Preprint
Review

A Review of Gateway Selection and Gateway Placement in Wireless Mesh Networks

Altmetrics

Downloads

105

Views

40

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

03 October 2024

Posted:

07 October 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Wireless mesh networks (WMNs) are gaining popularity due to their versatility and cost-effectiveness. However, selecting appropriate gateways to connect these networks to external networks remains a key challenge. This paper presents a comprehensive review of gateway selection methods in WMNs, classifying them into network-centric, user-centric, and hybrid approaches. Key factors such as network topology, traffic volume, quality of service, and available resources are considered in evaluating these methods. The effectiveness of different strategies is assessed using metrics like throughput, latency, energy usage, and fairness. The impact of mobility, node heterogeneity, and security concerns on gateway selection is also explored. In addition to reviewing existing methods, the paper identifies research gaps and proposes future directions. Advanced methods that can adapt to changing network environments and support large-scale deployments are highlighted. This survey offers valuable insights for researchers and network designers to improve the efficiency and reliability of WMNs in real-world applications.
Keywords: 
Subject: Computer Science and Mathematics  -   Computer Networks and Communications

1. Introduction

Wireless mesh networks have garnered significant attention in recent times due to their potential to offer flexible and cost-effective solutions to various communication challenges. The selection of the gateway in networks of this nature is of utmost importance, as it directly influences the overall performance and efficiency of the network [1,2]. To begin, gateway selection is critical to maintaining stable and efficient communication between the various mesh network nodes [3,4]. Nodes in separate subnetworks may communicate efficiently with one another when gateways are strategically placed to allow for direct communication between them. As a consequence, the network's coverage expands, signal interference decreases, and dependability rises [5,6,7].
Second, the efficiency with which a network manages and distributes traffic is affected by the gateway selection methods in use. The entire network performance may be improved by choosing gateways depending on criteria including available bandwidth, traffic load, and network congestion. Using efficient gateway selection algorithms, traffic can be spread evenly over the network, congestion hotspots can be avoided, and resources may be used to their full potential. This, in turn, improves network efficiency by increasing throughput and decreasing latency [8,9].
In order to guarantee the scalability and flexibility of wireless mesh networks, it is essential that the right gateways be chosen. Selecting gateways that can handle more traffic and more nodes is crucial as the network develops and evolves. The network's scalability may be planned and maximized by thinking about things like gateway capacity, processing power, and topology [10,11].
Gateway selection in wireless mesh networks is crucial because it facilitates seamless connection, maximizes network performance, and permits scalability. Data transmission efficiency, increased network coverage, and better overall performance are all attainable in wireless mesh networks via the use of intelligent gateway selection methods and tactics. Gateway selection is an area of ongoing study and development because of the increasing relevance of wireless mesh networks and their growing number of use cases [12,13,14].

2. Review Methods

Researchers all across the world use the Scopus database to search for and evaluate research publications. Scopus, launched in 2004 by Elsevier, is a major player among academic databases. Additionally, it may supply a plethora of literature search data, such as citations, bibliographies, abstracts, keywords, sources of financing, references, and more. This motivates us to query the Scopus database and undertake an examination of the pertinent literature.
In order to only give the most up-to-date findings, we limited our literature search data to publications published between 2010 and May 2022. In addition to the aforementioned standards, we only included articles written in Mandarin and English. By deleting all but one of the duplicates across all of our search phrases, we were able to reduce our search down to only 510 pages using this strategy.
Furthermore, a bibliometric analysis was conducted on the exported citation data utilizing VOSviewer. The Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University has created VOSviewer, a widely recognized software application that facilitates the construction and representation of bibliometric networks. Because of the software's advanced features, such as network visualizations and clustering algorithms, citation analysis may be performed with greater precision and depth, boosting the reliability and quality of the literature review. VOSviewer derives its bibliometric analysis algorithm on work by Van Eck and Waltman. A bibliometric examination of the document metadata (authors, publication year, source, citation, etc.) removed papers that did not utilize modeling approaches or that were comparable in model training and solution procedures. Titles, summaries, key words, and the entire document's structure and content were all carefully examined.
There have been 76,166 scholarly publications published on the topic of gateways selection in wireless mesh networks since 2010. Articles from books, case studies, conferences, reports, and other types of international research publications are included here. In order to find relevant papers, we first searched for terms like "gateway selection criteria," "gateway placement," "gateway selection algorithms," and "security issues in gateway selection" on ScienceDirect, Scimago, Google Scholar, and other scholarly databases.

2. Basic Concepts

2.1. Definition of Wireless Mesh Networks

A wireless mesh network (Figure 1) is a self-organizing and decentralized communication network made up of individual nodes. In a wireless mesh network, nodes work together to construct the network architecture, as opposed to in a typical network where devices connect to a central access point or router. Data packets are relayed from one network node to another, thereby increasing the range and coverage of the network as a whole [15,16].
Typically, wireless transceivers are installed in each node of a wireless mesh network so that they may exchange data with other nodes in close proximity. These nodes work together to dynamically construct and maintain network connections, guaranteeing that the network will remain up regardless of whether or not specific nodes are functioning properly or are added to or deleted from the network [17,18].
Benefits of wireless mesh networks include scalability, adaptability, and reliability. The network may be simply extended by adding more nodes, since each node can talk to many of its neighbors directly. since of its distributed architecture, mesh networks are less susceptible to disruptions and outages since data may be redirected to working nodes in the network [19,20].
Many different types of settings may benefit from wireless mesh networks, from homes and businesses to "smart cities," factories, and emergency situations. They provide for secure and efficient communication, facilitating the linking and sharing of equipment across great distances and in harsh or ever-changing conditions [21].
The following are some distinguishing characteristics of wireless mesh networks:
Self-Healing: Wireless mesh networks may automatically adjust to new network conditions and restore itself once nodes fail or the topology is altered. Neighboring nodes may dynamically redirect traffic over different channels when a node goes down, keeping the network up with minimal interruptions [22].
Wireless mesh networks are self-organizing in the sense that their nodes work together to build and maintain the network's architecture without any central authority. Rather of manually configuring each node to communicate with its neighbors, self-organization methods allow them to do so automatically [23,24].
Data in a wireless mesh network may be sent from node to node, or "hop," to hop, until it reaches its final destination. Network coverage may be increased and nodes that are not in close proximity to each other can still communicate thanks to multi-hop communication [25,26].
Wireless mesh networks provide ad hoc connectivity because they can be set up rapidly, even in places with minimal or no existing infrastructure. Since nodes may construct a network via ad hoc connections on the fly, this architecture is useful in circumstances when a permanent network infrastructure would be difficult, such as during disaster recovery efforts or during short-term deployments [27,28].
Because of the simplicity with which more nodes may be added to a wireless mesh network, its coverage area and throughput can be quickly expanded. As the network expands, it will be able to manage more traffic and more devices because to the mesh network's decentralized design and its ability to make optimal use of its resources [29,30].
Community networks, smart homes, outdoor wireless networks, wireless sensor networks, and IoT deployments are just a few of the many use cases for wireless mesh networks. In situations where it would be difficult or costly to construct a typical infrastructure-based network, such as in the case of wireless communication, they provide a flexible and adaptive option [31,32].
gateway placement in WMN
In a Wireless Mesh Network (WMN), the placement of gateways plays a crucial role in the network's performance and efficiency. Gateways serve as the bridge between the WMN and other networks, such as the Internet or other external networks [30].
The placement of gateways in a WMN should consider several factors, including [24,25,26,27]:
Coverage: Gateways should be strategically placed to ensure optimal coverage throughout the network. Placing gateways at central locations can help minimize the distance between nodes and improve network connectivity.
Traffic Load: Gateways should be placed considering the expected traffic load in different areas of the WMN. Areas with high user density or heavy data traffic may require additional gateways to handle the load efficiently and avoid congestion.
Redundancy and Fault Tolerance: To ensure network reliability, it is important to have redundant gateways in the WMN. Redundancy helps to avoid single points of failure and ensures that if one gateway fails, others can take over its responsibilities.
Interference and Signal Strength: Gateways should be placed in locations where they can receive strong signals from mesh nodes without significant interference. Factors such as physical obstructions, radio frequency interference, and signal attenuation should be considered to determine optimal gateway placement.
Network Management: The placement of gateways should also consider the ease of network management and maintenance. Placing gateways in accessible locations simplifies tasks such as configuration, monitoring, and troubleshooting.
It's important to note that the optimal gateway placement in a WMN can vary depending on the specific network requirements, topology, and deployment scenario. Conducting a thorough network analysis, including site surveys and simulations, can help determine the most suitable gateway placement strategy for a particular WMN deployment.

2.2. Introduction to Gateways and Their Role in Mesh Networks

In order to connect to and exchange data with other networks, wireless mesh networks need gateways. Data traffic flows via gateways, giving users instantaneous access to the internet and other wired and wireless networks. Gateways provide this interconnection across networks, allowing mesh network nodes to communicate with nodes and services outside of the mesh itself [33,34].
In wireless mesh networks, gateways play a significant role in establishing connections to the internet. They're crucial because they connect the mesh network to the wider web, letting devices on the network use the web, communicate with distant servers, and take use of cloud services. The gateways in a mesh network are the hubs via which all the devices may access the internet and its plethora of resources [35,36].
In wireless mesh networks, gateways also translate addresses, a very important function. They are responsible for translating addresses from the mesh network's internal addressing system to those of external networks [37,38]. Network Address Translation (NAT) is one mechanism used by gateways to facilitate communication between mesh network devices and devices in external networks, which may implement a different addressing scheme. Mesh nodes are able to successfully connect with devices outside the network thanks to this address translation feature [39,40].
When it comes to the safety of wireless mesh networks, gateways play a vital role. They often include firewall features, which provide a defensive wall against unwanted intrusion and assaults. When data enters or leaves a mesh network, it is filtered and controlled by gateways, which also impose security regulations. Gateways improve the security of a mesh network by continually monitoring and regulating network traffic, therefore protecting it from possible attacks [41,42].
When it comes to managing traffic inside a mesh network, gateways are in charge of sending information to its intended recipients. Factors including network status, traffic volume, and QoS needs all go into their routing determinations [43,44]. To alleviate congestion and maximize network performance, gateways use load balancing strategies. Gateways improve the overall performance and dependability of a wireless mesh network by intelligently handling traffic [45,46].
In addition, gateways are crucial in the administration and tracking of networks. They are responsible for gathering data about the network, checking on the status of devices, and allowing for the control and administration of network parameters. Gateways provide network administrators with powerful means of monitoring and controlling the mesh network. They make it easier to do things like diagnose problems, boost performance, and fix issues in the wireless mesh network [47,48].
In the context of wireless mesh networks, gateways assume a crucial function in the establishment of connections and facilitation of exchanges with other networks [49,50]. Mesh network nodes utilize mediators to facilitate communication with the broader World Wide Web or conventional wired networks. The essential characteristics and operations of gateways in mesh networks encompass the subsequent aspects [51,52]:
Gateways serve as the pivotal nodes within a wireless mesh network, enabling seamless communication with other networks. The connectivity of devices within a mesh network to external networks and resources is facilitated through the acquisition of access to services and resources offered by other networks [53,54].
Gateways are responsible for ensuring that the mesh network is able to establish connectivity with the internet. The nodes serve as a central point for the transmission of data between the mesh network and the broader internet. The devices within a mesh network have the capability to utilize internet services, engage in communication with other devices within the network, and access remote servers for the purpose of storing and retrieving data, all facilitated by the network connection [55,56].
Gateways perform address translation tasks, such as Network Address Translation (NAT), to facilitate the connectivity of mesh network devices with devices in external networks that employ diverse addressing systems. As a result, the devices within the mesh network are capable of seamless communication with devices located on the internet or other networks, as evidenced by sources [57,58].
Gateways are crucial in ensuring the security of mesh networks and enforcing security protocols. To govern the transmission of data within and outside the mesh network, several of these networks possess firewall functionalities. The implementation of this measure serves to safeguard the network against potential security breaches such as hacking and malicious attacks, as indicated by the cited sources [59,60].
Data packets inside a mesh network are routed and managed by gateways to guarantee efficient and dependable transmission. Factors including network status, traffic volume, and QoS needs all go into their routing determinations. To avoid congestion and maximize network performance, gateways also oversee traffic distribution and load balancing [61,62].
Gateways also allow for control and monitoring of the mesh network, which brings us to point number six. They are responsible for gathering data about the network, checking on the status of devices, and allowing for the control and administration of network parameters. This paves the way for administrators to keep tabs on the mesh network, fix any problems that arise, and keep it running smoothly [63,64].
Gateways may be used to divide a wireless mesh network into smaller networks, each with its own gateway (see also: segmenting the network, below). Because of this, administrators can more easily monitor, protect, and direct network traffic [65,66].
Bandwidth allocation and management are tasks performed by gateways in a mesh network. To guarantee the best possible performance for mission-critical apps and hardware, they might prioritize traffic, implement Quality of Service (QoS) standards, and set and enforce bandwidth limitations [67,68].
Gateways may also translate protocols between internal mesh network protocols and those of other networks. As a result, a wide variety of network configurations may be supported, and devices that use different protocols can communicate with one another without any hitches [69,70,71].
Gateways also make it possible to connect wireless mesh networks to other types of networks, whether they're wired or wireless. They provide for hybrid network installations and more connection choices by letting multiple network technologies like Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and cellular to coexist [72].
To guarantee high availability and fault tolerance, gateways may be set up with redundancy and failover techniques. In the case of a gateway failure, traffic may be immediately diverted via the remaining gateways in the event of their deployment [73,74].
Gateways govern network traffic and keep the mesh network safe by enforcing network regulations and access control methods. Sensitive information and prevent unwanted access by using authentication, encryption, and authorization procedures [75].
Gateways allow for wireless mesh network monitoring and troubleshooting, which is explained in point 13. They track network activity, gather statistics on network performance, and offer diagnostic tools for locating and fixing network faults [76,77].
Gateways aid with the scalability and adaptability of wireless mesh networks, which is a key feature of the technology. Additional gateways may be added to the network as it expands to handle more traffic and cover more ground. Gateways also provide scalability, making it easier to add new devices to an existing network or implement cutting-edge networking technology [77,78].
In conclusion, gateways link the wireless mesh network to other networks and perform addressing, routing, security, and administration tasks. In a wireless mesh network, they are essential for facilitating conversation, maintaining connection to the internet, and controlling data flow.

2.3. Introduction to Gateway Selection Criteria

Gateway selection in wireless mesh networks involves considering various criteria to determine the most suitable gateways for efficient routing and optimized network performance. The following are common gateway selection criteria [79,80,81,82,83,84]:
  • Link Quality: The quality of the link between nodes and potential gateways is a crucial criterion. Factors such as signal strength, signal-to-noise ratio, packet loss rate, and link stability are evaluated. Gateways with stronger and more reliable links are preferred to ensure robust and stable connections.
  • Network Metrics: Several network-level metrics are considered during gateway selection:
    a.
    Network Congestion: The level of congestion in the network and at candidate gateways is assessed. Gateways with lower congestion levels are favored to avoid bottlenecks and ensure smooth data transmission.
    b.
    Available Bandwidth: The bandwidth capacity of candidate gateways is taken into account. Gateways with higher available bandwidth are preferred, especially for applications requiring high data rates.
    c.
    Hop Count: The number of hops required to reach a gateway is considered. Gateways with a lower hop count can minimize latency and reduce routing overhead.
  • Quality of Service (QoS) Requirements: Specific applications or services may have unique QoS requirements, such as low latency, high throughput, or reliable connections. Gateways that can meet these requirements are prioritized during gateway selection. Differentiated QoS policies and mechanisms can be applied to ensure the desired level of service for different types of traffic.
  • Network Topology and Coverage: The network topology and coverage area are crucial factors. Gateways should be strategically placed to ensure adequate coverage and connectivity to all parts of the network. The distribution of gateways should optimize network reachability, minimize transmission distances, and ensure efficient network operation.
  • Security Considerations: The security aspects of gateways are taken into account during selection. Gateways should have robust security mechanisms, such as encryption, authentication, and access control, to protect the network from unauthorized access and ensure data confidentiality and integrity.
  • Redundancy and Fault Tolerance: Redundant gateways can be deployed to enhance network reliability and fault tolerance. Selection criteria may consider the presence of backup gateways and their ability to seamlessly handle traffic in case of gateway failures. Redundancy helps ensure continuous network operation and reduces the impact of single points of failure.
  • Energy Efficiency: The optimization of energy consumption is a crucial factor, particularly in wireless mesh networks that operate under limited resources. Gateways exhibiting lower energy consumption or higher energy efficiency are prioritized to extend the longevity of the network and reduce the energy consumption of individual nodes.
  • Scalability and Manageability: Gateways should be scalable and manageable in large-scale mesh networks. The selection criteria may consider factors such as the scalability of gateway management, ease of configuration and maintenance, and compatibility with network management protocols.
  • Gateway Capacity: The capacity of the gateway to handle the expected traffic load is an essential criterion. It considers factors such as processing power, memory, and storage capacity of the gateway. Gateways with higher capacity can effectively handle a larger volume of traffic without performance degradation.
  • Cost and Deployment Constraints: The cost of deploying and maintaining gateways is a practical consideration. The selection criteria may take into account the cost of the gateway hardware, installation, configuration, and ongoing operational expenses. Additionally, physical constraints, such as the availability of power supply and suitable locations for gateway placement, can also influence gateway selection.
  • Traffic Pattern Analysis: Analyzing the traffic patterns and characteristics of the wireless mesh network can be used as a criterion for gateway selection. By considering the traffic flow, volume, and communication patterns, gateways can be strategically selected to optimize routing efficiency and reduce network congestion.
  • Application Requirements: Different applications within the wireless mesh network may have specific requirements that need to be considered during gateway selection. For example, real-time applications such as voice or video streaming may require low latency and high bandwidth, while data transfer applications may prioritize reliable connections and efficient throughput.
  • Network Stability and Resilience: Gateway selection criteria can include evaluating the stability and resilience of potential gateways. Gateways that have a history of stable performance, minimal downtime, and resilience to network disruptions are preferred to ensure continuous network operation and minimize service interruptions.
  • Policy-Based Selection: Gateway selection can be influenced by policy-based rules and preferences. Administrators can define policies based on factors such as cost, performance, security, or specific routing requirements. These policies guide the selection process, allowing gateways to be chosen based on predefined rules.
  • Compatibility and Interoperability: The compatibility and interoperability of gateways with existing network infrastructure and protocols are important criteria. Gateways should support the necessary communication protocols, standards, and interfaces to seamlessly integrate with the wireless mesh network and external networks.
  • Vendor Reliability and Support: The reliability and support provided by gateway vendors can be considered during selection. Reputation, track record, and vendor support capabilities can play a role in ensuring that the selected gateways are backed by reliable manufacturers and have access to timely technical assistance if needed.
It's worth noting that the significance and weight assigned to each criterion may vary depending on the specific requirements and priorities of the wireless mesh network. Network administrators and researchers can adapt and customize gateway selection criteria based on the unique characteristics and goals of the network deployment.

