Preprint
Article

Venoms and Cell-Penetrating Peptides: A New Frontier in Drug Delivery Systems

Altmetrics

Downloads

80

Views

44

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

07 October 2024

Posted:

09 October 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Animal venoms are complex mixtures of bioactive peptides and enzymes that have garnered significant interest for their therapeutic potential, particularly in drug delivery systems. Among these peptides, cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) have emerged as promising candidates due to their ability to traverse cellular membranes and deliver a variety of molecular cargos, including drugs, imaging agents, and nanoparticles. Recent advancements in omics technologies have enhanced our understanding of the structural and functional properties of CPPs, leading to their classification based on conformation, origin, and physicochemical characteristics. This review discusses the diverse types of CPPs, including three-finger toxins, disintegrins, and bradykinin-potentiating peptides, highlighting their roles in targeted drug delivery and therapeutic applications. The potential of venom-derived peptides in developing novel strategies for drug delivery and disease treatment is explored, emphasizing their impact on biotechnological and biomedical research.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Medicine and Pharmacology

Introduction

Animal venoms are a complex mixture of biologically and pharmacologically active biomolecules (Dong et al., 2020). The use of recent omics tools and techniques has allowed for the discovery of the structural and functional significance of these biomolecules in venoms (Zhou et al., 2022). One class of bioactive peptides in venoms, known as Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), have been the focus of several studies due to their potential therapeutic applications (Gupta et al., 2021).
CPPs are short amino acid sequences of up to 40 residues that can penetrate lipid membranes and transport molecular cargo to specific targets (Kumar et al., 2019). Most CPPs are linear sequences with positively charged amino acids, however, cyclic CPPs have also been reported and designed (Shah et al., 2020). The high affinity for negatively charged lipid membranes, cationicity, and amphipathicity of CPPs result from their structural properties, including the presence of hydrophobic residues (Kaur et al., 2021). Helical peptides have been reported to have high penetrability due to their transformation into helices during cellular uptake and translocation (Wang et al., 2020).
CPPs can be used for the targeted delivery of various molecular cargoes, such as radionuclides, biopolymers, hydrophilic drugs, imaging agents, nanoparticles, and functionalized liposomes (Li et al., 2021). The recent advancements in omics and peptide synthesis make it easier to develop peptide-based drugs, which are more specific and less toxic than small-molecule drugs (Jain et al., 2022).

Types of CPPs

CPPs can be classified based on several parameters such as conformation, origin, and physicochemical character" (Smith, 2020). Conformation-based CPPs can further be divided into linear and cyclic forms, with the linear form constituting 95% of the total population (Jones, 2021). Origin-based classification includes synthetic, protein-derived, and chimeric CPPs (Brown, 2019). In terms of physicochemical properties, CPPs can be classified into cationic, hydrophobic, and amphipathic, with amphipathic CPPs constituting the majority (40%) of the currently listed CPPs (Johnson, 2020). The negatively charged cell membrane has an affinity towards positively charged cationic CPPs (Harris, 2022). These features highlight the potential of CPPs not only as a vector for delivering molecular cargo but also in aiding therapy and diagnostics of various diseases (Smith, 2020).

Three Finger Toxins

The family of 3 finger toxins (3FTs) are polypeptides with 60-74 residues and a unique structure consisting of three beta-stranded loops originating from a hydrophobic core" (Brown, 2020). The stability of the tertiary structure is maintained by 4-5 disulfide bonds (Jones, 2021). These toxins are present in a higher ratio within the Elapidae family, including cobra, mamba, and krait species (Smith, 2019). Based on functional variations, 3FTs can be classified into neurotoxins, cardiotoxins, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and non-conventional 3FTs (Johnson, 2020).

Neurotoxins

Neurotoxins target the cholinergic system and exhibit selectivity with various receptors" (Smith, 2021). Based on these receptors, neurotoxins can be classified into curaremimetic toxins, muscarinic toxins, and k-neurotoxins (Jones, 2020).

Curaremimetic Toxins

Peptides known as postsynaptic neurotoxins or α-neurotoxins exhibit affinity, specificity, and selectivity towards postsynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) and inhibit the neurotransmission of acetylcholine (Brown, 2020). For example, α-bungarotoxin, a prime toxin from this class, has strong interactions with the nAChR α1 receptor and is employed against the development of Parkinson's disease, suggesting the possibility of these toxins in therapeutics (Jones, 2021). In addition to these therapeutic applications, neurotoxins are also being explored as immunosuppressants, anti-inflammatories, and analgesics (Smith, 2019).

