Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Identifying Infant Body Position from Inertial Sensors with Machine Learning: Which Parameters Matter?

Version 1 : Received: 16 October 2024 / Approved: 17 October 2024 / Online: 17 October 2024 (14:47:16 CEST)

How to cite: Duda-Goławska, J.; Rogowski, A.; Laudańska, Z.; Żygierewicz, J.; Tomalski, P. Identifying Infant Body Position from Inertial Sensors with Machine Learning: Which Parameters Matter?. Preprints 2024, 2024101387. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1387.v1 Duda-Goławska, J.; Rogowski, A.; Laudańska, Z.; Żygierewicz, J.; Tomalski, P. Identifying Infant Body Position from Inertial Sensors with Machine Learning: Which Parameters Matter?. Preprints 2024, 2024101387. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1387.v1

Abstract

Efficient classification of body position is crucial for monitoring infants’ motor development. It may fast-track the early detection of developmental issues related not only to the acquisition of motor milestones but also to postural stability and movement patterns. In turn, this may facilitate and enhance opportunities for early intervention that are crucial for promoting healthy growth and development. Manual classification of human body position based on video recordings is labour-intensive, leading to the adoption of Inertial Motion Unit (IMU) sensors. IMUs measure acceleration, angular velocity, and magnetic field intensity, enabling automated classification of body position. Many research teams are currently employing supervised machine learning classifiers that utilise hand-crafted features for data segment classification. In this study, we used a longitudinal dataset of IMU recordings made in the lab in three different play activities of infants aged 4-12 months. The classification was conducted based on manually annotated video recordings. We found superior performance of the CatBoost Classifier over the Random Forest Classifier in the task of classifying five positions based on IMU sensor data from infants, yielding excellent classification accuracy of Supine (97.7%), Sitting (93.5%) and Prone (89.9%) position. Moreover, using data ablation experiments and analysing the SHAP values, the study assessed the importance of various groups of features from both time and frequency domains. The results highlight that both accelerometer and magnetometer data, especially their statistical characteristics, are critical contributors to improving the accuracy of body position classification.

Keywords

inertial motion sensors; human activity recognition; explainable machine learning

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.