Preprint
Article

Terahertz CMOS High Sensitivity Sensor based on Hybridized Spoof Surface Plasmons Resonator

Altmetrics

Downloads

24

Views

15

Comments

0

Submitted:

06 December 2024

Posted:

06 December 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
In recent years, spoof localized surface plasmons (SLSPs) have gained increasing attention due to their strong electromagnetic wave confinements. Based on the multipole resonance of the SLSPs, a high-Q-factor terahertz resonator based on CMOS technology is proposed. Specifically, a quad-rilateral hybridized SLSPs structure composed of a core and a cavity SLSPs resonator, is designed to reduce electric dimension and improve the Q-factor. The experimentally measured Q-factor reaches 56.7 at 194 GHz, which is a quite high value within the terahertz frequency band, partic-ularly given the compact electrical dimension of 0.081λ0.081λ. Moreover, the pharmaceutical testing in the terahertz frequency range have been successfully conducted, including glucose and two traditional Chinese medicine: Chuan bei and Sanqi. And three frequency shifts(4GHz, 3.2GHz, 1.4GHz) are observed. Thus, the SLSPs resonator holds great potential for high-performance te-rahertz applications.
Keywords: 
Subject: Engineering  -   Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Introduction

Millimeter-wave and terahertz (THz) sensing have attracted increasing interest[1,2,3,4]. The low photon energy in the THz frequency band allows for nondestructive detection, and can penetrate dielectric materials, making it suitable for high-sensitivity detection and sensing applications[2,3]. However, in the high-frequency range of millimeter-wave, it is difficult to ensure accuracy due to the high loss tangent value of traditional dielectric substrate. Consequently, great interests have been focused on CMOS technology during the past few years[1,5]. It can not only reduce the bulky size but also decrease the high loss[6].
Surface plasmons (SPs) have attracted much attention for their ability to confine the field in the metal-dielectric interface in the optical and far-infrared frequency band[7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Research in this area has expanded from the optical regime to the microwave and terahertz regime driven by the pioneering works[14,15,16,17]. According to the propagation characteristics, surface plasmons can be divided into two types, surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs), and localized surface plasmons (LSPs) which are localized near the metal particles[18].
By introducing periodic structures such as periodic sub-wavelength corrugation metal strips, spoof surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) and spoof localized surface plasmons (SLSPs) can be utilized to propagate signals or constrain electric fields. Based on these, a planar ring resonator in the terahertz frequency has been designed and simulated, which has been experimentally tested in the microwave frequency band and holds promising potential in integrated plasmonic circuits and systems[11].
The hybridization of plasmons brings a highly sensitive resonance characteristic to SLSPs, which makes it a good candidate for sensors and detectors[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. A hybridized SLSPs resonator was implemented by a concentric structure[19]. The design shows advantages of compact size, high-quality factor(Q-factor), and high environmental sensitivity. As a result, a small change in the surrounding environment can affect the resonant modes[24].
In this work, we propose a novel hybridized square quadrilateral resonator structure based on SLSPs fabricated using CMOS technology. This hybridized resonator structure consists of two coupled SLSPs resonators, a core resonator and a cavity resonator. Gratings are incorporated in both the outer and inner LSPs resonators, which are tightly interconnected to reduce the electrical size , with a total area of 126*126 μ m 2 . Experimental measurements show a Q-factor of 56.7 at 194 GHz. In addition, we performed pharmaceutical testing experiments on three medicinal solutions: glucose, Chuanbei, and Sanchi . The results conclusively demonstrate that the hybridized SLSPs resonator offers exceptional sensitivity for medicinal detection in the terahertz frequency range, indicating a substantial potential as a chip-based test strip.

2. Materials and Methods

To investigate the characteristics of the hybridized SLSPs resonator, we first simulated the cavity SLSPs resonator for comparison. As illuminated in Figure 1, the cavity resonator has a regular quadrilateral structure, with metallic spokes arranged periodically around the resonator. The attached spokes are located inside the cavity and extend inward. On the one side of the cavity resonator, the length of the attached spokes decreases gradually from middle to both sides. And the resonator is fed by non-contact coupling excitation, which is composed of a microstrip line terminated by a stub. A ground-signal-ground (GSG) pad is positioned on the left of the excitation to connect external probe. By tuning the length of the terminal stub L 1 and the gap between the resonator and the stub, coupling efficient of the feeding could be adjusted effectively.
An electromagnetic full-wave simulation was performed as depicted in Figure 2. The cavity SLSPs resonator was simulated to obtain the reflection coefficient, as well as the E z -field distributions on the xoy plane. In Figure 2(a), two obvious resonances labelled m1 and m2 are observed at 173.6GHz and 234GHz, corresponding to the E z -field distributions on the xoy plane presented in Figure 2 (b) and (c). From the E z -field distribution, mode m1 could be categorized as asymmetric mode, when mode m2 is a dipole mode, demonstrating that SLSPs resonant mode is successfully excited. Especially, the Q-factor of mode m2 can be calculated by the following equation:
Q = f 0 f 3 d B
where f 0 is the center frequency, and f 3 d B is 3dB bandwidth. The Q-factor of dipole mode is 53.
Then, a core SLSPs resonator was incorporated inside the cavity SLSPs resonator to form the hybridized SLSPs resonator, as shown in Figure 3. The shape of the core SLSPs resonator is also regular quadrilateral, the same as the cavity resonator. And spokes attached outside the metallic quadrilateral of core resonator interdigitate with the spokes on the cavity resonator. According to our previous work[19], strong coupling between interdigitated spokes will be generated. By altering the length of the spokes, the resonant characteristics will be changed accordingly. Figure 4(a) illustrates the S parameter of hybridized SLSPs resonator in comparison to the cavity resonator. Two resonant modes of hybridized resonator are observed and labelled M1 and M2, which are located at 168.8 GHz and 194.4 GHz, respectively. Comparing with the cavity resonator, both resonant modes of hybridized resonator exhibit red shift, indicating the ability reducing the electric size of the resonator. In Figure 4(b) and (c), electric distribution of modes M1 and M2 are presented, revealing that the cavity and core resonators resonate out-phase.
To study the resonance modes in detail, surface currents of mode m1, m2, M1, M2 are monitored and plotted in Figure 5. The surface current of the cavity SLSPs resonator are exhibited in Figure 5 (a) and (b). It can be observed that there are a pair of surface currents around the periphery of the cavity resonator, corresponding to the electric field oscillated out-phase of mode m1 and m2. In comparison, two pair of surface currents oscillated out-phase are also observed around the hybridized SLSPs structure. In Figure 5 (c) and (d), a pair of surface currents flow around the cavity resonator while another pair of currents flows around the core resonator. The overlapping of the currents increases the current path, which makes the red shift occur. Especially, the surface current intensity around the core resonator of mode M2 is stronger than that of mode M1, resulting a more significant red shift of mode M2.

3. Results

Complete S parameters from 170 GHz to 220 GHz were measured by the VectorStar broadband vector network analyzer ME7838G. The comparison between the simulation result and measured one is exhibited in Figure 6. The simulation and experimental results are located at 194.4 GHz and 194 GHz, respectively, with a quiet small frequency deviation. The measured Q-factor is 56.7, which is a fairly high level compared to the published resonator shown in Table 1.
To verify the highly sensitive biosensing properties of the SLSPs sensor, a series of experimental verifications were conducted for medicinal solution sensing. Three medicinal powders were made into solution for experiment: Sanchi, Chuanbei and glucose. Figure 7(a) presents the fabricated chip, where a solution was dripped on. When one solution measurement is completed, the chip will be cleaned by an ultrasonic cleaner. After the last solution is cleaned up, the chip will be dried thoroughly in air. Subsequently, next solution will be dripped on the chip, and the measurement will be conducted after the solution dried to a film. The process will be repeated until finishing the experiment.
Measured S parameter spectra are shown in Figure 7(b). It can be observed that compared to the S parameter in air, the spectra under tested samples exhibit a significant red shift, while maintaining a high Q-factor. Wherein, compared to air, the frequency shift for Chuanbei is 1.4GHz, and the one for Sanchi is 3.2GHz, when the one for glucose is 4GHz, demonstrating the potential of the resonator as a promising candidate for a variety of terahertz sensing applications.
Here, the results provide a qualitative analysis for biosensing. In the future, a quantitative measurement would be designed and implemented, allowing for the evaluation of sensing characteristics using figures of merit(FoM).
To highlight the superior features of the proposed SLSPs, comparison of resonators based on COMS technology are listed in Table 1. Comparing the reference 27 and 28 with the proposed SLSPs resonator, this work shows a quiet high Q-factor and maintains compact electrical size, showcasing a prominent performance in the terahertz band.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a novel approach is presented for achieving a high Q-factor compact resonator utilizing CMOS technology, based on the spoof localized surface plasmons. A quadrilateral hybridized SLSPs resonator is proposed and fabricated with a compacted electric size of 0.081λ×0.081λ. The measured Q-factor is as high as 56.7 in the THz frequency range. The pharmaceutical testing is also implemented on three medicine solutions: Sanchi, Chuanbei and glucose, and frequency shifts of 1.4GHz, 3.2GHz, 4GHz are observed. The hybridized SLSPs resonator provides a new solution for CMOS high sensitivity sensor in the terahertz band.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B; methodology, C.C.L.; software, M.W and C.C.L; validation, W.M., C.C.L and J.W; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, K.L.; resources, H.G.; data curation, Z.Y.Q; writing—original draft preparation, M.W.; writing—review and editing, D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program, grant number 2023YFB3811300, 2023YFB3811302; and the 111 Project , grant number 111-2-05.

Acknowledgments

M.Wan: C.C. Li and D.Bao contributed equally to this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shang, Y.; Yu, H.; Hu, S.; Liang, Y.; Bi, X.; Arasu, M.A. High-Sensitivity CMOS Super-Regenerative Receiver with Quench-Controlled High-Q Metamaterial Resonator for Millimeter-Wave Imaging at 96 and 135 GHz. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn. 2014, 62, 3095–3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gao, Z.; Gao, F.; Zhang, B. High-Order Spoof Localized Surface Plasmons Supported on a Complementary Metallic Spiral Structure. Sci Rep 2016, 6, 24447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liao, Z.; Liu, S.; Ma, H.F.; Li, C.; Jin, B.; Cui, T.J. Electromagnetically Induced Transparency Metamaterial Based on Spoof Localized Surface Plasmons at Terahertz Frequencies. Sci Rep 2016, 6, 27596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhou, J.; Chen, L.; Sun, Q.; Liao, D.; Ding, L.; Balakin, A.V.; Shkurinov, A.P.; Xie, J.; Zang, X.; Cheng, Q.; et al. Terahertz On-Chip Sensing by Exciting Higher Radial Order Spoof Localized Surface Plasmons. Appl. Phys. Express 2020, 13, 012014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liang, Y.; Yu, H.; Zhang, H.C.; Yang, C.; Cui, T.J. On-Chip Sub-Terahertz Surface Plasmon Polariton Transmission Lines in CMOS. Sci Rep 2015, 5, 14853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, H.C.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, J.F.; Tang, W.; Fan, Y.; Cui, T.J. Smaller-Loss Planar SPP Transmission Line than Conventional Microstrip in Microwave Frequencies. Sci Rep 2016, 6, 23396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gao, Z.; Gao, F.; Shastri, K.K.; Zhang, B. Frequency-Selective Propagation of Localized Spoof Surface Plasmons in a Graded Plasmonic Resonator Chain. Sci Rep 2016, 6, 25576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garcia-Vidal, F.J.; Martín-Moreno, L.; Pendry, J.B. Surfaces with Holes in Them: New Plasmonic Metamaterials. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2005, 7, S97–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kianinejad, A.; Chen, Z.N.; Qiu, C.-W. Design and Modeling of Spoof Surface Plasmon Modes-Based Microwave Slow-Wave Transmission Line. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn. 2015, 63, 1817–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pors, A.; Moreno, E.; Martin-Moreno, L.; Pendry, J.B.; Garcia-Vidal, F.J. Localized Spoof Plasmons Arise While Texturing Closed Surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 223905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shen, X.; Jun Cui, T. Planar Plasmonic Metamaterial on a Thin Film with Nearly Zero Thickness. Applied Physics Letters 2013, 102, 211909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shao, R.L.; Zhou, Y.J.; Yang, L. Quarter-Mode Spoof Plasmonic Resonator for a Microfluidic Chemical Sensor. Appl. Opt. 2018, 57, 8472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Goubau, G. Surface Waves and Their Application to Transmission Lines. Journal of Applied Physics 1950, 21, 1119–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Withayachumnankul, W.; Jaruwongrungsee, K.; Tuantranont, A.; Fumeaux, C.; Abbott, D. Metamaterial-Based Microfluidic Sensor for Dielectric Characterization. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 2013, 189, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, B.J.; Zhou, Y.J.; Xiao, Q.X. Spoof Localized Surface Plasmons in Corrugated Ring Structures Excited by Microstrip Line. Opt. Express, OE 2015, 23, 21434–21442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ebrahimi, A.; Withayachumnankul, W.; Al-Sarawi, S.; Abbott, D. High-Sensitivity Metamaterial-Inspired Sensor for Microfluidic Dielectric Characterization. IEEE Sensors J. 2014, 14, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liao, Z.; Pan, B.C.; Shen, X.; Cui, T.J. Multiple Fano Resonances in Spoof Localized Surface Plasmons. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 15710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liao, Z.; Luo, Y.; Fernández-Domínguez, A.I.; Shen, X.; Maier, S.A.; Cui, T.J. High-Order Localized Spoof Surface Plasmon Resonances and Experimental Verifications. Sci Rep 2015, 5, 9590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bao, D.; Cheng, Q.; Jiang, W.X.; Zhang, J.J.; Liao, Z.; Wu, J.W.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.R.; Cui, T.J. Concentric Designer Plasmon Hybridization in Deep Subwavelength Metamaterial Resonator. Applied Physics Letters 2019, 115, 121103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gholamian, M.; Shabanpour, J.; Cheldavi, A. Highly Sensitive Quarter-Mode Spoof Localized Plasmonic Resonator for Dual-Detection RF Microfluidic Chemical Sensor. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 145401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Li, Z. Ultra-Compact Effective Localized Surface Plasmonic Sensor for Permittivity Measurement of Aqueous Ethanol Solution With High Sensitivity. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, Y.; Salim, A.; Lim, S. Millimeter-Wave-Based Spoof Localized Surface Plasmonic Resonator for Sensing Glucose Concentration. Biosensors 2021, 11, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rawat, V.; Dhobale, S.; Kale, S.N. Ultra-Fast Selective Sensing of Ethanol and Petrol Using Microwave-Range Metamaterial Complementary Split-Ring Resonators. Journal of Applied Physics 2014, 116, 164106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Gao, H.; Fu, X.; Bao, D.; Cui, T.J. Mixed-Resolution High-Q Sensor Based on Hybridized Spoof Localized Surface Plasmons. Front. Phys. 2022, 10, 850186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, X.; Cui, W.Y.; Lei, Y.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, J.; Cui, T.J. Spoof Localized Surface Plasmons for Sensing Applications. Advanced Materials Technologies 2021, 6, 2000863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, Y.J.; Zhang, C.; Yang, L.; Xiao, Q.X. Electronically Controllable Spoof Localized Surface Plasmons. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 425102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, G.; Shen, Y.; Hu, S. On-Chip Localized Surface Plasmon Resonator for 127 GHz Compact CMOS Oscillator. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2023, 44, 1927–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thapa, S.K.; Pokharel, R.K.; Chen, B.; Barakat, A. On-Chip Millimeter-Wave DGS Based Bandstop Filter in 0.18- μ m CMOS Process. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 2022, 69, 2732–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the cavity SLSPs resonator, in which D=126 μ m , l 1 = 40 μ m , l 2 = 34 μ m , l 3 = 30 μ m , l 4 = 23 μ m , and l 5 = 12 μ m , gap 1 =8 μ m .
Figure 1. Schematic of the cavity SLSPs resonator, in which D=126 μ m , l 1 = 40 μ m , l 2 = 34 μ m , l 3 = 30 μ m , l 4 = 23 μ m , and l 5 = 12 μ m , gap 1 =8 μ m .
Preprints 142073 g001
Figure 2. (a) The simulated reflection coefficient. (b) The E z -field distributions of the cavity SLSPs structure.
Figure 2. (a) The simulated reflection coefficient. (b) The E z -field distributions of the cavity SLSPs structure.
Preprints 142073 g002
Figure 3. Schematic of the hybridized LSP resonator structure.
Figure 3. Schematic of the hybridized LSP resonator structure.
Preprints 142073 g003
Figure 4. (a) The simulation results comparison of the hybridized SLSPs resonator and the cavity resonator. (b-c) The electric field distributions of mode M1 and M2.
Figure 4. (a) The simulation results comparison of the hybridized SLSPs resonator and the cavity resonator. (b-c) The electric field distributions of mode M1 and M2.
Preprints 142073 g004
Figure 5. Surface current distributions of mode (a) m1, (b) m2, (c) M1 and (d) M2.
Figure 5. Surface current distributions of mode (a) m1, (b) m2, (c) M1 and (d) M2.
Preprints 142073 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of measured and simulated S parameter.
Figure 6. Comparison of measured and simulated S parameter.
Preprints 142073 g006
Figure 7. (a-b) The microscopic image of the proposed SLSPs. The test results for the sensing experiment.
Figure 7. (a-b) The microscopic image of the proposed SLSPs. The test results for the sensing experiment.
Preprints 142073 g007
Table 1. Comparison of resonators based on COMS technology.
Table 1. Comparison of resonators based on COMS technology.
Ref technology Frequency
(GHz)
Total Size Electrical Size Q-factor
[27] 40nm CMOS 614.5 58μm×67μm 0.12λ×0.14λ 16.7
[28] 0.18μm CMOS 53.2 235μm×283μm 0.037λ×0.045λ 26.
This work 0.18μm CMOS 194 420μm×280μm 0.081λ×0.081λ 56.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated