements. Failure to observe obvious differences in the distribution of Fe element between the A and B phases.
Figure 6 exhibits the SEM-BSE image of the alloy after undergoing annealing and corrosion treatment. The phase composition rules are the same for A9T3, A6T6, and A3T9 alloys. The microstructure of the annealed samples do not undergo significant changes compared to the two-phase interwoven network structure in the as-cast state, with only new phases precipitated from the dendrite and interdendritic regions. Same as
Figure 4, labeled as A phase (interdendritic structure) and B phase (dendritic structure). The black elongated phase, referred to as C phase, is a precipitated phase found between the dendrites and is primarily located within the A phase.
Figure 6f is a locally enlarged view of
Figure 6c, C phase is mainly distributed in A phase. Round rod shaped light colored phase was observed in the B phase, which is consistent with the color of A phase. Compared to as-cast alloys, the previously nanoscale particles in B phase exhibit growth phenomenon, the size has increased from a few hundred nanometers to a few micrometers. The microstructure and morphology changes in A8T4 and A4T8 alloys demonstrate the same regularity exhibit a similar pattern, becoming disordered while still retaining the dendrite structure observed in the as-cast state. To gain further insight into the composition distribution of the alloy after annealing heat treatment, a mapping scan was conducted, and the outcome are displayed in
Figure 7. The microstructure morphology of A9T3, A6T6, and A3T9 alloys are distinct from those of A8T4 and A4T8 alloys and are discussed in this section. In A9T3, A6T6, and A3T9 alloys, the elements Al, Ti, Cr, Fe, and Ni segregate on the basis of the following patterns: the interdendritic structure has a large content of Fe, Ni elements, the dendrite structure has a large content of Cr, Fe elements, and the black long strip phase within the interdendritic structure has a large content of Al, Ti and Ni elements. Additionally, there is a white granular phase within the black strip phase, which has a large content of Cr, Fe elements. In A8T4 and A4T8 alloys, there are also variations in the distribution of each element: the interdendritic structure has a large content of Ni, Fe and Cr elements, the dendrite structure has a large content of Cr, Fe elements, the lamellar structure has a large content of Ni, Ti elements, the black striped region (C phase) has a large content of Al, Ni, and Ti elements, and the granular phase within the interdendritic structure has a large content of Al, Ni, and Ti elements.
Due to the similar microstructure of A9T3, A6T6, and A3T9 alloys pre and post annealing treatment, A6T6 alloy after annealing was selected as the target of study. Transmission electron microscopy was used to analyze the morphology and structure of dendrites and interdendritic structures of the alloy at the nanoscale.
Figure 8a shows the bright -field TEM image of annealed A6T6 alloy,
Figure 8c shows the bright-field image of precipitates in the dendritic structure,
Figure 8b,d show the diffraction patterns along the [111] crystal band axis in the A and C regions of
Figure 8c,
Figure 8f shows a high-resolution TEM image of the interface area between the precipitate phase and the dendrite phase,
Figure 8e,g show the diffraction patterns along the [111] crystal band axis in the D and F regions of
Figure 8f. As the figure shown, a large number of precipitation particles enriched with Ni, Ti, and Al elements are distributed on the dendritic structure, the size distribution ranges from a few hundred nanometers to a few micrometers. Based on the analysis results of high-resolution transmission (HRTEM) and SAED, the C and F regions correspond to diffraction patterns along the axis of the BCC phase [111] crystal belt, the interplanar spacing of crystal face (110) is approximately 0.204 nm. The A and D regions correspond to diffraction patterns along the axis of the B2 phase [111] crystal belt, the interplanar spacing of crystal face (110) is approximately 0.207 nm. Compared with the standard PDF card diffraction peak of the (110) crystal plane in
Figure 1b, it can be determined that the phases in the C and F regions are BCC structured solid solution phases rich in [Fe, Cr], the D and F regions are B2 phases rich in Ni, Ti, and Al elements.
Figure 9 shows the TEM image of the interdendritic structure of A6T6 alloy after annealing,
Figure 9b shows the diffraction patterns along the [011] crystal band axis in region A of
Figure 9a,
Figure 9c shows the high-resolution TEM image of region A in
Figure 9a,
Figure 9d,e show the diffraction patterns along the [011] crystal band axis in the B and C regions of
Figure 9c.
Figure 9b shows the diffraction patterns along the axis of the [011] crystal band, weak superlattice diffraction spots can be observed.
Figure 9c shows the high-resolution TEM image of region A in
Figure 9a, we can observe the area of the triangle in lower right corner of
Figure 9c, diffraction analysis was conducted on both sides of the area.
Figure 9d shows the diffraction patterns along the [011] crystal band axis in the B region of
Figure 9c, no presence of superlattice diffraction spots observed, the interplanar spacing of crystal face (111) is approximately 0.211 nm.
Figure 9e shows the diffraction patterns along the [011] crystal band axis in the C region of
Figure 9c, superlattice diffraction spots can be clearly observed, the interplanar spacing of crystal face (111) is approximately 0.212 nm. Compared with the standard PDF card diffraction peak of the (110) crystal plane in
Figure 1b, we can determine that the corresponding phase in region B is FCC phase, the corresponding phase in region B is FCC phase, the phase in region C is L1
2 structured solid solution phase, the FCC phase maintains a good interfacial coherence with the L1
2 structured solid solution phase.
3.2. Analysis of Compressive Properties at Room Temperature
Figure 10 shows the engineering stress-strain curve of the sample, with a test strain rate of 2×10
-4 s
-1.
