0. Background
The wearable technology market has experienced significant growth and evolution in recent years, driven by advancements in miniaturization, sensor technology, and connectivity. Wearable devices, ranging from smartwatches and fitness trackers to smart clothing and augmented reality glasses, have become increasingly prevalent in various aspects of daily life, including health monitoring, fitness tracking, and consumer electronics. According to recent market research, the global wearable technology market size was valued at USD 61.30 billion in 2022 and is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.6% from 2023 to 2030 (Grand View Research, 2023). This rapid growth is attributed to several factors:
Health and Fitness Tracking: The increasing health consciousness among consumers has led to a surge in demand for devices that can monitor vital signs, track physical activity, and provide insights into overall well-being (Gao et al., 2020).
Technological Advancements: Continuous innovations in sensor technology, battery life, and data processing capabilities have enhanced the functionality and user experience of wearable devices (Seneviratne et al., 2017).
Integration with IoT and AI: The growing Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem and advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have expanded the capabilities of wearable devices, making them more intelligent and interconnected (Chuah et al., 2016).
Consumer Electronics Adoption: The widespread adoption of smartphones and other smart devices has paved the way for complementary wearable technologies (Kalantari, 2017).
COVID-19 Impact: The global pandemic has accelerated the adoption of wearable technologies, particularly in healthcare settings, for remote patient monitoring and contact tracing (Seshadri et al., 2020).
The market is dominated by key players such as Apple, Samsung, Fitbit (now part of Google), and Xiaomi, who continue to innovate and introduce new features to their wearable product lines (IDC, 2022). North America currently leads the market, accounting for 33.80% of the global share in 2022, driven by high health awareness and strong demand for multimedia devices (Grand View Research, 2023). Looking ahead, the wearable technology market is poised for further growth and diversification. Emerging trends include the development of more sophisticated health monitoring capabilities, the integration of 5G technology for enhanced connectivity, and the expansion of augmented reality applications in both consumer and enterprise settings (Niknejad et al., 2020).
As the market continues to evolve, addressing challenges such as data privacy concerns, battery life limitations, and interoperability between different devices and platforms will be crucial for sustained growth and widespread adoption of wearable technologies (Guk et al., 2019).
1. Introduction
1.1. Problem Statement
Despite the growing adoption of wearable technologies, their potential in fostering emotional connections between human brands and customers remains largely unexplored. There is a significant gap in understanding how these technologies can be leveraged to create more meaningful, personalized brand experiences that resonate emotionally with consumers (Rauschnabel et al., 2019). While wearables have been extensively studied in health and fitness contexts, their application in brand-consumer relationships is still in its infancy (Kalantari, 2017. )
1.2. Importance and Necessity of Research
The importance of this research lies in its potential to unlock new strategies for brand engagement in an increasingly digital world. As consumers become more technologically savvy and expectations for personalized experiences grow, brands must adapt to maintain relevance and build lasting relationships (Hollebeek & Macky, 2019). Wearable technologies offer a unique opportunity to bridge the physical and digital realms, creating more immersive and emotionally resonant brand experiences (Flavián et al., 2019). Understanding how to effectively utilize these technologies could provide brands with a significant competitive advantage in customer engagement and loyalty (Brakus et al., 2009).
1.3. Literature Review
Previous studies have highlighted the importance of emotional connections in brand loyalty and customer retention. Thomson et al. (2005) demonstrated that emotional attachment to a human brand is a strong predictor of commitment and loyalty. Park et al. (2010) further elaborated on this concept, showing that brand attachment leads to higher levels of brand loyalty and willingness to pay premium prices.
However, research on the role of wearable technologies in this context is limited. Existing literature primarily focuses on the functional aspects of wearables (e.g., Chuah et al., 2016) or their use in health monitoring (e.g., Piwek et al., 2016). Kalantari (2017) explored the potential of wearable technologies in marketing, but did not specifically address their role in emotional connection with human brands.
Recent studies have begun to explore the intersection of wearable technologies and brand experiences. For instance, Rauschnabel et al. (2019) investigated the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses, highlighting the importance of hedonic and functional benefits. However, the specific application of wearables in fostering emotional connections between human brands and customers remains a significant gap in the literature.