3. Gateway Selection

3.1. Gateway Selection Algorithms

In wireless mesh networks, a number of different gateway selection techniques may be utilized. These algorithms attempt to rank potential gateways according to a set of characteristics. Some popular algorithms for choosing gateways are listed below [85,86]:
Weighted Sum Algorithm (WSA) : Link quality, network congestion, available bandwidth, and hop count are only few of the variables that the Weighted Sum Algorithm gives importance to. Based on these criteria, the algorithm computes a weighted total for each gateway and selects the gateway with the largest sum as the preferred gateway [86].
Here are a few research papers and articles that discuss the application of the Weighted Sum Algorithm (WSA) for gateway selection in wireless mesh networks [87,88]:
For multi-radio wireless mesh networks, Zhang et al. (2015) offer a method for selecting gateways that is based on the WSA. Link quality, available bandwidth, and the number of hops are only few of the parameters that are taken into account by the algorithm, which is then given a weight. The study simulates the algorithm's operation and compares its results to those of alternative gateway selection strategies. In their 2018 paper, Sharma et al. describe a fuzzy logic WSA-based gateway selection technique. The technique uses fuzzy inference algorithms (Figure 2) to deal with vague or incomplete data while deciding which gateway to use.
The study utilizes simulations to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm and assesses its performance in relation to network throughput and latency. Gupta et al. (2016) have conducted research on the subject of energy-efficient gateway selection in wireless mesh networks, utilizing the Wireless Sensor Actor (WSA) technology. The algorithm considers multiple indicators, of which energy usage is merely one. The study presents a novel energy model and evaluates the efficacy of the algorithm in terms of network durability and power usage. The results demonstrate that the energy-conscious Wireless Sensor Architecture (WSA) effectively prolongs the lifespan of the network. Tuan et al. (2017) incorporated the Wireless Sensor Actuator (WSA) as one of the numerous instances in their examination of gateway selection algorithms for wireless mesh networks. The article provides an in-depth analysis of the advantages, limitations, and adaptability of the WSA approach. The essay presents an introduction to the WSA and draws a comparison with other gateway methods while highlighting its adaptable and multifaceted nature. Below, you can see Table 1, which relates to ‘Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and Weighted Sum Algorithm’.

3.2. Multi-Criteria Determination Making (MCDM)

Gateways are assessed and prioritized based on diverse criteria, utilizing multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) algorithms. The algorithms take into account the relative significance of specific criteria to prioritize the gateways.
In recent years, there has been an increase in the level of attention given to the utilization of fuzzy judgements for the purpose of gateway selection. A prevalent use case involves the identification of the optimal candidate for the position of cluster head (CH) within a network cluster, thereby facilitating the network's sustained operation over an extended duration. The field of decision-making encompasses various schemes, including Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) [15], The present study discusses several clustering algorithms that aim to enhance energy efficiency in distributed systems. Among these algorithms is the Energy-Efficient Distributed Clustering Algorithm based on Fuzzy Scheme (EEDCF), which utilizes the fuzzy Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) model to select cluster heads. Additionally, the Adaptive Network based on Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is presented, which employs a fuzzy neural network to optimize clustering. Lastly, the Density of Nodes approach is discussed, which utilizes the Mamdani method of fuzzy inference to select a set of candidate nodes.
The utilization of imprecise evaluations is a notable application in the determination of an optimal routing pathway through the implementation of multihop connections, which involves traversing from one node to another. This is exemplified by the relay node selection scheme founded on fuzzy inference algorithms (RNSFIA) [19]. The Relay Node Selection Framework for Industrial Applications (RNSFIA) employs a fuzzy inference methodology to determine the optimal relay node. This decision-making process considers various parameters, including the inter-node distance, residual energy, and communication level. The simultaneous enhancement of both network lifetime and throughput is achieved by RNSFIA in the context of MOD-LEACH [20]. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is a routing technique that utilizes imprecise judgments to achieve optimal results [21]. This approach considers various factors, including hop count, packet transmission frequency, and residual energy, and assigns weights to them.
The utilization of hierarchical procedures constitutes the basis of the second strategy, which involves making comparisons across various criteria. The selection of relay nodes in body area networks (WBANs) involves the use of weights among multiple candidate nodes through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) [22]. Meanwhile, AHP MCDM [23] utilizes a two-phase clustering approach that entails determining the nodes' location through the sink position and criteria like the number of neighbors, centrality, and residual energy. Additionally, the Analytical Network Process (ANP) [24] based on MCDM selects the optimal CH node based on criteria such as... Some researchers (e.g., [25]) utilize a fuzzy approach to incorporate both Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the selection of cluster network CH. Numerous techniques are currently being scrutinized due to the significant emphasis placed on enhancing energy efficiency within the realm of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSN). The study revealed that the utilization of the FAHP MCDM methodology with input parameters such as hop count, distance to the sink, and a number of neighbors yielded superior outcomes compared to the existing cutting-edge techniques. The only difference between FAHP and AHP lies in the approach employed to measure qualitative feedback. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is utilized to determine the relative significance of criteria in qualitative assessments. Conversely, the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach solely permits the use of imprecise numerical values as input. Consequently, the development of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) was proposed as a substitute for AHP, owing to its inadequacy in managing judgment ambiguity. A decision maker is unable to select any value within the range of 4 to 6, but must instead specifically choose the value of 5. In contrast to AHP methodologies, FAHP has the potential to accommodate imprecision by utilizing fuzzy integers. In the context of wireless mesh networks, gateways are selected for the purpose of facilitating network communication. Li and colleagues (2014) propose a hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach. The process of prioritizing selection criteria and ranking potential gateways is achieved through the utilization of a combination of two decision-making methodologies, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Approach for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The research endeavors to replicate the proposed methodology and assess its effectiveness in comparison to prior gateway selection algorithms, with the aim of drawing inferences about its efficacy. The topic of gateway selection in wireless mesh networks has been examined by Kumar et al[13] through the implementation of the TOPSIS and VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) methodologies. The TOPSIS method is commonly acknowledged for its capacity to assess the proximity of a solution to optimality, while the VIKOR method is frequently deliberated for its effectiveness in selecting the most suitable gateway, taking into account the compromise rating. Simulations are employed to evaluate the efficacy of proposed methodologies. The incorporation of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques into the framework has included notable approaches such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). The study employs rigorous simulations to evaluate the performance of the framework and scrutinize its ability to select the optimal gateway based on various factors.
Singh and colleagues [51] performed a thorough examination of multiple MCDM techniques utilized in the selection of wireless mesh network gateways. The present study examines various techniques, including AHP, TOPSIS, and VIKOR, among others, that are commonly employed in the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework for the purpose of gateway selection. The manuscript assesses the techniques in terms of accuracy, intricacy, and adaptability. The following Table 2 provides details on Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and MCDM.

3.3. Load Balancing Algorithms

Thirdly, load balancing algorithms disperse traffic over various gateways to lessen the impact of congestion on the network and make better use of available resources (Figure 3). Considerations including gateway usage, traffic volume, and available computing power are baked into these algorithms. The Round-Robin, Weighted-Round-Robin, and Least-Connection algorithms all fall within this category. Gateway selection in wireless mesh networks relies heavily on load balancing techniques. These algorithms increase network efficiency, resource usage, and dependability by intelligently distributing traffic. Round-robin, weighted round-robin, least connection, and intelligent dynamic load balancing are just a few examples of load balancing algorithms. Each has its advantages and disadvantages, and is best used in certain situations. Load balancing algorithms will be crucial in the development of reliable and effective WMNs as they become more commonplace [63,64,65,66,67].
The goal of load balancing algorithms is to maximize network efficiency by spreading traffic over many gateways. In order to identify the most appropriate gateway, these algorithms take into consideration data on connection quality, node capacity, network congestion, and traffic patterns. There have been several suggested and implemented load balancing techniques for wireless mesh networks [68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94].
This method rotates the incoming connection requests among the available gateways. It prevents any one gateway from being overworked by spreading the load over all of them. However, it does not take into account the capabilities of specific gateways or the state of the network, which might result in subpar performance [95,96].
This method improves the round-robin strategy by giving various gateways varied weights according on their capacity or network quality. In order to maximize the efficiency with which network resources are used, traffic is prioritized toward gateways with greater weights. However, it does not take into account current delays or congestion in the network [97,98].
This method chooses the gateway with the fewest number of open connections. The goal is to spread the traffic load uniformly across all gateways. This method is useful when gateways have widely varying connection counts, but it may overlook other elements that are crucial to performance [99].
This cutting-edge method integrates real-time monitoring of network variables including connection quality, traffic load, and congestion levels to provide intelligent dynamic load balancing. By taking them into account in real time, the gateway selection is optimized for performance and resource usage. Models that can anticipate network circumstances and make informed gateway selection choices may be trained using machine learning methods [100,101].
There are several advantages to using load balancing algorithms for gateway selection in wireless mesh networks. It boosts network efficiency, prevents congestion, increases dependability, and makes the most of available resources. It eliminates bottlenecks and optimizes performance by balancing traffic across many gateways. Also, load balancing algorithms are adaptable and scalable because they can adjust to new or changing network circumstances. Load balancing techniques pose certain difficulties to implement in WMNs. The overhead of a mesh network increases when nodes must communicate and report on network status in real time. Moreover, thought must be given while choosing the indicators and criteria to use in making decisions. In addition, load balancing techniques should be built to withstand disruption from assaults or malicious nodes [102,103].
Table 3 below illustrates information related to Gateways in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and load balancing algorithms.

3.4. Game Theory

To use game theory to gateway selection, one must first represent the interaction between nodes and gates as a game. By factoring in the strategic interactions between nodes and gateways, algorithms like the Nash Bargaining Solution and the Stackelberg Game may be utilized to make the most optimal gateway selection options. In WMNs, gateways act as the entry points connecting the mesh network to external networks, such as the Internet. The selection of gateways becomes challenging due to factors like varying link quality, traffic patterns, and network congestion. The goal is to choose gateways that maximize network performance while considering factors like load balancing, link quality, and available resources. Game theory algorithms offer a powerful framework to address these challenges [104,105].
Game theory provides mathematical models to study strategic interactions between multiple decision-making entities, called players. By applying game theory algorithms to gateway selection in WMNs, we can consider the interactions between mesh nodes and their decision-making processes. The following game theory algorithms are commonly employed in gateway selection [106,107]:
Non-cooperative Games: In non-cooperative games, each mesh node acts independently to maximize its own utility. This approach models gateway selection as a strategic decision made by each node to optimize its own performance metrics, such as minimizing latency or maximizing throughput. Nodes evaluate available gateways based on local information, including signal strength, congestion levels, and their own resource capacities. Examples of non-cooperative game models include the Nash equilibrium and the Stackelberg game [108,109].
Cooperative Games: Cooperative game theory focuses on the collaboration among mesh nodes to achieve a collective goal. In the context of gateway selection, cooperative game theory can be applied to form coalitions of mesh nodes that collectively optimize network performance. Cooperative game models consider the joint selection of gateways to maximize global metrics such as network throughput or fairness. Solutions like the core, Shapley value, and bargaining solutions can be employed to determine the allocation of gateways among the nodes [110,111].
Applying game theory algorithms in gateway selection for WMNs offers several benefits. Firstly, it provides a framework to model the strategic decision-making of mesh nodes, enabling them to make optimal choices considering their local information. Secondly, game theory algorithms can lead to efficient and fair gateway allocation, which enhances overall network performance and resource utilization. Furthermore, game theory-based approaches can adapt to dynamic network conditions and provide robustness against failures or changing topologies [112].
However, there are challenges in implementing game theory algorithms in WMNs. One challenge is the need for accurate and up-to-date information about network conditions and available resources, which may require additional overhead and communication among mesh nodes. Additionally, the design of appropriate utility functions and the choice of strategic interactions can impact the effectiveness of the algorithm. Furthermore, the scalability and computational complexity of game theory algorithms need to be considered to ensure practical implementation [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].
Game theory algorithms offer a powerful framework for gateway selection in wireless mesh networks. By incorporating strategic decision-making and considering the interactions between mesh nodes, these algorithms can optimize network performance, resource utilization, and fairness. The application of game theory algorithms in WMNs enables intelligent gateway selection, adapting to dynamic network conditions and enhancing overall connectivity.
Table 4 provides details on Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and game theory.

3.5. Reinforcement Learning Algorithms

Gateway selection choices may be learned and adapted depending on rewards and penalties received from the network using reinforcement learning algorithms like Q-learning and Markov Decision Processes. These algorithms allow gateways to make real-time adjustments to their selection depending on information about the state of the network and the results of previous attempts [99,100,101].
In WMNs, gateways act as the bridge between the mesh network and external networks, such as the internet. The selection of gateways becomes a complex task due to factors such as varying link quality, traffic patterns, and network congestion. The goal is to choose gateways that maximize network performance while considering factors like load balancing, link quality, and available resources. Reinforcement learning algorithms provide a promising solution to address these challenges [102,103].
Reinforcement learning is a branch of machine learning that focuses on training agents to make sequential decisions based on interactions with their environment. In the context of gateway selection in WMNs, reinforcement learning algorithms enable mesh nodes to learn and adapt their gateway selection policies over time. The following reinforcement learning algorithms are commonly applied [104,105,106,107]:

3.6. Q-Learning

Q-Learning is a popular algorithm in reinforcement learning. In gateway selection, each mesh node can be considered as an agent, and the selection of gateways is treated as a sequential decision-making process. Nodes learn from their experiences by maintaining a Q-table, which stores the expected rewards for choosing different gateways in different network states. By exploring and exploiting this Q-table, nodes can make intelligent decisions regarding gateway selection [108,109].
Deep Reinforcement Learning: Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) combines reinforcement learning with deep neural networks to handle high-dimensional and complex problems. In gateway selection, DRL algorithms, such as Deep Q-Networks (DQN) or Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), enable nodes to learn directly from raw input data, such as signal strength, link quality, and traffic patterns. DRL algorithms can capture complex patterns and dependencies in the network environment, leading to more sophisticated gateway selection strategies [110,111].
Applying reinforcement learning algorithms in gateway selection for WMNs offers several benefits. Firstly, these algorithms enable nodes to adapt their gateway selection policies based on real-time network conditions, resulting in improved network performance and resource utilization. Secondly, reinforcement learning algorithms can handle the dynamic and uncertain nature of WMNs, allowing nodes to learn and make decisions in dynamic environments. Furthermore, these algorithms can adapt to changing network topologies and user demands [112,113,114].
However, there are challenges in implementing reinforcement learning algorithms in WMNs. One challenge is the need for significant computational resources, especially for DRL algorithms, which require training and updating deep neural networks. Additionally, the training process of reinforcement learning algorithms may require a considerable amount of data, which may be difficult to collect in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, ensuring the fairness and stability of gateway selection policies across different nodes in the network remains an open research challenge [118,119].

3.7. Genetic Algorithms

Genetic algorithms use evolutionary principles to optimize gateway selection. These algorithms create a population of potential solutions (gateways) and evolve them through successive generations, applying genetic operators such as selection, crossover, and mutation to find the fittest gateways based on fitness functions. Gateways serve as the entry points connecting the mesh network to external networks, such as the Internet. In WMNs, gateway selection becomes challenging due to factors such as varying link quality, traffic patterns, and network congestion. The objective is to select gateways that maximize network performance while considering load balancing, link quality, and available resources. Genetic algorithms provide a robust framework to tackle these challenges [120].
Genetic algorithms are optimization techniques inspired by the process of natural selection and evolution. They involve iteratively evolving a population of candidate solutions through successive generations. In the context of gateway selection in WMNs, genetic algorithms can be applied as follows:
  • Representation: The first step in applying genetic algorithms is to define the representation of the gateway selection problem. Each individual in the population represents a potential gateway selection policy. The chromosome of an individual can be encoded as a binary string, with each gene indicating the selection or non-selection of a particular gateway [121,122].
  • Fitness Evaluation: The fitness of each individual in the population is evaluated based on predefined metrics, such as network throughput, latency, or load balancing. Fitness evaluation involves simulating the network and measuring the performance of the selected gateways based on the encoded policy [123,124].
  • Genetic Operators: Genetic algorithms employ genetic operators, including selection, crossover, and mutation, to evolve the population and generate new generations of individuals. Selection biases the selection of individuals with higher fitness, crossover combines the genetic material of two individuals to produce offspring, and mutation introduces random changes to maintain diversity in the population [124,125].
  • Evolution and Convergence: The population evolves through multiple generations, with fitter individuals being more likely to survive and pass on their genetic material. Over time, the population converges towards solutions that exhibit better performance in terms of network metrics [124,125].
The application of genetic algorithms in gateway selection for WMNs offers several benefits. Firstly, genetic algorithms provide a global search capability, exploring a large search space of potential gateway selection policies. This enables the identification of near-optimal or optimal solutions that may not be achievable through traditional algorithms. Secondly, genetic algorithms can adapt to changing network conditions and requirements, ensuring robustness and adaptability in dynamic WMNs [118,119].
However, there are challenges in implementing genetic algorithms in WMNs. The convergence speed of genetic algorithms can be influenced by the size of the search space and the complexity of fitness evaluation. Additionally, the choice of appropriate fitness metrics and the design of suitable genetic operators are crucial for obtaining effective results. Furthermore, the computational overhead of executing multiple simulations for fitness evaluation can be demanding, especially in large-scale networks [116,118].
Genetic algorithms provide a promising approach to gateway selection in wireless mesh networks. By leveraging evolutionary principles, these algorithms can explore and optimize gateway selection policies in dynamic and complex WMNs. The application of genetic algorithms in WMNs enables efficient network performance, resource utilization, and adaptability to changing conditions.
Below, there is Table 5 which illustrates information about Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and Genetic algorithms.

3.8. Machine Learning-Based Algorithms

Machine learning algorithms, such as decision trees, support vector machines, or neural networks, can be trained using historical network data to predict the optimal gateway selection decisions [57,58]. These algorithms learn patterns and relationships in the data and make gateway selection decisions based on the learned models. Gateways serve as the interface between the mesh network and external networks, such as the Internet. In WMNs, gateway selection becomes challenging due to factors such as varying link quality, traffic patterns, and network congestion [59,60]. The objective is to select gateways that maximize network performance while considering load balancing, link quality, and available resources. Machine learning techniques provide a promising solution to address these challenges [61,62].
Machine learning encompasses a variety of algorithms and techniques that enable systems to learn from data and make predictions or decisions without explicit programming. In the context of gateway selection in WMNs, the following machine-learning techniques can be applied [63,64,65]:

3.9. Supervised Learning

Supervised learning algorithms learn from labeled training data to predict outcomes or make decisions. In gateway selection, labeled historical data can be used to train models that can predict the best gateway selection based on features such as signal strength, congestion levels, and resource availability. Algorithms like decision trees, random forests, and support vector machines can be employed to learn gateway selection policies [66,67].
Reinforcement Learning: Reinforcement learning algorithms enable agents to learn through trial and error interactions with their environment. In gateway selection, mesh nodes can be considered as agents that learn optimal gateway selection policies based on rewards and penalties received for their actions. Reinforcement learning algorithms, such as Q-Learning or Deep Q-Networks (DQN), can be utilized to learn and optimize gateway selection policies based on real-time network conditions [69,70,71].
Ensemble Learning: Ensemble learning combines multiple machine learning models to improve prediction accuracy and generalization. In gateway selection, an ensemble of models can be trained using different machine learning algorithms or subsets of data. By aggregating the predictions of these models, a more robust and accurate gateway selection policy can be obtained [77,78].
The application of machine learning techniques in gateway selection for WMNs offers several benefits. Firstly, machine learning algorithms can capture complex patterns and dependencies in network data, enabling more accurate and effective gateway selection. Secondly, machine learning techniques can adapt to dynamic network conditions, allowing nodes to learn and update their gateway selection policies in real-time. Furthermore, machine learning algorithms provide the ability to leverage large volumes of data, enabling more informed decision-making [79,80,81].
However, there are challenges in implementing machine learning in WMNs. One challenge is the need for sufficient and representative training data that accurately reflects the network conditions and performance metrics. Collecting and labeling such data can be resource-intensive and may require substantial time and effort. Additionally, the design of appropriate features and the choice of suitable machine learning algorithms play a crucial role in achieving optimal gateway selection. Furthermore, the computational overhead of training and deploying machine learning models should be considered for practical implementation [82,83,84].
Machine learning techniques offer a powerful approach to gateway selection in wireless mesh networks. By leveraging the capabilities of supervised learning, reinforcement learning, and ensemble learning, these techniques enable intelligent and adaptive gateway selection policies. The application of machine learning in WMNs leads to improved network performance, resource utilization, and adaptability to dynamic network conditions [85,86].
The needs, features, and deployment situation of a wireless mesh network will determine which gateway selection method is best. Based on the network's objectives and limits, researchers and administrators may choose or develop the optimal algorithm.
Below, you can see Table 6, which relates to Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and Machine Learning.

4. Statistical and Predictive-Based Gateway Selection Algorithms

Statistical and predictive-based gateway selection algorithms are approaches that leverage statistical analysis and predictive modeling to make informed decisions regarding gateway selection in wireless mesh networks (WMNs). These algorithms utilize historical data, network metrics, and statistical techniques to predict the performance of potential gateways and select the most suitable one. In this essay, we will explore the concepts and applications of statistical and predictive-based gateway selection algorithms in WMNs [87,88].

4.1. Statistical Analysis:

Statistical analysis plays a crucial role in understanding the characteristics and behavior of WMNs. By analyzing historical data and network metrics, statistical techniques can provide valuable insights into the performance of gateways. Some statistical-based algorithms for gateway selection include [89,90]:
a) Statistical Thresholding: This approach involves setting performance thresholds based on statistical analysis of network metrics such as latency, throughput, or link quality. Gateways that exceed or fall below these thresholds are selected or rejected accordingly [91,92].
b) Probability-Based Selection: By utilizing statistical distributions and probabilities, gateways can be selected based on their likelihood of achieving desired performance levels. Probability-based algorithms consider the probability density functions of network metrics to determine the optimal gateway [93,94].

4.2. Predictive Modeling

Predictive modeling employs machine learning and data mining techniques to build models that can predict future performance based on historical data. These models can aid in gateway selection by estimating the performance of potential gateways. Some predictive-based algorithms for gateway selection include [95,96]:
a) Regression Analysis: Regression models can be used to establish relationships between network metrics and performance parameters. These models can then predict the performance of gateways based on the observed network metrics. For example, a regression model may predict the throughput of a gateway based on signal strength and traffic load [97,98].
b) Time-Series Forecasting: Time-series forecasting models can predict future performance based on historical data patterns. By analyzing temporal trends in network metrics, these models can estimate the future behavior of gateways. Time-series forecasting algorithms are particularly useful for predicting performance fluctuations and adapting gateway selection accordingly [99,100,101].
c) Machine Learning Algorithms: Machine learning algorithms, such as decision trees, support vector machines, or neural networks, can be trained on historical data to learn patterns and relationships between network metrics and gateway performance. These models can then be used to predict the performance of potential gateways based on real-time network conditions [102,103].
Statistical and predictive-based gateway selection algorithms offer several benefits in WMNs. Firstly, these algorithms provide a data-driven approach to gateway selection, utilizing historical data and statistical techniques to make informed decisions. Secondly, they enable proactive decision-making by predicting future performance based on current and historical network metrics. Furthermore, these algorithms can adapt to changing network conditions and enhance overall network performance [103,104].
However, there are challenges in implementing statistical and predictive-based gateway selection algorithms. One challenge is the availability and quality of historical data, as well as the need for continuous data collection to maintain accurate models [105]. Additionally, the choice of appropriate statistical techniques, regression models, or machine learning algorithms requires careful consideration and evaluation. Furthermore, the computational complexity of predictive models and the training process of machine learning algorithms should be taken into account for practical implementation [106,107,108].
Statistical and predictive-based gateway selection algorithms offer valuable insights and predictions for selecting optimal gateways in wireless mesh networks. By leveraging statistical analysis, regression models, time-series forecasting, and machine learning techniques, these algorithms enable proactive decision-making and enhance network performance. The application of statistical and predictive-based algorithms in WMNs provides intelligent gateway selection strategies based on historical data and predictive modeling, leading to efficient resource utilization and improved network connectivity [109,110].

4.3. Issues and Challenges

When it comes to gateway selection in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs), several issues and challenges need to be considered. WMNs are complex network infrastructures that rely on gateways to connect the mesh network with external networks or the internet. Here are some key issues and challenges in gateway selection for WMNs [57,58,59]:
Scalability: One of the primary challenges in gateway selection for WMNs is ensuring scalability. As the network grows and the number of mesh nodes increases, the gateway must have the capacity to handle the growing traffic and provide efficient routing between the mesh network and external networks. Selecting a gateway that can scale with the network's growth is crucial to avoid performance bottlenecks and ensure smooth operations.
Network Performance: Gateway selection plays a vital role in maintaining network performance in WMNs. The gateway should have sufficient processing power, memory, and bandwidth to handle the network's traffic demands. Inadequate gateway performance can lead to delays, packet loss, or degraded network performance, impacting the overall user experience.
Quality of Service (QoS): WMNs often support diverse applications with varying QoS requirements, such as real-time multimedia streaming, voice communication, or data transfer. Gateway selection should consider the ability to prioritize and manage different types of traffic to ensure appropriate QoS levels. The gateway must support QoS mechanisms that prioritize critical traffic and allocate network resources accordingly.
Interoperability: WMNs can comprise nodes from different vendors or operate on different wireless standards. Ensuring interoperability between the gateway and the mesh nodes is essential for seamless communication and network integration. The selected gateway should support the necessary wireless standards and protocols used by the mesh nodes to facilitate interoperability.
Security: Security is a critical concern in gateway selection for WMNs. Gateways serve as the entry points between the mesh network and external networks, making them potential targets for attacks. The selected gateway should have robust security features, such as strong authentication, encryption, intrusion detection, and secure routing protocols, to protect against unauthorized access, data breaches, or network intrusions.
Power Consumption and Energy Efficiency: In WMNs, nodes may be powered by limited energy sources, such as batteries or solar panels. The gateway should be energy-efficient to minimize power consumption and maximize the network's overall lifespan. Selecting a gateway with low power requirements and power-saving features can contribute to the sustainability and longevity of the WMN.
Deployment and Management: Gateway selection should also consider factors related to deployment and management. The gateway should be easy to install, conFigure , and manage, as it plays a central role in network operations. Additionally, remote management capabilities, centralized monitoring, and configuration management tools are beneficial for efficient administration and maintenance of the gateway.
Cost: Cost is always a consideration in gateway selection. The selected gateway should provide a balance between cost and the required functionality. While it is important to invest in a reliable and secure gateway, organizations need to consider their budgetary constraints and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the chosen solution.
Addressing these issues and challenges in gateway selection for WMNs requires careful evaluation, considering the specific requirements of the network, scalability needs, performance expectations, security measures, and budgetary considerations. Collaborating with experienced vendors and conducting thorough testing and validation can help organizations make informed decisions and select the most suitable gateway for their WMN deployment.

4.4. Security Issues in Gateway Selection

When selecting gateways in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs), there are specific security issues that need to be considered. WMNs are wireless networks where multiple nodes communicate with each other to provide extended coverage and connectivity. Here are some security issues related to gateway selection in WMNs [66,67,68,69,70]:
Authentication and Authorization: Gateways in WMNs should enforce strong authentication and authorization mechanisms to ensure that only authorized nodes can connect to the network. Weak or compromised authentication can lead to unauthorized access and potential security breaches.
Secure Key Management: WMNs often use encryption to protect the confidentiality of data transmitted between nodes. Gateways play a crucial role in key management for secure communication. It is important to select gateways that implement robust key management protocols to ensure secure generation, distribution, and revocation of encryption keys.
Secure Routing: Gateways in WMNs are responsible for routing traffic between the mesh network and external networks or the internet. Secure routing protocols should be implemented to protect against attacks such as spoofing, tampering, or hijacking of routing information. Gateways should employ secure routing protocols, such as the Secure Hybrid Wireless Mesh Protocol (SHWMRP), to ensure the integrity and authenticity of routing information.
Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attacks: Gateways in WMNs are potential targets for DoS attacks, which can disrupt network operations by overwhelming the gateway with excessive traffic or exploiting vulnerabilities. Gateways should have mechanisms in place to detect and mitigate DoS attacks, such as rate limiting, traffic shaping, or intrusion prevention systems (IPS).
Physical Security: Gateways in WMNs may be deployed in outdoor or publicly accessible areas, making them vulnerable to physical attacks. Physical security measures, such as tamper-resistant enclosures, video surveillance, or access control mechanisms, should be considered to protect the gateways from unauthorized access or tampering.
Firmware and Software Security: Gateways in WMNs run firmware or software that may have vulnerabilities. It is crucial to select gateways from trusted vendors that regularly release security patches and updates to address any identified vulnerabilities. Additionally, gateways should have secure update mechanisms to ensure that firmware or software updates are obtained from authenticated and trusted sources.
Monitoring and Intrusion Detection: Gateways should have monitoring and intrusion detection capabilities to detect and respond to security incidents promptly. This includes monitoring network traffic, detecting anomalies, and employing intrusion detection systems (IDS) or intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to identify and mitigate potential threats.
Compliance Considerations: Depending on the specific industry or regulatory requirements, gateways in WMNs may need to comply with specific security standards, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) guidelines. It is essential to select gateways that meet the required compliance standards.
Vendor Trustworthiness: The trustworthiness of gateway vendors is crucial in ensuring the security of WMNs. It is important to choose vendors with a strong reputation in security, timely security updates, and a commitment to addressing vulnerabilities promptly.
By addressing these security issues during gateway selection in WMNs, organizations can enhance the overall security of their wireless mesh networks and protect against potential threats and attacks. Implementing a combination of security measures, such as strong authentication, secure routing protocols, encryption, monitoring, and regular updates, can significantly mitigate security risks in WMNs.

5. Conclusion and Recommendations

gateway selection in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) is a critical task that requires careful consideration of various factors to ensure optimal network performance, security, scalability, and resource utilization. Selecting the right gateways plays a pivotal role in establishing seamless connectivity between the mesh network and external networks or the internet.
Throughout this discussion, we have highlighted several key points and challenges in gateway selection in WMNs. These include scalability, network performance, quality of service (QoS), security, interoperability, power consumption, deployment and management, and cost. Each of these factors requires in-depth research and consideration to make informed decisions when selecting gateways.
Furthermore, we have identified several areas for future research in gateway selection. These include dynamic gateway selection, machine learning-based approaches, multi-objective optimization, security-driven strategies, green gateway selection, edge computing integration, IoT integration, network virtualization and SDN, and real-world deployment studies. By exploring these areas, researchers can contribute to advancing the field and addressing the evolving challenges in gateway selection for WMNs.
Ultimately, effective gateway selection in WMNs contributes to the overall performance, reliability, and security of the network. By considering the unique requirements of WMNs and addressing the challenges and future research areas identified, organizations can make informed decisions and deploy gateways that meet their specific needs, enhance network connectivity, and enable efficient communication within the wireless mesh network and beyond.

5.1. Key Points and Areas for Further Research

Gateway selection in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) is an important area of research that continues to evolve with advancements in networking technologies. Here are key points and areas for further research in gateway selection in WMNs:
1. Gateway Placement Algorithms: Research can focus on developing efficient algorithms for gateway placement in WMNs. These algorithms should consider factors such as network topology, traffic patterns, QoS requirements, and energy efficiency to determine optimal gateway locations. The goal is to minimize network congestion, improve performance, and ensure effective coverage.
2. Load Balancing and Traffic Management: Investigate load balancing techniques to distribute traffic across multiple gateways in WMNs. Research can explore dynamic load balancing algorithms that adapt to changing network conditions and traffic patterns. Effective traffic management strategies can optimize resource utilization, enhance network performance, and ensure fair distribution of network resources.
3. Security and Trustworthiness: Further research is needed to enhance the security and trustworthiness aspects of gateway selection in WMNs. This includes developing robust authentication and encryption mechanisms, secure key management protocols, intrusion detection and prevention techniques, and secure routing algorithms. Addressing emerging security threats and vulnerabilities specific to WMNs will be crucial in securing the gateways and the overall network.
4. Integration with 5G and Beyond: Investigate the integration of WMNs with emerging wireless technologies like 5G and beyond. Research can explore the challenges and opportunities in gateway selection when deploying WMNs alongside next-generation wireless networks. This includes exploring the interworking between WMNs and 5G infrastructure, optimizing handover mechanisms, and leveraging network slicing capabilities.
5. Mobility Support: Study the implications of mobility in gateway selection for mobile WMNs. Research can focus on seamless handover mechanisms, efficient routing protocols, and dynamic gateway selection strategies to support the mobility of mesh nodes while maintaining uninterrupted connectivity and QoS.
6. Energy Efficiency and Sustainability: Explore energy-efficient gateway selection techniques in WMNs to prolong the network's lifespan and reduce environmental impact. This includes investigating sleep scheduling algorithms, energy-aware routing protocols, and power management strategies to optimize energy consumption in gateways while meeting network requirements.
7. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Investigate the application of machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques in gateway selection for WMNs. Research can explore the use of AI algorithms for dynamic gateway selection, predictive traffic analysis, anomaly detection, and automated network optimization to improve network performance and management efficiency.
8. Hybrid WMNs: Research the challenges and opportunities in gateway selection for hybrid WMNs that integrate different wireless technologies, such as Wi-Fi, cellular networks, or satellite communication. Investigate the optimal selection of gateways in these heterogeneous environments to achieve seamless connectivity and efficient network integration.
9. Resource Allocation and QoS Provisioning: Further research can focus on resource allocation strategies for WMNs to ensure effective utilization of network resources and efficient QoS provisioning. This includes investigating dynamic bandwidth allocation, priority-based scheduling, and congestion control mechanisms to optimize network performance and meet application-specific requirements.
By exploring these key points and areas for further research, the field of gateway selection in WMNs can advance, leading to more efficient, secure, and reliable wireless mesh network deployments.

6. Recommendations for Future Research

Here are some specific recommendations for future research in the area of gateway selection in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs):
1. Dynamic Gateway Selection: Investigate dynamic gateway selection algorithms that adapt to changing network conditions and traffic patterns. Consider factors such as real-time network performance, load balancing, and energy efficiency to dynamically select the most suitable gateway for optimal network performance.
2. Machine Learning-based Gateway Selection: Investigate creating smart gateway selection models with machine learning strategies like deep learning and reinforcement learning. Based on factors including traffic volume, connection quality, and user preferences, these models may make intelligent gateway selection judgments using collected network data.
3. Multi-objective Optimization: Conduct research on multi-objective optimization algorithms for gateway selection in WMNs. Consider multiple conflicting objectives, such as minimizing latency, maximizing throughput, and reducing energy consumption. Develop optimization models that can find the best compromise solutions to meet diverse network requirements.
4. Security-driven Gateway Selection: Focus on enhancing the security aspects of gateway selection in WMNs. Investigate advanced security mechanisms, such as anomaly detection, intrusion prevention, and threat intelligence, to integrate security considerations into the gateway selection process. Develop secure gateway selection frameworks that can mitigate security risks and ensure the integrity and confidentiality of data.
5. Green Gateway Selection: Address the energy efficiency challenges in gateway selection by developing eco-friendly approaches. Investigate energy-aware routing and gateway selection algorithms that consider the energy consumption of both mesh nodes and gateways. Explore energy harvesting techniques and renewable energy sources for powering gateways in WMNs.
6. Edge Computing-enabled Gateway Selection: Study the integration of edge computing capabilities in gateway selection for WMNs. Investigate the placement of gateway nodes with edge computing resources to enable low-latency data processing, reduce network congestion, and enhance application performance. Develop algorithms that consider both computational and networking aspects in gateway selection.
7. Integration with Internet of Things (IoT): Explore the integration of WMNs with IoT devices and applications. Investigate gateway selection strategies that can handle the unique requirements and massive scale of IoT deployments. Develop efficient gateway selection algorithms that consider IoT device density, data volume, and communication patterns to ensure seamless connectivity and efficient data processing.
8. Network Virtualization and Software-Defined Networking (SDN): Investigate the application of network virtualization and SDN principles in gateway selection for WMNs. Explore the dynamic allocation of virtual gateways and programmable routing mechanisms for improved network flexibility, scalability, and resource management. Develop novel gateway selection frameworks based on virtualized network architectures.
9. Real-world Deployment Studies: Conduct comprehensive empirical studies and field trials to validate the effectiveness and performance of different gateway selection approaches in real-world WMN deployments. Evaluate the scalability, reliability, security, and performance impact of various gateway selection algorithms under different network conditions and deployment scenarios.
By pursuing these recommendations, researchers can contribute to advancing the field of gateway selection in WMNs, leading to more efficient, secure, and resilient wireless mesh network deployments.
Ethical Approval: Not Applicable.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Authors' contributions: Write the paper and prepare tables: M.N; Review: M.N,M.J.
Availability of data and materials: The availability of data and materials is not applicable for this study as there were no data collected or materials used.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Marco Di Felice, Kaushik Roy Chowdhury, Andreas Kassler, Luciano Bononi (2011). Adaptive Sensing Scheduling and Spectrum Selection in Cognitive Wireless Mesh Networks. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  2. Xuecai Bao, Wenqun Tan, Jugen Nie, Changlong Lu, Guanglang Jin(2014). Design of logical topology with K-connected constraints and channel assignment for multi-radio wireless mesh networks. Communication system. [CrossRef]
  3. Mohsen Jahanshahi, Mehdi Dehghan, Mohammad Reza Meybodi (2016). A cross-layer optimization framework for joint channel assignment and multicast routing in multi-channel multi-radio wireless mesh networks. International Journal of Computer Mathematics. [CrossRef]
  4. Carlos Ferreira, Susana Sargento, Arnaldo Oliveira (2017). An architecture for a learning-based autonomic decision system. Journal of Computational Science. [CrossRef]
  5. Majid Asadi Shahmirzadi, Mehdi Dehghan, Abdorasoul Ghasemi (2017). On the Load Balancing of Multicast Routing in Multi-Channel Multi-Radio Wireless Mesh Networks with Multiple Gateways. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security.
  6. Arash Bozorgchenani, Mohsen Jahanshahi (2017). A Novel Reliability and Traffic Aware Gateway Selection Scheme in Wireless Mesh Networks. Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  7. Yuan Chai, Wenxiao Shi, Tianhe Shi (2017). Load-aware cooperative hybrid routing protocol in hybrid wireless mesh networks. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications. [CrossRef]
  8. N. N. Krishnaveni, K. Chitra (2017). CFTLB: a novel cross-layer fault tolerant and load balancing protocol for WMN. International Journal of Electronics. [CrossRef]
  9. Michael Rademacher, Karl Jonas, Florian Siebertz, Adam Rzyska, Moritz Schlebusch, Markus Kessel (2017). The Computer Journal, Volume 60, Issue 10, October 2017, Pages 1520–1535. [CrossRef]
  10. Yan Feng, Xingxing Wu, Yaoke Hu (2017). Forecasting Research on the Wireless Mesh Network Throughput Based on the Support Vector Machine. Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  11. Mustapha Boushaba, Abdelhakim Hafid, Michel Gendreau (2017). Node stability-based routing in Wireless Mesh Networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. [CrossRef]
  12. Khalid Mahmood, Babar Nazir, Iftikhar Ahmad Khan, Nadir Shah (2017). Search-based routing in wireless mesh network. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. [CrossRef]
  13. G. Vijaya Kumar and C. Shoba Bindu (2017). Liberal method of access point selection in wireless mesh networks. International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems. [CrossRef]
  14. Jihong Wang, Wenxiao Shi (2017). Joint multicast routing and channel assignment for multi-radio multi-channel wireless mesh networks with hybrid traffic. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. [CrossRef]
  15. Kagan Gokbayrak, E. Alper Yıldırım(2017). Exact and heuristic approaches based on noninterfering transmissions for joint gateway selection, time slot allocation, routing and power control for wireless mesh networks. Computers & Operations Research. [CrossRef]
  16. Liang Zhao, Ahmed Al-Dubai, Xianwei Li, Guolong Chen, Geyong Min (2017). A new efficient cross-layer relay node selection model for Wireless Community Mesh Networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering. [CrossRef]
  17. Jinqiang Yu, Wai-Choong Wong (2017). A Network Resource Management Framework for Wireless Mesh Networks. Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  18. Saleem Iqbal, Abdul Hanan Abdullah, Kashif Naseer Qureshi (2017). Channel quality and utilization metric for interference estimation in Wireless Mesh Networks. Computers, Electrical Engineering. [CrossRef]
  19. Jae-Wan Kim, Sang-Tae Kim & Yang-Ick Joo (2017). Distributed Channel Assignment Algorithm Based on Traffic Awareness in Wireless Mesh Networks. Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  20. Dibakar Chakraborty, Khumbar Debbarma(2017). Q-CAR: an intelligent solution for joint QoS multicast routing and channel assignment in multichannel multiradio wireless mesh networks. Applied Intelligence. [CrossRef]
  21. Zhufang Kuang, Zhigang Chen (2017). A high reliability and low latency routing algorithm in cognitive wireless mesh networks. International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems. [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang Yong, Liu Han, Ma Wenjie, Liu Kai-ming, Li Nan (2017). D-LAJOA: DYNAMIC LOAD-AWARE JOINT OPTIMAL ALGORITHM IN MULTI-RADIO MULTI-CHANNEL WIRELESS MESH NETWORKS.
  23. Xiaojun Wang, Lingzhen Meng, Jiangfei Peng and Xiaoshu Chen (2017). A joint routing and channel assignment in multi-radio multi-channel wireless mesh networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks. [CrossRef]
  24. Yuan Chai, Wenxiao Shi, Tianhe Shi, Xiaoping Yang (2017). An efficient cooperative hybrid routing protocol for hybrid wireless mesh networks. Wireless Networks. [CrossRef]
  25. G. Audrito, A.A. G. Audrito, A.A. Bertossi, A. Navarra, C.M. Pinotti(2017). Maximizing the overall end-user satisfaction of data broadcast in wireless mesh networks. Journal of Discrete Algorithms. [CrossRef]
  26. Jamal, N. Al-Karaki, Ghada A. Al-Mashaqbeh, Sameer Bataineh(2017). Routing protocols in wireless mesh networks: a survey. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology. [CrossRef]
  27. L. M. Kola, M. Velempini (2018). The Design and Implementation of the XWCETT Routing Algorithm in Cognitive Radio Based Wireless Mesh Networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. [CrossRef]
  28. Jingyang Lu, Xingyu Xiang, Dan Shen; Genshe Chen, Ning Chen, Erik Blasch, Khanh Pham, Yu ChenArtificial (2018). intelligence based directional mesh network design for spectrum efficiency. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  29. Khulan Batbaya,Emmanouil Dimogerontakis,Roc Meseguer,Esunly Medina, Rodrigo M. Santos (2018). The RIMO Gateway Selection Approach for Mesh Networks: Towards a Global Internet Access for All †. Proceedings. [CrossRef]
  30. Majid Asadi Shahmirzadi, Mehdi Dehghan, Abdulrasoul Ghasemi(2018). An optimization framework for multicasting in MCMR wireless mesh network with partially overlapping channels. Wireless Networks. [CrossRef]
  31. Tran Anh Quang Pham, Kamal Deep Singh, Juan Antonio Rodríguez-Aguilar, Gauthier Picard, Kandaraj Piamrat, Jesús Cerquides, César Viho (2018). AD3-GLaM: A cooperative distributed QoE-based approach for SVC video streaming over wireless mesh networks. Ad Hoc Networks. [CrossRef]
  32. Wenxiao Shi, Shaobo Wang, Zhuo Wang, Endong Wang (2018). An efficient channel assignment algorithm for multicast wireless mesh networks. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications. [CrossRef]
  33. Zeineb Lazrag, Monia Hamdi, Mourad Zaied (2018). Bi-objective GA for Cost-Effective and Delay-Aware Gateway Placement in Wireless Mesh Networks. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  34. Tran Anh Quang Pham, Kamal Deep Singh, Juan Antonio Rodríguez-Aguilar, Gauthier Picard, Kandaraj Piamrat, Jesús Cerquides, César Viho (2018). AD3-GLaM: A cooperative distributed QoE-based approach for SVC video streaming over wireless mesh networks. Ad Hoc Networks. [CrossRef]
  35. Ilir Shinko, Vladi Kolici, Ryoichiro Obukata, Admir Barolli, Tetsuya Oda, Leonard Barolli (2018). Performance analysis of a genetic algorithm-based system for wireless mesh networks considering exponential and Weibull distributions, DCF and EDCA, and different number of flows. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. [CrossRef]
  36. Leili Farzinvash (2018). A novel approach for multicast call acceptance in multi-channel multi-radio wireless mesh networks. Wireless Networks. [CrossRef]
  37. Maheen Islam, Md. Abdur Razzaque, Md. Mamun-Or-Rashid, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, Abdulhameed Alelaiwi, Atif Alamri (2018). Traffic engineering in cognitive mesh networks: Joint link-channel selection and power allocation. Computer Communications. [CrossRef]
  38. Jilong Li, Bhagya Nathali Silva, Muhammad Diyan, Zhenbo Cao, Kijun Han (2018). A clustering-based routing algorithm in IoT aware Wireless Mesh Networks. Sustainable Cities and Society. [CrossRef]
  39. Kagan Gokbayrak(2018). Robust gateway placement in wireless mesh networks. Computers & Operations Research. [CrossRef]
  40. Y. Mallikarjuna Rao, M. V. Y. Mallikarjuna Rao, M. V. Subramanyam, K. Satya Prasad (2018). Cluster-based mobility management algorithms for wireless mesh networks. Communication system. [CrossRef]
  41. Fuad, A. Ghaleb, Maznah Kamat, Mazleena Salleh, Mohd. Foad Rohani, Shukor Abd Razak, Mohd Arief Shah (2018). Fairness of Channel Assignment Algorithm Based on Weighted Links Ranking Scheme for Wireless Mesh Network. Fairness of Channel Assignment Algorithm Based on Weighted Links Ranking Scheme for Wireless Mesh Network. [CrossRef]
  42. Y. Mallikarjuna Rao, M. V. Subramanyam, K. Satya Prasad (2018). Cluster Based Hybrid Routing Protocol for Wireless Mesh Networks. Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  43. Wenxiao Shi, Shaobo Wang, Zhuo Wang, Ruidong Zhang (2018). An Efficient Multicast Routing Algorithm for Wireless Mesh Networks. An Efficient Multicast Routing Algorithm for Wireless Mesh Networks. [CrossRef]
  44. Cheng-Han Lin, Ce-Kuen Shieh, Wen-Shyang Hwang, Wei-Tsang Huang (2018). Proportional bandwidth allocation with consideration of delay constraint over IEEE 802.11e-based wireless mesh networks.
  45. Vinícius, N. Medeiros, Bruno Silvestre, Vinicius C. M. Borges (2019). Multi-objective routing aware of mixed IoT traffic for low-cost wireless Backhauls.
  46. G. P. Raja, S. Mangai (2019). Firefly load balancing based energy optimized routing for multimedia data delivery in wireless mesh network. Cluster Computing. [CrossRef]
  47. Feng Zeng, Nan Zhao, Wenjia Li (2019). Joint interference optimization and user satisfaction improvement for multicast routing and channel assignment in wireless mesh networks. Cluster Computing. [CrossRef]
  48. Samurdhi Karunaratne, Haris Galanin (2019). An Overview of Machine Learning Approaches in Wireless Mesh Networks. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  49. R. Parvanak, M. Jahanshahi, M. Dehghan(2019). A cross-layer learning automata-based gateway selection method in multi-radio multi-channel wireless mesh networks. Computing. [CrossRef]
  50. Amin Erfanian Araqi, Behrad Mahboobi (2019). Joint Channel Assignment and Multicast Routing in Multi-Channel Multi-Radio Wireless Mesh Networks Based on Q-Learning. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  51. Robert singh, D. Devaraj, R. Narmatha Banu (2019). Genetic algorithm-based optimization of load-balanced routing for AMI with wireless mesh networks. Applied Soft Computing. [CrossRef]
  52. Nandini Balusu, Suresh Pabboju, G Narsimha (2019). An Intelligent Channel Assignment Approach for Minimum Interference in Wireless Mesh Networks Using Learning Automata and Genetic Algorithms. Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  53. B. Prakash, S. Jayashri, T. S. Karthik (2019). An Intelligent Channel Assignment Approach for Minimum Interference in Wireless Mesh Networks Using Learning Automata and Genetic Algorithms A hybrid genetic artificial neural network (G-ANN) algorithm for optimization of energy component in a wireless mesh network toward green computing. Soft Computing. [CrossRef]
  54. Esmaeil Nik Maleki, Ghasem Mirjalily (2019). Cross layer resource allocation for fault-tolerant topology control in wireless mesh networks based on genetic algorithm. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. [CrossRef]
  55. Lamri Sayad, Louiza Bouallouche-Medjkoune, Djamil Aissani (2019). An Electromagnetism-like mechanism algorithm for the router node placement in wireless mesh networks. Soft Computing. [CrossRef]
  56. Muhammad Usama, Junaid Qadir, Aunn Raza, Hunain Arif, Kok-lim Alvin Yau, Yehia Elkhatib, Amir Hussain (2019). Unsupervised Machine Learning for Networking: Techniques, Applications and Research Challenges. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  57. Samurdhi Karunaratne, Ramy Atawia, Erma Perenda, Haris Gacanin (2019). Artificial Intelligence Driven Optimization of Channel and Location in Wireless Networks. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  58. Antonio Cilfone, Luca Davoli,Laura Belli,Gianluigi Ferrari (2019). Wireless Mesh Networking: An IoT-Oriented Perspective Survey on Relevant Technologies. Future Internet. [CrossRef]
  59. Lu Yang, Yujie Li, Shiyan Wang, Haoyue Xiao (2019). Interference-Avoid Channel Assignment for Multi-Radio Multi-Channel Wireless Mesh Networks with Hybrid Traffic. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  60. Anbu Ananth, C; Suresh, T; Prabakaran, G (2019). Efficient Load Balancing Techniques for Wireless Mesh Networks Based on Multi-Path Optimized Link State Routing Protocol. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. [CrossRef]
  61. Akram Hakiri, Aniruddha Gokhale, Pascal Berthou (2019). Software-defined wireless mesh networking for reliable and real-time smart city cyber physical applications. Software-defined wireless mesh networking for reliable and real-time smart city cyber physical applications. [CrossRef]
  62. Leili Farzinvash (2019). Online multicast tree construction with bandwidth and delay constraints in multi-channel multi-radio wireless mesh networks. Telecommunication Systems.
  63. Chun-Cheng Lin, Shu-Huai Chang, Chien-Liang Chen (2020). Link Scheduling for Wireless Mesh Networks Considering Gateway Feature. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things. [CrossRef]
  64. Jianjun Jing, Kailing Yao, Yuhua Xu, Xin Liu, Yuli Zhang, Changhua Yao (2020). QoE-oriented partially overlapping channel access in wireless networks: a game-theoretic learning approach. Wireless Networks. [CrossRef]
  65. Syed Sherjeel, A. Gilani, Amir Qayyum, Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Mukhtiar Bano (2020). SDNMesh: An SDN Based Routing Architecture for Wireless Mesh Networks. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  66. Mouna Naravani, Narayan D.G., Sumedha Shinde, Mohammed Moin Mulla (2020). A Cross-Layer Routing Metric with Link Prediction in Wireless Mesh Networks. Procedia Computer Science. [CrossRef]
  67. Admir Barolli, Kevin Bylykbashi, Ermioni Qafzezi, Shinji Sakamoto, Leonard Barolli.
  68. Jawad Manzoor, Llorenç Cerdà-Alabern, Ramin Sadre, Idilio Drago (2020). On the Performance of QUIC over Wireless Mesh Networks. Journal of Network and Systems Management. [CrossRef]
  69. Amar Singh, Shakti Kumar, Ajay Singh, Sukhbir S. (2020). Walia Parallel 3-Parent Genetic Algorithm with Application to Routing in Wireless Mesh Networks. Implementations and Applications of Machine Learning. [CrossRef]
  70. Syed Sherjeel, A. Gilani, Amir Qayyum, Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Mukhtiar Bano (2020). SDNMesh: An SDN Based Routing Architecture for Wireless Mesh Networks. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  71. Lamri Sayad, Louiza Bouallouche-Medjkoune, Djamil Aissani (2020). A Chemical Reaction Algorithm to Solve the Router Node Placement in Wireless Mesh Networks. Mobile Networks and Applications volume. [CrossRef]
  72. Wajahat Maqbool, S. K. Syed-Yusof, N. M. Abdul Latiff, Bushra Naeem, Bilal Shabbir, N. N. Nik Abdul Malik (2020). Optimal End-to-End Path Selection Mechanism for CR-WMNs Based on Fuzzy Logic System. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  73. Nandini Balusu (2020). Swarm Optimization Based Gravitational Search Approach for Channel Assignment in MCMR Wireless Mesh Network.
  74. Isaac Machorro-Cano,Giner Alor-Hernández,Mario Andrés Paredes-Valverde,Lisbeth Rodríguez-Mazahua,José Luis Sánchez-Cervantes, José Oscar Olmedo-Aguirre(2020). HEMS-IoT: A Big Data and Machine Learning-Based Smart Home System for Energy Saving. Energies. [CrossRef]