Table 5 illustrates the compressive property test results of as-cast alloys, including yield strength (σ0.2), fracture strength (σb), and deformation rate (εp). The data in
Table 5 reveal that the σ0.2 of A8T4 alloy is lower than that of A9T3 alloy, decreasing from 1435.93 MPa to 1338.13 MPa, the fracture strength decreases from 2934.41 MPa to 2093.71 MPa, and the plastic strain decreases from 45.11% to 37.68%. The σ0.2 of the A6T6 sample is the highest, reaching 1707.41 MPa, and its σb and plastic strain are 3010.29 MPa and 41.05%. As the Ti content growth, the plastic strain of alloys continues to decrease. In comparison to the A9T3 alloy, the A3T9 alloy has better strength but poorer plasticity, with the lowest plastic strain at 18.71%.
The fracture morphology of cast alloy was observed after compressive mechanical properties testing using scanning electron microscopy in secondary electron mode, analyzing the fracture mechanism of alloy specimens.
Figure 11 shows the microscopic morphology of the fracture surface of the as-cast alloy sample, A9T3 alloy has good plasticity, after compression testing, the sample did not break, bonded together. Therefore, the fracture surfaces of other samples were analyzed. Obvious dimple morphology was observed in
Figure 11a,b, there are many concave or convex micro pits at the fracture surface, the second phase particles can be observed in the micro pits. In addition, flat and shiny dissociation fracture morphology was also observed, and many tearing edges, dissociation fracture mixed with dimples, belonging to typical quasi dissociation fracture. The morphology of dimples is less and the dissociation morphology is more in
Figure 11c. In
Figure 11d, the dissociation morphology is mainly observed, fewer dimples and more tearing edges can be observed, the dissociated layer structure can be watched, the overall morphology is mainly composed of small layers. A3T9 alloy still exhibits quasi dissociation fracture, but showing the greatest tendency towards brittleness. From
Figure 11a–d, we can observe that as the Ti content growth, the plasticity of alloys gradually deteriorates, the fracture behavior of the alloy transfers from ductile fracture to brittle fracture.
Figure 12a illustrates the stress-strain curve of the compressive test of alloys after homogenization annealing heat treatment, with a test strain rate of 2×10
-4 s
-1.
Table 6 illustrates the compressive property test results of annealed alloys, including yield strength (σ0.2), fracture strength (σb), and deformation rate (εp).
Figure 12a reveals that the alloys after annealing have higher fracture strength (>2200MPa), while the plastic strain decreases to varying degrees. However, the change in yield strength is not regular due to the complex microstructure and morphology changes in the alloy after annealing heat treatment. After annealing, the uniform strength and fracture strength of A9T3 and A6T6 alloys decrease to different extents due to the reduction in the solid solution strengthening influence of Ti elements following homogenization of the composition. This is reflected in the decrease in hardness of the alloy after annealing. The relatively high yield strength of A6T6 alloy is owe to the smaller grain size and the increased presence of Ti atoms in solid solution. The microstructure of A8T4 and A4T8 alloys undergoes significant changes after annealing, presenting a high number of σ phases and a substantial increase in yield strength from the Ni
3Ti phase. A8T4 sample has the highest σ0.2 (2361.22 MPa) and σb (2602.28 MPa), with a low fracture strain is only 9.17%. After annealing, the σ0.2 of A3T9 sample increases, but the fracture strength decreases, leading to a lower plastic strain of 14.24%.
Figure 13 reveals the fracture morphology of samples after room temperature compression mechanical properties testing of the annealed alloy, after prolonged annealing treatment, the plasticity of the alloy is significantly reduced. Obvious dimple morphology observed in
Figure 13a,c, the second phase particles can be observed in the dimples, the particle size is coarser than that of cast alloys. The flat and shiny dissociation fracture morphology can also be observed, no friction marks observed on the surface of the fracture, dissociation fracture mixed with dimples, belonging to quasi dissociation fracture. There are compound precipitation in
Figure 13b, which increase the brittleness of grain boundaries. There are obvious secondary cracks present, the secondary crack disperses the stress borne by the main crack during the deformation process of the after prolonged annealing treatment, the plasticity of the alloy is significantly reduced. Obvious dimple morphology observed in
Figure 13a,c, the second phase particles can be observed in the dimples, the particle size is coarser than that of cast alloys. The flat and shiny dissociation fracture morphology can also be observed, no friction marks observed on the surface of the fracture, dissociation fracture mixed with dimples, belonging to quasi dissociation fracture. There are compound precipitation in
Figure 13b, which increase the brittleness of grain boundaries. There are obvious secondary cracks present, the secondary crack disperses the stress borne by the main crack during the deformation process of the alloy, causes the alloy to exhibit high yield strength. The friction marks on the fracture surface after shear fracture can be seen in
Figure 13b,d, the surface is very flat, presenting a river like pattern, it is the result of dissociating the step connection. There are also obvious secondary cracks in
Figure 13d, indicates that A4T8 alloy has relatively high strength, belonging to dissociation fracture.
Figure 13e shows a typical shear fracture morphology, which is caused by shear failure, friction marks appeared on the fracture surface, presenting a layered organizational morphology, belonging to quasi dissociation fracture. Compared to as-cast alloys, the plasticity of the alloy significantly decreases after annealing, the microstructure and morphology of A8T4 and A4T8 alloys have undergone significant changes, failure to maintain fracture behavior in the as-cast state.