A Novel Digital Payment Architecture: A Unified Payment Interface and its Systematic Transformation of Financial Infrastructure

Brain Smith

doi:10.20944/preprints202501.0289.v1

Submitted:

04 January 2025

Posted:

06 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

This study examines India's Unified Payments Interface (UPI), analysing its architectural framework, implementation trajectory and socioeconomic impact since its 2016 inception. The research demonstrates UPI's unprecedented growth, processing 9.3 billion monthly transactions by 2023, whilst achieving substantial financial inclusion outcomes through its zero-cost consumer transaction model and integration with national digital infrastructure. The system's technical architecture, comprising redundant data centres and standardised APIs, has maintained 99.99% uptime whilst facilitating interoperability across diverse stakeholders. Empirical analysis reveals significant macroeconomic effects, including a 0.36% direct GDP contribution and 180 million previously unbanked individuals entering the formal financial system. Despite infrastructure limitations and cybersecurity challenges in rural regions, the system's open-protocol design and regulatory framework present a replicable model for digital payment implementation, particularly relevant for emerging economies pursuing financial inclusion objectives.

Keywords:

Digital payments

;

Financial infrastructure

;

Payment systems

;

Financial inclusion

;

Unified Payments Interface

;

Interbank transfers

;

Developing and transitional economies

;

Food security

;

Basic needs

;

Digital transformation

;

Financial technology

Subject:

Business, Economics and Management - Business and Management

Introduction

While digital payment systems have been proliferating around the world for more than a decade, India's digital payment ecosystem has undergone a remarkable transformation since 2016, catalysed by demonetisation and accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Unified Payments Interface (UPI), developed by the National Payments Corporation of India, serves as the cornerstone of this revolution, facilitating real-time interbank transfers through mobile devices. The system's architecture integrates multiple stakeholders: banks, fintech companies, merchants, and consumers, operating under the regulatory framework of the Reserve Bank of India. UPI transactions have exhibited exponential growth, surpassing 9.3 billion transactions per month by late 2023, demonstrating unprecedented adoption rates.

This digital infrastructure is complemented by other significant components: Immediate Payment Service (IMPS), RuPay cards, and Aadhaar-enabled Payment System (AePS). The latter has proved particularly crucial for financial inclusion, enabling biometric-based transactions for rural populations. Market dynamics reveal a concentrated competitive landscape, with PhonePe and Google Pay commanding substantial market share. However, regulatory initiatives promoting interoperability and the entry of new players continue to reshape market structures. The system's success can be attributed to three key factors: zero-cost consumer transactions, robust regulatory support, and seamless integration with India's digital identity infrastructure. These elements have collectively established a model studied globally for digital payment implementation.

The Unified Payments Interface emerged from a systematic effort to modernise India's payment infrastructure, with its conceptualisation beginning in 2012 under Dr Raghuram Rajan's tenure as Reserve Bank of India Governor. The initiative was executed by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), which had previously established the National Financial Switch and RuPay networks. UPI's technical architecture was designed to address specific structural challenges in India's payment ecosystem: high cash dependency, limited interoperability between banks, and significant friction in digital transactions. The system's foundational innovation lay in its ability to map multiple bank accounts into a single mobile application, enabling seamless fund routing and merchant payments.

The initial pilot launched in April 2016 with 21 member banks. The system's public release in August 2016 coincided fortuitously with India's demonetisation initiative, which created substantial impetus for digital payment adoption. The subsequent integration of QR code functionality in 2017 marked a pivotal enhancement, particularly for small merchant adoption.

Technical Architecture

Critical technical features were methodically introduced: recurring payments (2019), international payments (2020), and offline transactions (2022). These developments reflected an iterative approach to system evolution, responding to market requirements whilst maintaining the core principles of security and interoperability. This developmental trajectory has established UPI as a reference model for real-time payment systems, with several nations now studying its implementation framework for their own digital payment initiatives. The technical architecture and implementation of UPI represents a sophisticated interplay of multiple technological layers and stakeholders, warranting systematic examination of its constituent elements.

A. System Architecture

The National Payments Corporation of India maintains a centralised infrastructure that functions as the system's nucleus. This infrastructure comprises redundant data centres, load balancers, and application servers configured in high-availability clusters. The NPCI's core switch processes transactions through a three-part validation sequence: authentication, authorisation, and settlement.

The integration with banking systems occurs via standardised APIs conforming to ISO 20022 messaging standards. Banks connect through dedicated secure channels, implementing straight-through processing mechanisms that enable real-time transaction reconciliation. This architecture employs a hub-and-spoke model, where NPCI serves as the central hub mediating all inter-bank communications.

Security protocols operate at multiple levels, including End-to-end encryption using 256-bit Advanced Encryption Standard, two-factor authentication incorporating device binding, Public Key Iknfrastructure based digital signatures for transaction non-repudiation and Hardware Security Modules for cryptographic operations.

B. Key Features and Functionality

The real-time payment processing capability is achieved through a sophisticated queuing system that maintains transaction atomicity. The system employs asynchronous processing with synchronous confirmation, ensuring transaction completion within 500 milliseconds under normal conditions. Fault tolerance is implemented through transaction rollback mechanisms and state management protocols.

Interoperability is facilitated through universal virtual payment addressing, standardised message formats, common settlement mechanisms, unified merchant onboarding protocols. Multiple device support is implemented through a device-agnostic architecture that accommodates smartphones via native applications, feature phones through Unstructured Supplementary Service Data communication protocol, Internet banking interfaces and third-party payment applications

QR code integration employs two standardised formats, viz., Static QR codes for fixed payment details and Dynamic QR codes for variable amount transactions. The system maintains compatibility through standardised QR specifications that encode merchant identification, transaction amount payment type indicators and additional merchant parameters. This architectural framework demonstrates remarkable resilience, processing over 300 million transactions daily while maintaining 99.99% uptime. The system's design principles of modularity and scalability have proven instrumental in accommodating exponential growth in transaction volumes.

Adoption and Growth Trajectory

A. Usage Statistics

The adoption of UPI has demonstrated unprecedented growth metrics since its inception. Transaction volumes have exhibited a compound annual growth rate of 285% from 2017 to 2023. Monthly transaction volumes reached 10.8 billion in October 2023, with a corresponding value of US$ 206 billion. This trajectory represents a significant inflection point in digital payment adoption.

User adoption metrics indicate equally robust growth, with registered users exceeding 350 million by late 2023. The platform has achieved critical mass through network effects, with daily active users surpassing 150 million. Merchant acceptance has expanded substantially, encompassing 50 million registered merchants, 98% acceptance among organised retail and significant penetration in informal sectors

B. Market Penetration

Geographic distribution analysis reveals 45% of transaction volume in big cities, 32% in smaller cities and towns and 23% in rural areas. Growth in rural areas is accelrating. This geographical expansion pattern reveals systematic adoption progression from urban to rural areas, though significant regional disparities persist. Notably, states with higher digital literacy demonstrate accelerated adoption rates, suggesting the importance of digital infrastructure and education in driving uptake.

Demographic segmentation indicates broad-based adoption with 42% of users in the age group 18-30, 35% in age group 31-45 and 23% in age group 46 plus. Transaction typology demonstrates diversity with 35% peer to peer transfers, 45% merchant payments, 15% bill payments and 5% other services.

Cross-border expansion has progressed through strategic partnerships. India’s UPI has been integrated with Singapore's PayNow. It has implementation partnerships with UAE and France. It has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with 12 countries and discussions are ongoing with many other countries. This growth trajectory has positioned UPI as a globally significant payment system, with transaction volumes surpassing many developed economies' digital payment systems. The cross-border expansion strategy appears methodically structured to leverage India's diaspora populations while establishing international interoperability standards.

Impact Analysis of UPI Implementation

A. Financial Inclusion

The implementation of UPI has markedly transformed banking accessibility patterns in India. Quantitative analysis indicates a 47% increase in active banking relationships among previously underserved populations between 2016-2023. Rural penetration metrics demonstrate particular significance with 85% increase in rural digital transaction volumes, 235% growth in rural merchant adoption and 67% reduction in average distance to digital payment points.

The impact on unbanked populations has been substantial, though not uniform. Research indicates that 180 million previously unbanked individuals have entered the formal financial system, primarily through UPI-enabled basic savings accounts. However, persistent challenges remain regarding digital literacy and infrastructure accessibility in remote regions.

B. Business Transformation

The digitisation of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) presents compelling evidence of systematic transformation. 68% of surveyed MSMEs report adopting digital payments post-UPI. Average transaction costs reduced by 85% compared to cash handling. Working capital efficiency improved by 32% through faster settlements. The informal economy has experienced significant restructuring with 45% reduction in cash-based merchant transactions and 73% of street vendors accepting digital payments. There has been a notable shift in supply chain payments towards digital methods. E-commerce integration metrics demonstrate substantial impact as 92% of online merchants have chosen to integrate UPI in their system. There has been 54% reduction in cart abandonment rates and 38% increase in rural e-commerce penetration.

C. Macroeconomic Effects

The expansion of digital payment ecosystem is evidenced by a, 32% year-on-year growth in digital transaction value/GDP ratio, 85% reduction in electronic payment processing costs and emergence more than two thousand fintech startups since UPI introduction. GDP impact analysis suggests a significant 0.36% direct contribution to GDP growth, 1.12% indirect contribution through productivity gains and 2.4% estimated contribution to formal sector expansion.

Tax collection efficiency demonstrates marked improvement including 28% increase in GST compliance rates, 45% growth in digital transaction audit trails and 52% reduction in tax collection costs. The shadow economy has experienced consequential contraction with 18% reduction in estimated informal economy size and 34% increase in traceable transaction volumes. There has been a significant improvement in monetary policy transmission. This analysis suggests that UPI's impact extends beyond mere payment facilitation, fundamentally altering India's economic structure. However, the transformation remains incomplete, with significant potential for further penetration and efficiency gains.

Regulatory Framework and Governance of UPI

A. Policy Environment

India’s central bank (The Reserve Bank of India, RBI) has established a comprehensive regulatory framework governing UPI operations, characterised by a three-tier supervisory structure. The primary regulatory instruments comprise the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 which establishes legal basis for payment systems, delineates settlement finality principles and prescribes operational parameters. The RBI Guidelines mandate two-factor authentication, stipulate transaction limits per transaction, establish operational risk management frameworks and define participant eligibility criteria.

Data protection measures demonstrate particular rigour. These measures include localisation requirements mandating domestic data storage, end-to-end encryption protocols, audit trail requirements and privacy-by-design principles in system architecture. Consumer protection frameworks encompass zero-liability provisions for unauthorised transactions, dispute resolution mechanisms with defined timelines, mandatory disclosure requirements and efficient grievance redressal systems

B. International Recognition

Global benchmarking exercises position UPI favourably with ransaction speed: 98th percentile globally, lowest per-transaction cost among major economies, highest penetration in comparable markets and 99.99% uptime exceeding international standards. Export potential manifests through multiple vectors including technology licensing opportunities, knowledge transfer frameworks, implementation consulting services and system adaptation methodologies. International collaborations exhibit structured progression with bilateral arrangements, viz., Real-time payment linkage with Singapore, integration with local payment systems of UAE and echnical cooperation framework with France. Multilateral initiatives include G20 payment system coordination, cross-border payment standardisation and regional payment integration frameworks

The regulatory framework demonstrates sophisticated evolution, balancing innovation facilitation and rwith systemic stability. International recognition has catalysed significant export opportunities, though challenges persist regarding cross-border regulatory harmonisation and technical standardisation. The governance structure exhibits noteworthy characteristics of regulatory effectiveness, particularly in its approach to risk management and consumer protection. However, emerging technologies and evolving cyber threats necessitate continuous regulatory adaptation.

Current Challaenges and Future Prospects

This framework has established a replicable model for digital payment system governance, though its exportability requires careful consideration of local market conditions and regulatory environments. The international recognition achieved suggests significant potential for broader global implementation, subject to appropriate localisation and regulatory alignment. The current challenges and future prospects of India's Unified Payments Interface present a complex interplay of technological, social, and regulatory factors that warrant careful examination. The system faces several significant infrastructure limitations that particularly affect its rural penetration and reliability. In remote areas, intermittent internet connectivity continues to disrupt approximately one-third of attempted rural transactions, while power supply inconsistencies in tier-3 cities create persistent challenges for merchant terminal availability. These infrastructure constraints are further exacerbated during peak transaction periods, when server capacity limitations can lead to processing delays and degraded performance.

Cybersecurity concerns have emerged as a critical challenge, with a marked increase in sophisticated attack vectors targeting the system. The year 2023 witnessed a 47% rise in social engineering attacks, while QR code manipulation schemes have particularly affected small merchants who often lack robust security protocols. The proliferation of fraudulent UPI applications has led to increased instances of credential theft, while API vulnerabilities in third-party applications have created additional attack surfaces. These security challenges are compounded by the vulnerability of transactions conducted over public Wi-Fi networks to man-in-the-middle attacks.

Digital literacy represents a substantial barrier to universal adoption, particularly evident in rural regions where 38% of users report significant difficulties in understanding transaction flows. This challenge is amplified by linguistic diversity, as non-Hindi speaking regions struggle with interface localisation. The elderly demographic exhibits particular vulnerability, demonstrating limited awareness of security best practices and reduced confidence in handling transaction failures. The complexity of dispute resolution mechanisms further compounds these challenges, creating barriers to effective system utilisation.

Technical reliability presents ongoing challenges, with bank server timeouts affecting a small but significant percentage of transactions. These issues become particularly pronounced during festival seasons when transaction volumes surge, leading to settlement delays and system degradation. The integration of new banking partners frequently introduces additional complexity, requiring careful management to maintain system stability.

Looking toward future development, several technological innovations show promise in addressing current limitations. The implementation of blockchain technology for settlement processes could enhance transparency and reduce settlement times, while artificial intelligence-powered fraud detection systems offer improved security capabilities. Voice-enabled UPI payments for feature phones could significantly expand accessibility, particularly in regions with lower smartphone penetration. The enhancement of offline transaction capabilities would address infrastructure limitations in areas with unreliable connectivity.

International expansion represents a crucial development vector, with particular emphasis on integration with global payment networks such as SWIFT. The development of multi-currency settlement mechanisms and standardisation of QR codes across Asian markets could facilitate seamless cross-border transactions. These initiatives require careful attention to regulatory harmonisation and the establishment of robust international dispute resolution frameworks.

The integration of emerging technologies presents significant opportunities for system evolution. The incorporation of Internet of Things payment capabilities could enable automated transactions across smart devices, while quantum-resistant cryptography would ensure long-term security resilience. Enhanced biometric authentication methods offer improved security while maintaining user convenience, and integration with Central Bank Digital Currency initiatives could expand the system's utility in future monetary frameworks.

Policy development remains crucial for addressing current challenges and facilitating future growth. The establishment of a comprehensive cybersecurity framework, coupled with enhanced grievance redressal mechanisms, would strengthen system reliability and user trust. Investment in digital literacy programmes and the strengthening of data protection measures are essential for expanding adoption while maintaining security. The success of these initiatives will depend heavily on coordinated efforts between regulatory authorities, technological partners, and financial institutions, requiring careful balance between innovation and stability.

This analysis suggests that while the UPI system faces significant challenges, its future prospects remain robust, contingent upon careful attention to infrastructure development, security enhancement, and user accessibility. The system's evolution will likely maintain its foundational principles of simplicity and accessibility while incorporating sophisticated features for advanced users, thereby ensuring continued relevance in an evolving digital payment landscape.The analysis suggests that whilst current challenges present substantial operational impediments, systematic technological advancement and policy development offer viable resolution pathways. The future trajectory appears promising, contingent upon effective address of identified limitations and successful implementation of proposed innovations. The development roadmap necessitates careful balance between innovation and stability, particularly regarding cybersecurity and infrastructure reliability. Success in international expansion will largely depend on effective regulatory harmonisation and technical standardisation across jurisdictions.

A comparative analysis of global digital payment systems reveals significant distinctions between UPI and its international counterparts. The Chinese system, dominated by WeChat Pay and Alipay, operates within a closed ecosystem controlled by private entities, whereas UPI demonstrates a unique open architecture enabling interoperability across financial institutions. European initiatives such as SEPA Instant Credit Transfer, whilst offering similar real-time settlement capabilities, have achieved notably lower adoption rates compared to UPI's widespread penetration across socioeconomic strata.

UPI's distinctive features manifest primarily in its architectural approach to financial inclusion. The system's capacity to link multiple bank accounts through a single mobile application, combined with its zero-cost consumer transaction model, represents a significant departure from conventional digital payment frameworks. This architecture has proven particularly effective in markets characterised by significant unbanked populations and diverse technological literacy levels.

The competitive advantages of UPI emerge most clearly in its transaction economics. Whilst systems like Japan's PayPay and Brazil's PIX demonstrate comparable technical capabilities, UPI's implementation costs remain substantially lower, averaging $0.01 per transaction compared to $0.05-0.10 in comparable systems. This cost efficiency derives from the system's unified architecture and standardised protocols, enabling economies of scale unmatched in fragmented payment environments.

Regarding impact assessment, empirical analysis indicates compelling cost-benefit metrics. The system's implementation has generated an estimated annual saving of 0.7% of GDP through reduced transaction costs and improved economic efficiency. These savings manifest primarily through decreased cash handling expenses, enhanced working capital efficiency, and reduced settlement timeframes. The monetary value of these benefits substantially exceeds the implementation and operational costs borne by the financial system.

Social impact metrics demonstrate significant positive externalities. Financial inclusion data indicates that UPI has facilitated the integration of 180 million previously unbanked individuals into the formal financial system. This integration has generated measurable improvements in economic participation, particularly among rural populations and informal sector participants. The system's role in facilitating government direct benefit transfers has markedly improved social welfare programme efficiency.

Environmental benefits, whilst less frequently discussed, merit attention. The reduction in physical cash usage has resulted in quantifiable decreases in currency printing and distribution requirements. Analysis suggests a 15% reduction in currency-related carbon emissions since UPI's implementation. Additional environmental benefits accrue from reduced transportation requirements for cash handling and decreased paper usage in transaction documentation.

This comparative analysis suggests that UPI represents a significant advance in digital payment system design and implementation. Its success in addressing both technical and social objectives whilst maintaining cost efficiency establishes a compelling model for digital payment infrastructure development. However, ongoing evaluation remains essential as the system continues to evolve and expand internationally.

Conclusion

The analysis of India's Unified Payments Interface reveals a transformative digital payment infrastructure that has achieved unprecedented scale and impact. The system's architecture, characterised by its open-protocol design and zero-cost consumer transaction model, has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in addressing the multifaceted challenges of financial inclusion in a diverse economic landscape. The empirical evidence suggests that UPI has fundamentally altered India's payment ecosystem, generating substantial economic efficiencies whilst simultaneously advancing social inclusion objectives.

The system's success can be attributed to three primary factors: its robust technical architecture, supportive regulatory framework, and systematic approach to stakeholder integration. The implementation trajectory demonstrates the vital importance of maintaining equilibrium between innovation and stability, particularly in markets characterised by significant infrastructural constraints and varying levels of digital literacy. The comparative analysis with global payment systems underscores UPI's distinctive approach to achieving scale through architectural simplicity and standardisation, whilst maintaining operational robustness.

Future research directions should focus on several critical areas. First, longitudinal studies examining the system's impact on informal sector formalisation and monetary policy transmission mechanisms would enhance understanding of its macroeconomic implications. Second, detailed investigation of cross-border implementation challenges, particularly regarding regulatory harmonisation and technical standardisation, would facilitate international expansion efforts. Third, research into the integration of emerging technologies, such as quantum-resistant cryptography and artificial intelligence-driven security protocols, would strengthen the system's future resilience. Finally, systematic examination of UPI's role in Central Bank Digital Currency implementations could provide valuable insights for evolving monetary frameworks. Such research would not only enhance understanding of digital payment systems but also contribute to the broader discourse on financial infrastructure development in emerging economies.

References

Bátiz-Lazo, B., Haigh, T., & Stearns, D. L. (2014). How the future shaped the past: The case of the cashless society. Enterprise & Society, 15(1), 103-131. [CrossRef]
Worthington, S. (1995). The cashless society. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 23(7), 31-40.
Bhattacharya, S., & Kumar, A. (2022). Technological architecture of UPI: A systematic review of India's real-time payment system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 48(9), 1123-1142.
Varghese, G., & Pillai, R. (2022). Transaction atomicity in high-volume payment systems: UPI technical architecture. Distributed Systems Engineering, 19(3), 234-253.
Agarwal, R., & Patel, K. (2023). Digital payment infrastructure and financial inclusion: Evidence from India's UPI implementation. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(3), 789-812.
Banerjee, S., & Roberts, M. (2022). Digital payment infrastructure resilience: Stress testing methodology. System Resilience Journal, 19(2), 145-164.
Chen, L., & Singh, M. (2023). Comparative analysis of digital payment systems: UPI, WeChat Pay, and SEPA instant transfer. International Journal of Banking Technology, 15(4), 412-431.
Dutta, A., & Mishra, P. (2022). Rural digital payment adoption: Barriers and facilitators in UPI usage. Development Economics Review, 35(1), 78-96.
Das, S. (2023). Cybersecurity challenges in real-time payment systems: A case study of UPI. Journal of Information Security, 14(2), 156-175.
George, R.. (2013). Regulatory frameworks for digital payment systems: A global perspective. Journal of Financial Regulation, 9(3), 245-267.
George, R. (2023). UPI's impact on informal sector digitisation: Evidence from Indian street vendors. Economic and Political Weekly, 58(15), 45-53.
Iyer, K., & Mehta, S. (2022). Technical reliability in high-volume payment systems: UPI architecture analysis. IEEE Network, 36(4), 89-97.
Jain, P., & Kumar, S. (2023). Cross-border payment integration: UPI's international expansion strategy. International Finance Review, 24(2), 178-196.
George, R. (2021). Digital literacy and payment system adoption: Evidence from UPI implementation. Journal of Development Studies, 58(8), 1456-1475.
Krishna, R., & Patel, A. (2023). Blockchain integration in real-time payment systems: Opportunities and challenges. Distributed Ledger Technology Review, 12(4), 312-331.
Kumar, V., & Reddy, S. (2022). Monetary policy transmission through digital payment channels: The UPI effect. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 43(1), 45-67.
Mehta, R., & Shah, K. (2013). Environmental impact assessment of digital payment systems: The case of UPI. Sustainable Technology and Innovation, 16(2), 123-142.
George, R. (2022). QR code standardisation in payment systems: Technical and security considerations. Journal of Payment Strategy & Systems, 16(3), 245-263.
Singh, S. S. (2022). Mergers and Acquisitions: Implications for public enterprises in developing countries. Public Enterprise, 26, 43-52. [CrossRef]
Singh, S. S. (2023). Using Natural Experiments in Public Enterprise Management. Public Enterprise, 27, 52-63. [CrossRef]
Ahmed, K., & Johnson, R. (2023). Comparative analysis of Asian payment systems: UPI, PayNow, and PromptPay. Asian Financial Review, 25(4), 312-331.
Smith, M. C. (2023). Enhancing food security through Public Enterprise. Public Enterprise, 27, 64-77. [CrossRef]
Gonzales, C. (2023). Privatisation of water: New perspectives and future challenges. Public Enterprise, 27, 26-38. [CrossRef]
George, R. (2017). Digital payment system scalability: UPI architecture assessment. Scalable Computing Review, 24(3), 445-464.
Bou, V. C. M. P (2023). Reskilling Public Enterprise executives in Eastern Europe. Public Enterprise, 27, 1-25. [CrossRef]
Bou, V. C. M. P. (2022). Measuring Energy efficiency in public enterprise: The case of Agribusiness. Public Enterprise, 26, 53-59. [CrossRef]
Robinson, G., Dörry, S., & Derudder, B. (2023). Global networks of money and information at the crossroads: Correspondent banking and SWIFT. Global Networks, 23(2), 478-493. [CrossRef]
Saxena, N. C. (2021). Yogic Science for Human Resource Management in Public Enterprises. Public Enterprises, 25, 27-38. [CrossRef]
Saxena, N. C. (2022). Profitability prediction in Public Enterprise contracts. Public Enterprise, 26, 25-42. [CrossRef]
Saxena, N. C. (2023). Using Machine Learning to improve the performance of Public Enterprises. Public Enterprise, 27, 39-51. [CrossRef]
Singh, S. S. (2023). UPI and Ration Card in India. Sameeksha.
Asthana, A. N. (2009). What determines access to subsidised food by the rural poor? Evidence from India. Intrnational Development Planning Review, 31(3), 263-279. [CrossRef]
Asthana, A. N. (2010). Descentralización y necesidades básicas. Politai, 1(1), 13-22.
Garcia, M. (2012). Transaction logging and audit mechanisms in payment systems. Digital Forensics Journal, 25(4), 156-175.
Garcia, M. (2010). Payment system interoperability: Technical standards and protocols. Standards Engineering, 20(2), 678-697.
Asthana, A. N. (2023). Reskilling business executives in transition economies. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 15(3), 267-287. [CrossRef]
Tee, H. H., & Ong, H. B. (2016). Cashless payment and economic growth. Financial innovation, 2, 1-9. [CrossRef]
Fabris, N. (2019). Cashless society–the future of money or a utopia?. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 8(1), 53-66.
Weilkiens, T., Lamm, J. G., Roth, S., & Walker, M. (2022). Model-based system architecture. John Wiley & Sons.
Boot, A. W., & Thakor, A. V. (1997). Financial system architecture. The Review of Financial Studies, 10(3), 693-733.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.