  75. G.P. Raja, S. Mangai (2020). Investigation on optimization, prioritizing and weight allocation techniques for load balancing and controlling multimedia traffic in wireless mesh network. International Journal of Business Information Systems. [CrossRef]
  76. Narayan, D.G. , Mouna Naravani, Sumedha Shinde (2020). Cross-layer Optimization for Video Transmission using MDC in Wireless Mesh Networks. Procedia Computer Science. [CrossRef]
  77. Fuad, A. Ghaleb, Bander Ali Saleh Al-Rimy, Wadii Boulila, Faisal Saeed,Maznah Kamat,Mohd. Foad Rohani,Shukor Abd Razak(2021). Fairness-Oriented Semichaotic Genetic Algorithm-Based Channel Assignment Technique for Node Starvation Problem in Wireless Mesh Networks. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. [CrossRef]
  78. Satish BHOJANNAWAR, Shrinivas MANGALWEDE (2021). Interference, Traffic Load and Delay Aware Routing Metric for Wireless Mesh Network. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering. [CrossRef]
  79. Di Zhou, Min Sheng, Jiaxin Wu, Jiandong Li, Zhu Han, Kyung Hee (2021). Gateway Placement in Integrated Satellite–Terrestrial Networks: Supporting Communications and Internet of Remote Things. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  80. Diana Jeba Jingle, P. Mano Paul (2021). A collaborative defense protocol against collaborative attacks in wireless mesh networks. International Journal of Enterprise Network Management. [CrossRef]
  81. Shasha Zhao, Gan Yu (2021). Channel allocation optimization algorithm for hybrid wireless mesh networks for information physical fusion system. Computer Communications. [CrossRef]
  82. Fuad, A. Ghaleb, Bander Ali Saleh Al-Rimy, Wadii Boulila, Faisal aeed,Maznah Kamat,Mohd. Foad Rohani, Shukor Abd Razak (2021). Fairness-Oriented Semichaotic Genetic Algorithm-Based Channel Assignment Technique for Node Starvation Problem in Wireless Mesh Networks. Networking and Internet Architecture. [CrossRef]
  83. Amel Faiza Tandjaoui, Mejdi Kaddour(2021). A Cross Layer Optimization Model for Investigating the Impact of Partially Overlapping Channels on Wireless Mesh Networks Capacity. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks. [CrossRef]
  84. Iyad Lahsen-Cherif, Lynda Zitoune, Véronique Vèque(2021). Energy Efficient Routing for Wireless Mesh Networks with Directional Antennas: When Q-learning meets Ant systems. Ad Hoc Networks. [CrossRef]
  85. Khamxay Leevangtou, Hideya Ochiai, Chaodit Aswakul (2021). Application of Q-Learning in Routing of Software-Defined Wireless Mesh Network. IEEJ. [CrossRef]
  86. Ankita Singh, Shiv Prakash, Sudhakar Singh (2021). Optimization of reinforcement routing for wireless mesh network using machine learning and high-performance computing. Concurrency and computation. [CrossRef]
  87. INTERFERENCE AND LOAD BALANCING ROUTING, METRICS USED IN WIRELESS MESH NETWORK: NEW, TREND AND CHALLENGES (2021). INTERFERENCE AND LOAD BALANCING ROUTING METRICS USED IN WIRELESS MESH NETWORK: NEW TREND AND CHALLENGES. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology.
  88. Fuad, A. Ghaleb, Bander Ali Saleh Al-Rimy,Wadii Boulila, Faisal Saeed,Maznah Kamat,Mohd. Foad Rohani, Shukor Abd Razak (2021). Fairness-Oriented Semichaotic Genetic Algorithm-Based Channel Assignment Technique for Node Starvation Problem in Wireless Mesh Networks. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. [CrossRef]
  89. Mariusz Wzorek, Cyrille Berger, Patrick Doherty (2021). Router and gateway node placement in wireless mesh networks for emergency rescue scenarios. Autonomous Intelligent Systems. [CrossRef]
  90. Nabil Abdelkader Nouri, Zibouda Aliouat, Abdenacer Naouri,Soufiene Ali Hassak (2021). Accelerated PSO algorithm applied to client’s coverage and routers connectivity in wireless mesh networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. [CrossRef]
  91. M Kiran Sastry, Arshad Ahmad Khan Mohammad, Arif Mohammad Abdul (2021). Optimized Energy-efficient Load Balance Routing Protocol for Wireless Mesh Networks. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications.
  92. Karunya Rathan, SusaiMichael Emalda Roslin, Easpin Brumancia (2021). MO-CSO-based load-balanced routing in MRMC WMN. IET communication. [CrossRef]
  93. Yanjun Yang, Aimin Liu, Hongwei Xin, Jianguo Wang, Xin Yu, Wen Zhang (2021). Deployment optimization of wireless mesh networks in wind turbine condition monitoring system. Wireless Networks.
  94. Rohit Kumar, Venkanna U., Vivek Tiwari (2021). Opt-ACM: An Optimized load balancing based Admission Control Mechanism for Software Defined Hybrid Wireless based IoT (SDHW-IoT) network. Computer Networks. [CrossRef]
  95. Ángeles Verdejo Espinosa, José Lopez Ruiz,Francisco Mata Mata, Macarena Espinilla Estevez (2021). Application of IoT in Healthcare: Keys to Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sensors. [CrossRef]
  96. Smita Mahajan, R. Harikrishnan, Ketan Kotecha (2022). Adaptive Routing in Wireless Mesh Networks Using Hybrid Reinforcement Learning Algorithm. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  97. Saleem Iqbal, Kashif Naseer Qureshi, Saqib Majeed, Kayhan Zrar Ghafoor, Gwanggil Jeon (2022). Partially Overlapped Channel Assignment for Cloud-Based Heterogeneous Cellular and Mesh Networks. Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  98. Satish, S. Bhojannawar, Shrinivas R. Managalwede (2022). Distributed and Dynamic Channel Assignment Schemes for Wireless Mesh Network. Computer Network and Information Security. [CrossRef]
  99. Fawaz, S. Al-Anzi (2022). Design and analysis of intrusion detection systems for wireless mesh networks. Digital Communications and Networks. [CrossRef]
  100. Thuy-Van, T. Duong, Le Huu Binh, Vuong M. Ngo (2022). Reinforcement learning for QoS-guaranteed intelligent routing in Wireless Mesh Networks with heavy traffic load. ICT Express. [CrossRef]
  101. Farid Bavifard, Mohammad Kheyrandish, Mohammad Mosleh(2022). A new approach based on game theory to reflect meta-cluster dependencies into VoIP attack detection using ensemble clustering. Cluster Computing. [CrossRef]
  102. Shabir Ali, Mayank Pandey, Neeraj Tyagi (2022). SDFog-Mesh: A software-defined fog computing architecture over wireless mesh networks for semi-permanent smart environments. Computer Networks. [CrossRef]
  103. Admir Barolli, Kevin Bylykbashi, Ermioni Qafzezi, Shinji Sakamoto, Leonard Barolli (2022). A comparison study of Weibull, normal and Boulevard distributions for wireless mesh networks considering different router replacement methods by a hybrid intelligent simulation system. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. [CrossRef]
  104. Sylia Mekhmoukh Taleb, Yassine Meraihi, Asma Benmessaoud Gabis, Seyedali Mirjalili, Amar Ramdane-Cherif (2022). Nodes placement in wireless mesh networks using optimization approaches: a survey. Neural Computing and Applications. [CrossRef]
  105. Admir Barolli, Kevin Bylykbashi, Ermioni Qafzezi, Shinji Sakamoto, Leonard Barolli (2022). A hybrid intelligent system based on particle swarm optimization and distributed genetic algorithm for WMNs: a comparison study of boulevard and stadium distributions considering different router replacement methods and load balancing. Wireless Networks. [CrossRef]
  106. Admir Barolli,Shinji SakamotoKevin Bylykbashi, Leonard Barolli (2022). A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building IoT Networks: Performance Comparison of Different Router Replacement Methods for WMNs Considering Stadium Distribution of IoT Devices. Sensor. [CrossRef]
  107. Ohara Seiji, Barolli Admir, Ampririt Phudit, Sakamoto Shinji, Matsuo Keita d, Barolli Leonard (2022). A Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Constructing IoT Networks: Performance Evaluation of WMN-PSODGA Simulation System Considering Different Router Replacement Methods. Internet of Things. [CrossRef]
  108. Shubhangi Kharche, Sanjay Pawar (2022). Optimizing network lifetime and QoS in 6LoWPANs using deep neural networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering. [CrossRef]
  109. Md. Iftekhar Hussain, Nurzaman Ahmed, Md. Zaved Iqubal Ahmed, Nityananda Sarma (2022). QoS Provisioning in Wireless Mesh Networks: A Survey. Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  110. C. S. Anita, R. Sasikumar (2022). Neighbor Coverage and Bandwidth Aware Multiple Disjoint Path Discovery in Wireless Mesh Networks. Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  111. Niloofar Tahmasebi-Pouya, Mehdi-Agha Sarram, Seyed-Akbar Mostafavi (2022). Load Balancing in Mobile Edge Computing: A Reinforcement Learning Approach. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  112. Ganesh Reddy Karri, A. V. Prabu, Sidheswar Routray, D. Sumathi, S. Rajasoundaran, Amrit Mukherjee, Pushpita Chatterjee, Waleed Alnumay (2022). Efficient Key Management Mechanism with Trusted Gateways for Wireless Mesh Networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. [CrossRef]
  113. Admir Barolli, Kevin Bylykbashi, Ermioni Qafzezi, Shinji Sakamoto, Leonard Barolli(2022). Implementation of roulette wheel and random selection methods in a hybrid intelligent system: A comparison study for two Islands and Subway distributions considering different router replacement methods. Applied Soft Computing. [CrossRef]
  114. Jianwei Zhang, Chenwei Zhao, Zengwei Zheng, Jianping Cai (2022). SR-WMN: Online Network Throughput Optimization in Wireless Mesh Networks with Segment Routing. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  115. Daud Abdul, Jiang Wenqi (2022). Evaluating appropriate communication technology for smart grid by using a comprehensive decision-making approach fuzzy TOPSIS. Soft Computing. [CrossRef]
  116. Maraj Uddin Ahmed Siddiqui, Faizan Qamar,Muhammad Tayyab,MHD Nour Hindia,Quang Ngoc Nguyen,Rosilah Hassan (2022). Mobility Management Issues and Solutions in 5G-and-Beyond Networks: A Comprehensive Review. Electronics. [CrossRef]
  117. Moses Effiong Ekpenyong, Daniel Ekpenyong Asuquo, Ifiok James Udo, Samuel Akpan Robinson, Francis Funebi Ijebu (2022). IPv6 Routing Protocol Enhancements over Low-power and Lossy Networks for IoT Applications: A Systematic Review. New Review of Information Networking. [CrossRef]
  118. Rashmi Kushwah (2023). A novel traffic aware reliable gateway selection in wireless mesh network. Cluster Computing. [CrossRef]
  119. Sylia Mekhmoukh Taleb, Yassine Meraihi, Seyedali Mirjalili, Dalila Acheli, Amar Ramdane-Cherif, Asma Benmessaoud Gabis (2023). Mesh Router Nodes Placement for Wireless Mesh Networks Based on an Enhanced Moth–Flame Optimization Algorithm. Mobile Networks and Applications. [CrossRef]
  120. Narayana Rao Appini, A. Rajasekhar Reddy (2023). Joint Channel Assignment and Bandwidth Reservation Using Improved FireFly Algorithm (IFA) in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMN). Wireless Personal Communications. [CrossRef]
  121. Tetsuya Oda (2023). A Delaunay Edges and Simulated Annealing-Based Integrated Approach for Mesh Router Placement Optimization in Wireless Mesh Networks. Sensors. [CrossRef]
  122. Abdelaziz Salama, Achilleas Stergioulis, Ali M. Hayajneh, Syed Ali Raza Zaidi, Des McLernon, Ian Robertson (2023). Decentralized Federated Learning Over Slotted ALOHA Wireless Mesh Networking. IEEE. [CrossRef]
  123. Nitasha Sahani Ruoxi Zhu Jin-Hee Cho Chen-Ching Liu (2023). Machine Learning-based Intrusion Detection for Smart Grid Computing: A Survey.ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems. [CrossRef]
  124. Ankita Singh, Sudhakar Singh, Shiv Prakash (2023). Critical Comparative Analysis and Recommendation in MAC Protocols for Wireless Mesh Networks Using Multi-Objective Optimization and Statistical Testing. Wireless Personal Communications volume. [CrossRef]
  125. Odongo Steven Eyobu, Kamwesigye Edwinah (2023). A Deep Learning-based Routing Approach for Wireless Mesh Backbone Networks. IEEE. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sample of WMN.
Figure 1. Sample of WMN.
Preprints 120193 g001
Figure 2. sample of fuzzy inference.
Figure 2. sample of fuzzy inference.
Preprints 120193 g002
Figure 3. load balancing algorithms in gateway selection in mash network.
Figure 3. load balancing algorithms in gateway selection in mash network.
Preprints 120193 g003
Table 1. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and Weighted Sum Algorithm.
Table 1. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and Weighted Sum Algorithm.
Title Writers Year Research goal Methodology Result
logical topology design for K-connected channel allocation and multi-radio wireless mesh networks. Xuecai Bao et al 2014 Determine the minimum and maximum numbers of channels that may be allocated after analyzing the factors impacting channel assignment performance. k-connected logical topology Numerical results confirm that our proposed channel assignment greatly improves network performance in the context of limited radio interfaces.
Wireless Mesh Networks with a Distributed Channel Assignment Algorithm that Considers Traffic Jae-Wan Kim, et al 2017 To improve performance, learn more about the multi-channel assignment system. a new method of WMN channel allocation based on the use of many channels and interfaces Results show that the proposed architecture improves network throughput in compared to the status quo.
In MIMO WDM wireless mesh networks, intelligent QoS multicast routing and channel assignment are performed using Q-CAR. Chakraborty, Debbarma 2017 uses sophisticated computational approaches to resolve the channel assignment and multicast tree building issues Q-CAR Finally, we compare Q-CAR to two alternative algorithms, Quality of Service Multicast Routing and Channel Assignment (QoS-MRCA) and intelligent Quality of Service Multicast Routing and Channel Assignment (i-QCA), for use in multichannel, multiradio wireless mesh networks. We performed comprehensive tests to prove that the proposed method is the best option.
An efficient and quick routing technique for cognitive wireless mesh networks Kuang , Chen 2017 HRL2A aims to be a reliable, low-latency route. HRL2A
In multi-radio, multi-channel wireless mesh networks, channel assignment and routing are done simultaneously. Xiaojun Wang, et al 2017 Choose the channel with the least amount of static. MRMC-AODV In simulations, the HRL2A algorithm achieved the desired result. The construction route is quicker and more trustworthy than the other. The production has increased.
Highest end-user satisfaction wireless mesh networks for data transmission G. Audrito , et al 2017 Our objective is to optimize total user satisfaction provided that no more than K times of the same common material can be retransmitted at various speeds by different access points. Time by exploiting the convex Monge property of the satisfaction function The simulation results show that this method has the potential to improve network performance, latency, and packet loss.
An overview of wireless mesh network routing methods Jamal N. Al-Karaki, et al 2017 Consider the routing metrics, operations, and design concerns of these protocols. MANETs Then, optimal strategies are devised for solving certain particular problems in polynomial time.
Effective cooperative hybrid routing in hybrid node wireless mesh networks Yuan Chai, et al 2017 Consider the channel, interference, and client power constraints while choosing a route. CHRP This publication offers a wide-ranging survey of relevant methodologies and many contrasts between diverse approaches. We also describe the most critical issues that affect the overall protocol and routing metric development for WMNs. The paper concludes with several recommendations for moving ahead in this crucial area.
The D-LAJOA method is a dynamic load-aware joint optimum technique for wireless mesh networks with multiple radios and multiple channels. Zhang Yong, et al 2017 Design optimizations for interference avoidance, load balancing, channel allocation, and routing LAJOA Using ns-3 simulations, we showed how the proposed CHRP improves upon state-of-the-art solutions in terms of packet loss rate, latency, network throughput, client energy consumption, and residual client energy.
Algorithms for weighted links-based channel allocation and its fairness An Effective Multicast Routing Algorithm in Wireless Mesh Networks, and a Cluster-Based Method for Evaluating a Hybrid Routing Protocol Fuad A. Ghaleb, et al 2018 Reduce interference to maximize network performance. Algorithm based on weighted link ranking scheme The average performance, network overhead, and packet loss are all much better for D-LAJOA in the simulations.
Fair bandwidth distribution in IEEE 802.11e wireless mesh networks when there is a delay restriction Rohani, et al 2018 connection load and connection quality between two nodes must be optimized for optimal resource use in order to provide a high level of service to end users. Combination of intra cluster routing protocol (ICR) and inter cluster routing protocol Numerical simulations have proven that the proposed channel assignment method is effective in decreasing interference, increasing network capacity, and guaranteeing fair channel allocation.
Cluster-based mobility management algorithms for wireless mesh networks Y. Mallikarjuna Rao, et al 2018 proposes a delay-aware proportional bandwidth allocation method LLLQ Throughput, end-to-end latency, packet delivery ratio, and jitter are all improved over baseline routing approaches, showing that the proposed protocol is the way to go.
Design and Implementation of the XWCETT Routing Algorithm for Cognitive Radio-Based Wireless Mesh Networks. Wenxiao Shi, et al 2018 Protocols for routing and clustering analysis QoE In simulations, we found that our method significantly improved WMN efficiency.
Online multicast tree construction is used in multi-channel, multi-radio wireless mesh networks, however it is constrained by latency and bandwidth. Cheng-Han Lin, et al 2018 Cognitive radio (CR) technology and other emerging wireless methods are being integrated into the existing wireless infrastructure. Static clustering algorithm
Dynamic clustering algorithm
The results of the simulations show that the suggested technique improves over its forerunners in terms of throughput equity among WMN users and end-to-end transmission delay.
Wireless networks with low costs that provide multi-objective routing and take into account mixed IoT traffic backhauls Y. Mallikarjuna Rao, et al 2018 Each incoming session's latency and bandwidth needs may be accommodated by the proposed method. xWCETT Compared to the state-of-the-art baseline mobility management algorithms and routing protocols, the realized throughput, packet delivery ratio, and communication cost are all much greater.
Multimedia data transfer in a wireless mesh network with energy-efficient load-balancing routing employing fireflies Kola, Velempini 2019 uses three weighted criteria to determine how to route in a wide variety of wireless mesh networks A mathematical model to satisfy bandwidth requirement in the second phase, which constructs the tree over the selected paths. The results of the comparative evaluation demonstrate that the xWCETT has much greater average throughput, latency, and the normalized routing load.
Using segment routing and gateway-aware link scheduling, wireless mesh networks may have their network throughput optimized in real-time. Wireless Mesh Networks Leili Farzinvash 2019 Balancing the load MAXI Extensive simulations show that the proposed method works well. It increases the total acceptance rate from the previous systems by as much as 60%, for example.
dynamic programming excels above genetic algorithms in performance. Chun-Cheng Lin, et al 2022 Determine the minimum and maximum numbers of channels that may be allocated after analyzing the factors impacting channel assignment performance. SR-WMN The experimental results show that the proposed scheduling method not only preserves numerous wireless network characteristics, but also correctly simulates the results of dynamic programming and surpasses the genetic algorithm.
Table 2. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and MCDM.
Table 2. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and MCDM.
Title Writers Year Research goal Methodology Result
Sustainable Development Goals Implementation Drivers from IoT Healthcare Applications Ángeles Verdejo et sl 2021 There is a close relationship between public health, energy efficiency, and sustainable development. Methodology combining a literature research with an examination of how IoT and smart technologies might contribute to the UN's Sustainable Development Goals Questions like the ones below are addressed with regards to these systems and applications as a consequence of the study of results: (a) Do Internet of Things (IoT) applications play a crucial role in bettering human health and the state of the planet? (b) Do any studies or case studies show that IoT applications improve public health and have been deployed in any cities or territories? What indicators and goals of sustainable development may be evaluated in the applications and projects under consideration (c)?
A Systematic Analysis of Mobility Management Challenges and Approaches for 5G and Beyond Networks Maraj Uddin Ahmed Siddiqui et sl 2022 It is crucial to deal with traffic issues and eliminate any possibility of a network failure. DMM By outlining recent studies, we demonstrate the feasibility of a flat network architecture for mobility management in B5G and illustrate its potential and advantages for efficient and fast traffic routing.
Systematic Review of Improvements to the IPv6 Routing Protocol across Low-power and Lossy Networks for Internet-of-Things Applications Moses Effiong Ekpenyong et sl 2022 Literature-adopted metrics are analyzed for their strengths and flaws, with recommendations for improving areas of weakness offered. machine learning (ML) for RPL functionalities in IoT-based networks Review results showed that ML approaches may help deploy several sought-after parameters to significantly boost LLNs' performance.
Using a Fuzzy Logic-based Method for Evaluating Smart Grid Communication Technologies TOPSIS Daud Abdul, Jiang Wenqi 2022 The purpose of this research is to look at a viable means of SG communication. F-TOPSIS According to the case study's findings, wireless communication technology is better suited to the SG. Future SG communication technology infrastructure may benefit from this broader examination of SGs and telecommunications networks from the vantage point of power production, transmission, distribution, and pollution.
Table 3. Gateways in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and load balancing algorithms.
Table 3. Gateways in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and load balancing algorithms.
Title Writers Year Research goal Methodology Result
Future Opportunities in Software-Defined Wireless Mesh Networking and the Current State of the Art Michael Rademacher, Karl Jonas, Florian Siebertz, Adam Rzyska, Moritz Schlebusch, Markus Kessel 2017 Examines where we are now with regards to software-defined wireless meshed networks SDN On the control plane, it is necessary to represent and handle modulation and coding, routing and load balancing, client administration, and topology discovery.
Innovative CFTLB technology for wireless mesh networks, which can handle faults and distribute them evenly. N. N. Krishnaveni, K. Chitra 2017 Fix WMN's problems. CFTLB The proposed CFTLB uses a hashing algorithm to check the packets' integrity and outperforms prior art in terms of throughput, latency, and overhead.
Multicast traffic in multi-radio, multi-channel wireless mesh networks is coordinated by channel allocation. Jihong Wang, Wenxiao Shi 2017 From a traffic management standpoint, multicast routing and channel assignment issues are resolved by adding load balancing. POCs We present a heuristic method for multicast routing and channel assignment using a multicast weighted conflict graph to solve this problem. The simulation findings show that the service capacity of WMNs may be much enhanced by using this heuristic technique, while the computational cost of the problem is also greatly reduced.
The use of accurate and heuristic algorithms based on noninterfering transmissions to jointly choose gateways, allocate time slots, route data, and manage power in wireless mesh networks. Kagan Gokbayrak, E. Alper Yıldırım 2017 Our mission is to distribute resources across nodes in accordance with their traffic loads in order to optimize the service level defined by the minimal capacity-to-demand ratio. TDMA Our computer results demonstrate the correctness of the inequality and the promise of our precise and heuristic methods.
In wireless community mesh networks, a new and more efficient method of choosing relay nodes across layers is needed. Liang Zhao, Ahmed Al-Dubai, Xianwei Li, Guolong Chen, Geyong Min 2017 QoS Selects requires novel routing techniques to be developed in order to reduce interference on the selected channels. PP-QoS PP-QoS considers the busyness of the channel to further improve the efficacy of the route selection process. The simulation results show that the proposed model is superior than many alternative options.
A method for estimating interference in wireless meshed networks based on measurements of channel quality and utilization. Saleem Iqbal, Abdul Hanan Abdullah, Kashif Naseer Qureshi 2017 improved use of WMN network resources QUAM Simulation findings verified the efficacy of QUAM by demonstrating a significant improvement in network throughput with a reduction in network latency and packet losses.
Management of Resources in Wireless Mesh Networks Jinqiang Yu, Wai-Choong Wong 2017 routing specified gateway capabilities while accommodating for router and client quirks and taking load into account In multicast communication, the path-tracing technique is used to reduce the maximum channel use. MAP–STA It is possible to improve either network performance or user equity using the flexible MAPs for the backhaul and the utility-fair bandwidth distribution mechanism. We demonstrate the increased performance of the proposed approaches via simulations with various network topologies and scenarios.
Load-aware cooperative routing in wireless mesh networks that combine the best of both worlds Yuan Chai, Wenxiao Shi, Tianhe Shi 2017 Algorithm for routing based on clustering LA-CHRP The results of the simulations indicate that LA-CHRP has the potential to decrease latency and packet loss in hybrid WMNs while keeping the throughput the same.
Incorporating Reliability and Traffic into Gateway Selection in Wireless Mesh Networks Arash Bozorgchenani , Mohsen Jahanshahi 2017 To prevent wireless congestion, we implement the spatial reuse time division multiple access (TDMA) technique, which allocates time slots for wireless communications. Internet Gateway (IGW) selection The simulation findings demonstrate that our novel approach improves throughput, latency, and overall network energy consumption.
Balancing multicast traffic in densely connected wireless mesoscopic networks Majid Asadi Shahmirzadi, Mehdi Dehghan, Abdorasoul Ghasemi 2017 the goal being a higher data rate achieved by the coordinated control of network interfaces and channels Load-balanced Multicasting with Multiple Gateways (LMMG)
framework
The results of our simulations demonstrate the importance of channel optimization for network performance.
Secure gateway placement in clusters of wireless mesh networks, optimized for the Internet of Things Jilong Li, Bhagya Nathali Silva, Muhammad Diyan, Zhenbo Cao, Kijun Han 2018 Learn how to get around the issues of unipath routing. Minimizing the existing issues of networks From the simulation results, it is clear that the proposed method outperforms the current state-of-the-art routing metrics.
Hybrid traffic channel allocation in multi-radio, multi-channel wireless meshed networks with interference mitigation Kagan Gokbayrak 2018 Refactoring wireless protocols into control and forwarding choices provides a consolidated, real-time perspective on the whole network. TDMA In order to establish which of the suggested formulations, with or without valid inequalities, produces the best results in terms of accurate solution performance and linear programming (LP) relaxations in light of demand forecasting errors, a local search approach is introduced. prove, using these examples, that our local search method can fortify networks against inaccurate predicting.
Load balancing strategies for wireless mesh networks based on a multi-path optimal link state routing protocol; software-defined wireless mesh networking for reliable and real-time cyber physical applications in smart cities. Lu Yang, Yujie Li, Shiyan Wang, Haoyue Xiao 2019 Enhancing the Quality of Service for Multi-Radio Video Streaming Mesh Networks, or Wireless, LBIA-POCA The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed system achieves an acceptable performance and packet loss rate in hybrid traffic WMNs.
Improving Media Flow Management in Wireless Mesh Networked Video Applications Anbu Ananth, C; Suresh, T; Prabakaran, G 2019 Routing metrics help determine the optimal path for data to go from one node to another. MP-OLSR Dijkstra's initial method for finding the quickest route across a network has been improved upon to allow for quicker route computations. The method was designed to effectively get the alternative routes and to aid the cost function.
Load-balanced routing using MO-CSOs in the MRMC WMN Wind turbine condition monitoring system deployment optimization using wireless mesh networks Energy-efficient load-balance routing protocol for wireless mesh networks: research on optimization, prioritization, and weight allocation techniques for balancing and controlling multimedia traffic Akram Hakiri, Aniruddha Gokhale, Pascal Berthou 2019 Attempts to solve the shortcomings of standard approaches by proposing an energy-efficient load balancing routing measure. SDN Network virtualization, routing, and traffic engineering may improve the stability, flexibility, and predictability of a communication network.
Opt-ACM is an improved load balancing Admission Control Mechanism for SDHW-IoT networks. Narayan D.G., Mouna Naravani, Sumedha Shinde 2020 Congestion and collisions in networks are exacerbated by the use of shortest-path and GW routing algorithms. Multiple Description Coding (MDC) The results show that the proposed approach with MDC is superior to the status quo with respect to PSNR, frame delay, and frame loss.
Future Opportunities in Software-Defined Wireless Mesh Networking and the Current State of the Art G.P. Raja, S. Mangai 2020 By delivering a scalable, cost-effective, and simple-to-implement network infrastructure, we can ensure that the newly installed CMS will not disrupt the SCADA system's communication network in extreme conditions. WSN Developing a methodology for load-balancing and energy efficiency in WMN routing.
Innovative CFTLB technology for wireless mesh networks, which can handle faults and distribute them evenly. M Kiran Sastry, Arshad Ahmad Khan Mohammad, Arif Mohammad Abdul 2021 Congestion in the network should be reduced or avoided. QoS in the WMN by load balancing, and energy efficiency Results showed that the proposed routing protocols worked better than the two existing ones, Buffer-based load balancing and energy-delay-based load balancing.
Future Opportunities in Software-Defined Wireless Mesh Networking and the Current State of the Art Karunya Rathan, SusaiMichael Emalda Roslin, Easpin Brumancia 2021 Examines where we are now with regards to software-defined wireless meshed networks MO-CSOAHP The simulation results show that the proposed MO-CSO achieves higher network performance than the state-of-the-art routing techniques such as SBR, ETX, LG, NG, and IR.
Innovative CFTLB technology for wireless mesh networks, which can handle faults and distribute them evenly. Yanjun Yang, Aimin Liu, Hongwei Xin, Jianguo Wang, Xin Yu, Wen Zhang 2021 Fix WMN's problems. K-medoids clustering algorithm The results show that the proposed approach has the potential to reduce network operating costs, meet the capacity requirements of MC, and mitigate the effects of link losses.
Multicast traffic in multi-radio, multi-channel wireless mesh networks is coordinated by channel allocation. Rohit Kumar, Venkanna U., Vivek Tiwari 2021 From a traffic management standpoint, multicast routing and channel assignment issues are resolved by adding load balancing. Opt-ACM Mininet-Wifi can also simulate Opt-ACM in different network topologies, allowing comparisons to be made with both time-tested routing protocols like OLSR and OSPF and state-of-the-art alternatives like FACOR and EASDN. The Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and Packet Loss Ratio (PLR) achieved by Opt-ACM are superior than those achieved by competing techniques by an average of 9.47% and 12.32%, respectively. Improvements in Average Delay (AD) and Average Jitter (AJ) are similar in size, coming in at 26.77% and 33.10%, respectively.
Table 4. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and game theory.
Table 4. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and game theory.
Title Writers Year Research goal Methodology Result
More liberal techniques for access point selection in wireless mesh networks G. Vijaya Kumar and C. Shoba Bindu 2017 In WMNs, the system throughput is enhanced more so than with the RSS-based AP selection method. Vovel method of AP selection In order to connect to the internet using a WMN that has already been set up, users just need to pair their devices with one of the APs in the network.
Artificial intelligence-guided mesh network design for spectral efficiency Jingyang Lu, Xingyu Xiang, Dan Shen; Genshe Chen, Ning Chen
, Erik Blasch, Khanh Pham, Yu Chen
2018 A DMN might make greater use of its radio spectrum by using ML strategies from the field of artificial intelligence. DMN It enhances system security by reducing network congestion.
An efficient channel assignment method is necessary in multicast wireless mesh networks. Wenxiao Shi, Shaobo Wang, Zhuo Wang, Endong Wang 2018 We present the concept of local multicast and a channel assignment technique for multicast WMNs that accounts for interference and forwarding weight at the local level. Algorithm considering the interference of local multicast and forwarding weight of each node (LMFW). Simulations have demonstrated that the proposed method may increase WMN network capacity while decreasing interference.
Using a cooperative distributed QoE-based technique called AD3-GLaM, SVC video may be streamed through wireless mesh networks. Tran Anh Quang Pham, Kamal Deep Singh, Juan Antonio Rodríguez-Aguilar, Gauthier Picard, Kandaraj Piamrat , Jesús Cerquides , César Viho 2018 The ultimate objective is to improve everyone's time spent online. OLSR and AD3 AD3-GLaM makes use of OLSR, a common routing protocol used by the great majority of modern ad hoc-capable devices.
An optimization framework for multicasting across partly overlapping channels in a multihop, multiradio (MCMR) wireless mesh network Majid Asadi Shahmirzadi, Mehdi Dehghan, Abdulrasoul Ghasemi 2018 In particular, it tackles the problem of how to improve multi-channel multicast routing's performance. MG-POC Reducing network interference by using numerous gateways and channels that only partly overlap significantly increases network performance.
Gateways in Mesh Networks The RIMO Algorithm for Throughput Prediction Research in Wireless Mesh Networks: Towards Universal Internet Access Building on support vector machines Khulan Batbaya ,Emmanouil Dimogerontakis,Roc Meseguer,Esunly Medina, Rodrigo M. Santos 2018 With this best-effort method, each client node may choose its own gateway independently of the others. RIMO algorithm As a consequence, underprivileged people may access the Internet using a simple, robust, and cost-effective approach that does not rely on expensive network capacity planning and traffic management. As a result of RIMO's optimization, even a little increase in network traffic doesn't compromise performance. Through the employment of gateways, RIMO achieves a balance between client nodes, which boosts the network's resilience and the user's perception of the Internet's speed.
The application of learning-based game theory to the problem of partial overlap channel access in wireless networks with an emphasis on user experience quality Feng Zeng, Nan Zhao, Wenjia Li 2019 By building and allocating multicast trees at the same time, we may reduce co-channel interference in multicast transmission, which is the focus of this study. CIOMT The recommended multicast routing approach has been shown to be successful in simulation. In comparison to the two conventional algorithms, the new technique significantly improves customer satisfaction.
A novel method for edge computing based on multi-strategy channel allocation Jianjun Jing, Kailing Yao, Yuhua Xu, Xin Liu, Yuli Zhang, Changhua Yao 2020 Our major optimization goal is not throughput or interference reduction, but rather QoE enhancement for end users. Using a rough correlation between interference and quality of experience Using an approximation of the relationship between interference and quality of experience, it was shown that the proposed game had at least one pure NE with ordinal potential. However, the best NE point for a purely theoretical strategy was quite near to the worldwide optimum for QoE maximization in the network. To find the NE of the game, a decentralized approach was proposed; this method may asymptotically maximize the QoE of the network given a sufficiently large learning parameter.
Channel allocation optimization algorithm for I/O-centric physical-data fusion in hybrid wireless mesh networks Degan Zhang, Mingjie Piao, Ting Zhang, Chen Chen , Haoli Zhu 2020 When transmitting data via WMNs, it is important to look at issues such radio interference and time slot multi-user collisions. A multi-strategy channel allocation technique for edge computing is built using a node data cache model and step-by-step calculations of node channel separation. Reduce channel interference and overall network energy consumption while maximizing throughput and decreasing delay from beginning to end.
To investigate the impact of interleaved channels, we provide a model for cross-layer optimization in wireless mesh networks. Channel allocation in wireless meshed networks that prioritizes capacity fairness using a semi-chaotic genetic algorithm Shasha Zhao, Gan Yu 2021 Think of a reasonable way to distribute traffic. Algorithm for hybrid wireless mesh network optimization Despite being arbitrarily divided into distinct sub-time periods, it is difficult to guarantee that inter-node communication will be present at any given instant. By using the shortest route as a sorting criterion, the communication paths between nodes may be determined and the issue can be avoided.
Incorporating Interference, Traffic Load, and Delay into Wireless Mesh Network Gateway Positions as a Communication and Internet of Things Support Metric Amel Faiza Tandjaoui , Mejdi Kaddour 2021 In contrast to traditional operations, which are limited to orthogonal channels, a cross-layer optimization model based on the physical interference model may predict the potential increase of network capacity that may be obtained by using all channels in the radio spectrum. Algorithm-Based Channel Assignment Technique (FASCGA-CAA) is a cross-layer optimization technique that uses the physical interference model to address the issue of node hunger in wireless mesh networks. Using a unique nonlinear fairness-oriented fitness function, FA-SCGA-CAA optimizes link fairness while reducing link interference. It's possible that the capacity gains from using a dynamic channel assignment won't amount to much of an upgrade if an efficient static assignment is expected.
For wireless mesh networks, an anti-collaborative attack technique Fuad A. Ghaleb ,
, Bander Ali Saleh Al-Rimy, Wadii Boulila ,
Faisal Saeed,
Maznah Kamat,Mohd. Foad Rohani,
,Shukor Abd Razak
2021 Utilization of all available channels across the mesh's nodes. Using a rough correlation between interference and quality of experience The proposed FA-SCGA-CAA is reliable for achieving the ultimate goal of many wireless networks, which is to increase resource consumption without sacrificing good node-level fairness.
