1. Introduction
Let
be a complex Hilbert space and
A be a possibly unbounded self-adjoint linear operator defined on domain
. For
with
, define the
uncertainty (also known as variance) of
A at the point
h as
In 1929, Robertson [
1] derived the following mathematical form of the uncertainty principle (term due to Condon [
2]) of Heisenberg derived in 1927 [
3]. Recall that, for two linear operators
and
, we define
and
.
Theorem 1.
[1,3,4,5,6,7] (Heisenberg-Robertson Uncertainty Principle) Let and be self-adjoint operators. Then for all with , we have
In 1930, Schrodinger improved Inequality (
1) [
8].
Theorem 2.
[8] (Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrodinger Uncertainty Principle) Let and be self-adjoint operators. Then for all with , we have
Theorem 2 leads to the following question.
Question 3. What is the version of Theorem 2 for three operators?
In this note, we answer Question 3 by deriving an uncertainty principle for three operators acting on classes of Banach spaces, using trilinear forms. We note that there are uncertainty principles derived for three operators on Hilbert spaces, but ours differ from them [
9,
10,
11,
12,
13].
2. 3-Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrodinger Uncertainty Principle
The Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrodinger uncertainty principle requires the inner product to handle two operators; for three operators, we need a 3-product defined as follows.
Definition 1.
Let be a real Banach space with norm . A map is said to be a 3-product if following conditions hold.
-
(i)
for all , for all bijections .
-
(ii)
for all , for all .
-
(iii)
for all .
-
(iv)
for all .
In this case, we say that is a 3-product space.
Following is the standard example we keep in mind.
Example 1.
Let be a measure space and be the standard real Lebesgue space. Generalized Holder’s inequality says that
Therefore is a 3-product space equipped with 3-product
We next introduce the notion of self-adjointness for operators on 3-product spaces.
Definition 2.
Let be a 3-product space. A possibly unbounded linear operator is said to be 3-self-adjoint if
Example 2.
Consider with the 3-product
Let be any real numbers. Define
Then A is 3-self-adjoint.
Example 3.
Consider (as a real sequence space) with the 3-product
Let be a bounded real sequence. Define
Then A is 3-self-adjoint.
Example 4.
We continue from Example 1. Let . Define
Then A is 3-self-adjoint.
Let
be a 3-self-adjoint operator. For
with
, define the
3-uncertainty of
A at the point
x as
Theorem 4.
(3-Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrodinger Uncertainty Principle) Let be a 3-product space. Let , and be possibly unbounded 3-self-adjoint operators. Then for all
with , we have
Proof. First inequality follows from AM-GM inequality for three positive reals. Given
with
, set
□
References
- Robertson, H.P. The Uncertainty Principle. Phys. Rev. 1929, 34, 163–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Condon, E.U. Remarks on Uncertainty Principles. In Selected Scientific Papers of E.U. Condon; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 93–96. [Google Scholar]
- Heisenberg, W. The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics. In Quantum Theory and Measurement; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1983; pp. 62–84. [Google Scholar]
- Cassidy, D.C. Heisenberg, uncertainty and the quantum revolution. Sci. Am. 1992, 266, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. xviii+304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debnath, L.; Mikusiński, P. Introduction to Hilbert spaces with applications; Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999; pp. xx+551. [Google Scholar]
- Ozawa, M. Heisenberg’s original derivation of the uncertainty principle and its universally valid reformulations. Curr. Sci. 2015, 109, 2006–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schrödinger, E. About Heisenberg uncertainty relation. Bulgar. J. Phys. 1999, 26, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
- Song, Q.C.; Qiao, C.F. Stronger Schrödinger-like uncertainty relations. Phys. Lett. A 2016, 380, 2925–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kechrimparis, S.; Weigert, S. Heisenberg uncertainty relation for three canonical observables. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 90, 062118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, H.H.; Fei, S.M.; Li-Jost, X. Multi-observable Uncertainty Relations in Product Form of Variances. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kechrimparis, S.; Weigert, S. Geometry of uncertainty relations for linear combinations of position and momentum. J. Phys. A 2018, 51, 025303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodonov, V.V. Variance uncertainty relations without covariances for three and four observables. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 022105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).