Submitted:
16 January 2025
Posted:
18 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This research explores the role of communication and information sharing in strengthening supply chain resilience during disruptions. In today’s interconnected and rapidly evolving business environment, supply chains are increasingly vulnerable to a variety of disruptions, including natural disasters, geopolitical crises, and supply shortages. Effective communication and the seamless exchange of information are critical for organizations to respond quickly and adapt to such challenges. The study adopts a qualitative research methodology, including interviews with key stakeholders from different industries, to examine how communication strategies and information sharing practices influence supply chain resilience. The findings indicate that clear, timely, and proactive communication between supply chain partners significantly enhances resilience by enabling swift decision-making and coordinated responses. Digital tools and platforms, such as real-time tracking systems, cloud-based platforms, and data analytics, are essential in improving communication and facilitating information sharing. Furthermore, the research highlights the importance of trust and collaboration, as well as a culture of transparency and flexibility, in fostering effective communication within organizations and across the supply chain network. However, challenges such as technological incompatibility, data overload, and concerns over information confidentiality were identified as significant barriers. The study suggests that overcoming these challenges requires investments in technology, building strong relationships with supply chain partners, and promoting a culture of open communication and collaboration. Overall, the research emphasizes that communication and information sharing are integral to enhancing supply chain resilience, and organizations must prioritize these factors to navigate future disruptions successfully.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Methodology
4. Results and Findings
| Theme | Description |
| Proactive Communication | Clear, pre-emptive communication about potential risks. |
| Reactive Communication | Communication that occurs in response to disruptions. |
| Cross-Organizational Communication | Exchange of information between different companies in the supply chain. |
| Internal Communication | Communication within the organization to align actions and response strategies. |
| Theme | Description |
| Real-Time Information | Information shared as events unfold, in real time. |
| Predictive Information | Data shared based on forecasts or projections. |
| Historical Information | Sharing of past data to inform current decisions. |
| Risk-Related Information | Information about potential disruptions and their impact. |
| Theme | Description |
| Cloud-Based Platforms | Platforms used to store and share data across the supply chain. |
| Real-Time Tracking Systems | Tools that allow monitoring of goods and materials in real-time. |
| Data Analytics Tools | Software used to analyze large sets of data for decision-making. |
| Blockchain Technology | Tools that ensure secure and transparent data sharing. |
| Theme | Description |
| Technological Barriers | Issues related to incompatible systems or lack of digital infrastructure. |
| Cultural Barriers | Challenges arising from differing cultural norms and values. |
| Trust Issues | Reluctance to share information due to concerns over competitive advantage. |
| Data Overload | Too much information being shared, making it difficult to act. |
| Theme | Description |
| Transparency | Open communication practices within the organization. |
| Flexibility | Ability to quickly adapt to changing circumstances. |
| Cross-Functional Collaboration | Cooperation between different departments to solve problems. |
| Centralized Decision-Making | Decision-making concentrated within a few individuals or departments. |
| Theme | Description |
| Strong Trust | Positive relationship and mutual willingness to share data. |
| Weak Trust | Hesitancy to share sensitive data due to concerns over competitive advantage. |
| Trust-Building Initiatives | Efforts to foster trust through long-term collaboration and transparency. |
| Theme | Description |
| Decentralized Decision-Making | Decisions made by multiple stakeholders at various levels. |
| Centralized Decision-Making | Decisions made by top management or a small group. |
| Collaborative Decision-Making | Decisions made collectively through group discussions. |
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
References
- Agarwal, N., & Seth, N. (2024). Analysis of Supply Chain Resilience Enablers and Business Outcomes Using Delphi and Fuzzy ISM for Indian Automobile Industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 25(4), 763–783. [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, N., & Jain, R. K. (2022a). Building supply chain resilience in supply chain disruption: the role of organisational ambidexterity. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 41(4), 381–403. [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, N., & Jain, R. K. (2022b). Insights from systematic literature review of supply chain resilience and disruption. Benchmarking, 29(8), 2495–2526. [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi, T., Hesaraki, A. F., & Morsch, J. P. M. (2024). Exploring IT-driven supply chain capabilities and resilience: the roles of supply chain risk management and complexity. Supply Chain Management. [CrossRef]
- Aldhaheri, M., Sharma, R., Sundarakani, B., & Manikas, I. (2023). An investigation of the effect of supply chain digitalization and sustainability on food security through improved forecasting capabilities. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions, ICTMOD 2023. [CrossRef]
- Aldrighetti, R., Battini, D., & Ivanov, D. (2023). Efficient resilience portfolio design in the supply chain with consideration of preparedness and recovery investments. Omega (United Kingdom), 117. [CrossRef]
- Aldrighetti, R., Battini, D., Ivanov, D., & Zennaro, I. (2021). Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 235. [CrossRef]
- Aldrighetti, R., Calzavara, M., Martignago, M., Zennaro, I., Battini, D., & Ivanov, D. (2024). A methodological framework for the design of efficient resilience in supply networks. International Journal of Production Research, 62(1–2), 271–290. [CrossRef]
- Alhawari, O., Bhutta, K., & Muzzafar, A. (2021). Supply chain emerging aspects and future directions in the age of covid-19: A systematic review. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 429–446. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2024). Unlocking Sustainability through Supply Chain Visibility: Insights from the Manufacturing Sector of Bangladesh. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(4), 2194. [CrossRef]
- Khan, T., & Emon, M. M. H. (2024). Exploring the Potential of the Blue Economy: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enhancing International Business in Bangladesh in the context of Indo-Pacific Region. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 12(2), 55–73. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., Hamid, A. B. A., & Yaakub, N. I. (2025). GreenTech Revolution: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 63–90). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
- Al-Husain, R., & Al-Eideh, B. (2024). Stochastic Resilience in Operations Management Using Ito Diffusion and Gamma Catastrophe Processes. International Journal of Business Analytics, 11(1). [CrossRef]
- Ali, I., Arslan, A., Tarba, S., & Mainela, T. (2023). Supply chain resilience to climate change inflicted extreme events in agri-food industry: The role of social capital and network complexity. International Journal of Production Economics, 264. [CrossRef]
- Alikhani, R., Ranjbar, A., Jamali, A., Torabi, S. A., & Zobel, C. W. (2023). Towards increasing synergistic effects of resilience strategies in supply chain network design. Omega (United Kingdom), 116. [CrossRef]
- Alikhani, R., Torabi, S. A., & Altay, N. (2021). Retail supply chain network design with concurrent resilience capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 234. [CrossRef]
- Altay, N., & Pal, R. (2023). Coping in supply chains: a conceptual framework for disruption management. International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(2), 261–279. [CrossRef]
- Alvarenga, M. Z., Oliveira, M. P. V. de, & Oliveira, T. (2023). Let’s talk about bad experiences instead of forgetting them: An empirical study on the importance of memory for supply chain disruption management. International Journal of Production Economics, 261. [CrossRef]
- Al-Zuheri, A., & Vlachos, I. (2023). A genetic algorithm-based optimisation model for designing an efficient, sustainable supply chain network under disruption risks. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 37(1), 1–23. [CrossRef]
- Aman, S., & Seuring, S. (2023). Analysing developing countries approaches of supply chain resilience to COVID-19. International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(4), 909–934. [CrossRef]
- Arabsheybani, A., & Arshadi Khasmeh, A. (2021). Robust and resilient supply chain network design considering risks in food industry: flavour industry in Iran. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 16(3), 197–208. [CrossRef]
- Asafo-Adjei, E., Hamidu, Z., Issau, K., Seidu, B. A., & Adam, A. M. (2023). The dark and bright side of network complexity: Novel insights from an asymmetric supply chain recovery and disruption approach. Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). [CrossRef]
- Asamoah, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., & Ashun, E. (2020). Social network relationship, supply chain resilience and customer-oriented performance of small and medium enterprises in a developing economy. Benchmarking, 27(5), 1793–1813. [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, M., Eltawil, A., & Ali, I. (2024). Disruption detection for a cognitive digital supply chain twin using hybrid deep learning. Operational Research, 24(2). [CrossRef]
- Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., & Rahman, M. A. (2024). A systematic review on exploring the influence of Industry 4.0 technologies to enhance supply chain visibility and operational efficiency. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 12(3), 6–27. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Factors Influencing the Usage of Artificial Intelligence among Bangladeshi Professionals: Mediating role of Attitude Towards the Technology. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computing, Applications and Systems (COMPAS), 1–7. [CrossRef]
- Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., Rahman, M. A., Hamid, A. B. A., & Yaakub, N. I. (2025). Bridging the Gap: Realizing GreenTech Potential. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 91–122). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
- Badhotiya, G. K., Soni, G., Jain, V., Joshi, R., & Mittal, S. (2022). Assessing supply chain resilience to the outbreak of COVID-19 in Indian manufacturing firms. Operations Management Research, 15(3–4), 1161–1180. [CrossRef]
- Badkoubeh, M., & Ghannadpour, S. F. (2024). DESIGNING A CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY CHAIN MODEL USING BACKUP SUPPLIER AIMING AT OPTIMIZING RESILIENCY AGAINST DISRUPTION. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 30(7), 614–631. [CrossRef]
- Baghersad, M., & Zobel, C. W. (2021). Assessing the extended impacts of supply chain disruptions on firms: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 231. [CrossRef]
- Baghersad, M., Zobel, C. W., Lowry, P. B., & Chatterjee, S. (2022). The roles of prior experience and the location on the severity of supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 60(16), 5051–5070. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).