Adaptive Routing in Wireless Mesh Networks Utilizing a Hybrid Reinforcement Learning Algorithm Satish BHOJANNAWAR, Shrinivas MANGALWEDE 2021 Add together the wait times for each step of the route (contention, transmission, and queuing) to get the whole route delay. ITLDA Simulation results suggest that ITLDA performs better than traditional routing metrics.
A strategy for detecting VoIP threats using ensemble clustering that is influenced by game theory. Di Zhou, Min Sheng, Jiaxin Wu, Jiandong Li, Zhu Han
, Kyung Hee
2021 Placement of gateways in ISoLS-TNs may be seen as a multi-objective optimization issue with objectives including maximization of total revenue of service data demand within coverage, minimization of average access distance, and maximization of the number of installed gateways. To determine the total income of service data demand within coverage, an algorithm using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) was developed as part of a distributed resource allocation (DRA) mechanism. The results also provide insight on the distribution of service data demand and how users' choices for gateway sites stack up against one another.
Cloud-based heterogeneous cellular and mesh networks: designing and analyzing an intrusion detection system for networks with partially overlapping channel assignments Channel assignments in wireless mesh networks may be dynamic and spread. I. Diana Jeba Jingle, P. Mano Paul 2021 Compare the outcomes of basic routing algorithms like Ad hoc On-Demand Distance-Vector routing with those of more complex ones like Optimized-Link-State Routing, Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing, and Distance Source routing to identify the nature of the attack before it does significant damage. Collaborative defense protocol (CDP) CDP is reliable and efficient, and it can identify an attack before major damage is done.
More liberal techniques for access point selection in wireless mesh networks Smita Mahajan, R. Harikrishnan, Ketan Kotecha
All Authors
2022 As a means of effectively considering complex relationships between attributes. To address this shortcoming, ensemble clustering may be used to synthesize the verdicts of many base clustering components into a single judgment. Routing algorithm (QFFR) The top results for the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Algorithm are a throughput of 723.13 Kbps and a latency of 343.73 ns. Q-learning agent in non-grid architecture can determine the optimal route to the goal and reach it in an average of 3.7 seconds. The Q-learning agent needs just 0.49 seconds to do its work on a 10x10 grid, but it takes 0.53 seconds on a 3x4 grid. The suggested QFFR consistently and reliably maintains a score-over-time of 7.62s.
Artificial intelligence-driven directed mesh network architecture for optimum spectrum efficiency in multicast wireless mesh networks. Farid Bavifard, Mohammad Kheyrandish, Mohammad Mosleh 2022 Learning how these systems flag security breaches across several OSI layers was the key focus. The proposed intrusion detection on VoIP traffics is implemented in MATLAB, then trained and evaluated on NSL-KDD and a real dataset, containing traffics on a VoIP framework. Increases of 7.15 percent in Accuracy, 23.43 percent in Detection Rate, and 29.83 percent in F-Measure are typical.
More liberal techniques for access point selection in wireless mesh networks Fawaz S. Al-Anzi 2022 The proposed INCACG system aims to assign the available non-overlapping channels to the WMN backbone routers in a way that ensures low interference and sufficient network connectivity. IDS If an effective static assignment is anticipated, the capacity improvements from using a dynamic channel assignment may not amount to much of an increase.
Artificial intelligence-guided mesh network design for spectral efficiency Satish S. Bhojannawar, Shrinivas R. Managalwede 2022 Centralized Interference Aware Partially Overlapped Channel Assignment is offered to take into consideration both external and internal interference, as well as the degree of overlap between nearby channels. INCACG
FLADCA
The simulation results demonstrate that the INCACG scheme quickly converges and effectively distributes channels among the routers.
An efficient channel assignment method is necessary in multicast wireless mesh networks. Saleem Iqbal, Kashif Naseer Qureshi, Saqib Majeed, Kayhan Zrar Ghafoor, Gwanggil Jeon 2022 In WMNs, the system throughput is enhanced more so than with the RSS-based AP selection method. POCs Simulations showed considerable improvements in throughput, packet loss ratio, and end-to-end latency compared to the current state of affairs.
Table 5. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and Genetic algorithms.
Table 5. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and Genetic algorithms.
Title Writers Year Research goal Methodology Result
A cross-layer optimization method for allocating channels and routing multicast traffic in wireless mesh networks with numerous channels and radios is presented. Mohsen Jahanshahi , Mehdi Dehghan , Mohammad Reza Meybodi 2016 Develop network coding strategies that maximize throughput while reducing error rates and allowing optimal routing to be determined in polynomial time. Maximizing multicast performance and assigning channels simultaneously in MCMR wireless mesh networks QoS routing using a cross-layer convex optimization framework NSR, or "Node Stability-based Routing," is a routing technique that prioritizes connections based on the stability of individual nodes. We have conducted thorough tests to determine how well our strategy works in comparison to other available choices.
A machine-learning-based framework for fully autonomous decision making Carlos Ferreira, Susana Sargento, Arnaldo Oliveira 2017 It was crucial to assign certain pieces of network gear with administrative responsibilities. The Using Genetic Algorithms Technique The results show that even without perfect knowledge of the network state, agents in the surrounding area can work together to establish bandwidth-aware communication paths that are just as optimal as those obtained with a concentrated decision approach that contains full network information, and that these paths can react to changes in the network with rapid convergence.
Stability-Based Routing in Wireless Mesh Networks Mustapha Boushaba, Abdelhakim Hafid, Michel Gendreau 2017 Network stability is a crucial performance indicator for real-time wireless communication. COTE Simulation results show that NSR can significantly improve the overall network performance compared to other routing methods such as interference and channel switching (MIC), Expected Transmission count (ETX) or load at entrances as a routing metric, Reinforcement learning-based best path to best gateway (RLBDR), and nearest gateway (i.e. shortest path to gateway).
Search-based routing in a wireless mesh network Khalid Mahmood, Babar Nazir, Iftikhar Ahmad Khan, Nadir Shah 2017 Data transmission networks may be made more economically viable by the development of a suitable cost metric for use by routing protocols. A less-than-ideal mathematical model for constructing trees has been built over the generated mesh. Our results show that evolutionary algorithms perform better than the more common hop count measure when used to WMN routing. Finally, we go into the numbers to learn more about the potential of the genetic algorithm for routing in WMN.
Cognitive mesh networks for traffic engineering: power management and link-channel selection Maheen Islam, Md. Abdur Razzaque, Md. Mamun-Or-Rashid, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, Abdulhameed Alelaiwi, Atif Alamri 2018 Our goal is to increase the network's total throughput by picking the best possible link-channel combinations, sharing the load among them, and dividing the traffic fairly. We evaluate the performance of conventional and hybrid wireless mesh networks (WMNs). We provide thorough simulation results to demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed TE mechanisms compared to the existing gold standard.
A novel method has been developed for multicast call acceptance in wireless mesh networks that make use of many channels and radios. Leili Farzinvash 2018 enabling Multimedia Content Describe the current developments in unsupervised learning and the range of learning problems that could benefit from it. The results show that, in comparison to conventional methods, the proposed strategy increases the acceptance rate of multicast calls by an average of 40%.
This paper analyzes the efficiency of a genetic algorithm–based system for wireless mesh networks, considering several flow rates and distributions (Weibull, exponential, DCF, EDCA), as well as the potential impact of each. Ilir Shinko, Vladi Kolici, Ryoichiro Obukata, Admir Barolli, Tetsuya Oda, Leonard Barolli 2018 Simulations of the connection state optimized for ns-3 time steps For an NP-hard task, consider wireless mesh networks' access points (APs). In the instance of Hybrid WMN, the simulation results show that the throughput of both MAC protocols is more than I/B for exponential distribution. The WMN has contributed to the development of machine learning that is more flexible, universal, and autonomous.
Wireless mesh network router node placement using an electromagnetic algorithm: techniques, applications, and future research challenges in unsupervised machine learning for networking. Muhammad Usama, Junaid Qadir, Aunn Raza, Hunain Arif, Kok-lim Alvin Yau, Yehia Elkhatib, Amir Hussain 2019 We want to advance the state of the art by synthesizing the results of previous survey studies and providing comprehensive coverage of the most recent developments and improvements. The collected findings demonstrate that the proposed EM algorithm outperforms the present particle swarm intelligence algorithm and genetic algorithm in designing almost optimal locations for mesh routers with regard to coverage and connection.
Optimization of Wireless Network Channels and Locations using Deep Learning Lamri Sayad, Louiza Bouallouche-Medjkoune , Djamil Aissani 2019 Optimisation of Mesh Routers Self-X (self-improvement via learning) To ensure its fast convergence, enhanced throughput, and resistance to dynamic interference, we run comprehensive simulations.
Using a genetic approach for cross-layer resource allocation, wireless mesh networks may maintain fault-tolerant topologies. Samurdhi Karunaratne, Ramy Atawia, Erma Perenda, Haris Gacanin 2019 Channel configuration for wireless repeaters and access points (APs) in a Wireless Mesh Network. Using a heuristic strategy based on problem decomposition, the computational complexity may be reduced by a factor of four. We propose an approach for topology control in wireless mesh networks, and numerical validation demonstrates its efficacy.
Analyzing Wireless Mesh Networking Technologies from an Internet of Things-Focused Perspective Esmaeil Nik Maleki, Ghasem Mirjalily 2019 There must be a way to solve the NP-complete issue. Using technologies like sub-GHz radio, Bluetooth, and IEEE 802.15.4, LoRa Please provide concrete illustrations of the applications of the mesh-oriented technologies you researched.
Using Learning Automata and Genetic Algorithms for Efficient Channel Assignment in Wireless Mesh Networks Antonio Cilfone, Luca Davoli, Laura Belli, Gianluigi Ferrari 2019 Our goal is to bring attention to the fact that many different kinds of communication protocols may either natively support mesh networks or be adapted to do so. The genetic algorithm's robust search capabilities and the learning automata methodology of adaptive decision making are used in this approach. Experiments are run in NS2, and a high-performance proposal is made based on comparisons of packet delivery ratio, end-to-end latency, throughput, and total cost to those of LAMR, LCA, and GA based multicast channel assignment methods.
Using a genetic algorithm, we optimize load-balanced routing in a wireless mesh network for AMI. Nandini Balusu, Suresh Pabboju, G Narsimha 2019 There must be a way to drastically improve throughput while lowering the amount of noise in the network. Load aware-HWMP (LA-HWMP) is a kind of hybrid wireless mesh routing protocol (HWMP) used in WMNs to decide which paths to use. The proposed method finds a route with better latency and throughput than the alternatives, as shown by the results.
Maximizing 6LoWPANs' service life and quality of life with the use of deep neural networks. A. Robert singh , D. Devaraj , R. Narmatha Banu 2019 Avoid doing so because of the frequent need for packet retransmissions. P3PGA uses deep neural networks to solve routing problems that are NP-hard. The proposed routing method improves upon the basic 6LoWPAN routing protocol by increasing network lifetime by 50%, decreasing latency by 40%, and decreasing jitter by 25%. An 18 dB improvement in signal-to-interference and noise ratio is achieved on average.
Parallel Routing Protocol for Wireless Mesh Networks The Genetic Algorithm with 3 Parents Shubhangi Kharche, Sanjay Pawar 2020 offers a variety of solutions for eliminating the interference, from which the best may be selected. Both a Particle Swarm Optimization (WMN-PSO) and a Genetic Algorithm (WMN-GA) based simulation system may be used to tackle the node placement issue in WMNs. We compared it to eight other algorithms—including genetic algorithms, biogeographic optimization, ant colony optimization, the BAT algorithm, and the big bang big crunch algorithm—to see how well they performed on this challenge. P3PGA outperformed all other approaches for networks with 1000+ nodes.
Chemical-reaction-based method for routing-node placement in wireless mesh networks Amar Singh, Shakti Kumar, Ajay Singh, Sukhbir S. Walia 2020 Minimal-effort route routing in wireless mesh networks. Using fuzzy logic Compared to the GA technique and the SA algorithm, our proposed strategy may improve client coverage by 4.5-18% and network connectivity by 4.5-61%, as shown by the simulation results.
Performance Evaluation of the WMN-PSODGA Simulation Environment Regarding Alternative Router Replacement Strategies for IoT Network Construction Using a Hybrid Intelligent Simulation Environment Lamri Sayad, Louiza Bouallouche-Medjkoune , Djamil Aissani 2020 Wireless Internet that is both cheap and fast increasing; a solution to the challenge of wireless mesh network router node placement (WMN-RNP). Effective strategies for allocating channels The results of the simulations show that the CM and LDVM alternatives for replacing routers work better. It's obvious that LDVM behaves better than CM when the two are compared.
An Optimal End-to-End Path Selection Mechanism for CR-WiMAX Networks Utilizing Fuzzy Logic Ohara Seiji, Barolli Admir, Ampririt Phudit, Sakamoto Shinji, Matsuo Keita d, Barolli Leonard 2020 A cognitive user may make the best use of the network's resources by figuring out the quickest path between any two sets of nodes. The HEMS-IoT Approach (FA-SCGA-CAA): SDNMesh, a Software-Defined Network (SDN)-based Routing Architecture for Wireless Mesh Networks. Most of the information gathered pertained to improving the processes of route analysis and path selection. The proposed method is modeled in Matlab. The results of the simulations demonstrate the efficacy of the fuzzy system.
A Gravitational Search Algorithm Based on Adaptive Swarm Theory for MCMR Channel Assignment in a Wireless Mesh Network Wajahat Maqbool, S. K. Syed-Yusof, N. M. Abdul Latiff, Bushra Naeem, Bilal Shabbir, N. N. Nik Abdul Malik 2020 The inability to scale with increasing bandwidth demands is one of the disadvantages of single-radio networks that might be mitigated by combining many radio nodes into a mesh structure. RRT-WMN APSO Algorithm This approach is put through its paces in NS2 and compared to a number of other heuristic optimization tactics, such as the Learning Automated and Genetic Algorithm Approach, the Improved Gravitational Search Approach, and the Dynamic Particle Swarm Optimization Approach, to determine its effectiveness. The simulation results showed that the suggested solution performed better than the current best practices.
A Smart Home Energy Management System with Internet of Things for Big Data and Machine Learning Nandini Balusu 2020 An intelligent energy management system for homes that leverages big data and machine learning to improve occupants' well-being, security, and productivity. Combinations of precise and heuristic or meta-heuristic approaches are also possible. RuleML and Apache Mahout are used to provide energy-saving recommendations, ensuring the smart home's comfort and safety.
Software-Defined Routing in a Wireless Mesh Network (SDNMesh) Isaac Machorro-Cano,Giner Alor-Hernández,Mario Andrés Paredes-Valverde,Lisbeth Rodríguez-Mazahua,José Luis Sánchez-Cervantes, José Oscar Olmedo-Aguirre 2020 When software-defined networking (SDN) is combined with wireless mesh networking (WMN), mesh networks may meet the needs of current users for resources, coverage, and scalable high bandwidth. This strategy combines the efficient decision-making of learning automata with the extensive search capabilities of a genetic algorithm. We show that our SDNMesh routing solution outperforms OLSR, BATMAN, and an SDN based Three-Stage routing protocol in simulated networks with regards to throughput, packet loss ratio, and latency. According to experimental results, SDNMesh also excels in these efficiency areas.
Fairness-Driven Semi-Chaotic Genetic Algorithm-Based Channel Allocation to Solve the "Node Starvation" Issue in Wireless Mesh Networks Approach Syed Sherjeel A. Gilani, Amir Qayyum, Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Mukhtiar Bano 2020 The distribution of channels in a mesh network so that users may share the available bandwidth equitably. WMN-PSODGA Trustworthy preservation of high node-level fairness while increasing resource consumption is the ultimate goal of many wireless networks, and this is exactly what the proposed FA-SCGA-CAA does.
Routing and access point deployment in a wireless mesh network for use in search and rescue Fuad A. Ghaleb
, Bander Ali Saleh Al-Rimy
,Wadii Boulila
, Faisal Saeed,Maznah Kamat,Mohd. Foad Rohani, Shukor Abd Razak
2021 The fundamental capabilities of UAVs need at the outset of rescue operations to immediately establish an ad hoc communication infrastructure Techniques such as Vmax constriction (VC), RIWM, and reasonable decrement of Vmax (RDVM). Strategies that cut the required number of routers by between 73% and 92% while maintaining the same service quality.
To maximize client coverage and router connection, the PSO algorithm is sped up in wireless mesh networks. Mariusz Wzorek, Cyrille Berger, Patrick Doherty 2021 Keep users connected and online at all times. Multiple Wireless Mesh Network Quality of Service Issues, and Reported Solutions The results of these experiments show that the APSO approach is much more effective than the linearly decreasing weight particle swarm optimizer (LDWPSO).
A survey of the literature on methods for optimally positioning nodes in wireless mesh networks. Nabil Abdelkader Nouri, Zibouda Aliouat, Abdenacer Naouri ,Soufiene Ali Hassak 2021 Locating nodes in WMNs is a problem that has to be addressed. Method for Identifying a Collection of Distinct Courses (MDPD) Objectives, constraints, node placement (Mesh Router vs. Mesh Gateway), node distribution (discrete vs. continuous), and category context (static vs. dynamic) all go into a critical assessment of each class.
The use of a genetic artificial neural network (G-ANN) hybrid strategy for eco-friendly computing in mobile ad hoc networks Sylia Mekhmoukh Taleb, Yassine Meraihi, Asma Benmessaoud Gabis, Seyedali Mirjalili, Amar Ramdane-Cherif 2022 There must be a way to drastically improve throughput without significantly impacting the stability of the network. Methods for maximizing expected utility in a Markov decision-making process (MDP) based on the MEC model, include Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Distributed Genetic Algorithm (DGA). Experiments are run in NS2, and a high-performance proposal is made based on comparisons of packet delivery ratio, end-to-end latency, throughput, and total cost to those of LAMR, LCA, and GA based multicast channel assignment methods.
Study of wireless mesh networks (WMNs) using particle swarm optimization and a distributed genetic algorithm, comparing boulevard and stadium distributions with an eye on router replacement techniques and load balancing. B. Prakash, S. Jayashri , T. S. Karthik Use the fewest possible mesh routers that are nevertheless totally interconnected and can cover all mesh clients if you wish to install a powerful, well-connected WMN on a small budget. The FireFly Algorithm (JCABR-IFA) is used in the WMN Coverage Construction Method (CCM). Our simulation results show that the best client coverage, router connectivity, and load balancing can be achieved by combining the Stadium distribution with the Rational Decrement of Vmax approach as the router replacement technique.
Performance Comparison of Router Replacement Techniques for Wireless Mesh Networks Using a Hybrid Intelligent Simulation System for Building Internet of Things Networks Admir Barolli, Kevin Bylykbashi, Ermioni Qafzezi, Shinji Sakamoto, Leonard Barolli 2022 Identifying the best spots to put nodes Using stochastic geometry, we model these dynamics explicitly and determine how well the DFL ML-based IDS performs in smart grids. Simulation findings reveal that RIWM offers greater performance over CM and RDVM because it gives the highest connection while covering more customers.
Quantitative study of wireless mesh network neighbor coverage and bandwidth-aware QoS provisioning Multiple, Independent Path Discovery in Wireless Mesh Networks Admir Barolli,Shinji SakamotoKevin Bylykbashi , Leonard Barolli 2022 Offers a comprehensive analysis of service quality enhancement strategies discussed in the academic literature. Channel parameters, AP load, and the wireless mesh backhaul methodology are all considered in this novel approach of selecting access points. provides a glimpse into the benefits and drawbacks of the researched protocols while highlighting the outstanding research topics for the future generation of networking.
Load Balancing using Reinforcement Learning for Mobile Edge Computing Md. Iftekhar Hussain, Nurzaman Ahmed, Md. Zaved Iqubal Ahmed, Nityananda Sarma 2022 Combining the WMN with the Internet of Things Optimization of both channel allocation and multicast performance in MCMR WMNs QoS routing using a cross-layer convex optimization framework NSR, or "Node Stability-based Routing," is a routing technique that prioritizes connections based on the stability of individual nodes. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed MDPD mechanism over WMN may efficiently identify a large number of distinct paths and optimize data flow along those paths.
Wireless mesh networks benefit from a reliable key management system made possible by trusted gateways. C. S. Anita, R. Sasikumar 2022 Uniformly distributing user requests among edge servers may minimize wait times and increase response times, which is particularly important in healthcare. The Using Genetic Algorithms Technique The simulation findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the suggested load balancing methodology in both healthcare and emergency settings, with improvements over prior approaches in terms of average execution latency, load balancing, and response time.
Improved FireFly Algorithm (IFA) for Joint Channel Assignment and Bandwidth Reservation in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMN) A study comparing two Island and Subway distributions utilizing a roulette wheel and random selection procedures, taking into consideration router replacement strategies. Niloofar Tahmasebi-Pouya, Mehdi-Agha Sarram, Seyed-Akbar Mostafavi 2022 It has become clear that the present protocols are not adequate to safeguard the backbone network on a number of fronts. COTE Our research and experimental results show that the suggested approach mitigates the impact of malicious nodes and improves security compared to previous centralized solutions such digital signature authentication (DSA-Mesh, MENSA, Mobisec, and AHKM). The significance of the proposed work is illustrated by experimental solutions that boost performance by 10% to 12% above state-of-the-art approaches.
An Integrated Approach to Mesh Router Placement Optimization Through Distributed Federated Learning Over Slotted ALOHA Wireless Networking with Delaunay Edges and Simulated Annealing Ganesh Reddy Karri, A. V. Prabu, Sidheswar Routray, D. Sumathi, S. Rajasoundaran, Amrit Mukherjee, Pushpita Chatterjee, Waleed Alnumay 2022 By improving communication between mesh routers and the clients they serve, we can deploy WMNs with high availability and low latency at a cheap cost. A less-than-ideal mathematical model for constructing trees has been built over the generated mesh. By simulating different selection and router replacement strategies and comparing their outcomes, we are able to determine which configurations provide the best coverage, connectivity, and load balancing. The random selection method, in conjunction with the Constriction Method (CM) and the Random Inertia Weight Method (RIWM), can produce full network connectivity and client coverage, but the Two Islands and Subway distributions provide the best load balancing.
Admir Barolli, Kevin Bylykbashi, Ermioni Qafzezi, Shinji Sakamoto, Leonard Barolli 2022 Frequency and Channel Assignment Coordination We evaluate the performance of conventional and hybrid wireless mesh networks (WMNs). Through simulation, we show that our proposed approach successfully decreases traffic while simultaneously raising channel efficiency.
Multi-objective optimization and statistical testing are used to critically compare and select MAC protocols for wireless mesh networks. Smart grid computing with machine learning-based intrusion detection: a literature review Narayana Rao Appini, A. Rajasekhar Reddy 2023 Improving network performance by strategically placing mesh routers. Maximizing multicast performance and assigning channels simultaneously in MCMR wireless mesh networks QoS routing using a cross-layer convex optimization framework NSR, or "Node Stability-based Routing," is a routing technique that prioritizes connections based on the stability of individual nodes. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed strategy may optimize mesh router placement to guarantee service to all mesh clients in the evacuation zone. In addition, the DECCM-based SA technique helps improve network connectivity in WMNs since it often encompasses a greater number of mesh clients.
A cross-layer optimization method for allocating channels and routing multicast traffic in wireless mesh networks with numerous channels and radios is presented. Tetsuya Oda 2023 This study's goal is to do away with the necessity for a central server by using Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) via one-hop neighbors. The Using Genetic Algorithms Technique Due to the random nature of communication, these actors interact with a non-zero percentage of the nodes in the neighborhood, exchanging model parameters that are subsequently utilized to fine-tune their own models. These folks made friendships with a diverse set of neighbors.
A machine-learning-based framework for fully autonomous decision making Abdelaziz Salama, Achilleas Stergioulis, Ali M. Hayajneh, Syed Ali Raza Zaidi, Des McLernon, Ian Robertson 2023 The CPS as a whole works as a unified unit. COTE
Stability-Based Routing in Wireless Mesh Networks Nitasha Sahani Ruoxi Zhu Jin-Hee Cho Chen-Ching Liu 2023 Associating with lower-rate users may cause a performance drop for higher-rate users who are already connected to the same AP, but our method aims to alleviate this problem. A less-than-ideal mathematical model for constructing trees has been built over the generated mesh. We have conducted thorough tests to determine how well our strategy works in comparison to other available choices.
A cross-layer optimization method for allocating channels and routing multicast traffic in wireless mesh networks with numerous channels and radios is presented. Ankita Singh, Sudhakar Singh, Shiv Prakash 2023 Develop network coding strategies that maximize throughput while reducing error rates and allowing optimal routing to be determined in polynomial time. We evaluate the performance of conventional and hybrid wireless mesh networks (WMNs). The strategy, as opposed to the RSS-based AP selection method, increases system throughput in WMNs.
Table 6. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and Machine Learning.
Table 6. Gateway in Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) and Machine Learning.
Title Writers Year goals of the research Methodology Result
Using a Support Vector Machine with Adaptive Sensing, Scheduling, and Spectrum Selection in Cognitive Networks to Predict Throughput in Wireless Mesh Networks. Marco Di Felice, Kaushik Roy Chowdhury, Andreas Kassler, Luciano Bononi 2011 Each MR in a CR-WMN must be able to determine the spectrum's current condition, choose a channel free of PUs, and then switch to a new channel if a PU is discovered on the first channel. An MR may find its own sweet spot between detecting, exploiting, and exploring the spectrum by using network feedbacks from the simulated MCs in a network simulator (NS2). Long-running simulations confirm that our strategy scales well and outperforms non-learning-based approaches to CR-WMNs in terms of throughput improvement.
Using a cooperative distributed QoE-based strategy for SVC video streaming via wireless mesh networks: AD3-GLaM. Yan Feng, Xingxing Wu, Yaoke Hu 2017 Experimental research and machine learning approaches were used to create a model that can accurately forecast IEEE 802.11 WMN throughput. Quality-of-experience-based cooperative distributed routing The experimental results show that the suggested SVR-based model has better prediction accuracy than the BPNN model. The WMN's throughput prediction models are now in place, laying the groundwork for efficient network architecture planning, management, and design.
Cost and delay are taken into account in a bi-objective GA for determining where to put gateways in wireless meshed networks. Tran Anh Quang Pham, Kamal Deep Singh, Juan Antonio Rodríguez-Aguilar, Gauthier Picard, Kandaraj Piamrat, Jesús Cerquides, César Viho 2018 The final result should be a better network experience for everyone using it. AD3 is one of the best distributed cooperative optimization algorithms because of its fast convergence.
Selected Gateways in Multi-Radio, Multi-Channel Wireless Mesh Networks Employing Cross-Layer Learning Automata Zeineb Lazrag, Monia Hamdi, Mourad Zaied 2018 We seek to determine the best placement for gateways by reducing the range of hop counts in the MR-IG and the total number of gates in use. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach with respect to both operational expenditures and communication latencies.
Using QUIC Effectively in Wireless Mesh Networks: A Predictive Metric for Cross-Layer Routing Amin Erfanian Araqi, Behrad Mahboobi 2019 Multicast routing distributes data more efficiently across a group of nodes than traditional unicast routing systems. The multicast channel assignment issue in MCMR wireless mesh networks Throughput, end-to-end latency, packet delivery ratio, and other metrics are all improved upon by QLMR, as shown by modeling and experimental results. The proposed method will be evaluated for its efficacy.
Software-Defined Networking (SDNMesh) for Wireless Mesh Network Routing Samurdhi Karunaratne, Haris Gacanin 2019 The optimal use of the network capacity and minimized congestion consequences are two aims of WMNs, making gateway selection one of the main research issues. Tools of the Trade for ML
Using directional antennas, a wireless mesh network's routing may save power. Combining Q-learning with Ant-based systems A. R. Parvanak, M. Jahanshahi, M. Dehghan 2019 An ingenious method of diagnosing and fixing weak wireless connections. RLBPR Algorithms Better use of network capacity is achieved with this strategy as opposed to the closest gateway, minimum load index, projected transmission count, best route to best gateway, and RLBPR algorithms.
Machine learning and HPC are used to optimize reinforcement routing in wireless mesh networks. The use of Q-learning to SD-WiMesh networks Mouna Naravani , Narayan D.G. , Sumedha Shinde , Mohammed Moin Mulla 2020 Compare the QUIC protocol's file-download rates to those of the TCP protocol. Prediction techniques include multiple linear regression, support vector regression, and the Gaussian process. NS-2 simulation results demonstrate that the multiple linear regression method is superior for predicting throughput, average delay, and packet loss.
Emerging Trends and Challenges in Wireless MemBrain Network Interference and Load Balancing Routing Metrics Jawad Manzoor, Llorenç Cerdà-Alabern, Ramin Sadre, Idilio Drago 2020 The end objective is to make it easier to control and administer both wired and wireless networks. The Effectiveness of QUIC in Wireless Mesh Networks Our results show that although QUIC outperforms TCP on wired networks, it is much slower on the WMN.
Semi-permanent smart settings may take use of a software-defined fog computing architecture that is built on wireless mesh networks. Syed Sherjeel A. Gilani, Amir Qayyum, Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Mukhtiar Bano 2020 Develop a novel technique for optimizing backhaul throughput and energy consumption. DAs in wireless network topologies Take advantage of an SDN by using the WMN MILP Ant-Q algorithm We show that our SDNMesh routing solution outperforms OLSR, BATMAN, and an SDN based Three-Stage routing protocol in simulated networks with regards to throughput, packet loss ratio, and latency. According to experimental results, SDNMesh also excels in these efficiency areas.
Reinforcement learning for quality-of-service-assured intelligent routing in crowded wireless mesh networks Iyad Lahsen-Cherif, Lynda Zitoune, Véronique Vèque 2021 The purpose of this project is to optimize network routing using a reinforcement-learning framework. The purpose of this project is to optimize network routing using a reinforcement-learning framework. The purpose of this project is to optimize network routing using a reinforcement-learning framework. We look at the optimization weight factor, gateway location, network design, and beamwidth to see how these affect the overall tradeoff.
Weibull, normal, and Boulevard distributions are compared for mesh networks with router replacement choices using a hybrid intelligent simulation system. 26. Khamxay Leevangtou, Hideya Ochiai, Chaodit Aswakul 2021 The fundamental objective of this research is to develop an adaptive routing system that may simultaneously decrease delivery times and prevent networks from becoming saturated. Adaptive Routing Algorithm When compared to the suggested method, the Dijkstra algorithm uses static or instantaneous changes to connection costs. The per-hop latency measurement from a real-world outdoor testbed is utilized to calibrate the simulation and provide the resultant end-to-end route delay.
Positional Improvements for Mesh Router Nodes In Wireless Mesh Networks, an Enhanced Moth-Flame Algorithm is Used. Ankita Singh, Shiv Prakash, Sudhakar Singh 2021 An effective routing metric is necessary for a productive routing mechanism. Data must be routed using unique and intelligent routing protocols based on routing metrics to improve the performance of these networks. The outcomes significantly outperform the reference routing algorithms in an experimental evaluation. Using the NS-3 simulator, we assess how well the proposed approach performs in terms of QoS measures including packet delivery ratio (PDR), latency, and throughput.
Selecting Gateways in Wireless Mesh Networks that Can Handle Heavy Traffic Loads Using a Deep Learning-based Routing Strategy. BAHAA MUNEER ISMAEL
, ASRI BIN NGADI
, JOHAN BIN MOHAMAD SHARIF
2021 Wireless mesh networks (WMN) offer a streamlined underlying communication substrate for constructing Internet of Things (IoT)-based smart infrastructures when a cable network is not an option owing to expense. Algorithm for Learning Meshes in Stochastic Environments (SDFog-Mesh) With the information gleaned from this literature review, the researcher will be better equipped to develop and test new, more effective routing methods.
Wireless mesh network throughput forecasting Adaptive sensing, scheduling, and spectrum selection using a support vector machine in cognitive networks Shabir Ali, Mayank Pandey, Neeraj Tyagi 2022 choosing a route with the greatest packet delivery rate prediction. Combines particle swarm optimization (PSO) with a distributed genetic algorithm (DGA) in a hybrid intelligence architecture (WMN-PSODGA ECLO-MFO LSTM). Consideration has been given to the time required for setup, the time required to construct flows in data route devices, the time required to deliver microservices, the quality of service constraints, and the expenses associated with maintenance.
Thuy-Van T. Duong, Le Huu Binh, Vuong M. Ngo 2022 Overhead, mesh routers are set up to cover the desired area. Traffic aware reliable gateway selection (TARGS) is a novel approach created to improve WMN service quality. Our experiments show that the proposed method outperforms several widely used routing techniques.
Title Admir Barolli, Kevin Bylykbashi, Ermioni Qafzezi, Shinji Sakamoto, Leonard Barolli 2022 Wireless mesh network node placement difficulties for mesh routers (WMN-MRNP) need to be resolved. Methodology Our simulation results show that normal distribution with LDIWM as a replacement method for routers offers the best performance in terms of coverage and load balancing.
Using a Support Vector Machine with Adaptive Sensing, Scheduling, and Spectrum Selection in Cognitive Networks to Predict Throughput in Wireless Mesh Networks. Sylia Mekhmoukh Taleb, Yassine Meraihi, Seyedali Mirjalili, Dalila Acheli, Amar Ramdane-Cherif , Asma Benmessaoud Gabis 2023 To forecast the route with the greatest Quality of Service (QoS), we use data from a simulated wireless mesh network to train a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based deep learning model. An MR may find its own sweet spot between detecting, exploiting, and exploring the spectrum by using network feedbacks from the simulated MCs in a network simulator (NS2). The superiority and precision of ECLO-MFO in locating mesh routers is proved by simulated results produced in MATLAB 2020a. Here, we evaluate ECLO-MFO against not only the original MFO but also eleven additional optimization methods, such as the Genetic Algorithm (GA), Simulated Annealing (SA), Harmony Search (HS), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CS), and Bat Algorithm (BA).
Using a cooperative distributed QoE-based strategy for SVC video streaming via wireless mesh networks: AD3-GLaM. Odongo Steven Eyobu, Kamwesigye Edwinah 2023 A novel method known as traffic aware reliable gateway selection (TARGS) was developed to improve WMNs' QoS. Quality-of-experience-based cooperative distributed routing Our results show that the LSTM-based model achieves the best PDR and throughput with its route selection. We also discover that the PDR and throughput of the learning models (MLP, LR, RF) are higher than those of the traditional Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol.
Cost and delay are taken into account in a bi-objective GA for determining where to put gateways in wireless meshed networks. Rashmi Kushwah 2023 Each MR in a CR-WMN must be able to determine the spectrum's current condition, choose a channel free of PUs, and then switch to a new channel if a PU is discovered on the first channel. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms Simulation findings show that the proposed strategy achieves lower average latency and traffic load and greater throughput than two other techniques available in the literature.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated