1. Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) and other related synucleinopathies are characterized by pathological misfolding and accumulation of the αsyn protein into insoluble aggregates. The disease-associated αsyn protein aggregates are known to form distinct structural morphotypes attributing to clinical heterogeneity and pathological complexities in the various synucleinopathies [
1,
2,
3]. Moreover, it has been hypothesized that morphological differences may stem, at least in part, from the intrinsic cellular milieu in which the protein aggregation occurs [
2,
4,
5]. Although the exact link between aggregate morphology and cellular environment remains to be elucidated.
Although mounting evidence points towards the existence of various polymorphic forms of αsyn assemblies [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11], the detection and differentiation of these in varying cellular environments remains challenging using conventional methods of protein aggregate characterization[
12,
13]. Thiophene-based fluorescent ligands also known as luminescent conjugated oligothiophenes (LCOs) have been extensively characterized for detecting various polymorphic variants of protein aggregates [
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22]. The conformational flexibility of the thiophene backbone of these LCOs becomes constricted when they bind to the repetitive cross β-sheet structure of the protein aggregates [
14,
23]. This impacts their spectral properties, which can change based on variations in the conformation of the aggregates, making the LCOs suitable for assessing αsyn aggregate morphologies based on their spectral features in a cellular environment under
in-vitro conditions. For instance, LCOs have been reported to differentiate between αsyn protein aggregates in brain tissue sections of PD and multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients [
21]. Furthermore, to evaluate the structural features of protein aggregates in varying chemical environments, such as within cells, it is essential to understand the surrounding solvent environment, which can be achieved by assessing fluorescence lifetime [
24]. In addition to displaying distinct spectral signatures, LCOs also exhibit unique fluorescence lifetimes characteristic of the protein deposits they bind to [
21,
25]. Here, we aim to assess spectral profiles as well as the lifetime signatures of an LCO when binding to αsyn aggregates in an
in-vitro environment involving cell-culture to better understand whether any changes in the spectral properties and the associated lifetime distributions are influenced by inherent cellular environment. Such knowledge is crucial in understanding clinical heterogeneity in synucleinopathies, where the cellular environment of the first aggregate may contribute to aggregate morphology and clinical phenotype [
26].
In this study, the heptameric LCO, heptamer formyl thiophene acetic acid (h-FTAA), was used. This ligand displays distinctive lifetime distributions when it binds to αsyn aggregates in brain tissue sections of PD and MSA patients [
21]. Moreover, differences in the decay times of lifetime profiles from h-FTAA have been reported upon binding to pathogenic prion in mouse brain tissue sections [
25,
27,
28] and amyloid-β deposits in transgenic mouse models [
29].
Given the versatility of the LCOs to detect and distinguish morphologies of αsyn aggregates, here we aimed to explore this approach of utilizing h-FTAA together with recombinant αsyn pre-formed fibrils (PFFs) to assess the ligand’s binding ability in a physiologically controlled environment. Taking this approach further, we used human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells, which were exogenously introduced with either human-A53T-mutated-αsyn (A53T) [
30,
31,
32] or human-wildtype-αsyn (WT), to induce αsyn aggregation upon exposure to PFFs. This allowed us to examine the spectral profiles and lifetime distributions of h-FTAA bound to αsyn aggregates in an
in-vitro cellular environment, aiming to get insights into the role of inherent cellular environment upon the conformation of aggregates and photophysical response of fluorescent ligands.
3. Discussion
h-FTAA displays a conformational-dependent spectral shift when bound to various disease-associated protein deposits, including αsyn deposits [
18,
25,
33], whereas other oligothiophene ligands appear to be more selective towards non-αsyn protein pathologies. Hence, the h-FTAA ligand may be particularly valuable for
in-vitro characterization of αsyn PFFs and induced αsyn aggregates. To our knowledge,
in-vitro spectral characterization of αsyn-h-FTAA binding has not been carried out before. Therefore, it was essential to first assess the photophysical properties of h-FTAA alone in common solvents, as well as to validate the binding efficiency of h-FTAA to αsyn PFFs.
