Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Asymmetric Roles of Different Punishments under Centralized Sanctions

Version 1 : Received: 26 October 2024 / Approved: 27 October 2024 / Online: 28 October 2024 (13:23:39 CET)

How to cite: Ziying, Z.; Elvis, N. T.; Gonglin, H.; Yan, K. C.; Yun, S. Y. Asymmetric Roles of Different Punishments under Centralized Sanctions. Preprints 2024, 2024102118. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.2118.v1 Ziying, Z.; Elvis, N. T.; Gonglin, H.; Yan, K. C.; Yun, S. Y. Asymmetric Roles of Different Punishments under Centralized Sanctions. Preprints 2024, 2024102118. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.2118.v1

Abstract

Altruistic punishment has been found to promote cooperation and address social dilemmas in both small and large societies. For many years, peer punishment has been viewed as a decentralized sanction to promote cooperation. Recent studies have found that centralized sanctions and punishments are more effective. In this paper, we incorporate centralized sanctions (third-party sanctions) into the repeating public goods game to investigate how different patterns of third-party punishment impact public cooperation and the organization’s profit, given enough information. Furthermore, the study assesses the influence of various punishments on cooperative behavior and examines the asymmetric roles of punishments in centralized sanctions. As a result: (1) Given enough information, high-intensity and non-random punishment can maintain long-term and high-level cooperation. (2) Punishment successfully deters free riding, regardless of intensity or randomness. (3) Under punishment, people can swiftly establish cooperative social norms to avoid punishment and, eventually, increase profits, regardless of the pattern applied. Therefore, our study sheds light on the heterogeneity of human cooperative behaviors under different centralized sanctions and proves the effectiveness of punishment in promoting human cooperation.

Keywords

punishment; centralized sanctions; cooperation; public goods game

Subject

Social Sciences, Behavior Sciences

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.