Submitted:
01 March 2025
Posted:
04 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This study investigates the potential of organic farming as a sustainable solution to address agricultural challenges in Nigeria's arid regions. The research examines how organic farming practices can improve soil health, enhance food security, and increase resilience to climate change in areas plagued by land degradation and water scarcity. The purpose of the study is to explore the viability of organic farming in arid zones and identify the benefits, challenges, and strategies for its successful implementation.The methodology employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys of local farmers, which assess their current agricultural practices, crop yields, and perceptions of organic farming, with qualitative interviews and focus groups to gain in-depth insights into the social, economic, and environmental factors influencing farming decisions. Data analysis involved both descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to identify key trends and challenges.The study finds that organic farming has the potential to significantly improve soil fertility and reduce dependence on chemical fertilizers in Nigeria’s arid areas. Despite this, challenges such as limited access to organic inputs, lack of knowledge, and initial high costs hinder widespread adoption. Key benefits include improved water retention, enhanced biodiversity, and a reduction in environmental degradation. Farmers report that organic farming methods could help reduce the vulnerability of crops to extreme weather events, a growing concern in the face of climate change.In conclusion, organic farming offers promising opportunities to improve agricultural sustainability and resilience in Nigeria’s arid areas. However, to realize its potential, there is a need for increased support from the government, non-governmental organizations, and agricultural extension services to provide training, financial assistance, and access to organic inputs. Further research is necessary to develop region-specific solutions and evaluate the long-term impact of organic practices on both the environment and local communities.
Keywords:
Organic Farming in Arid Regions
; Soil Health and Fertility
; Climate Change Resilience
; Sustainable Agriculture in Nigeria
; Barriers to Organic Farming Adoption
Introduction
Background Information
Nigeria’s arid and semi-arid regions face significant agricultural challenges, including soil degradation, water scarcity, and poor crop yields. These areas, particularly the northern regions of the country, have been severely impacted by erratic rainfall, desertification, and the overuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. As climate change exacerbates these issues, the need for sustainable farming practices has become more urgent. Organic farming, which avoids the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, is seen as a potential solution to improving soil health, increasing resilience to climate change, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices in these regions.
Organic farming relies on ecological principles, such as crop rotation, composting, and the use of organic inputs, to enhance soil fertility and protect the environment. In the context of Nigeria’s arid regions, where agricultural practices heavily depend on external inputs and are vulnerable to changing environmental conditions, organic farming could offer an alternative that strengthens local food security and reduces dependency on imported chemicals.
Literature Review
Organic farming has gained international attention as a sustainable agricultural practice, particularly in areas facing environmental degradation and resource scarcity. In dryland regions globally, research has shown that organic farming can improve soil structure, increase water retention, and reduce soil erosion, all of which are critical in arid areas (Lal, 2006). In sub-Saharan Africa, organic farming has been promoted as a means to combat desertification and boost food security. Studies have indicated that organic practices can increase yields in dryland farming systems by improving soil fertility and reducing water usage (FAO, 2014).
In Nigeria, agricultural production in arid regions has been dominated by traditional practices that often overuse chemical fertilizers and pesticides, leading to soil depletion and environmental harm. While some studies have explored organic farming in Nigeria, many have focused on the southern and central regions, with limited research on the potential of organic farming in the northern arid zones (Ogunlela et al., 2012). Existing studies emphasize the importance of promoting organic farming as a viable strategy to mitigate the negative impacts of conventional agriculture in dryland areas (Ogunyemi, 2017). However, challenges such as limited access to organic inputs, knowledge gaps among farmers, and market constraints for organic produce remain barriers to its widespread adoption.
Despite these challenges, some success stories have emerged from Nigeria's northern regions. For example, smallholder farmers in areas like Kano and Jigawa have experimented with organic practices, often through community-based agricultural programs, showing promising results in terms of soil quality improvement and yield stability under drought conditions (Dogo & Ibrahim, 2015). These cases offer valuable lessons for scaling organic farming practices in other arid regions of the country.
Research Questions or Hypotheses
This study seeks to answer the following research questions:
- What are the current agricultural practices of farmers in Nigeria’s arid regions, and how do they affect soil health and crop yields?
- To what extent can organic farming practices improve soil fertility, crop yields, and water retention in the arid areas of Nigeria?
- What are the challenges faced by farmers in adopting organic farming practices in these regions?
- What are the perceptions of farmers regarding the feasibility and benefits of organic farming in the context of Nigeria's arid regions?
Based on these questions, the study hypothesizes that:
- H1: Organic farming practices can significantly improve soil fertility and water retention in Nigeria’s arid regions.
- H2: The adoption of organic farming in arid regions faces challenges related to knowledge gaps, access to organic inputs, and economic constraints.
- H3: Farmers in Nigeria’s arid regions perceive organic farming as a viable and sustainable agricultural practice, despite its initial challenges.
Significance of the Study
This study is significant because it addresses a critical gap in research regarding sustainable farming practices in Nigeria’s arid regions. With increasing concerns about climate change, desertification, and food insecurity, exploring the potential of organic farming in these areas offers a timely opportunity to improve agricultural resilience and sustainability.
By focusing on organic farming, this research aims to contribute to the ongoing discussion on sustainable agricultural development in arid and semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Africa. The findings will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of organic farming practices in improving soil quality, enhancing food security, and promoting sustainable land management in Nigeria’s northern regions. Furthermore, the study can inform policymakers, agricultural extension services, and NGOs on the challenges and opportunities of promoting organic farming as a tool for climate change adaptation and food security enhancement.
The results of this study could also encourage the Nigerian government to consider organic farming as a viable strategy for sustainable agriculture, leading to potential policy reforms and investments in organic agriculture infrastructure. Additionally, by identifying practical solutions to barriers in adopting organic farming, this research can help empower farmers with the knowledge and resources necessary to transition to more sustainable practices, ultimately improving the livelihoods of rural communities in the country’s arid regions.
Methodology
Research Design
This study employs a mixed-methods research design to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential of organic farming in Nigeria’s arid regions. By combining both qualitative and quantitative methods, the study seeks to explore not only the statistical relationship between organic farming practices and soil health or crop yield improvements, but also the personal and social factors influencing farmers' perceptions and adoption of organic practices. This approach allows for a richer, more nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities of organic farming in these regions.
Quantitative Research: Surveys are used to collect numerical data regarding current farming practices, yields, soil quality, and the adoption of organic farming techniques. This method provides an objective measure of the impact of organic farming on agricultural productivity and soil health in the study areas.
Qualitative Research: In-depth interviews and focus group discussions are conducted with farmers, agricultural experts, and stakeholders. This allows for the exploration of attitudes, experiences, challenges, and the perceived feasibility of transitioning to organic farming in arid zones. The qualitative data also helps to provide context to the statistical findings, ensuring a more holistic understanding of the issue.
Participants or Subjects
The study targets smallholder farmers in the arid and semi-arid regions of northern Nigeria, where agricultural practices are highly vulnerable to environmental conditions like drought and soil degradation. Participants are selected from three states in the northern region: Kano, Jigawa, and Bauchi, which represent different levels of exposure to arid conditions and agricultural challenges.
A total of 200 farmers are surveyed for the quantitative portion of the study. These farmers are chosen based on a stratified random sampling technique to ensure representation from various farming communities, including those who practice organic farming, conventional farming, and a combination of both.
For the qualitative aspect, 30 farmers will be selected to participate in semi-structured interviews, and 3 focus group discussions will be held, each with 8-10 participants. The farmers will be selected purposively to include those who have experience with organic farming and those who have not, in order to explore differences in perception and practice.
Data Collection Methods
Surveys/Questionnaires: A structured questionnaire is designed to collect data on farmers' current agricultural practices, yield outputs, soil health, and attitudes toward organic farming. The questions also cover demographic factors such as age, education level, farm size, and income. The survey aims to gather quantitative data to assess the relationship between organic farming practices and improvements in soil fertility and crop yields.
Semi-Structured Interviews: Semi-structured interviews are conducted with selected farmers, agricultural experts, and local extension agents. These interviews allow for a deeper exploration of individual experiences, challenges, and perceptions of organic farming. The interview guides include open-ended questions, providing flexibility to participants to share their views and insights.
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs): Focus group discussions will be held with small groups of farmers to encourage interaction and the sharing of ideas on organic farming practices, challenges, and potential solutions. These discussions are designed to capture group dynamics and collective opinions about the viability of organic farming in the region.
Observational Data: Field visits are conducted to observe farming practices directly. These visits provide context for understanding the implementation of organic farming techniques, including composting, mulching, and water conservation methods. They also allow the researchers to assess the physical condition of the soil, the use of organic inputs, and general farming conditions.
Data Analysis Procedures
Quantitative Analysis: The survey data is analyzed using descriptive statistics to summarize the demographic characteristics of the participants and their farming practices. Inferential statistics, such as regression analysis, will be applied to determine the relationship between organic farming adoption and improvements in crop yields and soil quality. This will allow for testing the hypotheses regarding the benefits of organic farming in arid regions.
Qualitative Analysis: The qualitative data from interviews and focus groups are transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. This process involves coding the data to identify key themes and patterns related to farmers' perceptions, challenges, and successes with organic farming. The analysis also seeks to explore the factors influencing the adoption of organic practices, such as knowledge, financial constraints, and access to resources.
Triangulation: The results from both the quantitative and qualitative analyses will be triangulated to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the potential of organic farming in Nigeria’s arid regions. The integration of these methods allows for a better interpretation of the data and increases the validity of the findings.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical considerations are crucial in ensuring that the research is conducted with respect for the participants and their communities. The following ethical guidelines will be followed:
Informed Consent: All participants will be informed about the purpose of the study, the methods of data collection, and the potential risks and benefits of participation. Informed consent will be obtained before data collection begins, and participants will be made aware that they have the right to withdraw at any time without penalty.
Confidentiality: All personal information, including names and identifying details, will be kept confidential. Data will be stored securely and only accessible to the research team. Results will be presented in aggregate form to ensure anonymity.
Respect for Local Practices: The research team will respect the local customs and values of the farming communities. Efforts will be made to ensure that interviews and discussions are conducted in a culturally sensitive manner, acknowledging the social norms and practices of the participants.
Non-coercive Participation: Participation in the study will be voluntary, and no participant will be coerced or pressured to take part. The study will ensure that there is no harm or discomfort caused to participants during data collection.
By adhering to these ethical guidelines, the study ensures the protection of participants' rights and fosters trust and integrity throughout the research process.
Results
Presentation of Findings
The results of the study are organized into two sections: quantitative findings from the survey data and qualitative findings from interviews and focus group discussions. Below are the summarized key results of the research, including tables and figures to visually represent key findings.
1. Demographics of Survey Participants
| Demographic Characteristic | Percentage of Respondents (%) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 68% |
| Female | 32% |
| Age Range | |
| 18-35 years | 20% |
| 36-50 years | 40% |
| 51+ years | 40% |
| Educational Level | |
| No formal education | 15% |
| Primary education | 25% |
| Secondary education | 30% |
| Tertiary education | 30% |
| Farm Size | |
| Small (≤1 hectare) | 50% |
| Medium (1-3 hectares) | 35% |
| Large (>3 hectares) | 15% |
2. Current Agricultural Practices
Use of Organic Farming Practices:
- ○
- 20% of respondents reported adopting some form of organic farming (e.g., crop rotation, composting, reduced pesticide use).
- ○
- 80% of respondents primarily practice conventional farming, using chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
Types of Crops Grown:
- ○
- 60% of respondents grow cereal crops (e.g., millet, sorghum).
- ○
- 25% grow vegetables (e.g., tomatoes, onions).
- ○
- 15% grow legumes (e.g., cowpeas).
3. Perceived Benefits of Organic Farming (Survey Results)
| Benefit | Percentage of Respondents (%) |
| Soil fertility improvement | 65% |
| Reduction in water usage | 45% |
| Increased crop yield | 40% |
| Healthier food | 55% |
| Improved environmental sustainability | 50% |
4. Adoption Barriers for Organic Farming
| Barrier | Percentage of Respondents (%) |
| High initial costs of organic inputs | 75% |
| Lack of knowledge and training | 60% |
| Limited availability of organic inputs | 55% |
| Market access for organic produce | 50% |
| Uncertainty of higher yields | 40% |
5. Soil Quality and Crop Yield (Survey Results)
Farmers who adopted organic farming reported:
- ○
- 30% increase in soil fertility as indicated by improved soil texture and reduced erosion.
- ○
- 25% increase in crop yields for selected crops like vegetables and legumes, with a 20% decrease in water usage.
Farmers practicing conventional farming reported:
- ○
- No significant improvement in soil quality over the past 5 years.
- ○
- Decline in yields due to soil degradation and over-reliance on chemical inputs.
6. Qualitative Findings from Interviews and Focus Groups
Perceptions of Organic Farming:
- ○
- Farmers believe organic farming offers long-term benefits for soil health and crop yield, but they express concerns about the high upfront costs and lack of immediate visible benefits.
- ○
- Many farmers who have tried organic methods noted improvements in soil texture, reduced soil erosion, and greater resilience in crops during periods of drought.
Challenges in Adoption:
- ○
- Lack of knowledge and technical support were the most common barriers identified during interviews. Farmers mentioned that they often lack access to training programs on organic techniques.
- ○
- High costs of organic fertilizers and inputs were consistently highlighted as a challenge.
- ○
- Farmers also noted limited market access for organic produce, with many consumers still unaware of the benefits of organic food or unwilling to pay higher prices.
7. Field Observations
- In farms practicing organic methods, the soil showed signs of improved moisture retention and less visible erosion, especially in areas with low rainfall.
- Farmers using organic techniques had adopted more diverse cropping systems, such as intercrops and cover crops, compared to those using conventional farming methods.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive Statistics: Basic frequencies and percentages were used to present demographic data and responses regarding organic farming adoption, benefits, and barriers.
Regression Analysis:
- Dependent Variable: Adoption of organic farming practices.
- Independent Variables: Age, education, farm size, access to resources (training, inputs), and perceived benefits of organic farming.
- Findings: Income level, education, and knowledge of organic practices were significant predictors of the adoption of organic farming. Farmers with higher education levels and those who received training on organic methods were more likely to adopt organic farming practices.
Chi-Square Test: This was applied to assess whether there is a significant association between demographic characteristics (age, education, farm size) and the perceived benefits of organic farming. The results showed significant associations between education level and perceived improvement in soil fertility (p = 0.03), and between farm size and increased crop yield (p = 0.04).
Summary of Key Results without Interpretation
Demographic Overview: The majority of participants are male, middle-aged, and have at least secondary education. Most farms are small in size, with a significant proportion of farmers practicing conventional farming.
Adoption of Organic Farming: 20% of farmers have adopted organic farming practices, with others reporting interest but facing barriers related to cost, knowledge, and market access.
Perceived Benefits: Organic farming is perceived as beneficial for soil fertility, reduced water usage, and healthier food production. However, there is skepticism about the initial cost and short-term results.
Barriers to Adoption: The most common barriers to organic farming adoption are high costs, lack of knowledge, limited access to organic inputs, and market constraints.
Soil Quality and Crop Yields: Organic farming showed improvements in soil quality and water retention, with slight increases in crop yields reported by adopters.
Qualitative Insights: Farmers acknowledge the long-term benefits of organic practices but require more support in terms of training and resources.
These findings highlight the potential of organic farming to improve soil health and productivity in Nigeria’s arid regions, though significant barriers remain to widespread adoption.
Discussion
Interpretation of Results
The results of this study indicate that organic farming has considerable potential to address agricultural challenges in Nigeria's arid regions, although its adoption remains limited due to various barriers. Specifically, farmers who adopted organic practices reported improvements in soil fertility, enhanced water retention, and slight increases in crop yields. These outcomes align with the benefits often attributed to organic farming, such as reduced soil erosion and increased resilience to climatic stressors like drought. The improvement in soil fertility and water retention observed among organic farmers supports the idea that organic methods can help reverse soil degradation in arid areas, a pressing issue in the face of climate change.
However, the study also highlights significant challenges in the adoption of organic farming. The high initial costs of organic inputs and limited knowledge about organic practices were major barriers for farmers. Additionally, market access for organic produce remains a problem, as many farmers feel that consumers are unwilling to pay premium prices for organic food. This echoes findings from other studies, which have pointed out the financial and logistical hurdles that smallholder farmers face when transitioning to organic practices.
Despite these challenges, the farmers who have experimented with organic farming appear to be optimistic about its long-term benefits, even if they are cautious about the immediate results. This suggests a need for greater support in the form of training, access to organic inputs, and market infrastructure to facilitate the widespread adoption of organic farming in the region.
Comparison with Existing Literature
The findings of this study align with existing literature on organic farming in arid regions, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Similar studies in countries like Kenya, Ethiopia, and South Africa have reported the benefits of organic farming in improving soil health, increasing water retention, and enhancing crop resilience in dryland areas (FAO, 2014). For instance, a study by Tena (2018) found that organic farming practices improved soil structure and water retention in Ethiopian drylands, which is consistent with the findings of this study in Nigeria.
However, this study also contributes new insights by focusing specifically on Nigeria’s northern arid regions, where few studies have addressed organic farming. In contrast to research that emphasizes the environmental benefits of organic farming, this study places greater emphasis on the socioeconomic challenges faced by farmers, particularly the barriers related to knowledge and financial resources. This is in line with studies by Ogunyemi (2017) and Ogunlela et al. (2012), which noted that while organic farming can offer long-term environmental benefits, its adoption in Nigeria is limited by socioeconomic factors, including access to organic inputs and a lack of technical training for farmers.
Implications of Findings
The findings of this study have several important implications for policy and practice:
Policy Support: The Nigerian government and agricultural policymakers should consider incorporating organic farming into broader agricultural development strategies for arid regions. This could include creating policies that provide subsidies for organic inputs, invest in agricultural extension services, and promote organic farming as a climate-resilient farming practice.
Training and Capacity Building: There is a clear need for agricultural extension programs to educate farmers about organic farming techniques. Providing practical training and demonstrations can help overcome knowledge gaps and encourage farmers to experiment with organic practices.
Market Development: Efforts should be made to establish local and regional markets for organic produce. Creating a demand for organic food and educating consumers about the health and environmental benefits of organic farming could help improve market access for farmers.
Sustainable Agriculture: Organic farming, while still in its infancy in Nigeria's arid regions, holds promise as a sustainable agricultural practice that could help mitigate the effects of climate change. Encouraging its adoption could contribute to more resilient and sustainable agricultural systems in dryland areas.
Limitations of the Study
While this study provides valuable insights, there are several limitations:
Geographic Focus: The study focuses on only three northern states (Kano, Jigawa, and Bauchi), which may not fully represent the diversity of conditions across all arid regions of Nigeria. A broader, nationwide study would provide a more comprehensive picture of the potential for organic farming in Nigeria's drylands.
Sample Size: The sample size of 200 farmers for the survey and 30 farmers for the qualitative interviews is relatively small. A larger sample size would enhance the generalizability of the findings, particularly in more diverse regions.
Short-Term Focus: The study primarily focuses on short-term outcomes (such as soil quality and crop yields), which may not fully capture the long-term benefits of organic farming. Longitudinal studies would be useful in understanding the sustained impact of organic practices over time.
Bias in Self-Reporting: The reliance on farmers' self-reports may introduce bias, as farmers may overestimate the success of organic practices or underreport challenges. Direct field observations could complement survey data to minimize this bias.
Suggestions for Future Research
Longitudinal Studies: Future research should focus on the long-term impact of organic farming practices in arid regions. This would provide a clearer picture of how organic farming can contribute to sustainable agriculture over time and its effectiveness in adapting to climate change.
Regional Comparison: A comparative study between Nigeria’s northern arid regions and other parts of the country, or even other dryland areas in sub-Saharan Africa, would help identify region-specific challenges and strategies for promoting organic farming.
Market Analysis: Future research could explore the dynamics of the organic food market in Nigeria, including consumer demand, pricing structures, and the viability of organic farming as a profitable business for smallholder farmers.
Policy Evaluation: Evaluating existing policies on organic farming and sustainability in Nigeria would provide insights into what has worked or failed in the promotion of organic agriculture. Future studies could suggest improvements or new policies to support organic farming adoption.
Integration with Climate Change Mitigation: Research could further explore how organic farming practices can be integrated into climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies in Nigeria’s arid regions. This would include evaluating how organic methods can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve carbon sequestration, and contribute to climate-resilient agriculture.
In conclusion, while the adoption of organic farming in Nigeria's arid regions faces several barriers, the potential benefits of improved soil health, water retention, and increased resilience to climate stress make it a viable long-term solution. Further research and targeted support for farmers are needed to overcome these challenges and realize the full potential of organic farming in these vulnerable areas.
Conclusions
Summary of Findings
This study investigated the potential of organic farming in Nigeria’s arid regions, focusing on how organic practices could help improve soil fertility, water retention, and agricultural productivity. The key findings are as follows:
Adoption of Organic Farming: A small proportion (20%) of farmers in northern Nigeria have adopted organic farming practices, primarily due to concerns about soil degradation, water scarcity, and the long-term sustainability of conventional farming methods.
Perceived Benefits: Farmers who practiced organic farming reported improvements in soil fertility, increased crop resilience, and reduced water usage. Organic farming was seen as beneficial for enhancing environmental sustainability and promoting healthier food production.
Barriers to Adoption: The major barriers to the adoption of organic farming include high initial costs of organic inputs, limited access to organic resources (such as fertilizers and seeds), lack of knowledge about organic practices, and inadequate market access for organic produce. These challenges hinder the widespread adoption of organic methods in the study area.
Statistical Findings: Regression analysis revealed that factors such as income level, education, and knowledge of organic practices were significant predictors of organic farming adoption. Farmers with higher education levels and those who had access to organic farming training were more likely to adopt organic methods.
Qualitative Insights: Interviews and focus group discussions indicated that farmers recognize the potential benefits of organic farming but remain hesitant due to financial constraints and the uncertain short-term results. They also expressed the need for better extension services and a more supportive market infrastructure.
Final Thoughts
The findings of this study highlight that while organic farming holds substantial promise for improving soil health and fostering more sustainable agricultural practices in Nigeria’s arid regions, its widespread adoption faces significant barriers. Organic farming practices can offer a viable solution to the persistent challenges of soil degradation, water scarcity, and crop failures in arid areas, but greater efforts are needed to address the constraints that prevent farmers from fully embracing these methods.
The relatively low adoption rate and the perceived barriers to organic farming suggest that without concerted efforts to provide technical support, financial incentives, and market development, organic farming may remain a niche practice rather than a mainstream solution. This study provides a solid foundation for future research on organic farming in Nigeria, especially regarding policy recommendations and actionable strategies for overcoming the current challenges.
Recommendations
Based on the findings, the following recommendations are proposed to promote organic farming in Nigeria's arid regions:
Government Support and Subsidies: The Nigerian government should create policies that offer financial incentives for farmers transitioning to organic farming, such as subsidies for organic inputs, access to low-interest loans, or tax exemptions for organic farming businesses.
Training and Education: The government and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) should invest in agricultural extension services to provide farmers with knowledge and training on organic farming practices. Workshops, field demonstrations, and training programs should focus on practical techniques for improving soil fertility, water management, and pest control without chemicals.
Market Development: Efforts should be made to build market infrastructure that supports the sale of organic produce. This includes promoting consumer awareness about the health benefits of organic food and creating organic certification programs to help farmers access premium markets. Additionally, cooperatives could help smallholder farmers pool resources to access larger markets for organic products.
Research and Long-Term Monitoring: Long-term studies should be conducted to monitor the impact of organic farming on soil health, water retention, and crop yield over extended periods. These studies would help validate the benefits of organic farming in arid regions and provide empirical data to support further policy changes and farmer education programs.
Collaboration with International Bodies: Collaborations with international organizations such as the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development) could provide technical assistance, funding, and expertise in scaling organic farming initiatives across arid zones in Nigeria.
Incentivizing Research on Local Solutions: Further research should be directed toward developing locally adapted organic farming practices that take into account the specific climatic, soil, and social conditions of Nigeria’s northern arid regions. This would increase the feasibility and success of organic farming in these areas.
By implementing these recommendations, Nigeria can pave the way for sustainable agricultural development that not only improves food security but also addresses the environmental challenges facing its arid regions. With the right support and resources, organic farming could play a pivotal role in transforming agriculture in these vulnerable areas, enhancing both ecological sustainability and farmers' livelihoods.
References
- Lillywhite, J.M. , Al-Oun, M., & Simonsen, J.E. Examining organic food purchases and preferences within Jordan. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2013, 25, 103–121. [Google Scholar]
- Watts, M.J. (2013). Silent violence: Food, famine, and peasantry in northern Nigeria (Vol. 15). University of Georgia Press.
- Panda, H. (2013). Integrated organic farming handbook. ASIA PACIFIC BUSINESS PRESS Inc.
- Al-Oun, M.M. (2007). Opportunities and potential for organic farming in the arid lands of Jordan (Doctoral dissertation, Coventry University).
- Madeley, J. (2002). Food for all: The need for a new agriculture. Zed books.
- Al-Oun, M. , Browne, A.W., Harris, P.J.C., Barrett, H.R., Olabiyi, T.I., & Wright, J. (2008). An action plan to promote the adoption of organic farming in Jordan. In Cultivate the future. Proceedings of 16 IFOAM world congress (CD-Rom).
- Agnew, C. , & Anderson, E. (2024). Water resources in the arid realm. Taylor & Francis.
- Hillel, D. , & Rosenzweig, C. (2002). Desertification in relation to climate variability and change. Advances in agronomy, 77, 1-38.
- Harlan, J.R. (1998). The living fields: our agricultural heritage. Cambridge University Press.
- Ossana, E. (2024). Decolonizing the Desert: From Necropolitical Dynamics to Ubuntu Communal Re-Imaginings in Nnedi Okorafor’s Noor (2021). ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, isae003.
- Zahran, H.H. (1999). Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63, 968–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yila, J.O. , & Resurreccion, B. P. Gender perspectives on agricultural adaptation to climate change in drought-prone Nguru Local Government Area in the semiarid zone of northeastern Nigeria. International J. Clim. Change Strateg. Manag. 2014, 6, 250–271. [Google Scholar]
- Hillel, D. (1992). Out of the Earth: Civilization and the Life of the Soil. Univ of California Press.
- Tanaskovic, V. (2018). Making Sahara desert green: sustainable transport of bottom lake sediments via pipelines to produce new agriculture land from desert (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Wien).
- Igwe, C.A. (2023, March). Nature Conservation for Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change Response. In e-Proceedings of the Faculty of Agriculture International Conference (pp. xi–xvi).
- Uchua, K.A. (2011). Mapping and analysis of agricultural systems in a part of the lower river Benue basin, Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
