Version 1
: Received: 16 October 2024 / Approved: 17 October 2024 / Online: 17 October 2024 (12:47:44 CEST)
How to cite:
Plotnitsky, A. “In the Language of Mathematics”: On Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Foundations. Preprints2024, 2024101399. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1399.v1
Plotnitsky, A. “In the Language of Mathematics”: On Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Foundations. Preprints 2024, 2024101399. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1399.v1
Plotnitsky, A. “In the Language of Mathematics”: On Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Foundations. Preprints2024, 2024101399. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1399.v1
APA Style
Plotnitsky, A. (2024). “In the Language of Mathematics”: On Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Foundations. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1399.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Plotnitsky, A. 2024 "“In the Language of Mathematics”: On Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Foundations" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1399.v1
Abstract
The argument of this article is threefold. First, the article argues that, from its rise in the sixteenth century to our own time, the advancement of modern physics, as mathematical-experimental science, has been defined by the invention of new mathematical structures. Secondly, the article argues that quantum theory, specifically with quantum mechanics, gave this thesis a radically new meaning by virtue of the following two features: one the one hand, quantum phenomena themselves are defined by purely physical features, as essentially different from all previous physics; and on the other, quantum mechanics and quantum field theory are defined by purely mathematical postulates, which connect them to quantum phenomena strictly in terms of probabilities, without representing or otherwise relating to how these phenomena physically come about. While these two features may appear discordant, if not inconsistent, I argue that they are in accord with each other, at least in certain interpretations (including the one adopted here), designated as “reality without realism,” RWR, interpretations. This argument allows this article to offer a new perspective on a thorny problem of the relationships between continuity and discontinuity in quantum physics. In particular, rather than being concern only with the discreteness and continuity of quantum objects or phenomena, quantum mechanics and quantum field theory relate their continuous mathematics to the irreducibly discrete quantum phenomena, in terms of probabilistic predictions, while, at least in RWR interpretations, precluding a representation or even conception of how these phenomena come about. This subject is rarely, if ever discussed, apart from previous work by the present author. It will, however, be given a new dimension in this article which introduces, as one of its main contributions, a new principle: the mathematical complexity principle.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
