1. Background
Falls are among the most common and serious issues that contribute to disability, particularly in older adults. Each year, approximately 26.5% (23.4% - 29.8%) of older adults experience a fall, with 10% falling at least twice annually[
1,
2]. These incidents often result in serious injuries, including fractures, joint dislocations, sprains, strains, and concussions, occurring in roughly 10% of falls[
2]. A previous study indicated that the lifetime costs associated with falls were substantial, ranging from 50 million to 2.3 billion for hospitalizations and 15 – 450 million for emergency department-treated and related falls across U.S. states. This substantial financial burden highlights the importance of fall prevention efforts, especially older adults. To reduce healthcare costs and improve quality of life [
3]. Thailand has the second-highest proportion of older adults in ASEAN region following Singapore [
4]. As an upper-middle-income country, as ranked by World Bank, this demographic shift poses a significant financial burden to Thais society, particularly for family with older adults. Previous studies have reported that the proportion of falls in Thailand ranges from 7.5% to 17.6% [
5,
6,
7], with this trend expected to increase. This rise in fall incidents contributes to a financial strain on individuals, families, and society as a whole, further emphasizing the need for effective fall prevention strategies.
Falls can be prevented through the effective coordination of normal gait, which involves the basal ganglia, brainstem system, regulated muscle tone, and sensory processing including vision, hearing, and proprioception [
8]. In addition, proper attire, such as wearing appropriately sized clothing for ease of movement and slip-resistant shoes, can help reduce the risk of falls [
8,
9]. Ensuring a safe environment is equally important—this includes providing adequate lighting in the home, keeping pathways clear of obstacles, and maintaining dry, non-slippery floors [
8,
9,
10]. These measures collectively contribute to fall prevention and promote safety for older adults.
The literature review highlights that an individual's knowledge [
11,
12] and perceptions significantly impact their behaviors, with notable variations across gender [
13,
14] and social support [
15,
16]. Moreover, Health Belief Model [
14] explains that people who perceive the severity of a disease and their personal susceptibility, combined with their views on the benefits and barriers of preventive behaviors, are more likely to engage in those behaviors. Previous studies [
17,
18,
19] have shown that health education plays a crucial role in improving fall prevention behaviors. In the current era, health education has evolved beyond traditional methods such as classroom instruction or printed materials to include e-education through online platforms, such as group chats or social media posts. Consequently, in an urban industrial community like Samutprakarn, residents may have better access to health information and an increased level of knowledge, potentially leading to more effective behavior changes, particularly regarding fall prevention. Therefore, to develop effective fall prevention strategies, it is essential to understand the factors influencing fall prevention behaviors. This a cross-sectional study aims to assess fall prevention behaviors and identify the associated factors, including knowledge, perceptions, access to health information, and social support, among older adults in the urbanized community of Samutprakarn Province, Thailand.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
The study population comprises elderly individuals aged 60 and above, both male and female, who are registered in the population registry of Samut Prakan Province, totaling 374 people. To determine the sample size from this known population, the formula provided. The total number of elderly people in Samut Prakan Province is 233,560 as of 2022. Additionally, the proportion of elderly individuals exhibiting high fall prevention behavior, based on the study by Kanokwan Muangsiri, is 33.2%. The calculation also considers a maximum allowable margin of error of 0.05. In Samut Prakan Province, six districts were selected, and within each district, six municipalities were randomly chosen. Following this, the study population was randomly selected from each area according to the sample size calculated.
2.2. Measurement Tool
The study employs a comprehensive assessment tool for elderly individuals in Samut Prakan Province, consisting of eight sections. It starts with collecting general demographic and health-related information through 9 questions. Next, it assesses knowledge on fall prevention with 21 questions, scoring responses as "Yes" (1 point) or "No/Not Sure" (0 points). The tool then evaluates perceived fall risk, severity, benefits, barriers, with 15 questions using a 3-point Likert scale. Social support is measured through 10 questions across 5 domains, utilizing a 4-point Likert scale. Finally, it examines fall prevention behaviors with 17 questions, scored as "Always" (3), "Sometimes" (2), and "Never" (1).
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were calculated to assess the proportions of various factors, including gender, education, history of illness, history of falling, knowledge of fall prevention, perceived severity and susceptibility, benefits and barriers, access to health information, social support, and fall prevention behaviors. These factors were reported as both numbers and percentages. Additionally, binary logistic regression was then employed to evaluate the impact of these variables on fall prevention behaviors. The analysis provided odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values to determine the significance of each variable. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The variables analyzed included gender, education, history of illness, history of falling, knowledge of fall prevention, perceived severity and susceptibility, benefits and barriers, access to health information, and social support.
3. Results
3.1. Sample Description
In a study involving 374 respondents, 82.6% were female, and 17.4% were male. Most participants (85.3%) had completed only primary school education, with the remainder having completed secondary school, high school, or higher education, as shown in
Table 1. Approximately 65% of respondents had been diagnosed with at least one non-communicable disease. Additionally, nearly one-third (32.1%) reported a history of falling.
Over 90% of the participants demonstrated good knowledge of fall prevention and had positive perceptions regarding the severity and susceptibility of falls, as well as the benefits and barriers to prevention, as detailed in
Table 1. Nearly 80% of the respondents indicated that they had sufficient information on fall prevention, and 70.6% reported having strong social support. Lastly, 96.5% of the participants exhibited good fall prevention behaviors as shown in
Table 1.
3.2. Factors Association to Fall Prevention Behaviors among Older Adults in Dwelling Community
Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed several factors significantly associated with fall prevention behaviors among older adults. Being female was strongly associated with better fall prevention behaviors compared to males, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.39 (95% CI: 1.42-13.52). Additionally, older adults with good knowledge of fall prevention were nine times (95%CI: 2.78-30.38) more likely to engage in good fall prevention behaviors than those with moderate or poor knowledge as shown in
Table 2.
Using the Health Belief Model, the analysis showed that older adults who perceived the severity and susceptibility of falls, along with the benefits and barriers to prevention (OR = 11.25 [95%CI: 3.36-37.69]), as high, were more likely to practice good fall prevention behaviors compared to those with moderate or poor perceptions. Moreover, having sufficient access to health information (OR= 4.94 [95%CI: 1.61-15.16]) significantly increased the likelihood of engaging in good fall prevention behaviors compared to those with insufficient information. Finally, strong social support (OR= 4.06 [95%CI: 1.30-12.71]) was also positively correlated with good fall prevention behaviors as shown in
Table 2.
In contrast, the analysis found no statistically significant association between a history of falling or the presence of non-communicable diseases and fall prevention behaviors. Similarly, education level was not associated with fall prevention behaviors, as demonstrated in
Table 2.
4. Discussion
As mentioned in the introduction above, this study was conducted in an urban community within an industrial economic zone near Bangkok. The study found that the majority of older adults exhibited good fall prevention behaviors, with nearly half having an education level higher than primary school. This higher level of education may contribute to better access to health information. The urban setting of the study area likely played a role in the relatively better access to information on fall prevention practices among older adults, as compared to other studies [
6,
7]. This information may have been sourced from healthcare professionals and various online media platforms, among others.
The study's findings reinforce the significance of knowledge, perceived severity, susceptibility to falls, benefits, barriers to prevention, and sufficient access to health information in influencing fall prevention behaviors among older adults in urban communities. These results align with previous research, which has shown that healthcare behaviors are strongly affected by an individual's knowledge [
11,
12] and perceptions [
12]. Moreover, adequate access to health information plays a crucial role in empowering individuals to acquire the knowledge necessary to make informed decisions about changing their behaviors and lifestyle [
17,
18,
19].