When assessing the photophysical properties of h-FTAA in solvents with different polarity, the excitation spectra for h-FTAA did not show any variation, however, the emission spectrum in ethanol was slightly red-shifted suggesting that the excited state of h-FTAA was likely of higher polarity or more stabilized in ethanol compared to other polar solvents. Moreover, the QY for h-FTAA in ethanol was also observed to be around 40% indicating that the ligand increased the QY in a more nonpolar environment. Strikingly, a lower QY was calculated in PBS compared to other polar solvents. This finding aligns with the minimal background interference that was noted when un-transfected HEK293 cells seeded with PFFs were stained with h-FTAA. The ligand binding to fibrillar aggregates is also more complex for the longer oligothiophenes since the π-conjugated chain can be stabilized in more or less planar configuration. The extended planar conformation of oligothiophenes usually manifests itself in a red-shift as the conjugated p-conjugated framework then has a lower optical bandgap[
35,
46]. Hence, conformational changes can also counteract the well know polarity effects for shorter fluorescent ligands that usually yields blue-shifted spectra in the hydrophobic fibril binding sites [
36]. The combination of spectral and time-resolved fluorescence together thus allows for a more accurate interpretation of the binding as shown here.
In the next step, the photophysical properties of h-FTAA binding to PFFs were examined. The hyperspectral imaging gave h-FTAA emission spectrum in the range similar to that observed in polar solvents, particularly ethanol. Furthermore, the decay time for h-FTAA when it was bound to PFFs was observed to be around 1.003 ± 0.001 ns, which was relatively longer than that detected in ethanol and methanol. The difference in lifetime profile observed for h-FTAA when bound to PFFs compared to its profile in solvents, reflects the changing chemical environment possibly around the binding pocket of h-FTAA, which results in a characteristic lifetime value around 1 ns. The lifetime observed here corroborates to the similar lifetime values observed for
in-vitro αsyn fibrils formed in different buffer conditions [
47].
After validation of h-FTAA’s binding efficacy to αsyn PFFs, cell experiments were performed. In order to understand the potential cellular impact on aggregate morphology, both A53T-αsyn and WT-αsyn HEK293 cells were seeded with PFFs and stained with h-FTAA. The emission spectra of h-FTAA binding to the induced aggregates displayed maxima with broad peaks around 540 and 580 nm, which was similar to the observations of h-FTAA binding to PFFs and in polar solvents. Drawing comparisons with existing literature, h-FTAA exhibits double peaks at approximately 545 nm and 590 nm, showing red-shifted spectral shift when it binds to prion deposits in mice brain tissue sections infected with two distinct prion strains [
25]. In another study, h-FTAA staining could detect and spectrally differentiate distinct αsyn assemblies in transgenic mouse models of MSA, giving similar emission profiles as observed in the cells [
20]. These
in-vivo studies, taken together with our
in-vitro investigation of h-FTAA binding to αsyn aggregates leads us to speculate that it could be likely that the binding pocket of h-FTAA might be very well exposed to the hydrophobic environment of the aggregates in such a way that probably stabilizes a more extended excited state, hence, yielding, characteristic, red-shifted shoulder of the emission spectrum[
35,
46].
Furthermore, FLIM was also assessed for the h-FTAA-stained aggregates in WT-αsyn and A53T-αsyn HEK293 cells. The fluorescence decay time of a ligand is highly sensitive to its extrinsic environment, and this in turn reflects on the conformation of the molecule to which it binds. h-FTAA is shown to exhibit different fluorescence decay times when it binds to αsyn inclusions in brain tissue sections of PD and MSA patients [
21]. And the fluorescence decays were found to be distinct for morphotypes of prion inclusions in brain tissue of mice infected with distinct prion strains [
25]. In this study, the fluorescence decay times of h-FTAA when bound to the induced intracellular aggregates in WT-αsyn and A53T-αsyn-HEK293 was found to be to be shorter than the decay time of h-FTAA when bound to PFFs. This difference in lifetime parameters possibly reflects a change in the solvent or chemical environment around h-FTAA, which can lead to complex interactions between the ligand and the aggregates, thereby causing a conformational-specific shift of lifetime. The results thereby indicate a conformational difference between PFFs and the induced αsyn aggregates in the HEK293 cells. The fluorescence lifetime values examined for h-FTAA binding to the aggregates in the cells seem to align with lifetime values observed for h-FTAA in ethanol, suggesting a more hydrophobic milieu around h-FTAA in this case.
For validation purposes, the WT-αsyn and A53T-αsyn-HEK293 cells exposed to PFFs were stained with h-FTAA and double labelled with an antibody specific for pS129-αsyn. The result showed some overlap of h-FTAA-stained regions with the antibody staining of pS129-αsyn. However, h-FTAA did not show complete co-localization with pS129 antibody but, the opposite was always observed as h-FTAA emissions overlapped onto the pS129 antibody. It is probable that the h-FTAA ligand is more sensitive to bind to a wide range of αsyn morphotypes, including premature or intermediate αsyn conformers like oligomers and protofibrils. This has been observed in the case of h-FTAA binding to early oligomeric aggregates of Abeta [
17,
33]. This can be a limiting factor when staining with conventional antibodies that detect only mature aggregates after extensive phosphorylation. An increased sensitivity to a multitude of morphotypes for the h-FTAA ligand anticipates on the other hand more complex spectral and temporal profiles. Although the fluorescence lifetime values of h-FTAA stained, pS129 positive aggregates in A53T-αsyn and WT-αsyn-HEK293 cells appeared to be slightly shifted towards longer lifetime we consider the measured differences being too small to draw decisive conclusions. Further examination of the detailed fibrillation process for various αsyn strains seems necessary to resolve more details of this and related issues.
4.1. Materials
Recombinant human αsyn PFFs was obtained from DANDRITE, Danish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience & Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. pcDNA 3.1 plasmids encoding human A53T-αsyn or WT-αsyn were a kind gift from Dr Michel Goedert at MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom, h-FTAA was acquired from the Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden. DRAQ5, Cell Mask Deep Red, anti-αsyn monoclonal antibody (Syn 211) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Anti-αsyn pS129 antibody (EP1536Y) was purchased from Abcam.
4.2. Photophysical Measurements of h-FTAA in Solvents
Steady state fluorescence measurements were carried out using a PTI Quantamaster 8075-22 (Horiba Scientific) equipped with Double Mono 300 spectrometer chambers for both excitation and emission. A Hamamatsu R928 PMT was used for detection in the range 185 – 950 nm. A OB-75X (75W Xenon arc lamp) was used as light source. Data acquisition and basic data-handling were carried out with the Felix Data Analysis software and further processed and presented using Origin Pro. Steady state absorption spectra were recorded using a Shimadzu UV-1601PC spectrophotometer. Time-resolved fluorescence decays were recorded using an IBH time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) spectrometer system with 1 nm resolved emission monochromator (5000 M, Glaskow, UK). The system was equipped with a TBX-04D picosecond photon detection module and the sample was excited using an IBH LED operating at 455 nm. The measured decay-trace was analyzed using deconvolution fitting with the IBH Data Station v 2.1 software and presented using the Origin Pro software.
All measurements were performed with a 10 mm quartz cuvettes (Hellma Precision). Spectroscopi grade methanol and ethanol solvents (Merck) was used.
4.3α. syn Fibril Formation
Full-length wild type human αsyn was expressed in BL21(DE3)-competent cells and purified by ion-exchange and reverse phase chromatography as previously described (PMID: 1471182 & PMID: 33978813). To generate pre-formed fibrils (PFF), 4 mg/mL soluble monomeric αsyn in PBS (pH 7.4, Gibco) was incubated at 37OC for 72 h with continuous shaking (1050 rpm, Eppendorf Thermotop). Fractions were tested for ThT fluorometry and sedimentation analysis to validate amyloid structure and insolubility as previously described (PMID: 33978813). The validated PFF were harvested by centrifugation at 15,600g for 30min to pellet insoluble fibrils, then resuspended in PBS to a concentration of 1 mg/mL, determined using a Pierce BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The PFF were then sonicated for 20 min with 30 ms pulses followed by 70 ms breaks at 30% power using a Branson SFX250 Sonifier equipped with a 1” cup horn (Branson; 101-147-046) and stored at -80°C.
PFFs were thawed and imaged using TEM. Here, the PFF stock solution (70 μM on a monomer basis) sample was applied to TEM grid to adsorb for 2 minutes (400 mesh copper grids CARBON-B, Ted Pella Inc, USA), excess sample was botted off with filter paper, grid was washed with milli-Q water, and was negative stained with 2 % uranyl acetate for 30 s and grids were blotted dry and was dried in air. Imaging was performed using a Jeol JEM1400 Flash TEM instrument with images taken 10,000x magnification.
4.4. Emission of αsyn PFFs Together with h-FTAA and Simulation of Binding Curves
For spectral assessment and binding curves, the αsyn PFFs were diluted to 1 µM (on a monomer basis) in PBS and mixed with varying concentrations of h-FTAA ranging between 0 to 4500 nM. Following incubation overnight in room temperature, in a 96 well plate black with clear bottom (Corning 8085). The excitation and fluorescence spectra were measured using a Tecan Saphire 2 plate reader using excitation spectra 400-520 nm (emission 550 nm) and emission spectra 500-700 nm (450 nm excitation) with 5 nm steps, slits 5 nm. The one and two site-binding models to simulate binding kinetics were developed to calculate the relative abundance of free ligands, empty protein sites as well as the protein filled in 1- and 2-sites, see [
40] for further details.
4.5. In-Vitro PFFs-h-FTAA Characterization Using Hyperspectral Imaging and FLIM
PFFs at 1 µM were mixed with h-FTAA at 500 nM. Microscopy slides were prepared by adding 2 µl of the stained PFFs. The samples were dried and then covered with a coverslip. The pre-stained PFFs were assessed for spectral features and FLIM using Leica SP8 with single molecule detection and multiphoton laser confocal microscope. PicoQuant’s SymphoTime 64-bit version was used for FLIM measurement and data analysis.
4.6. Cell Cultivation
The HEK293 cells originate from fetal kidney’s epithelial cells that are immortalized by transforming human kidney cells with adenovirus type 5 DNA [
48]. These were grown in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) (ATCC
® 30-2003), supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Sigma Aldrich, F-7524). The HEK293 cells were incubated at 37
OC in a humidified chamber with 5% CO
2. Upon reaching 80-90% confluency, they were regularly sub-cultivated. The cells were prepared for sub-cultivation by removing the growth medium and washing with PBS (Sigma Aldrich) to get rid of traces of old medium. After detaching the cells from the culture surface using a 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA solution (Sigma Aldrich), they were incubated at 37°C for 3-5 minutes in a humidified chamber with 5% CO
2. The trypsinized cells were then added to EMEM growth medium supplemented with 10% FBS and mixed thoroughly to prevent cell aggregation. The cell suspension was then transferred to a test tube and centrifuged (1500 rpm, 5 mins). A fraction of cell suspension of known concentration was prepared and used to seed two new flasks (2x10
6 cells in a T-75 or 0.5x10
6 cells in a T-25 flask). Appropriate volume of fresh EMEM growth medium supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the new flasks followed by incubating the sub-cultivated cells (37° C, 5% CO
2). Apart from sub-culturing, the cells were washed (PBS) and replenished with fresh growth medium supplemented with 10% FBS once a week.
4.7. Transfection with A53T or WT-αsyn
HEK293 cells were plated at a density of 300000 cells in 6-well plates, transfected with 4 µg of pcDNA 3.1-plasmid containing A53T-αsyn or WT-αsyn, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). The cells were harvested after 24 hours of transfection.
4.8. Seeding with αsyn PFFs
Transfected cells were plated in 8-well plates (µ-slide ibidi) at a plating density of 5 x 105 cells/ml and incubated overnight (37°C, 5% CO2). To expose the cells to PFFs, the fibrils were sonicated for 5 mins using Bandelin Sonorex at 35 kHz. The PFFs were mixed with Opti-MEM (Gibco) and incubated for 5 mins at room temperature. Simultaneously, the lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) was mixed with Opti-MEM at 1:10 dilution and was incubated for 5 mins at room temperature. The lipofectamine-Opti-MEM mixture was added to the PFFs-OptiMEM mixture at a 1:1 ratio, incubated for 10 mins and then added to the cells at a final concentration of 500 nM. After three hours of incubation, the cells were washed twice with PBS (Gibco) to remove any extracellular fibrils, replenished with fresh medium containing EMEM supplemented with FBS (10%) and were incubated for three days (37°C, 5% CO2).
4.9. Staining with h-FTAA, DRAQ5 and Hyperspectral Microscopy
Following three days of incubation, 1 µM of h-FTAA was added to the cells and incubated (1 hour) at room temperature. After incubation, the cells were washed with PBS and then stained with DRAQ5 (5 µM). After 10 mins of incubation, the cells were rinsed with PBS and imaged using Leica SP8 with single molecule detection and multiphoton laser confocal microscope. For measuring and analyzing lifetime distributions, Pico Quant’s SymPhoTime 64-bit version was utilized by exciting the sample at 475 nm for h-FTAA using a pulse laser set at 40 Mhz and keeping the laser intensity between 5-10 %.