1.4. Theoretical Framework
This study is grounded in two primary theoretical frameworks:
Attachment Theory (Bowlby, 1969): Originally developed in psychology, this theory has been adapted to marketing to explain how consumers form emotional bonds with brands (Thomson et al., 2005).
Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, 1989): This model provides insights into how and why users adopt new technologies, which is crucial for understanding the potential uptake of wearable technologies in brand-consumer interactions (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000).
By integrating these perspectives with more recent frameworks such as the Brand Experience Scale (Brakus et al., 2009) and the Customer Engagement Technology Model (Hollebeek et al., 2021), we aim to develop a comprehensive framework for analyzing the role of wearable technologies in brand-customer relationships.1.6. Research Objectives and QuestionsThe primary objective of this study is to explore how wearable technologies can be utilized to create and strengthen emotional connections between human brands and their customers. Specifically, we aim to address the following research questions:
What features of wearable technologies are most effective in fostering emotional connections between human brands and customers?
How do consumers perceive the use of wearable technologies in their interactions with human brands?
What are the potential challenges and ethical considerations in using wearable technologies for brand-customer relationships?
By addressing these questions, this study aims to contribute to both the theoretical understanding of technology-mediated brand relationships and provide practical insights for marketers and brand managers. The findings of this research have the potential to inform future strategies for customer engagement and loyalty in the era of wearable technologies (Hollebeek et al., 2021; Rauschnabel et al., 2019).
2. Theoretical Framework and Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Framework
The theoretical foundation of this study is built upon two primary theories that provide insights into the emotional connections between brands and consumers, particularly in the context of wearable technologies:
Attachment Theory: Developed by Bowlby (1969), Attachment Theory posits that emotional bonds are formed through consistent and meaningful interactions. In marketing, this theory has been adapted to explain how consumers develop emotional attachments to brands, leading to increased loyalty and commitment (Thomson et al., 2005). This framework is particularly relevant in understanding how wearable technologies can enhance these emotional bonds by facilitating continuous engagement and personalized experiences.
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Proposed by Davis (1989), TAM explains how users come to accept and use new technologies. The model suggests that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness significantly influence users’ attitudes towards technology adoption (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000). In the context of wearable technologies, understanding these perceptions is crucial for assessing their impact on brand-consumer relationships.
2.2. Literature Review
A comprehensive review of existing literature reveals significant insights into the application of wearable technologies and their implications for emotional branding and consumer engagement.
2.3. Wearable Technologies in Health and Wellness
Wearable technologies have been extensively studied in the health sector, where they facilitate continuous monitoring of vital signs and physical activities. A literature review by Ali and Khan (2015) highlights the potential of wearables in disease prevention and health maintenance, emphasizing their role in enhancing patient care and reducing healthcare costs. The integration of these devices into everyday life allows consumers to track their health metrics, thereby fostering a sense of ownership and emotional connection to their health and wellness (Piwek et al., 2016).
2.2. Emotional Connections and Brand Loyalty
Research indicates that emotional connections between consumers and brands significantly influence loyalty and purchasing behavior. Thomson et al. (2005) found that emotional attachment to a brand is a strong predictor of consumer commitment. In the context of wearable technologies, the ability to provide personalized experiences can enhance these emotional connections, as evidenced by studies that show how tailored notifications and health insights can lead to greater consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty (Rauschnabel et al., 2019).
2.3. User Concerns and Technology Adoption
Despite the benefits of wearable technologies, several user-related concerns hinder their widespread adoption. A scoping review by Jansen et al. (2020) identifies key issues such as privacy, data security, and the reliability of wearable devices. These concerns are critical as they can impact consumer trust and, consequently, their emotional connections to brands utilizing these technologies. Addressing these issues is essential for brands aiming to leverage wearables for enhanced consumer engagement.
2.4. Current Trends and Future Directions
The landscape of wearable technology is rapidly evolving, with advancements in sensor technology, data analytics, and communication protocols (Gao et al., 2020). The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) is expected to further enhance the capabilities of wearable devices, enabling more personalized and context-aware interactions (Chuah et al., 2016). Future research should focus on exploring the ethical implications of these technologies and their long-term effects on brand-consumer relationships.
Table 1.
Summary of Key Literature on Wearable Technologies.
Table 1.
Summary of Key Literature on Wearable Technologies.
Author(s) |
Year |
Focus Area |
Key Findings |
Ali & Khan |
2015 |
Healthcare Applications |
Wearables enhance patient care and reduce costs through continuous monitoring. |
Thomson et al. |
2005 |
Emotional Attachment and Brand Loyalty |
Emotional connections significantly predict consumer commitment and loyalty. |
Rauschnabel et al. |
2019 |
Consumer Engagement with Wearables |
Personalized experiences via wearables lead to greater consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty. |
Jansen et al. |
2020 |
User Concerns in Wearable Technology Adoption |
Privacy and data security concerns impact consumer trust and adoption of wearable technologies. |
Gao et al. |
2020 |
Trends in Wearable Technology |
Advancements in technology enhance the capabilities of wearables for personalized interactions. |
The literature indicates a growing recognition of the potential of wearable technologies to foster emotional connections between brands and consumers. However, addressing user concerns and ensuring the ethical use of these technologies will be crucial for their successful integration into brand strategies. Future research should continue to explore these dynamics, providing valuable insights for marketers seeking to leverage wearable technologies in their engagement strategies.
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Design
This study employs a mixed-methods research design, integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of wearable technologies in fostering emotional connections between human brands and customers. The qualitative phase involves in-depth interviews with marketing experts, while the quantitative phase consists of a survey administered to consumers.
3.2. Population
The target population for this research includes two distinct groups:
Marketing Experts: Professionals with experience in brand management, digital marketing, and technology adoption.
Consumers: Individuals who own or use wearable technologies, representing diverse demographic backgrounds.
3.3. Sample and Sampling Method
Sample Size: A total of 25 marketing experts and 300 consumers were selected for this study.
Sampling Method:
For the qualitative phase, purposive sampling was employed to select marketing experts based on their expertise and experience in relevant fields.
For the quantitative phase, a stratified random sampling method was utilized to ensure a representative sample of consumers across various demographics (age, gender, income level, etc.).
3.4. Data Collection Instruments
Qualitative Data Collection: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with marketing experts. An interview guide was developed to facilitate discussions on the emotional impact of wearable technologies in brand-consumer relationships. Each interview lasted approximately 45-60 minutes and was recorded for transcription and analysis.
Quantitative Data Collection: An online survey was designed to gather data from consumers. The survey included the following sections:
Demographic information
Usage patterns of wearable technologies
Perceived emotional connection with brands
Attitudes towards wearable technology in brand interactions
3.5. Validity and Reliability of Instruments
Qualitative Instrument: The interview guide was reviewed by three experts in marketing and technology to ensure content validity. A pilot test was conducted with five participants to refine questions and improve clarity.
Quantitative Instrument: The survey instrument was pre-tested with a sample of 30 consumers to assess clarity and relevance. The reliability of the survey was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, achieving a score of 0.87, indicating high internal consistency.
3.6. Data Analysis Methods
Qualitative Data Analysis: Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes and patterns from the interview transcripts. The analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase framework, which includes familiarization, coding, theme development, and review.
-
Quantitative Data Analysis: Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software. The following methods were utilized:
Descriptive statistics to summarize demographic data and usage patterns.
Pearson correlation to assess the relationships between emotional connection and various factors related to wearable technology.
Multiple regression analysis to determine the predictive power of different features of wearable technologies on emotional connections with brands.
Table 2.
Summary of Methodology.
Table 2.
Summary of Methodology.
Component |
Description |
Research Design |
Mixed-methods (qualitative and quantitative) |
Population |
Marketing experts and consumers |
Sample Size |
25 marketing experts and 300 consumers |
Sampling Method |
Purposive sampling for experts; stratified random sampling for consumers |
Data Collection Instruments |
Semi-structured interviews and online surveys |
Validity and Reliability |
Expert review and pilot testing for qualitative; Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87 for quantitative |
Data Analysis Methods |
Thematic analysis for qualitative; descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and regression for quantitative |
This methodology provides a robust framework for exploring the emotional connections fostered by wearable technologies in brand-consumer relationships. By integrating qualitative insights with quantitative data, the study aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of this emerging field, contributing valuable knowledge for marketers and brand managers seeking to leverage wearable technologies effectively.