This finding supports the concept of health literacy [
20], which emphasizes the importance of accessible health information. When individuals have sufficient access to health education—whether through direct communication with healthcare providers, health news, or social media—they are more confident in discussing their health care, verifying information, and making informed choices. For those who are motivated to improve their health outcomes or prevent health risks, access to reliable information is critical in fostering positive behavioral changes, which ultimately leads to better health outcomes.
Moreover, social support also plays a crucial role in reinforcing health information and behaviors, as this study found a significant association between social support and fall prevention behaviors among older adults, consistent with other studies [
15,
16]. Social support theory encompasses four dimensions: informational support, emotional support, instrumental support, and appraisal support. Although this support can influence behavior change throughout the entire process, this study was unable to pinpoint the specific stages where social support is most impactful. Therefore, further research could explore at which stage of behavior change—whether it's the intention to change, information gathering, behavior modification, or lifestyle adjustment—social support is most influential.
This cross-sectional study is limited in establishing causality between factors and fall prevention behaviors, as it captures data at a single point in time, making it challenging to determine the direction of relationships. The small sample size may reduce the generalizability of the findings, and the unusually high proportion of reported good fall prevention behaviors could suggest response bias or unique population characteristics, raising concerns when comparing with other studies. Additionally, the study did not explore the underlying mechanisms or sequence of behavior change processes, indicating a need for further research to better understand these interactions over time.
5. Conclusion
This study was conducted in an urban community within an industrial economic zone near Bangkok, Samutprakarn Province, Thailand, reveals that a significant proportion (96.3%) of older adults exhibit good fall prevention behaviors. Key factors contributing to these behaviors include being female, having good knowledge of fall prevention, perceiving the severity and susceptibility of falls along with understanding the benefits and barriers to prevention, having sufficient access to health information, and receiving strong social support. The findings underscore the importance of targeted educational programs and supportive interventions in promoting effective fall prevention strategies. Specifically, older adults with comprehensive knowledge and awareness of fall risks, alongside robust social support networks, are more likely to engage in preventive behaviors. These insights highlight the need for policies that enhance health education, improve access to relevant information, and strengthen social support systems to better support older adults in managing fall risks and reducing related disabilities.
Disclosure of AI Assistance
This manuscript underwent English grammar checking performed solely by AI tools. Please note that no AI was used for conceptualization or data analysis. The use of AI was limited to language refinement, and all other aspects of the study, including conceptualization and data analysis, were conducted by the authors.
References
- Salari N, Darvishi N, Ahmadipanah M, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jun 28;17(1):334. [CrossRef]
- Ganz DA, Latham NK. Prevention of falls in community-dwelling older adults. N Engl J Med 2020;382 (8):734–43. [CrossRef]
- Haddad YK, Bergen G, Florence CS. Estimating the Economic Burden Related to Older Adult Falls by State. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019;25(2):E17-E24. [CrossRef]
- ESCAP. Addressing the challenges of population aging in Asia and Pacific: implementation of the Madrid international plan of action on ageing. Bangkok: United Nations publication; 2017.
- Namwong Th., Arrirak N. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Falls among Elderly in Yasothon Province. Dis Control J. 2022; 49(1): 158-166. [CrossRef]
- Pantong U., Trapero I. Analysis and Prevention of Falls among Community-dwelling older adults in Southern Thailand. J Adv Nurs. 2024; 80: 2121-2136. [CrossRef]
- Sutalangka Ch., Namkorn Pl., Sitthipornvorakul E., Kongkratoke S., Mee-inta A., Chaiut W. Accidental Fall Related to Physical and Environmental Risk Factors among Older Hill Tribe Adults in Northern Thailand. J Health Sci Med Res. 2024; 42(5):a20241037. [CrossRef]
- Osoba MY, Rao AK, Agrawal SK, Lalwani AK. Balance and gait in the elderly: A contemporary review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019;4(1):143-153. [CrossRef]
- Kim IJ, Hegazy F. Enhancing Footwear Safety for Fall Prevention in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Review of Design Features. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2024;28(2):121-133. [CrossRef]
- Campani D, Caristia S, Amariglio A, et al. Home and environmental hazards modification for fall prevention among the elderly. Public Health Nurs. 2021;38(3):493-501. [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, D.M., Larson, J.L. & Zikmund-Fisher, B.J. Associations between health literacy and preventive health behaviors among older adults: findings from the health and retirement study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16: 596. [CrossRef]
- Ning, L., Niu, J., Bi, X. et al. The impacts of knowledge, risk perception, emotion and information on citizens’ protective behaviors during the outbreak of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20:1751. [CrossRef]
- Ahmad K. Older adults’ social support and its effect on their everyday self-maintenance activities: Findings from the household survey of urban Lahore-Pakistan. South Asian Studies. 2020 Apr 9;26(1).
- Kim, S.; Kim, S. Analysis of the Impact of Health Beliefs and Resource Factors on Preventive Behaviors against the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020, 17: 8666. [CrossRef]
- Galasso V., Pons V., Profeta P., Becher M., Brouard S., Foucacult M. Gender differences in COVID-19 attitude and behavior: Panel evidence from eight countries. PNAS. 2020; 117 (44): 27285-27291.
- Mary P. Gallant, Gail P. Dorn, Gender and race differences in the predictors of daily health practices among older adults , Health Education Research. 2001, 16 (1):21–31. [CrossRef]
- Montero-Odasso MM, Kamkar N, Pieruccini-Faria F, et al. Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Fall Prevention and Management for Older Adults: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12):e2138911. [CrossRef]
- Sherrington C, Fairhall N, Wallbank G, et al. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community: an abridged Cochrane systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020;54:885-891.
- Papalia GF, Papalia R, Diaz Balzani LA, Torre G, Zampogna B, Vasta S, Fossati C, Alifano AM, Denaro V. The Effects of Physical Exercise on Balance and Prevention of Falls in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(8):2595. [CrossRef]
- Santana S., Brach C., Harris L., Ochiai E., Blakey C., Bevington F., et al. Updating Health Literacy for Healthy People 2030: Defining Its Importance for a New Decade in Public Health. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2021; 27(Supplement 6): S258-S264.
Table 1.
characteristics of participants in the study.
Table 1.
characteristics of participants in the study.
Variables |
Female (n=309) |
Male (n=650 |
All (n=374) |
Education |
|
|
|
- Primary school |
178 (57.6%) |
40 (61.5%) |
218 (58.3%) |
- Secondary school |
42 (13.6%) |
10 (15.4%) |
52 (13.9%) |
- High school |
54 (17.5%) |
10 (15.4%) |
64 (17.1%) |
- Higher than high school |
35 (11.3%) |
5 (7.7%) |
40 (0.7%) |
History of illness |
|
|
|
- no |
107 (34.6%) |
21 (32.3%) |
128 (34.2%) |
- having NCD |
202 (65.4%) |
44 (67.7%) |
246 (65.8%) |
History of falling |
|
|
|
- no |
204 (66.0%) |
50 (76.9%) |
254 (67.9%) |
- Having failing |
105 (34.0%) |
15 (23.1%) |
120 (32.1%) |
Knowledge of fall prevention |
|
|
|
- good |
287 (92.9%) |
59 (90.8%) |
346 (92.5%) |
- Fair and poor |
22 (7.1%) |
6 (9.2%) |
28 (7.5%) |
Perceived severity |
|
|
|
- good |
289 (93.5%) |
61 (93.8%) |
350 (93.6%) |
- Fair and poor |
20 (6.5%) |
4 (6.2%) |
24 (6.4%) |
Perceived susceptibility |
|
|
|
- good |
289 (93.5%) |
61 (93.8%) |
350 (93.6%) |
- Fair and poor |
20 (6.5%) |
4 (6.2%) |
24 (6.4%) |
Perceived benefits |
|
|
|
- good |
289 (93.5%) |
61 (93.8%) |
350 (93.6%) |
- Fair and poor |
20 (6.5%) |
4 (6.2%) |
24 (6.4%) |
Perceived barriers |
|
|
|
- good |
289 (93.5%) |
61 (93.8%) |
350 (93.6%) |
- Fair and poor |
20 (6.5%) |
4 (6.2%) |
24 (6.4%) |
Sufficient information |
253 (81.9%) |
45 (69.2%) |
298 (79.7%) |
Good social support |
228 (73.8%) |
36 (55.4%) |
264 (70.6%) |
Fall prevention behaviors |
|
|
|
- Good |
302 (97.7%) |
59 (90.8%) |
361 (96.5%) |
- Moderate and poor |
7 (2.3%) |
6 (9.2%) |
13 (3.5%) |
Table 2.
factors association to fall prevention behaviors among older adults in dwelling community.
Table 2.
factors association to fall prevention behaviors among older adults in dwelling community.
variables |
Fall prevention behaviors |
OR (95%CI) |
P-value |
good |
fair/poor |
Gender |
|
|
|
|
- male |
59 (90.8%) |
6 (9.2%) |
ref. |
|
- female |
302 (97.7%) |
7 (2.3%) |
4.39 (1.42-13.52) |
0.01* |
Education |
|
|
|
|
- Primary school |
213 (97.7%) |
5 (2.3%) |
ref. |
|
- Higher than Primary school |
148 (94.9%) |
8 (5.1%) |
0.43 (0.14-1.35) |
0.15 |
History of illness |
|
|
|
|
- no |
123 (96.1%) |
5 (3.9%) |
0.83 (0.27-2.58) |
> 0.05 |
- having NCD |
238 (96.7%) |
8 (3.3%) |
ref. |
|
History of falling |
|
|
|
|
- no |
244 (96.1%) |
10 (3.9%) |
1.60 (0.43-5.92) |
> 0.05 |
- Having failing |
117 (97.5%) |
3 (2.5%) |
ref. |
|
Knowledge of fall prevention |
|
|
|
|
- good |
338 (97.7%) |
8 (2.3%) |
9.185 (2.78-30.38) |
<0.01* |
- Fair and poor |
8 (2.3%) |
5 (17.9%) |
ref. |
|
Perceived severity |
|
|
|
|
- good |
342 (97.7%) |
8 (2.3%) |
11.25 (3.36-37.69) |
<0.01* |
- Fair and poor |
19 (79.2%) |
5 (20.8%) |
ref. |
|
Perceived susceptibility |
|
|
|
|
- good |
342 (97.7%) |
8 (2.3%) |
11.25 (3.36-37.69) |
<0.01* |
- Fair and poor |
19 (79.2%) |
5 (20.8%) |
ref. |
|
Perceived benefits |
|
|
|
|
- good |
342 (97.7%) |
8 (2.3%) |
11.25 (3.36-37.69) |
<0.01* |
- Fair and poor |
19 (79.2%) |
5 (20.8%) |
ref. |
|
Perceived barriers |
|
|
|
|
- good |
342 (97.7%) |
8 (2.3%) |
11.25 (3.36-37.69) |
<0.01* |
- Fair and poor |
19 (79.2%) |
5 (20.8%) |
ref. |
|
Information sufficiency |
|
|
|
|
- Sufficient information |
292 (98.0%) |
6 (2.0%) |
4.94 (1.61-15.16) |
<0.01* |
- Insufficient information |
69 (90.8%) |
7 (9.2%) |
ref. |
|
Good social support |
|
|
|
|
- Good |
259 (98.1%) |
102 (92.7%) |
4.06 (1.30-12.71) |
0.02* |
- Moderate/poor |
5 (1.9%) |
8 (7.3%) |
ref. |
|
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).