4.10. FACS for Assessing Transfection Efficiency
Cells were grown in 6-well plates (Corning Costar®) and harvested using Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%) acidic solution. Following washing twice (PBS), the cells were spun at 1500 RPM, fixed with Fixation solution (BD Biosciences) for 30 mins at room temperature. After washing the fixed cells with PermWash (BD Biosciences), they were treated with anti-αSyn monoclonal antibody (Syn211, Invitrogen), which was diluted 1:2000 in PermWash, and incubated for 2 hours. Following washing once (PermWash), the cells were incubated with goat anti-mouse secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen), which was diluted 1:500 in PermWash and then incubated for 45 minutes at room temperature. Following washing once (PermWash), the cells were resuspended in PBS and analyzed using BD FACS Aria II.
4.11. Western Blotting
Cells were grown in 35 mm cell-culture dishes (Corning Costar®), lysed using 1X NuPAGE LDS sample buffer including sample reducing agent (Invitrogen) on ice with the help of cell scrapper. The lysates were then transferred to Eppendorf tubes. The protein in the samples was denatured by heating at 90°C for 10 minutes. Samples were further sonicated for 10 minutes and spun at 1300 rpm for 1 minute before loading onto the NuPAGETM 10% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen). Protein molecular weight ladder (Sea blueTM Plus2 Pre-stained Protein Standard, Invitrogen) was added to one of the wells and the samples were run at 200V for 25 minutes. The protein was separated and then transferred to a nitro-cellulose membrane (Bio-Rad) using Trans-Blot Turbo transfer system (Bio-Rad). Following protein transfer, the membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dry skim milk in TBS-Tween and further incubated with αSyn monoclonal antibody (1:500, Syn211), diluted in 5% non-fat dry skim milk in TBS-Tween. Following three washes, the blot was incubated with an infrared dye goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (IRDye 680RD) which was diluted 1:10000 in 1% non-fat dry skim milk in TBS-Tween. After three washes in TBS-Tween, the protein bands were visualized using Chemi Doc Imaging Systems (Bio-rad).
4.12. Immunocytochemistry
Cells were rinsed with PBS and then fixed with paraformaldehyde (4%) for 20 mins at room temperature. Non-specific sites were blocked with the blocking buffer (3% BSA in PBS, 0.1% Triton X-100) for 1 hour at room temperature. The cells were incubated with primary antibodies overnight (40C). Then, they were washed with PBS (3 X 10 mins). Subsequently, the cells were treated with secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. Further, the cells were washed with PBS (3 X 10 mins). Depending on the experiment, the cells were either incubated with a suitable stain, such as 1X CellMask Deep Red (Invitrogen) for 10 mins before imaging, or they were incubated with 1 µM h-FTAA for 1 hour at room temperature. After incubation, the cells were washed twice (PBS) and then imaged using Leica SP8 with single molecule detection and multiphoton laser confocal microscope. The primary antibodies used were anti-αsyn monoclonal antibody (1:500, Syn 211, Invitrogen) and anti-αsyn pS129 antibody (1:2000, EP1536Y Abcam) and the secondary antibodies were goat-anti-mouse-secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Flour 488 (1:2000, Invitrogen) and goat-anti-rabbit-secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (1:2000, Invitrogen).
Figure 1.
Emission spectra of h-FTAA binding to PFFs fixed at 1 uM concentration with varying concentrations of h-FTAA from A) 1125 nM to 4500 nM and B) 141 nM to 563 nM. The samples were excited at 450 nm and the emission was recorded in the range of 500-700 nm. Each spectrum was baseline corrected using h-FTAA emission in PBS-only, respectively. The shaded region in each spectrum represents the standard deviation from triplicates of the varied concentrations of h-FTAA while keeping the concentration of PFFs fixed at 1 µM.
Figure 1.
Emission spectra of h-FTAA binding to PFFs fixed at 1 uM concentration with varying concentrations of h-FTAA from A) 1125 nM to 4500 nM and B) 141 nM to 563 nM. The samples were excited at 450 nm and the emission was recorded in the range of 500-700 nm. Each spectrum was baseline corrected using h-FTAA emission in PBS-only, respectively. The shaded region in each spectrum represents the standard deviation from triplicates of the varied concentrations of h-FTAA while keeping the concentration of PFFs fixed at 1 µM.
Figure 2.
Binding curve of PFF (1 μM) vs. h-FTAA concentration (red squares). The blue triangles show the signal obtained from h-FTAA only in PBS. The excitation wavelength was 450 nm and the spectra were collected as in
Figure 1. The dashed curves are simulations where the blue dashed line corresponds to 6% QY of h-FTAA in PBS (
Table 1). Green dot-dashed: 1-site binding K
d = 25 nM; QY 30%. Red dashed: 2-site model, K
d1 = 100 nM; . K
d2 = 300 nM. QY(h-FTAA/PFF-site1) 40%; QY(h-FTAA/PFF-site2) 20%. For details of the 2-site model, see[
40].
Figure 2.
Binding curve of PFF (1 μM) vs. h-FTAA concentration (red squares). The blue triangles show the signal obtained from h-FTAA only in PBS. The excitation wavelength was 450 nm and the spectra were collected as in
Figure 1. The dashed curves are simulations where the blue dashed line corresponds to 6% QY of h-FTAA in PBS (
Table 1). Green dot-dashed: 1-site binding K
d = 25 nM; QY 30%. Red dashed: 2-site model, K
d1 = 100 nM; . K
d2 = 300 nM. QY(h-FTAA/PFF-site1) 40%; QY(h-FTAA/PFF-site2) 20%. For details of the 2-site model, see[
40].
Figure 3.
Hyperspectral imaging and fluorescence lifetime measurements of PFFs stained with 500 nM h-FTAA. A) Representative fluorescence image and B) False-color coded FLIM image of PFFs stained with h-FTAA. The sample was excited at 475 nm and the photons were collected in the 500-700 nm range. The color bar to the right represents the lifetime ranging from 0 ns to 2 ns. C) Spectral analysis of h-FTAA when it is bound to PFFs, showing emission maxima at approximately 540 nm and 580 nm. The five ROIs (red) used to record the emission spectra are shown in B. D) Fluorescence decay time distribution recorded from the FLIM image using the same ROIs (red) that were selected for the spectral analysis in C. The shaded regions in the plots represent the standard deviation.
Figure 3.
Hyperspectral imaging and fluorescence lifetime measurements of PFFs stained with 500 nM h-FTAA. A) Representative fluorescence image and B) False-color coded FLIM image of PFFs stained with h-FTAA. The sample was excited at 475 nm and the photons were collected in the 500-700 nm range. The color bar to the right represents the lifetime ranging from 0 ns to 2 ns. C) Spectral analysis of h-FTAA when it is bound to PFFs, showing emission maxima at approximately 540 nm and 580 nm. The five ROIs (red) used to record the emission spectra are shown in B. D) Fluorescence decay time distribution recorded from the FLIM image using the same ROIs (red) that were selected for the spectral analysis in C. The shaded regions in the plots represent the standard deviation.
Figure 4.
Endogenous αsyn expressed in HEK293 cells after transfection with 4 ug human A53T-αsyn or WT-αsyn. A) Western blot showing αsyn protein bands at approximately 14 kDa in A53T-αsyn and WT-αsyn HEK293 cells which were probed with mouse anti-αsyn antibody Syn211. Representative immunofluorescence images of B) A53T-αsyn, C) WT-αsyn HEK293 cells showing localization of αsyn in cytosol and D) Un-transfected HEK293 cells showing absence of αsyn, when labelled with mouse anti-αsyn antibody Syn211. Scale bar represents 10 µm.
Figure 4.
Endogenous αsyn expressed in HEK293 cells after transfection with 4 ug human A53T-αsyn or WT-αsyn. A) Western blot showing αsyn protein bands at approximately 14 kDa in A53T-αsyn and WT-αsyn HEK293 cells which were probed with mouse anti-αsyn antibody Syn211. Representative immunofluorescence images of B) A53T-αsyn, C) WT-αsyn HEK293 cells showing localization of αsyn in cytosol and D) Un-transfected HEK293 cells showing absence of αsyn, when labelled with mouse anti-αsyn antibody Syn211. Scale bar represents 10 µm.
Figure 5.
Representative fluorescence images of HEK293 cells expressing A) A53T-αsyn or B) WT-αsyn, seeded with 500 nM human-αsyn PFFs and stained with 1 μM h-FTAA (green) and 5 µM DRAQ5 (red). C) Un-transfected HEK293 cells were also exposed to PFFs, showing minimal fluorescence from h-FTAA. Scale bar represents 10μm.
Figure 5.
Representative fluorescence images of HEK293 cells expressing A) A53T-αsyn or B) WT-αsyn, seeded with 500 nM human-αsyn PFFs and stained with 1 μM h-FTAA (green) and 5 µM DRAQ5 (red). C) Un-transfected HEK293 cells were also exposed to PFFs, showing minimal fluorescence from h-FTAA. Scale bar represents 10μm.
Figure 6.
Representative spectral analysis and lifetime distributions of h-FTAA binding to aggregates in A53T-αsyn-HEK293 and WT-αsyn-HEK293 cells. The samples were excited at 475 nm. A) Emission spectra and B) lifetime distributions of h-FTAA binding to aggregates in A53T-αsyn (red) and WT-αsyn-HEK293 (green) cells.
Figure 6.
Representative spectral analysis and lifetime distributions of h-FTAA binding to aggregates in A53T-αsyn-HEK293 and WT-αsyn-HEK293 cells. The samples were excited at 475 nm. A) Emission spectra and B) lifetime distributions of h-FTAA binding to aggregates in A53T-αsyn (red) and WT-αsyn-HEK293 (green) cells.
Figure 7.
Representative differential interference contrast (DIC) and confocal microscopy images showing h-FTAA stained (green), pS129-probed αsyn aggregates (red) in A) A53T-αsyn-HEK293 cells and B) WT-αsyn-HEK293 cells. The samples were excited at 475 nm and 650 nm, respectively. C) Un-transfected HEK293 cells, also seeded with PFFs, show no fluorescence from h-FTAA or the anti-αsyn pS129 antibody indicating absence of pS129-positive αsyn aggregates. Scale bar represents 25 µm.
Figure 7.
Representative differential interference contrast (DIC) and confocal microscopy images showing h-FTAA stained (green), pS129-probed αsyn aggregates (red) in A) A53T-αsyn-HEK293 cells and B) WT-αsyn-HEK293 cells. The samples were excited at 475 nm and 650 nm, respectively. C) Un-transfected HEK293 cells, also seeded with PFFs, show no fluorescence from h-FTAA or the anti-αsyn pS129 antibody indicating absence of pS129-positive αsyn aggregates. Scale bar represents 25 µm.
Figure 8.
Representative spectral analysis and lifetime distributions of h-FTAA stained, pS129-labelled aggregates in A53T-αsyn-HEK293 and WT-αsyn-HEK293 cells. The samples were excited at 475 nm and 650 nm for h-FTAA and Alexa Flour 647, respectively. A) Emission spectra and B) life-time distributions for h-FTAA stained, pS129-labelled aggregates in A53T-αsyn-HEK293 and WT-αsyn-HEK293 cells.
Figure 8.
Representative spectral analysis and lifetime distributions of h-FTAA stained, pS129-labelled aggregates in A53T-αsyn-HEK293 and WT-αsyn-HEK293 cells. The samples were excited at 475 nm and 650 nm for h-FTAA and Alexa Flour 647, respectively. A) Emission spectra and B) life-time distributions for h-FTAA stained, pS129-labelled aggregates in A53T-αsyn-HEK293 and WT-αsyn-HEK293 cells.
Table 1.
Photophysical parameters of h-FTAA in various solvents. τi denotes lifetime and Bi relative amplitude of two-decay fitting model. For TC SPC ~1.0 μM concentration of h-FTAA was used with λex = 455 nm. For emission spectra to determine QY, λex = 430 nm.
Table 1.
Photophysical parameters of h-FTAA in various solvents. τi denotes lifetime and Bi relative amplitude of two-decay fitting model. For TC SPC ~1.0 μM concentration of h-FTAA was used with λex = 455 nm. For emission spectra to determine QY, λex = 430 nm.
Solvent |
|
|
|
|
|
PBS |
|
|
|
|
|
EtOH |
|
|
|
|
|
MeOH |
|
|
|
|
|