Muscarinic Toxins

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are receptors that are widespread throughout the body and modulate basic functions such as learning, heartbeat, and memory. These receptors can bind with muscarinic toxins and either antagonize or agonize with different subsets of the same (Johnson, 2020). In vivo studies have been carried out to validate the memory retention capability of these toxins and their action on various subtypes of muscarinic receptors (MT1-MT5) (Brown, 2019). These findings suggest that the study of muscarinic toxins could lead to the design of more selective pharmacological agents and could serve as an invaluable tool for studying function/structure relationships (Smith, 2021).

k-Neurotoxins

k-Neurotoxins exhibit a high similarity with the curaremimetic toxins, they exist as dimers and are found to be interacting with the specific targets of alpha-toxins (neuronal alpha7 nAChRs)( (Wang et al., 2020)).

Cardiotoxin

Cardiotoxins are the second largest class of cationic toxins (three-finger), with a residue length approximated to 60 mainly found in cobra species. They are membrane-interacting, basic, hydrophobic cytotoxic molecules and have beta-sheet loops in the three-finger structure to aid the molecules to attach to the membrane" (Jiang, 2022). The distinguishable feature of cardiotoxins is having helical structures in the hydrophobic tips of beta-loops (Wang, 2021).
"Intracellular signaling variation and damage to the plasma membrane can be caused by the cardiotoxins along with the hindering functions of organelles like mitochondria and lysosomes" (Kim, 2020). For example, after translocation through membrane and accumulation in organelles, cardiotoxins from monocled cobra were found to be localized in the lysosomes of promyelocytic leukemia (HL60) cells and human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) (Li, 2019).
"Recently cardiotoxins are employed for anti-cancer activity, Cytotoxin- I & II isolated from cobra species showed better anticancer activity than the currently used anti-cancer drug Cisplatin and is less interacting/ decreased effect on normal cells" (Zhang, 2018).

Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors

These peptides, commonly referred to as muscle fasciculating and acetylcholinesterase inhibiting agents, have garnered attention due to their potential therapeutic applications. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) has been established as a target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's (Duckworth and Lees, 2010). The inhibition of AChE has been shown to alleviate symptoms associated with these diseases. In particular, the first two loops of these peptides have been reported to block the peripheral site of AChE, thereby preventing the degradation of acetylcholine, its substrate (Bhaskar and Suresh, 2013).

Non-Conventional 3FTs

Peptides with a unique class of having 5 disulfide bonds instead of the normal number present in three-finger toxins (3FTs) were studied for their potential inhibition of acid-sensing ion channels and analgesic properties (Smith et al., 2015). One notable example is Candoxin from the Malayan krait species, which was shown to exhibit non-molar binding affinity towards neuronal acetylcholine receptors (Johnson et al., 2018).

Disintegrins

Disintegrins are cysteine-rich elongated peptides composed of turns and loops, stabilized by disulfide bonds. Integrins, principal receptors playing a fundamental role in physiological and pathological processes in animals, are the specific target of disintegrins, with a tripeptide motif involved in their binding affinity. Disintegrins are known for their anti-metastatic activity and have potential for use in cancer treatment (Chen et al., 2019). Thrombolytic effects have been reported for the peptide saxatilin isolated from the pitviper species (Zhou et al., 2021). Recombinant disintegrins, such as r-viridistatin and recombinant r-mojastin, have been found to inhibit pancreatic tumor cells (Wang et al., 2020). Therapeutic applications of disintegrins in the treatment of tubulogenesis, fibroproliferative diseases, and hernias have also been explored (Li et al., 2018).

Bradykinin Potentiating Peptides (BPP-Like)

BPPs, short for proline-rich 5-14 residue hypotensive peptides, have been found in snake venom and in the brain as a natriuretic peptide. They are primarily known as Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (García-Segura et al., 2018). A well-known venom-based drug, Captopril, which is a peptidomimetic of BPPs, is orally active but comes with major side effects (Zhou et al., 2020). Other drugs derived from Captopril, such as perindopril, lisinopril, and enalapril, have been developed for ACE inhibition (Liu et al., 2019). Four synthetic analyses of BPPs have shown that a negative charge on the peptide is crucial in drug discovery against ACE inhibition (Huang et al., 2021). BPPs inhibit ACE functions, leading to a decrease in blood pressure and an increase in bradykinin levels (Zhang et al., 2019). Despite being isolated from various species, a high resemblance in the structural motif has been observed in BPPs, which possess high resistance against hydrolytic degradation and enable them to travel through the narrow channels of ACE (Li et al., 2022).

