Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Precision and Characteristics of Satellite Spatial Quality Estimators Measurement using Edge Target imaged with KOMPSAT-3A

Version 1 : Received: 21 October 2024 / Approved: 21 October 2024 / Online: 22 October 2024 (04:07:34 CEST)

How to cite: Lee, D.; Park, D.; Yoo, D. Precision and Characteristics of Satellite Spatial Quality Estimators Measurement using Edge Target imaged with KOMPSAT-3A. Preprints 2024, 2024101623. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1623.v1 Lee, D.; Park, D.; Yoo, D. Precision and Characteristics of Satellite Spatial Quality Estimators Measurement using Edge Target imaged with KOMPSAT-3A. Preprints 2024, 2024101623. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1623.v1

Abstract

After the launch of a high-resolution remote sensing satellite, representative spatial quality estimators (RER, FWHM, MTF50, MTFA) are measured from images taken of ground Edge targets. In this work, the best spatial quality estimator is proposed by quantitatively comparing and analyzing the precision between Relative Edge Response (RER), Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), MTF value at Nyquist frequency (MTF50), and MTF Area between 0 and Nyquist frequency (MTFA). While the basic method for the measurement of spatial quality estimators on Edge targets is already well established, this work summarizes and explains the uncertain factors and problems in the measurement procedure that affect the accuracy and precision of spatial quality estimators. It also considers how to improve the precision of spatial quality estimators during the measurement procedure. The contents and results of this work were discussed by various satellite development organizations in the Geo-Spatial Working Group within CEOS WGCV IVOS from 2012 to 2019, and the Edge target Spatial quality Measurement Python code (ESMP) was developed in 2019 to reflect the findings of this workshop. Using 483 Edge targets from worldwide images taken by KOMPSAT-3A, which has been in operation since 2017, the results obtained via ESMP show that the precision of RER, FWHM, and MTFA are approximately three to four times higher than that of MTF50 when comparing the Coefficient of Variance (CV) statistics.

Keywords

Satellite spatial quality; MTF; RER; FWHM; Edge target; Precision

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Remote Sensing

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.