Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Influence of Riemann Space-time Curvature on the Laws of Electromagnetism

Altmetrics

Downloads

87

Views

56

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Optimisation, Optimal Control and Nonlinear Dynamics in Electrical Power, Energy Storage and Renewable Energy Systems, 2nd Edition

Submitted:

27 September 2024

Posted:

30 September 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
In this paper, we focus on the influence of Riemann space-time curvature on the laws of electromagnetism, such as Gauss’s law, Maxwell-Amp´ere’s law, and Faraday’s law. Furthermore, we also introduce the work done on the unification of the gravitation and electromagnetic fields.
Keywords: 
Subject: Physical Sciences  -   Theoretical Physics

1. Electromagnetism in Curved Space-time

The background space-time curvature of the geometry influences the electromagnetic fields [35,36,37]. Here, we consider the electromagnetic fields in a curved space-time geometry; however, we will ignore the influence of the electromagnetic field on the space-time geometry, which is discussed in the next section. For that, we describe the electromagnetic field equations, derived from the action principle.
The covariant derivative of the electromagnetic field covariant vector potential A μ (or contravariant vector A μ ) in the torsionless space-time manifold is
D ν A μ = ∇ ν A μ D ν A μ = ∇ ν A μ
and hence, the anti-symmetric part of the connection, Γ σ ν μ A σ = 0 . Thus, the field strength tensor in covariant form is:
F μ ν = D μ A ν − D ν A μ = ∇ μ A ν − ∇ ν A μ
and its contravariant form is
F μ ν = D μ A ν − D ν A μ = ∇ μ A ν − ∇ ν A μ
Furthermore, the electric and magnetic fields of the electromagnetic field components are given as follows:
F 0 i = ∇ 0 A i − ∇ i A 0 = E i c = − E i c F i j = ∇ i A j − ∇ j A i = − B i j = − ε k i j B k
Thus, F μ ν are the components of the electromagnetic field strength 2-form F and A μ are the components of the electromagnetic field potential 1-form A . On the other hand [21], the electric field vector E is related to the line integrand, and hence it is represented by a covector or a 1-form in three-dimensional space; the magnetic field vector B is related to surface and it is represented by a 2-form with components B i j that are expressed in terms of the contravariant components of the density vector B k being surface integrands:
B i j = ε k i j B k
The Maxwell’s equations are written as
∇ · D = ρ ∇ × E = − ∂ B ∂ t ∇ · B = 0 ∇ × H = J + ∂ D ∂ t
which are equivalent to conservation laws of charge and magnetic flux. These equations, under the influence of the curved space-time geometry, are written in terms of covariant derivative as
D μ F μ ν = μ 0 J ν D μ F ν α + D ν F α μ + D α F μ ν = 0
Besides, it is required that
D σ g μ ν = 0
Note that Eq. (8) indicates that during the covariant differentiation the metric tensor components g μ ν can be considered a constant.
The actions of the covariant and contravariant derivatives on a vector can be written as
D ν A μ = ∇ ν A μ + A σ Γ μ σ ν D ν A μ = ∇ ν A μ + A σ Γ σ ν μ D μ = g μ ν ( x ) D ν
where Γ σ ν μ is the space-time connection, the so-called Christoffel’s symbols, and x is a vector characterising x μ point in the space-time. Besides, the actions of the covariant derivative on the second-rank tensors are determined as
D μ F σ ν = ∇ μ F σ ν + Γ λ μ σ F λ ν + Γ λ μ ν F σ λ D μ F σ ν = ∇ μ F σ ν + Γ σ μ λ F λ ν + Γ ν μ λ F σ λ
For that, the general form of the covariant derivative of the anti-symmetric electromagnetic field strength tensor F μ ν in Riemann curved space-time is used, given as
D μ F μ ν = 1 − g ∇ μ − g F μ ν Γ μ ν σ = ∇ μ ln − g
Combining Eq. (7) and Eq. (11), we obtain
∇ μ F μ ν + 1 − g ∇ μ − g F μ ν = μ 0 J ν
Therefore,
g σ μ g λ ν ∇ μ F σ λ + F σ λ ∇ μ g λ ν g σ μ + g σ μ g λ ν 1 − g ∇ μ − g = μ 0 J ν
where the following relations were used:
F μ ν = g σ μ g λ ν F σ λ ∇ μ F μ ν = ∇ μ g σ μ g λ ν F σ λ + g λ ν g σ μ ( ∇ μ F σ λ )
In terms of the components of the electric and magnetic fields, Eq. (13) can be written as
1 c ∇ μ E i g 0 μ g i ν − g i μ g 0 ν + 1 c E i × ∇ μ g 0 μ g i ν − g i μ g 0 ν + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g 0 μ g i ν − g i μ g 0 ν − ε k l m ∇ μ B k g l μ g m ν − ε k l m B k × ∇ μ g l μ g m ν + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g l μ g m ν = μ 0 J ν
where J ν = ( ρ c , J ) (with ρ being the charge density and J = ρ v the current density, where c is the speed of light in vacuum and v velocity vector in three-dimensional space.)
For ν = 0 , Eq. (15) can be written as
∇ μ E i g 0 μ g i 0 − g i μ g 00 + E i ∇ μ g 0 μ g i 0 − g i μ g 00 + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g 0 μ g i 0 − g i μ g 00 − c ε k l m ∇ μ B k g l μ g m 0 − c ε k l m B k × ∇ μ g l μ g m 0 + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g l μ g m 0 = μ 0 ρ c 2 = ρ ϵ 0
where the relation c 2 = 1 / ( μ 0 ϵ 0 ) is used. Note that Eq. (16) is the generalisation of Gauss’s law of Maxwell’s equations in Minkowski (flat) space-time for the case of Riemann (curved) space-time. Interestingly, this equation is showing some new phenomena of the electromagnetism in the presence of the gravitational fields modifying the curvature of the space-time. For instance, in the absence of charges (that is, ρ = 0 ), a magnetic field (including a static magnetic field) creates an electric field. Furthermore, in the case of the weak gravitational fields, when the off-diagonal elements of metric tensor are zero, the magnetic field cancels out of Eq. (16). In particular, for g 0 i = g i 0 = g i j = 0 (for i ≠ j ), we get
− g j j g 00 ∇ j E j − E j g j j g 00 1 − g ∇ j − g + ∇ j g j j g 00 = ρ ϵ 0
From Eq. (17), for the Riemann space-time geometries for which the second term is non-zero, then the electric field in vacuum (that is, ρ = 0 ) is non-vanishing and it is necessary non-uniform. Therefore, the curvature of the space-time introduces a spatial change on the electric field in vacuum, even for weak gravitational fields. Furthermore, in the case of Minkowski space-time (that is, g 00 = 1 and g j j = − 1 ), Eq. (17) reduces to the first Maxwell’s equation, ∇ · E = ρ / ϵ 0 .
For ν = 1 , 2 , 3 , we obtain the generalisation of Maxwell-Ampére’s law in the Riemann’s curved space-time. In particular, from Eq. (15), for ν ≡ j = 1 , 2 , 3 , we obtain
1 c ∇ μ E i g 0 μ g i j − g i μ g 0 j + 1 c E i × ∇ μ g 0 μ g i j − g i μ g 0 j + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g 0 μ g i j − g i μ g 0 j − ε k l m ∇ μ B k g l μ g m j − ε k l m B k × ∇ μ g l μ g m j + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g l μ g m j = μ 0 J j
For the case of the weak gravitational fields (i.e., g 0 i = g i 0 = 0 ), we obtain
1 c ∇ 0 E i g 00 g i j + 1 c E i ∇ 0 g 00 g i j + 1 − g ∇ 0 − g g 00 g i j − ε k l m ∇ n B k g l n g m j − ε k l m B k × ∇ n g l n g m j + 1 − g ∇ n − g g l n g m j = μ 0 J j
Or,
1 c ∇ 0 E i g 00 g i j + 1 c E i ∇ 0 g 00 g i j + 1 − g ∇ 0 − g g 00 g i j − ∇ n B l m g l n g m j − B l m × ∇ n g l n g m j + 1 − g ∇ n − g g l n g m j = μ 0 J j
where the following relation is used
B l m = ε l m k B k
which transforms the electromagnetic vector field to the corresponding 2-form. Thus, Eq. (20) becomes
1 c 2 g 00 g i j ∇ t E i + 1 c 2 E i ∇ t g 00 g i j + 1 − g ∇ t − g g 00 g i j − g l n g m j ∇ n B l m − B l m ∇ n g l n g m j + 1 − g ∇ n − g g l n g m j = μ 0 J j
where the following relation is used
∇ 0 = ∂ ∂ x 0 = ∂ ∂ ( c t ) = 1 c ∂ ∂ t = 1 c ∇ t
Next, we consider a metric with vanishing the off-diagonal elements (i.e., g i j = 0 , for i ≠ j ), and Eq. (22) reduces to
1 c 2 g 00 g j j ∇ t E j + 1 c 2 E j ∇ t g 00 g j j + 1 − g ∇ t − g g 00 g j j − g l l g j j ∇ l B l j − B l j ∇ l g l l g j j + 1 − g ∇ l − g g l l g j j = μ 0 J j
Or,
− ε l j k g l l g j j ∇ l B k − ε l j k B k ∇ l g l l g j j + 1 − g ∇ l − g g l l g j j = μ 0 J j + μ 0 ϵ 0 − g 00 g j j ∇ t E j + μ 0 ϵ 0 E j ∇ t − g 00 g j j − 1 − g ∇ t − g g 00 g j j
Interestingly, Eq. (25) indicates that the coupling between the magnetic and electric fields does not vanish from Maxwell-Ampére’s law, even for weak gravitational fields and diagonal Riemann metric, in contrast to Gauss’s law. Furthermore, if the geometry is time-independent, then Eq. (25) reduces to
− ε l j k g l l g j j ∇ l B k − ε l j k B k ∇ l g l l g j j + 1 − g ∇ l − g g l l g j j = μ 0 J j + μ 0 ϵ 0 − g 00 g j j ∇ t E j
because ∇ t − g 00 g j j − 1 − g ∇ t − g g 00 g j j = 0 . However, the time derivative term of electric field does not cancel out (to cancel this term out, a time-varying charge density is required based on Gauss’s law). For time-varying space-time geometry, both terms on the right-hand side of Eq. (26), because a non-stationary space-time geometry, will certainly induce a time-varying electric field (based on Gauss’s law). Furthermore, the gravitational waves will directly influence the magnetic fields. If we introduce a generalised charge current density as
J j = − g J j
a generalised displacement current as
J D j = ϵ 0 − g − g 00 g j j ∇ t E j − E j ∇ t g 00 g j j − 1 − g ∇ t − g g 00 g j j
and by introducing the following five-dimensional object
B l l j j k = − g g l l g j j B k
then Eq. (26) takes the form of the generalised Maxwell-Ampére’s law as
ε l j k ∇ l B l l j j k = μ 0 ( J j + J D j )
Therefore, in the absence of the currents (that is, J = 0 ), the electric field can be the source of the magnetic field, where an extra contribution is added from the displacement current that is induced by the time-varying space-time geometry. For stationary space-time geometry that contribution is zero; however, for high frequency gravitational waves (strongly varying waves), that contribution might be significant.
The homogeneous equations of the electromagnetic fields are expressed as follows:
0 = D μ F ν α + D ν F α μ + D α F μ ν = ∇ μ F ν α + Γ ν μ σ F σ α + Γ α μ σ F ν σ + ∇ ν F α μ + Γ α ν σ F σ μ + Γ μ ν σ F α σ + ∇ α F μ ν + Γ μ α σ F σ ν + Γ ν α σ F μ σ
Thus, for a torsionless manifold, as it is the case of Riemann space-time geometry, we get
∇ μ F ν α + ∇ ν F α μ + ∇ α F μ ν = 0
Eq. (31) indicates that the homogeneous equations of the electromagnetic fields are not influenced by the curvature of Riemann’s space-time, and hence they are equivalent to Faraday’s law (for μ = 1 , 2 , 3 ) and Gauss’s law for magnetic field (for μ = 0 ):
∇ t B i = − ε i j k ∇ j E k ∇ j B j = 0
where the summation of repeating indices is assumed.

1.1. Equation of Electromagnetic Field Potential Wave

In the following, the inhomogeneous equations will be expressed in terms of the electromagnetic field 4-potential, namely A μ . For that, the covariant derivative of field strength tensor is
D μ F μ ν = D μ D μ A ν − g σ ν D μ , D σ A μ + D σ D μ A μ
where
D μ , D σ = D μ D σ − D σ D μ
Furthermore,
D μ , D σ A ν = R λ μ σ ν A λ
where R λ μ σ ν are the components of Riemann tensor. Therefore, we obtain Maxwell’s equation in the following form:
D μ D μ A ν − g σ ν R λ σ A λ − D ν ( D μ A μ ) = μ 0 J ν
where R λ σ is Ricci tensor
R λ σ = R λ μ σ μ
Using Lorentz condition for the electromagnetic field potential in the curved space-time:
D μ A μ = 1 − g ∇ μ − g A μ = 0
we obtain the following
D μ D μ A ν − g σ ν R λ σ A λ = μ 0 J ν
The formula of generalised Laplacian in the curved space-time is
D μ D μ Φ = 1 − g ∇ μ − g g μ σ ∇ σ Φ
Combining Eq. (40) and Eq. (41), we get
∇ μ ∇ μ A ν + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g μ σ ∇ σ A ν − g σ ν R λ σ A λ = μ 0 J ν
Using the relationship with Christoffel’s symbol for Riemann’s space-time geometry:
1 − g ∇ μ − g g μ σ = − g μ ν Γ μ ν σ
Eq. (42) can also be written as follows:
∇ μ ∇ μ A ν − g μ ν Γ μ ν σ ∇ σ A ν − g σ ν R λ σ A λ = μ 0 J ν
Consider a diagonal metric in vacuum (that is, J ν = 0 ), Eq. (42) reduces to
∇ μ ∇ μ A ν + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g μ μ ∇ μ A ν − g ν ν R λ ν A λ = 0
Thus, the 4-potential components of the electromagnetic field are coupled in either Eq. (42) or Eq. (45), which is not the case of Minkowski flat space-time geometry. Furthermore, Eq. (45) indicates that even when Ricci’s tensor components are zero, there will be a coupling between the components of the 4-potential of the electromagnetic field. Therefore, these results indicate that presence of the geometry dependent terms for the gravitational fields suggests new phenomena may arise for electromagnetism under the influence of space-time curvature.

1.2. Equations of Electromagnetic Waves

Using the electromagnetic field equations in vacuum ( J μ = 0 ), we write
D μ F μ ν = ∇ μ F μ ν + 1 − g ∇ μ − g F μ ν = 0 D μ F α β + D α F β μ + D β F μ α = 0
These two equations are gauge invariant.
First, consider the first expression in Eq. (46) for ν ≡ j = 1 , 2 , 3 (which is Maxwell-Ampére’s law). Then using Eq. (19) for J j = 0 (that is, vacuum), we obtain:
1 c ∇ μ E i g 0 μ g i j − g i μ g 0 j + 1 c E i × ∇ μ g 0 μ g i j − g i μ g 0 j + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g 0 μ g i j − g i μ g 0 j − ε k l m ∇ μ B k g l μ g m j − ε k l m B k × ∇ μ g l μ g m j + 1 − g ∇ μ − g g l μ g m j = 0
For weak gravitational fields (i.e., g 0 i = g i 0 = 0 ) with a diagonal metric (i.e., g i j = 0 for i ≠ j ), from Eq. (47), we obtain
1 c 2 g 00 g j j ∇ t E j + 1 c 2 E j ∇ t g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g g 00 g j j = ε l j k g l l g j j ∇ l B k + ε l j k B k ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j
where the following identity is used
1 − g ∇ t − g = ∇ t ln − g
Taking the time derivative of both sides of Eq. (48), we get
1 c 2 g 00 g j j ∇ t t 2 E j + 1 c 2 ( ∇ t E j ) 2 ∇ t g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g g 00 g j j + 1 c 2 E j ∇ t t 2 g 00 g j j + ∇ t t 2 ln − g g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g ∇ t g 00 g j j = ε l j k ∇ t g l l g j j ∇ l B k + ε l j k g l l g j j ∇ l ∇ t B k + ε l j k ( ∇ t B k ) ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j + ε l j k B k ∇ l t 2 g l l g j j + ∇ l t 2 ln − g g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g ∇ t g l l g j j
Using Faraday’s law in the following form
− ε m n k ∇ m E n = ∇ t B k
and the mathematical identity
ε l j k ε m n k = δ l m δ j n − δ l n δ j m
then, we have
ε l j k g l l g j j ∇ l ∇ t B k = − ε l j k g l l g j j ε m n k ∇ l ∇ m E n = − δ l m δ j n g l l g j j ∇ l ∇ m E n + δ l n δ j m g l l g j j ∇ l ∇ m E n = − g m m g n n ∇ m ∇ m E n + g n n g m j ∇ n ∇ m E n = − g n n ∇ m ∇ m E n = − g j j ∇ k ∇ k E j
where g m j = 0 , g m m ∇ m = ∇ m , and E j = g k j E k are used.
Furthermore,
ε l j k ( ∇ t B k ) ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j = ε l j k ( − ε m n k ∇ m E n ) ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j = ( − δ l m δ j n + δ l n δ j m ) ∇ m E n ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j = − ∇ m E n ∇ l g m l g n j + ∇ l ln − g g m l g n j + ∇ m E n ∇ l g n l g m j + ∇ l ln − g g n l g m j = 0
where g m l = g n j = g n l = g m j = 0 is used.
Using Gauss’s law in vacuum ( ρ = 0 ), from Eq. (18), we write
g j j g k k ∇ k E k − g j j g 00 E k a k ( x ) = 0
where
a k ( x ) = − g k k g 00 ∇ k ln − g + ∇ k g k k g 00
which is a function of the space-time point.
Taking the derivative ∇ j of both sides and summing for j = 1 , 2 , 3 , we obtain
∇ j ( g j j g k k ) ∇ k E k + g j j g k k ∇ j ∇ k E k + ( ∇ j g j j g 00 ) a k E k + g j j g 00 a k ∇ j E k + g j j g 00 ( ∇ j a k ) E k = 0
Or,
∇ j ( g j j g k k ) + g j j g k k ∇ j ∇ k E k + ( ∇ j g j j g 00 ) a k + g j j g 00 ( ∇ j a k ) E k + g j j g 00 a k ∇ j E k = 0
Combining Eq. (50), Eq. (53), Eq. (54), and Eq. (58) we obtain
g j j g 00 c 2 ∇ t t 2 E j + ∇ k ∇ k E j = α j j ∇ t E j + η j k k ∇ k E k + θ j j k ∇ j E k + β j j E j + ψ j k E k + γ k j l ∇ l B k + σ k j B k
where
α j j = − 1 c 2 ( ∇ t E j ) 2 ∇ t g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g g 00 g j j β j j = − 1 c 2 ∇ t t 2 g 00 g j j + ∇ t t 2 ln − g g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g ∇ t g 00 g j j γ k j l = − ε l j k ∇ t g l l g j j σ k j = − ε l j k ∇ l t 2 g l l g j j + ∇ l t 2 ln − g g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g ∇ t g l l g j j η j k k = ∇ j ( g j j g k k ) + g j j g k k ∇ j θ j j k = g j j g 00 a k ψ j k = ( ∇ j g j j g 00 ) a k + g j j g 00 ∇ j a k
Eq. (53) represents the wave equation of the electric field in a curved space-time geometry. It can be seen that is not a homogeneous second order differential equation, as derived for the flat space-time geometry. The presence of non-vanishing terms on the right-hand side indicates the influence of the space-time curvature on the electric field polarisation. Furthermore, the wave equation of the electric field is not independent on the magnetic field, even in the case of stationary space-time curvature indicating that the electromagnetic wave is a mixture of transverse and longitudinal waves, which is in contrast to Lorentz flat space-time geometry.
The following steps can be taken to derive the wave equation for magnetic field. From homogeneous electromagnetic equation in Eq. (46), for μ = 0 , we obtain
ε k l j ∇ l E j = − ∇ t B k
Taking the derivative for time t of both sides in Eq. (61), we will get
ε k l j ∇ t ∇ l E j = − ∇ t t 2 B k
Furthermore,
∇ t ∇ l E j = ε l j k ∇ t t 2 B k
Taking the derivative ∇ l in both sides of Eq. (48) and summing for l = 1 , 2 , 3 , we obtain
1 c 2 ∇ l ( g 00 g j j ) ( ∇ t E j ) + 1 c 2 g 00 g j j ∇ t ∇ l E j + 1 c 2 ( ∇ l E j ) ∇ t g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g g 00 g j j + 1 c 2 E j ∇ l ∇ t g 00 g j j + ∇ l ∇ t ln − g g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g ∇ l g 00 g j j = ε l j k ( ∇ l g l l g j j ) ∇ l B k + ε l j k g l l g j j ∇ l ∇ l B k + ε l j k ∇ l B k ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j + ε l j k B k ∇ l ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g ∇ l g l l g j j
Substituting Eq. (63) into Eq. (64), we get
1 c 2 ∇ l ( g 00 g j j ) ( ∇ t E j ) + ε l j k g 00 c 2 g j j ∇ t t 2 B k + 1 c 2 ( ∇ l E j ) ∇ t g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g g 00 g j j + 1 c 2 E j ∇ l ∇ t g 00 g j j + ∇ l ∇ t ln − g g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g ∇ l g 00 g j j = ε l j k ( ∇ l g l l g j j ) ∇ l B k + ε l j k g j j ∇ l ∇ l B k + ε l j k ∇ l B k ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j + ε l j k B k ∇ l ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g ∇ l g l l g j j
Or,
g j j g 00 c 2 ∇ t t 2 B k + ∇ l ∇ l B k = A j j l ∇ l B k + C j j B k + D j j j k ∇ t E j + F l j j j k ∇ l E j + M j j j k E j
where
A j j l = − 2 ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j C j j = − ∇ l ∇ l g l l g j j + ∇ l ∇ l ln − g g l l g j j + ∇ l ln − g ∇ l g l l g j j D j j j k = − ε l j k 1 c 2 ∇ l ( g 00 g j j ) F l j j j k = − ε l j k 1 c 2 ∇ t g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g g 00 g j j M j j j k = − ε l j k 1 c 2 ∇ l ∇ t g 00 g j j + ∇ l ∇ t ln − g g 00 g j j + ∇ t ln − g ∇ l g 00 g j j
Eq. (66) represents the wave equation of the magnetic field in a curved space-time geometry. Again, it is not a homogeneous second order differential equation, in contrast to the wave equation derived for the flat space-time geometry. The presence of non-vanishing terms on the right-hand side indicates the influence of the space-time curvature on the magnetic field. Furthermore, the wave equation of the magnetic field is coupled to the electric field, even in the case of stationary space-time curvature indicating that the electromagnetic wave is a mixture of transverse and longitudinal waves, which is in contrast to Lorentz flat space-time geometry.

2. On Unification of Gravitation and Electromagnetism in Framework of General Relativity

2.1. System of Discrete Point-like Particles

Consider a system of discrete relativistic non-interacting point-like particles with a rest mass of m i . The mass density at the position r can be given as
ρ ( r ) = ∑ i m i δ r − r i
where r i denotes the position of the i-th particle at some reference frame and δ ( ⋯ ) is the delta-function. Furthermore, the 4-momentum density can be defined as
p μ = ρ u μ , μ = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3
where u μ is the 4-velocity, u μ = ( γ c , γ v ); therefore,
p μ = γ ρ c , γ ρ v = ε c , p
where ε is the relativistic particle energy density and p is the relativistic three-dimensional momentum density vector.
We propose the following scalar form of Lagrangian density function:
− g L = − 1 γ ρ g α β u α u β = − 1 γ g α β u α p β
where the summation of repeating indices is assumed.
The energy-momentum density tensor of the system is
G μ ν = 1 γ u μ p ν
The spatial components of the energy-momentum density tensor are given as
G 0 i = 1 γ u 0 p i = 1 γ ρ u 0 u i = c p i = c p i G i j = 1 γ u i p j = 1 γ ρ u i u j
where p i is the Cartesian component of the relativistic three-dimensional momentum density vector and p i is the contravariant component.
From Eq. 73, it can be seen that the energy-momentum density tensor is symmetric; that is, G 0 i = G i 0 and G i j = G j i . Moreover, the zeroth component (which equals the energy density) is given as
G 00 = 1 γ u 0 p 0 = ε
where ε is the relativistic energy density given as
ε = γ ρ c 2 = ρ c 2 1 − v 2 c 2
Here,
ε 0 = ρ c 2
is the rest energy density.
Now, consider a system of discrete relativistic non-interacting point-like particles with charges q i , then the charge density at the position r will be as
ρ e ( r ) = ∑ i q i δ r − r i
The 4-current charge density is defined as
J μ = ρ e c , ρ e v , μ = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3
and its covariant form is
J μ = ρ e c , − ρ e v , μ = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3
We propose the following scalar form of Lagrangian density function for this system:
− g L = − κ e ρ e g α β u α u β = − κ e g α β J α u β
We obtain the energy-momentum density tensor as
T μ ν = κ e J μ u ν
The spatial components of the energy-momentum density tensor due to the current charges are written as
T q 0 i = κ e J 0 u i = γ κ e ρ e c v i T q i j = κ e J i u j = γ κ e ρ e v i v j
where κ e is a scaling factor [11]
κ e = 4 π G / s 2 κ = c 4 2 G s 2
where s = 1 and its SI unit is m2/s2.
Similarly, see also Eq. 82, the energy-momentum density tensor is symmetric; that is, T q 0 i = T q i 0 and T q i j = T q j i . The zeroth component is given as
T q 00 = γ κ e ρ e c 2
Note that in Eq. 84 the term T q 00 equals some relativistic charge energy density, similar to the relativistic energy density of the mass (see also Eq. 74). Therefore, the presence of the charge and current density of the matter in the Riemann space-time deforms the space-time [11], similar to the presence of mass. Here, T q μ ν are the energy-momentum density tensor components of the deformable charged medium, which depends on the velocity v and charge density ρ e .

2.2. Macroscopic Masses

For the ideal fluid of non-charged masses, the energy-momentum density tensor is also defined by G μ ν (or G μ ν ) [4,5,6,7]. The macroscopic mass is considered continuous bodies. The flux of momentum through an element d A of the surface of the mass equals the force on that surface element. Therefore, the ith component of the force vector acting on the surface element is
F i = σ i j d A i
In a reference frame in which a volume element is at rest, using the Pascal’s law, the pressure P is equal in all directions and it is perpendicular to the surface element, and thus
σ i j d A i = P d A i
Therefore, the stress tensor is
σ i j = P δ i j
Thus, in the reference frame in which the macroscopic body is at rest, Lagrangian density function is suggested as
− g L = − P
and in any arbitrary reference frame as
− g L = − ρ + P c 2 g α β u α u β − P
We find that the energy-momentum density tensor of the macroscopic mass in an arbitrary reference frame is
G μ ν = ρ + P c 2 u μ u ν + g μ ν P
where ρ is the mass density of macroscopic mass distribution and P is the pressure. In Eq. 85, g μ ν is the metric tensor of Riemann space-time. The zeroth component is
G 00 = ρ + P c 2 γ 2 c 2 + g 00 P = γ 2 ρ c 2 + γ 2 P + g 00 P = γ ε + P γ 2 + g 00
where ε is the relativistic energy density. Eq. 86 indicates that G 00 > 0 , as expected.
The other components are given as
G 0 i = ρ + P c 2 γ 2 c v i + g 0 i P = c p i = S i c , i = 1 , 2 , 3
where p i is the ith 4-momentum density component
p i = γ 2 ε 0 + P v i c 2 + g 0 i P c
and S is energy density flow vector:
S i = γ 2 ε 0 + P v i + g 0 i c P
where ε 0 is the rest energy density, ε 0 = ρ c 2 .
Introducing, the three-dimensional components of the stress density tensor as follows:
σ i j = γ 2 ε 0 + P v i v j c 2 + P g i j
then,
G i j = γ 2 ε 0 + P v i v j c 2 + P g i j = σ i j
In general, the covariant form of the energy-momentum density tensor of the macroscopic body is
G μ ν = 1 c 2 ε 0 + P u μ u ν + P g μ ν
and its contravariant form is
G μ ν = 1 c 2 ε 0 + P u μ u ν + P g μ ν
where the metric of the space-time is Riemann metric tensor of the curved space-time geometry. In a mixed-tensor form, we can write
G ν μ = 1 c 2 ε 0 + P u μ u ν + P δ ν μ
Besides, if there is an electromagnetic field present in the matter, then we will discuss two different approaches. In the first approach, the energy-momentum density tensor of the electromagnetic field contributes to the total energy-momentum density tensor of the matter, which is given as follows
T μ ν = G μ ν + T q μ ν + T EM μ ν
where the space-time curvature of Riemann geometry is determined by the gravitational field.
In Eq. 100, T EM μ ν is energy-momentum density tensor of the electromagnetic field, which is calculated by taking Lagrangian density function as
− g L = − 1 4 μ 0 F α β F α β
We obtain the energy-momentum density tensor of the electromagnetic field:
T 00 = ϵ 0 E 2 2 + B 2 2 μ 0 T 0 i = 1 c μ 0 ( E × B ) i = 1 c ( E × H ) i = S i c T i j = − ϵ 0 E i E j + c 2 B i B j − 1 2 δ i j E 2 + c 2 B 2
In Eq. 100, T EM μ ν is the energy-momentum density tensor of electromagnetic field:
T EM μ ν = 1 μ 0 g μ α F α β F β ν + 1 4 μ 0 g μ ν F α β F α β
In this case, however, the Maxwell’s laws (such as Gauss’s laws for electric and magnetic fields, Faraday’s law, and Maxwell-Ampére’s law) must be revised due the space-time curvature caused by gravitational field, which will be described in a future work.
In the second approach (see also Refs. [13,14,15]), one can introduce a joint space-time, which is a result of both gravitational and electromagnetic fields, characterised by the joint metric tensor of space-time curvature g ˜ μ ν and joint manifold connection symbols Γ μ ν ν . In this case, the total energy-momentum density tensor of the matter is
T μ ν = G μ ν + T q μ ν
The covariant form is:
κ − 1 Λ g μ ν = T μ ν − κ − 1 G μ ν
T μ ν gives the energy-momentum density tensor of the matter, which may includes the mass distribution and they current of charges in matter. κ − 1 Λ g μ ν is the total energy-momentum density tensor; and − κ − 1 G μ ν gives the energy-momentum density tensor of the gravitation field only. That is the viewpoint of the un-unified theory of the gravitation and electromagnetic fields.
Furthermore, there is an essential difference between the − κ − 1 G μ ν , which represents the storage of gravitation field energy and momentum density surrounding the masses, and the gravitational potential energy, which expresses the interaction energy between the masses, and hence it represents the interaction forces between the masses and it depends on the mass distribution. Therefore, their physical origin is completely different. The gravitational field energy and momentum distribution (which is the reality) is represented by the curvature of the space-time described by the Riemann metric tensor g μ ν ( x σ ) a function of the space-time point x σ (which is a picture of that reality). Besides, both can not be localised in space; thus, to obtain both, one has to integrate overall space. Moreover, the gravitational potential energy density is always negative and it vanishes in the empty space-time.
On the other hand, the gravitation field energy density is always negative inside the matter, and outside it depends on the metric used; for instance, for some metrics, it is positive and thus the cosmological constant Λ > 0 . Λ is a constant parameter, which depends on the metric d s 2 [7,26], and it is proportional to the total energy density concerning the metric under consideration. Λ is positive concerning Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric (de Sitter space), see also Ref. [18]; however, Λ is negative for the metric of the celestial body (anti-de Sitter space). Thus, the cosmological constant Λ is connected to the cosmology in the universe under the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric. In the case of Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric, the cosmological constant has a value of Λ = 1.1056 × 10 − 52 m − 2 . In contrast, κ is a universal constant, and hence it is the same constant in every reference frame.
One can also think about the electromagnetic field energy (which is a reality) and the electromagnetic interactions between the currents and the electromagnetic field; in this view, the electromagnetic field energy represents the energy stored around the space of the sources that created it, and the electromagnetic potential energy represents the interaction between the charges and the currents with the electromagnetic field, and so it depends on the charge and the current distribution of the matter. Therefore, in analogy, the distribution of the stored electromagnetic field energy and momentum (which is the reality) can introduce a new fabrication of the geometry, which can be described by an effective metric tensor, namely g ˜ μ ν [13,14,15]:
g ˜ μ ν = g μ ν + α F μ ν
which is a projection of the reality influenced by both gravitational and electromagnetic fields. In Eq. (106), F μ ν denotes the electromagnetic field strength tensor, and α is a constant having the inverse units of F μ ν such that α F μ ν is dimensionless.
Then, we have the following covariant form:
κ − 1 Λ g μ ν = G μ ν + T μ ν ( q ) − κ − 1 G μ ν
In Eq. (107), κ − 1 Λ g μ ν is the total energy-momentum density tensor; G μ ν + T μ ν ( q ) gives the energy-momentum density tensor of the matter (which includes the mass distribution and the current of charges in matter only); and − κ − 1 G μ ν gives the energy-momentum density tensor of the gravitation field and electromagnetic field. Therefore, the rays of the electromagnetic field bend when they travel as they would bend in a space with only gravitation field with the effective metric tensor g ˜ μ ν [15].

3. Conclusions

We focused on the influence of Riemann space-time curvature on the laws of electromagnetism, such as Gauss’s law, Maxwell-Ampére’s law, and Faraday’s law. Furthermore, we also introduced some work done on the unification of the gravitation and electromagnetic fields.

References

  1. Edited by M. J. Klein, A. J. Kox, and R. Schulman. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: The Berlin Years: Writings, 1914-1917, Vol 6. Princeton University Press, (2016).
  2. R. M. Wald. General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, (1984).
  3. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz. The Classical Theory of Fields. Pergamon Press, (1971).
  4. S. B. Rüster. The fundamental conservation law in the theory of general relativity: an unconventional approach is feasible and correct. Parana Journal of Science and Education, 6(9), 1-11, (2020).
  5. S. B. Rüster. Why in general relativity the energy density of the gravitational field must be localizable?. Parana Journal of Science and Education, 7(1), 1-9, (2021).
  6. S. B. Rüster. Energy is Conserved in General Relativity. Parana Journal of Science and Education, 8(6), 13-22, (2022).
  7. S. B. Rüster. Energy Conservation in General Relativity and Flat Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies. Parana Journal of Science and Education, 9(6), 20-27, (2023).
  8. R. P. Feynman. Feynman Lectures on Gravity. Addison Wesley, (1995).
  9. G. Hooft. Introduction to general relativity. Utrecht University, Utrecht, 2010.
  10. D. Giulini. The Rich Structure of Minkowski Space. Part of the Fundamental Theories of Physics. FTPH, Vol. 165, (2009). [CrossRef]
  11. S. Barak. Electric Charge and its Field as Deformed Space. Applied Physics Research, 11(4), 29-40, (2019). [CrossRef]
  12. F. Cabral and F. S. N. Lobo. Electrodynamics and Space-time Geometry: Foundations. Foundations of Physics, 47, 208-228, (2017). [CrossRef]
  13. M. Born and L. Infeld. Foundations of the New Field Theory. In: Proc. Royal Soc. A 144, 852, (1934). [CrossRef]
  14. E. Bergshoeff et al. The Born-Infeld Action from Conformal Invariance of the Open Superstring. In: Phys. Lett. B 188, 1, (1987). [CrossRef]
  15. A. A. Chernitskii. On unification of gravitation and electromagnetism in the framework of a general-relativistic approach. Gravitation and Cosmology. 15, 151-153, (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. G. Boillat. Nonlinear Electrodynamics: Lagrangians and Equations of Motion. In: J. Math. Phys. 11, 941, (1970). [CrossRef]
  17. M. Nakahara. Geometry, Topology, and Physics. Institute of Physics Publishing, (1996). [CrossRef]
  18. B. P. Schmidt and N. B. Suntzeff and M. M. Phillips and R. A. Schommer and A. Clocchiatti and R. P. Kirshner and P. Garnavich and P. Challis and B. Leibundgut and J. Spyromilio and A. G. Riess and A. V. Filippenko and M. Hamuy and R. C. Smith and C. Hogan and C. Stubbs and A. Diercks and D. Reiss and R. Gilliland and J. Tonry and J. Maza and A. Dressler and J. Walsh and R. Ciardullo. The High-Z Supernova Search: Measuring Cosmic Deceleration and Global Curvature of the Universe Using Type Ia Supernovae The Astrophysical Journal, 507(1), 46, (1998). [CrossRef]
  19. H. Sykja. Bazat e Elektrodinamikës. SHBUT, (2006).
  20. D. J. Griffiths. Introduction to Electrodynamics. Prentice Hall, 3rd Edition, (1999).
  21. H. Kamberaj. Electromagnetism. With Solved Problems. Springer Nature, (2022).
  22. J. D. Jackson. Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons, 3rd Edition, (1999). [CrossRef]
  23. H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko. Classical Mechanics. Third Edition. Addison Wesley, (2002).
  24. U. J. Nöckel. Maxwell’s equations as mechanical law. Eur. J. Phys., 43(4), 045202, (2022). [CrossRef]
  25. M. A. Jaswon. Mechanical Interpretation of Maxwell’s Equations. Nature, 224, 1303-1304, (1969). [CrossRef]
  26. S. B. Rüster. The Importance of the Cosmological Constant for Understanding Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Parana Journal of Science and Education, 6(5), 1-8, (2020). [CrossRef]
  27. D. Holliday, R. Resnick, and J. Walker. Fundamentals of Physics. John Wiley & Sons, (2011).
  28. D. Clery. Event Horizon Telescope Images Second Black Hole’s Jets. Science, 373, 6553, (2021). [CrossRef]
  29. M. Modugno and D. Saller and J. Tolksdorf. Classification of infinitesimal symmetries in covariant classical mechanics. J. Math. Phys., (2006). [CrossRef]
  30. A. Einstein. Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin Sitzungsber, 47, 844-847, (1915).
  31. B. P. Abbott et al. LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Observation of Gravitation Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 061102, 2016; B. P. Abbott et al., LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, GW170817: Observation of Gravitation Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 161101, (2017).
  32. A. Einstein. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein: The Berlin Years: Writings, 1914-1917, Vol 6, Edited by M. J. Klein, A. J. Kox, and R. Schulman.
  33. L. C. Loveridge. Physical and Geometrical Interpretations of the Riemann Tensor, Ricci Tensor, and Scalar Curvature. 2016. http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0401099v1. [CrossRef]
  34. Y. Alam and A. Behne and I. Matthews. Born-Infeld electrodynamics. arXiv:2111.08657v1,(2021).
  35. Y. N. Zayko. Maxwell’s Electrodynamics in Curved Space-Time. World Journal of Innovative Research, ISSN: 2456-8236, Volume-1, Issue-1, November 2016 Pages 16-19). 2.
  36. F. Cabral and F. S. N. Lobo. Electrodynamics and space-time geometry I: Foundations. arXiv:1602.01492v1, (2016).
  37. O. Atale. Lagrangian Field Approach to Einstein-Maxwell Equation in Curved Space-time along with Relativistic dust. Khandesh Collage Education Society, Moolji Jaitha collage Jalgaon, Maharashtra.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated