Preprint Review Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

A Review on Ex-Vessel Melt Retention Measures Adopted in Light Water Reactors

Version 1 : Received: 1 October 2024 / Approved: 1 October 2024 / Online: 2 October 2024 (08:02:06 CEST)

How to cite: Xing, J.; Huo, X.; Li, W.; Yuan, Y.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, L.; Guo, Y.; Pei, J.; Ma, W. A Review on Ex-Vessel Melt Retention Measures Adopted in Light Water Reactors. Preprints 2024, 2024100066. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.0066.v1 Xing, J.; Huo, X.; Li, W.; Yuan, Y.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, L.; Guo, Y.; Pei, J.; Ma, W. A Review on Ex-Vessel Melt Retention Measures Adopted in Light Water Reactors. Preprints 2024, 2024100066. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.0066.v1

Abstract

As the cornerstone of severe accident management strategy, either in-vessel or ex-vessel retention of core melt (IVR or EVR) plays a pivotal role in the stabilization and termination of a severe accident, and ultimately secures the safety goal of “Practical elimination of large radioactive release” for light water reactors. In contrast to the IVR measures that are more or less identical in reactor designs, the EVR measures are quite different from design to design. This paper was intended to give a critical review on the EVR measures adopted in the reactor designs of VVER-1000, EPR, ESBWR, EU-APR1400 and APWR. The review study began with a general description of the existing EVR measures, including their principles, operational procedures and research efforts. We then focused our discussions on the pros and cons of each EVR measure, through the comparisons with the IVR and with the others in terms of simplicity, reliability and economy. We finally tried to identify the remaining issues and uncertainties in the qualification of the EVR measures, based on which potential design improvements and future research needs were recommended.

Keywords

severe accident; ex-vessel melt retention; core catcher

Subject

Engineering, Energy and Fuel Technology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.