4. Findings
This section presents the results of our mixed-methods study on the role of wearable technologies in fostering emotional connections between human brands and customers. We begin with descriptive statistics, followed by the results of statistical tests, and conclude with answers to our research questions.
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
Table 3.
Demographic Characteristics of Consumer Participants (N=300).
Table 3.
Demographic Characteristics of Consumer Participants (N=300).
Characteristic |
Category |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Gender |
Male |
156 |
52% |
|
Female |
144 |
48% |
Age |
18-25 |
75 |
25% |
|
26-35 |
105 |
35% |
|
36-45 |
78 |
26% |
|
46+ |
42 |
14% |
Education |
High School |
45 |
15% |
|
Bachelor’s |
168 |
56% |
|
Master’s+ |
87 |
29% |
Table 4.
Wearable Technology Usage Among Participants.
Table 4.
Wearable Technology Usage Among Participants.
Type of Wearable |
Users |
Percentage |
Smartwatch |
210 |
70% |
Fitness Tracker |
180 |
60% |
Smart Glasses |
45 |
15% |
Smart Clothing |
30 |
10% |
4.2. Statistical Test Results
4.2.1. Correlation Analysis
Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between various aspects of wearable technology use and emotional connection with brands.
Table 5.
Correlation Matrix.
Table 5.
Correlation Matrix.
Variable |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1. Emotional Connection |
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
2. Frequency of Use |
0.72* |
1.00 |
|
|
|
3. Personalization |
0.68* |
0.59* |
1.00 |
|
|
4. Real-time Interaction |
0.65* |
0.57* |
0.61* |
1.00 |
|
5. Data Privacy Concerns |
-0.31* |
-0.25* |
-0.28* |
-0.22* |
1.00 |
4.3. Multiple Regression Analysis
A multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictive power of different features of wearable technologies on emotional connections with brands.
Table 6.
Multiple Regression Results.
Table 6.
Multiple Regression Results.
Predictor |
β |
SE |
t |
p |
Frequency of Use |
0.35 |
0.04 |
8.75 |
<0.001 |
Personalization |
0.28 |
0.04 |
7.00 |
<0.001 |
Real-time Interaction |
0.25 |
0.04 |
6.25 |
<0.001 |
Data Privacy Concerns |
-0.15 |
0.03 |
-5.00 |
<0.001 |
4.3.1. Answers to Research Questions
Based on our findings, the most effective features are:
Frequency of use (β = 0.35)
Personalization capabilities (β = 0.28)
Real-time interaction features (β = 0.25)
Qualitative analysis of interview data revealed that consumers generally view wearable technologies positively in their brand interactions. Key themes included:
Enhanced convenience and accessibility
Appreciation for personalized experiences
Increased sense of connection with the brand
However, concerns about data privacy were also prominent.RQ3: What are the potential challenges and ethical considerations in using wearable technologies for brand-customer relationships?
The main challenges and ethical considerations identified were:
Data privacy and security concerns (negatively correlated with emotional connection, r = -0.31)
Potential for over-reliance on technology in relationships
Ethical use of personal data for marketing purposes
These findings provide valuable insights into the role of wearable technologies in fostering emotional connections between human brands and customers, highlighting both opportunities and challenges for marketers and brand managers.
5. Discussion and Conclusion
5.1. Interpretation of Findings
Our study provides compelling evidence for the significant role of wearable technologies in fostering emotional connections between human brands and customers. The findings reveal several key insights:
Frequency of Use: The strong positive correlation (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) and high predictive power (β = 0.35, p < 0.001) of frequency of use suggest that consistent engagement with wearable devices strengthens emotional bonds. This aligns with the principles of Attachment Theory (Bowlby, 1969), indicating that repeated positive interactions facilitated by wearables can enhance brand attachment.
Personalization: The high correlation (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) and significant predictive power (β = 0.28, p < 0.001) of personalization capabilities underscore the importance of tailored experiences in building emotional connections. This supports the notion that wearables can serve as powerful tools for delivering personalized brand experiences.
Real-time Interaction: The strong relationship between real-time interaction features and emotional connection (r = 0.65, p < 0.001; β = 0.25, p < 0.001) highlights the value of immediate, context-aware brand interactions in fostering emotional bonds.
Privacy Concerns: The negative correlation between data privacy concerns and emotional connection (r = -0.31, p < 0.001) indicates that addressing these concerns is crucial for brands seeking to leverage wearable technologies effectively.
5.2. Comparison with Previous Research
Our findings both support and extend previous research in several ways:
Emotional Branding: The results align with Thomson et al.‘s (2005) work on emotional attachment to brands, extending their findings to the context of wearable technologies. Our study demonstrates that wearables can serve as a powerful medium for building and reinforcing these emotional connections.
Technology Adoption: The positive reception of wearable technologies by consumers in brand interactions supports the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, 1989). However, our findings suggest that emotional factors play a more significant role in adoption than previously emphasized in the model.
Personalization in Marketing: Our results corroborate Rauschnabel et al.‘s (2019) findings on the importance of personalized experiences in consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty. We extend this understanding by quantifying the impact of personalization through wearable technologies.
Privacy Concerns: The negative impact of privacy concerns on emotional connection aligns with Jansen et al.‘s (2020) scoping review, emphasizing the need for brands to address these issues proactively.
5.3. General Conclusion
This study provides strong evidence that wearable technologies can significantly enhance emotional connections between human brands and customers. The key drivers of this connection – frequency of use, personalization, and real-time interaction – offer clear pathways for brands to leverage these technologies effectively. However, the importance of addressing privacy concerns cannot be overstated.
Our findings have several important implications:
Strategic Integration: Brands should strategically integrate wearable technologies into their marketing and customer relationship management strategies, focusing on frequent, personalized, and real-time interactions.
Privacy-Centric Approach: Developing transparent data practices and giving users control over their data is crucial for building trust and fostering stronger emotional connections.
Continuous Innovation: As wearable technology evolves, brands must continually innovate to provide unique, valuable experiences that resonate emotionally with consumers.
Ethical Considerations: Brands must navigate the ethical implications of using personal data from wearables, balancing personalization with respect for privacy and autonomy.
In conclusion, wearable technologies present a powerful opportunity for human brands to create deeper, more meaningful connections with their customers. By leveraging these technologies thoughtfully and ethically, brands can foster strong emotional bonds that drive loyalty and engagement in an increasingly digital world.
Future research should explore the long-term effects of wearable technology-mediated brand relationships, investigate potential negative consequences of over-reliance on these technologies, and examine how different demographic groups respond to these tech-driven emotional connections.
6. Recommendations
Based on our findings and conclusions, we offer the following recommendations for practitioners and future researchers:
6.1. Practical Recommendations
-
1.
-
Strategic Integration of Wearable Technologies
Brands should develop comprehensive strategies for integrating wearable technologies into their customer engagement efforts.
Focus on creating consistent, frequent interactions through wearables to strengthen emotional bonds.
Implement personalization algorithms that leverage data from wearables to tailor brand experiences.
-
2.
-
Privacy-Centric Approach
Develop transparent data collection and usage policies.
Implement robust data security measures to protect consumer information.
Provide users with granular control over their data, allowing them to opt-in or opt-out of specific data collection and usage scenarios.
-
3.
-
Personalization and Real-Time Interaction
Invest in AI and machine learning capabilities to enhance personalization efforts.
Develop real-time interaction features that provide immediate value to users.
Create context-aware notifications and interactions that respect user preferences and routines.
-
4.
-
Ethical Considerations
Establish an ethics board or committee to oversee the use of wearable technology data.
Regularly conduct ethical audits of data usage and brand interaction practices.
Develop clear guidelines for ethical use of personal data in marketing and brand engagement.
-
5.
-
Consumer Education
Implement educational initiatives to inform consumers about the benefits and potential risks of wearable technologies in brand interactions.
Provide clear, accessible information about how data is collected, used, and protected.
-
6.
-
Cross-Platform Integration
Ensure seamless integration of wearable technology data and interactions with other brand touchpoints (e.g., mobile apps, websites, physical stores).
Develop a unified customer profile that incorporates data from wearables and other sources to provide a holistic view of the customer.
-
7.
-
Continuous Innovation
Establish a dedicated team or department focused on exploring new applications of wearable technologies in brand engagement.
Regularly conduct user research to identify emerging needs and preferences related to wearable technologies.
6.2. Recommendations for Future Research
-
1.
-
Longitudinal Studies
Conduct long-term studies to examine the sustainability of emotional connections fostered through wearable technologies.
Investigate how brand relationships evolve over time with consistent use of wearable devices.
-
2.
-
Cross-Cultural Analysis
Explore how cultural differences impact the effectiveness of wearable technologies in building emotional brand connections.
Examine variations in privacy concerns and technology adoption across different cultural contexts.
-
3.
-
Psychological Impact
Investigate the potential psychological effects of long-term, technology-mediated brand relationships.
Explore the concept of “digital attachment” and its implications for consumer behavior and well-being.
-
4.
-
Ethical Frameworks
Develop comprehensive ethical frameworks for the use of wearable technologies in marketing and brand engagement.
Examine the long-term societal implications of increased reliance on wearable technologies for brand-consumer relationships.
-
5.
-
Integration with Other Technologies
-
6.
-
Demographic Variations
-
7.
-
Negative Consequences
Investigate potential negative outcomes of over-reliance on wearable technologies in brand relationships, such as privacy invasions, addiction, or erosion of authentic human connections.
-
8.
-
Measurement Tools
-
9.
-
Industry-Specific Studies
Conduct sector-specific research to understand how wearable technologies can be most effectively leveraged in different industries (e.g., healthcare, fitness, luxury goods).
-
10.
-
Regulatory Implications
By addressing these areas, future research can provide deeper insights into the complex dynamics of wearable technology-mediated brand relationships, helping both practitioners and policymakers navigate this rapidly evolving landscape.
References
- Ali, T., & Khan, N. (2015). A systematic review of wearable sensors and IoT-based monitoring applications for older adults – a focus on ageing population and independent living. Journal of Medical Systems, 39(6), 1-11. [CrossRef]
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
- Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 52-68. [CrossRef]
- Chuah, S. H. W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276-284. [CrossRef]
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y., Li, H., & Luo, Y. (2020). An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(9), 1704-1723. [CrossRef]
- Hollebeek, L. D., & Macky, K. (2019). Digital content marketing’s role in fostering consumer engagement, trust, and value: Framework, fundamental propositions, and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 45, 27-41. [CrossRef]
- Hollebeek, L. D., Clark, M. K., Andreassen, T. W., Sigurdsson, V., & Smith, D. (2021). Virtual reality through the customer journey: Framework and propositions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102056. [CrossRef]
- Jansen, Y., Hornbæk, K., & Dragicevic, P. (2020). What did authors value in the CHI’20 reviews they received? In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12). [CrossRef]
- Kalantari, M. (2017). Consumers’ adoption of wearable technologies: Literature review, synthesis, and future research agenda. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 12(3), 274-307. [CrossRef]
- Niknejad, N., Ismail, W. B., Mardani, A., Liao, H., & Ghani, I. (2020). A comprehensive overview of smart wearables: The state of the art literature, recent advances, and future challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 90, 103529. [CrossRef]
- Park, E., Kim, K. J., & Kwon, S. J. (2016). Understanding the emergence of wearable devices as next-generation tools for health communication. Information Technology & People, 29(4), 717-732. [CrossRef]
- Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016). The rise of consumer health wearables: Promises and barriers. PLoS Medicine, 13(2), e1001953. [CrossRef]
- Rauschnabel, P. A., He, J., & Ro, Y. K. (2019). Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: A closer look at privacy risks. Journal of Business Research, 92, 374-384. [CrossRef]
- Seneviratne, S., Hu, Y., Nguyen, T., Lan, G., Khalifa, S., Thilakarathna, K., Hassan, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2017). A survey of wearable devices and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(4), 2573-2620. [CrossRef]
- Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77-91. [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).