Preprint Review Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

How Agroecological Transition Frameworks Are Reshaping Agroecology: A Review

Version 1 : Received: 23 September 2024 / Approved: 24 September 2024 / Online: 25 September 2024 (04:12:41 CEST)

How to cite: Fonseca, A. F.; Polita, F.; Madureira, L. How Agroecological Transition Frameworks Are Reshaping Agroecology: A Review. Preprints 2024, 2024091926. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1926.v1 Fonseca, A. F.; Polita, F.; Madureira, L. How Agroecological Transition Frameworks Are Reshaping Agroecology: A Review. Preprints 2024, 2024091926. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.1926.v1

Abstract

The "agroecological transition" has emerged as a framework that aims to explain the complex changes taking place in agrifood systems. This study offers a mapping of the emergence of this framework, and aims to demonstrate that the “agroecological transition” can refer to different perspectives beyond the simple combination of two concepts. We carried out a bibliometric analysis of 298 articles (2012 - 2023), searched under the command "agroecologic* transition*". We used VOSviewer software, which is able to reveal clusters of co-citations of the most cited authors and articles. This result, in turn, indicates the existence of different perspectives on the use of "agroecological transitions". Four clusters were found: "Techniques and Practices", represented by articles that document the agroecological transition as an expression of specific agricultural techniques and practices; “Transition Theory", which employs the emerging theory and its conceptual contributions; "Transition Criteria", which involves the use of criteria to monitor the transition; "Political and Social", made up of articles that explore the political and social movement dimension of agroecology. Each of these clusters, and their approaches, contribute different interpretations of agroecology itself, indicating the emergence of a new framework capable of attributing new meanings to it.

Keywords

agroecology; transition; agroecological transition; transition theory; bibliometric review

Subject

Social Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.