Preprint Article Version 2 This version is not peer-reviewed

Note for the P versus NP problem (II)

Version 1 : Received: 24 September 2024 / Approved: 25 September 2024 / Online: 26 September 2024 (07:44:40 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 27 September 2024 / Approved: 27 September 2024 / Online: 29 September 2024 (11:14:57 CEST)

How to cite: Vega, F. Note for the P versus NP problem (II). Preprints 2024, 2024092053. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.2053.v2 Vega, F. Note for the P versus NP problem (II). Preprints 2024, 2024092053. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.2053.v2

Abstract

The P versus NP problem is a cornerstone of theoretical computer science, asking whether problems that are easy to check are also easy to solve. "Easy" here means solvable in polynomial time, where the computation time grows proportionally to the input size. While this problem's origins can be traced to John Nash's 1955 letter, its formalization is credited to Stephen Cook and Leonid Levin. Despite decades of research, a definitive answer remains elusive. Central to this question is the concept of NP-completeness. If even one NP-complete problem could be solved efficiently, it would imply that all problems in NP could be solved efficiently, proving P equals NP. This research proposes that EXACT CLOSURE, a notoriously difficult NP-complete problem, can be solved efficiently, thereby potentially establishing the equivalence of P and NP. This work is an expansion and refinement of the article "Note for the P versus NP problem", published in IPI Letters.

Keywords

Complexity classes; Boolean formula; Graph; Completeness; Polynomial time

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Data Structures, Algorithms and Complexity

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.