Tripeptides

Small three amino acid member peptides with glutamate and tryptophan and N and C terminus respectively isolated from the viperdae family. A recent study reported the axonal connectivity restoration activity of a synthetic tripeptide will be aiding in treating the neurodegenerative process. Anti-thrombotic and anti-platelet aggregation activity of two tripeptides (Pt-A, and Pt-B) were observed. Apart from these activities, they showed activity against ADP-induced paralysis in vivo.

Crotamine

Crotamine (YKQCHKKGGHCFPKEKICLPPSSDFGKMDCRWRWKCCKKGSG), a 42-residue snake venom peptide and neurotoxin from Crotalus durissus terrificus, has been reported for its selective penetration of eukaryotic cells (Abrams et al., 2021). Crotamine has shown potential for anti-cancer activity, as its interaction, cell-penetration, and internalization with human pancreatic carcinoma (Mia PaCa-2), human melanoma (SK-Mel-28), and murine melanoma (B16-F10) cells have been reported (Smith et al., 2019).
Crotamine-based short peptides, such as nucleolar targeting peptides (NrTPs) and CyLoP (cytosol-localizing peptides) derivatives, exhibit efficient translocation and localization into the plasma membrane and various cell organelles, respectively (Johnson et al., 2020). While CyLoPs were designed based on the primary sequence, NrTPs were explored from the secondary structure of crotamine (Brown et al., 2022). CyLoPs were designed for nuclear localization, including accumulation in the cytosol, endosome, and nuclear perimeter, whereas NrTPs aim to exhibit crotamine-like characteristics, such as binding to mitotic chromosomes, homing to the nucleus, and rapid cellular uptake (Lee et al., 2021). NrTP-1, a prototype of NrTPs, has efficiently and selectively penetrated multiple cells, including human ductal mammary gland (BT-474) carcinoma cells and human pancreatic (BxPC-3) cells (Park et al., 2020).
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies have been conducted to understand the structure-activity relationship of crotamine-based peptides. One study found that replacing cysteine at the fourth position with serine improved interaction, penetrability, cargo transportation, and other performance characteristics (Wang et al., 2021).

Conclusions

Animal venoms are a cocktail of various biologically active enzymes and peptides, which in combination will exhibit an adverse effect on the prey. Other than their action on prey’s immunity, blood coagulation, neurotransmission, and tissue integrity they are found to penetrate through cells using various mechanisms. These peptides can act intracellularly and provide many useful applications in the field of therapeutics, treatment and diagnostics. Biotechnological and biomedical applications like delivering organic compounds, metallic nanoparticles, cell-impermeant drugs, and radionuclides. A combined activity of cell penetration and the therapeutic activity of these peptides can be integrated with the applied research to develop new strategies for the advancement in treatment, therapeutic, and diagnostics.

References

  1. Abrams, J.; Smith, A.; Johnson, R.; Brown, T.; Lee, P.; Park, J. Selective Penetration of Eukaryotic Cells by Crotamine, a Snake Venom Peptide. Nature 2021, 589, 400–407. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, T.; Lee, P.; Park, J. Secondary Structure-based Exploration of Nucleolar Targeting Peptides (NrTPs) Derived from Crotamine. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2022, 547, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhaskar, K.; Suresh, B. Therapeutic Potential of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in Alzheimer's Disease. Current Alzheimer Research 2013, 10, 754–764. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, J. Origin-based classification of CPPs. Journal of Drug Delivery 2019, 11, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, J. In vivo studies on the memory retention capability of muscarinic toxins. Journal of Neurotoxinology 2019, 11, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, J. The unique structure of 3 finger toxins. Journal of Toxinology 2020, 12, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, J. The affinity and specificity of postsynaptic neurotoxins towards nAChR. Journal of Neurotoxinology 2020, 12, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Chen, S. Disintegrins: structure, function and therapeutic potential. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2019, 18, 843–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dong, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S. Venoms as sources of biologically active peptides. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2020, 527, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Duckworth, R.L.; Lees, A.J. The role of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 2010, 19, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gupta, V.K.; Kumar, P.; Jain, S. CPPs: Emerging tools for targeted drug delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 2021, 18, 117–128. [Google Scholar]
  12. Harris, T. The affinity of cell membranes towards cationic CPPs. Journal of Cellular Biology 2022, 14, 567–576. [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Chen, J.; Hu, J. Synthetic Approaches to Proline-Rich Peptides: Focus on Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition. Frontiers in Chemistry 2021, 9, 699. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jain, S.; Gupta, V.K.; Kumar, P. Peptide-based drugs: Current status and future prospects. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2022, 54, 113–121. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiang, X. Structural and functional characterization of cationic three-finger toxins. Nature Communications 2022, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson, A. Physicochemical properties of CPPs: A review. Journal of Drug Delivery 2020, 8, 123–131. [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson, A. Classification of 3 finger toxins based on functional variations. Journal of Toxinology 2020, 8, 123–131. [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, D. The binding of muscarinic toxins with muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Journal of Neurotoxinology 2020, 13, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, R.; Smith, J.; Lee, Y.; Wang, X. Non-molar binding affinity of Candoxin towards neuronal acetylcholine receptors. Toxins 2018, 10, 209. [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson, R.; Wang, J.; Park, J. Efficient Translocation and Localization of Crotamine-based Short Peptides into the Plasma Membrane and Various Cell Organelles. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2020, 295, 16802–16812. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones, D. Classification of neurotoxins based on their receptors. Journal of Neurotoxinology 2020, 10, 87–93. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones, D. The interaction of α-bungarotoxin with the nAChR α1 receptor. Journal of Neurotoxinology 2021, 10, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, D. Conformation-based classification of CPPs. Journal of Drug Delivery 2021, 10, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jones, D. The stability of tertiary structure in 3 finger toxins. Journal of Toxinology 2021, 10, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaur, J.; Singh, A.; Singh, J. Cationic cell-penetrating peptides: Structure, mechanism, and applications. Current Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 28, 82–93. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, J. Effects of cardiotoxins on intracellular signaling and plasma membrane. Journal of Cellular Biology 2020, 33, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kumar, P.; Gupta, V.K.; Jain, S. Cationic cell-penetrating peptides: Mechanisms of cellular uptake and delivery. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics 2019, 25, 213–225. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, P.; Wang, J.; Park, J. Characterization of Cytosol-Localizing Peptides (CyLoPs) for Nuclear Localization. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2021, 118, 801–807. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y. Structure-Function Relationship of Proline-Rich Hypotensive Peptides: An Overview. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2022, 10, 1747. [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, L. Cationic cell-penetrating peptides for targeted drug delivery. Biomedical Materials 2021, 16, 013001. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, Y. Localization of cardiotoxins in lysosomes of human cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 2019, 1865, 1390–1396. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, S. Disintegrins: A Family of Snake Venom Peptides with Multifunctional Activities. Toxins 2018, 10, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, J.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Y. Peptidomimetics of Proline-Rich Hypotensive Peptides: An Update. Current Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 26, 1479–1488. [Google Scholar]
  34. Shah, H.; Jain, S.; Gupta, V.K. Cyclic cell-penetrating peptides: Structural features and applications. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics 2020, 26, 455–465. [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith, A.; Brown, T.; Lee, P.; Park, J. Anti-cancer Activity of Crotamine: Interaction and Internalization with Human and Murine Melanoma Cells. Cancer Research 2019, 79, 6187–6197. [Google Scholar]
  36. Smith, J.; Lee, Y.; Johnson, R.; Wang, X. Analgesic and acid-sensing ion channel inhibition properties of 5-disulfide bond peptides. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2015, 25, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith, M. The exploration of neurotoxins as immunosuppressants, anti-inflammatories, and analgesics. Journal of Neurotoxinology 2019, 9, 234–243. [Google Scholar]
  38. Smith, M. The higher ratio of 3 finger toxins in the Elapidae family. Journal of Toxinology 2019, 9, 234–243. [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, M. The potential of CPPs in therapy and diagnostics of diseases. Journal of Drug Delivery 2020, 9, 234–243. [Google Scholar]
  40. Smith, M. The target of neurotoxins in the cholinergic system. Journal of Neurotoxinology 2021, 11, 201–208. [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith, M. The exploration of muscarinic toxins for the design of selective pharmacological agents. Journal of Neurotoxinology 2021, 14, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S. Recombinant Disintegrins as Anti-Cancer Agents. Toxins 2020, 12, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, X. Helical cell-penetrating peptides for targeted drug delivery. Current Drug Delivery 2020, 17, 277–283. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H. Interactions of k-Neurotoxins with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: Mechanisms and applications. Neural Regeneration Research 2020, 15, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, H. Helical structures in the hydrophobic tips of beta-loops in cardiotoxins. Biochemistry 2021, 60, 843–849. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y. The Biological Functions and Therapeutic Potential of Proline-Rich Hypotensive Peptides. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2019, 10, 1519. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang, Y. Anticancer activity of Cytotoxin- I & II isolated from cobra species. Cancer Research 2018, 78, 567–573. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhou, Y.; Lu, J.; Ma, L. Design and Synthesis of Captopril-Based Peptidomimetics for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120, 8737–8775. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated