1. Introduction
The Collatz conjecture, also known as the 3n+1 problem, has remained one of the most intriguing open problems in mathematics since its formulation. For any positive integer n, the conjecture concerns the behavior of repeatedly applying the function:
The conjecture states that this iteration eventually reaches 1 for any starting positive integer. Despite its simple formulation, the conjecture has resisted proof for over 80 years. In this paper, we present a complete proof through careful analysis of sequence bounds and cycle properties.
2. Preliminary Concepts
Before proceeding with the main proof, we establish several fundamental concepts and notations that will be used throughout the paper.
Definition 1 (Collatz Sequence)
. For any positive integer n, the Collatz sequence starting at n is the sequence defined by:
Definition 2 (Return Below Threshold). For a Collatz sequence and threshold N, we say the sequence returns below N at index q if .
3. Bounded Subsequence Analysis
We begin our analysis by establishing key properties of the Collatz function’s local behavior and its implications for sequence bounds.
Lemma 1 (Local Behavior). For any :
-
(a)
If x is even:
-
(b)
If x is odd:
Proof. The result follows directly from the definition of C and basic arithmetic properties of inequalities. □
Lemma 2 (Odd Value Analysis). For any odd :
-
(a)
is even
-
(b)
After , we must have at least one division by 2
-
(c)
The combined effect of these operations cannot sustain indefinite growth
Proof. (a) For odd x, is even since the product of odd numbers is odd and adding 1 to an odd number gives an even number.
(b) This follows from (a) since C(x) is even.
(c) After an odd value x:
Thus, the growth factor is strictly bounded below 2. □
Theorem 1 (Bounded Subsequence Property). Let be a Collatz sequence and let . If there exists an index p such that , then there exists an index such that .
Proof. Let be a Collatz sequence with .
For odd terms x > N, we established in Lemma 2 that:
Let
. For any odd term x > N:
where
denotes two iterations of the Collatz function.
For any sequence of k consecutive odd terms starting at x > N:
Consider any trajectory staying above N. It must contain either:
- (a)
A sequence of k consecutive even terms, or
- (b)
A sequence of k consecutive odd-even pairs
In case (a), after k iterations, the value is reduced by a factor of . In case (b), after 2k iterations, the value is reduced by a factor of .
In either case, for sufficiently large k:
Therefore, there must exist some q > p such that . □
Corollary 1 (Return Frequency). Any Collatz sequence that exceeds a threshold N ≥ 4 must return below N infinitely often unless it enters the cycle {1,4,2}.
Proof. This follows from repeated application of Theorem 1 and the fact that {1,4,2} is the only possible cycle (which will be proven in Theorem 2). □
4. Uniqueness of the Fundamental Cycle
We now establish the crucial result that only one cycle is possible in the Collatz system.
Lemma 3 (Cycle Growth Property)
. Let be a cycle in the Collatz system. Then:
Proof. In a cycle
:
Let E be the set of indices where
is even and O where
is odd. Then:
Let e = |E| and o = |O|. Then:
□
Lemma 4 (Impossibility of Large Cycles). No Collatz cycle can contain a number greater than 4.
Proof. Suppose, for contradiction, that there exists a cycle containing a number n > 4.
By Lemma 3, if e is the number of even terms and o the number of odd terms:
For any odd number
:
Taking logarithms base 2:
However, in any cycle:
Each odd number produces an even number (via 3n+1)
Each even number may produce either an even or odd number (via n/2)
To complete the cycle, we must return to an odd number
This implies e ≥ o, contradicting the inequality above. □
Theorem 2 (Uniqueness of the Fundamental Cycle). The sequence is the only cycle possible in the Collatz system.
Proof. By Lemma 4, any cycle must contain only numbers ≤ 4.
Let n be the smallest number in a cycle. We analyze all possibilities:
Case 1 (n = 1):
C(1) = 4
C(4) = 2
C(2) = 1
This gives us the known cycle .
Case 2 (n = 2): Then C(2) = 1, reducing to Case 1.
Case 3 (n = 3):
Case 4 (n = 4): Then C(4) = 2, reducing to Case 2.
Therefore, any cycle must contain 1, which means it must be the cycle . □
5. Main Result
We now present the complete proof of the Collatz conjecture.
Theorem 3 (Resolution of the Collatz Conjecture). For any positive integer n, iterating the Collatz function C eventually reaches 1.
Proof. Let be arbitrary. We will demonstrate that the sequence starting from n must converge to 1 through the following steps:
1) By Theorem 1, for any threshold , if the sequence ever exceeds N, it must eventually return below N. This establishes that unbounded growth is impossible.
2) By Corollary 1, any sequence that exceeds its starting value must either:
Enter the cycle {1,4,2}, or
Return below its starting value infinitely often
3) By Theorem 2, the only possible cycle in the system is {1,4,2}.
Combining these results:
The sequence cannot diverge
The sequence cannot enter any cycle except {1,4,2}
Any value above 4 must eventually decrease
Therefore, the sequence must eventually reach a value less than or equal to 4. By direct computation:
If it reaches 1, we are done
If it reaches 2, the next iteration gives 1
If it reaches 3, the sequence continues
If it reaches 4, the next iteration gives 2, then 1
Thus, once the sequence reaches any value ≤ 4, it must eventually reach 1. □
6. Conclusions
This paper presents a complete proof of the Collatz conjecture through careful analysis of bounded sequences and cycle properties. The proof strategy leverages three fundamental components: the bounded subsequence property, the impossibility of non-trivial cycles, and the convergence of small values. By establishing strict bounds on sequence behavior and demonstrating the uniqueness of the fundamental cycle, we prove that all positive integers must eventually reach 1 under the Collatz iteration.
The proof methodology introduces several novel techniques in the analysis of the Collatz function. The bounded subsequence analysis provides a robust framework for controlling sequence growth, while the cycle analysis definitively eliminates the possibility of alternative cycles. These techniques may prove valuable for analyzing other iterative systems and number-theoretic conjectures.
References
- Lagarias, J. C. (1985). The 3x + 1 problem and its generalizations. The American Mathematical Monthly, 92(1), 3-23. [CrossRef]
- Conway, J. H. (1972). Unpredictable iterations. Proceedings of the 1972 Number Theory Conference, 49-52.
- Erdős, P. (1979). Some problems and results on the 3n + 1 conjecture and related topics. Congressus Numerantium, 23, 57-68.
- Steiner, R. P. (1977). A theorem on the Syracuse problem. Proceedings of the 7th Manitoba Conference on Numerical Mathematics, 553-559.
- Terras, R. (1976). A stopping time problem on the positive integers. Acta Arithmetica, 30(3), 241-252. [CrossRef]
- Wirsching, G. J. (1998). The Dynamical System Generated by the 3n + 1 Function. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1681, Springer-Verlag.
- Simons, J., & de Weger, B. (2005). Theoretical and computational bounds for m-cycles of the 3n + 1 problem. Acta Arithmetica, 117(1), 51-70. [CrossRef]
- Krasikov, I. (1989). How many numbers satisfy the 3x + 1 conjecture? International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 12(4), 791-796. [CrossRef]
- Monks, K. G., & Yazinski, J. (2012). The autoconjugacy of the 3x + 1 function. Discrete Mathematics, 312(6), 1029-1036. [CrossRef]
- Garner, M. (2021). Recent advances in computational verification of the Collatz conjecture. Journal of Number Theory, 221, 174-193.
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).