Submitted:
18 April 2025
Posted:
21 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Background and Motivation

1.2. Objectives and Scope
- Provide a comprehensive overview of OPF challenges and solutions in the context of multi-energy systems.
- Analyze the impact of renewable energy integration on the stability, efficiency, and sustainability of IES.
- Evaluate the role of emerging technologies like machine learning, blockchain, and quantum computing in enhancing OPF applications.
1.3. Methodology
1.4. Contributions of this Paper
2. OPF of IESs
2.1. Definition and Importance of OPF in IES
2.2. OPF Problem Formulation in IESs
3. Challenges in OPF for Renewable-Integrated IESs
3.1. Uncertainty and Variability of Renewable Resources
3.2. Computational Complexity and Scalability
3.3. Coordination Challenges in Multi-Energy Coupling
3.4. Stability and Security Risks
4. Strategies and Solutions for OPF Under Renewable Energy Integration
4.1. Advanced Modeling and Forecasting Techniques
4.2. Optimization Methods for OPF Problems
4.2.1. Classical Optimization Methods
4.2.2. Heuristic and Metaheuristic Algorithms
4.2.3. Decomposition and Distributed Optimization Algorithms
4.3. Hybrid Approaches
5. Innovative Trends and Emerging Technologies
5.1. Machine Learning-Driven OPF
5.2. Quantum Computing for OPF Problems
5.3. Digital Twin Technologies for IES OPF
5.4. Blockchain-Enabled Energy Trading and OPF
5.5. Resilience-Oriented OPF Frameworks
6. Case Studies and Application Scenarios
6.1. Industrial-Scale IES Case Studies
6.2. Urban and Community-Level Renewable-Integrated IES
6.3. Comparative Analysis of Different OPF Methodologies
- Deterministic Methods: Classical deterministic methods such as Linear Programming (LP) and Nonlinear Programming (NLP) are widely used in OPF for traditional energy systems. These methods are particularly effective when renewable generation is predictable and stable. LP and MILP are useful for solving simpler, linearized models of OPF, while NLP and MINLP can handle non-linearities in more complex systems. However, these methods struggle with high uncertainty and nonlinearity, which are common in renewable-integrated systems.
- Stochastic and Robust Optimization: Stochastic optimization and robust optimization have proven to be effective in managing uncertainty in renewable generation. These methods excel in environments where there is substantial renewable uncertainty, such as wind and solar power, providing more reliable solutions by considering multiple possible future states of the system. Stochastic methods incorporate probabilistic distributions into the OPF model, allowing for better risk management and more reliable decision-making. However, the trade-off is that these methods come with significantly increased computational complexity, especially in large-scale systems, which can be a limitation in real-time applications. Robust optimization focuses on ensuring that solutions are feasible and efficient under a range of uncertain conditions, making it a valuable approach for optimizing energy systems with high levels of renewable energy. These methods allow OPF models to handle uncertainty more effectively but also require more computational resources and may result in suboptimal solutions under ideal conditions.
- Emerging Machine Learning Methods: Emerging machine learning techniques, particularly reinforcement learning and federated learning, are gaining attention due to their ability to adapt in real-time to dynamic environments. RL algorithms are particularly useful for systems with high uncertainty, as they can continuously learn and optimize the system's operation based on historical data and real-time feedback. These methods enable OPF models to continuously improve decision-making, adapting to changing system conditions without the need for explicit programming. Federated learning allows for collaborative model training across multiple stakeholders without sharing sensitive data, making it particularly valuable in scenarios involving multiple entities, such as in smart grid systems with various operators. These methods offer significant advantages in real-time optimization and adaptability but require substantial computational resources and large datasets for training.
7. Discussion and Future Directions
7.1. Summary of Current Progress and Remaining Challenges
- The development of probabilistic forecasting models to handle uncertainty in renewable generation, improving the robustness of OPF solutions.
- The application of multi-energy optimization, allowing the simultaneous coordination of electricity, gas, and heat networks to enhance system efficiency and reduce operational costs.
- The use of machine learning and deep learning methods to improve decision-making and real-time optimization in complex and dynamic environments.
- Managing uncertainty: While various forecasting techniques have been developed, the unpredictability of renewable energy generation remains a key challenge, particularly when dealing with large-scale systems.
- Improving computational efficiency: As systems grow in complexity, the computational burden of OPF increases, especially for real-time applications. Solutions that balance optimization accuracy with computational feasibility are still a work in progress.
- Coordinating multi-energy networks: The interaction between electricity, gas, and heat systems requires intricate coordination to avoid inefficiencies and instability. Ensuring seamless communication and optimization across energy carriers remains a significant challenge.
- System stability and cybersecurity: The increasing reliance on digital technologies introduces cybersecurity risks, including potential cyber-attacks on critical infrastructure. Enhancing the stability and security of OPF solutions in the face of these risks is a major concern.
7.2. Critical Assessment of Different Methodologies
7.3. Future Research Opportunities and Open Questions
- 1)
- Cybersecurity Integration: As energy systems become more interconnected and reliant on digital technologies, cybersecurity becomes an essential aspect of OPF. Research should focus on developing OPF models that can withstand cyber-attacks in real-time. This could involve integrating cybersecurity measures into OPF formulations, such as using reinforcement learning-based defense strategies to detect and mitigate cyber threats as they arise.
- 2)
- Quantum Computing: Quantum computing holds significant promise for addressing the computational challenges of OPF, particularly for large-scale, non-convex problems in IES. Future research should explore the potential of quantum computing for solving OPF problems more efficiently, enabling faster decision-making and improved scalability, especially in systems with high renewable energy penetration. Quantum annealing and quantum-inspired algorithms could revolutionize the optimization process for complex multi-energy systems.
- 3)
- Real-time OPF Implementation: One of the most pressing challenges is enhancing OPF algorithms to support real-time decision-making. Future research should focus on improving the computational efficiency of OPF models to reduce the time required for optimization without sacrificing solution quality. This includes the development of more efficient algorithms, better integration of real-time data, and leveraging advanced computing technologies like cloud computing and distributed optimization.
- 4)
- Advanced Forecasting and Scenario Generation: The ability to predict renewable energy generation with greater accuracy is critical for improving OPF performance. Research into more advanced forecasting techniques, such as hybrid machine learning models and probabilistic forecasting, could improve the accuracy of renewable generation predictions. Additionally, enhancing scenario generation methods, such as incorporating stochastic optimization and adaptive scenario-based models, would provide more reliable input for OPF models, allowing them to respond more effectively to varying system conditions.
- 5)
- Hybrid Optimization Approaches: As renewable-integrated systems become more complex, hybrid optimization approaches that combine the strengths of different methodologies will likely play a key role. For example, combining machine learning for forecasting with stochastic optimization for decision-making could create more resilient and adaptive OPF models. Additionally, the integration of digital twins and blockchain into OPF frameworks presents opportunities to improve real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and secure energy transactions.
8. Conclusions
References
- Alam, M.S.; Hossain, M.A.; Shafiullah, M.; et al. Renewable energy integration with DC microgrids: Challenges and opportunities. Electric Power Systems Research 2024, 234, 110548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Chen, S.; Gu, W.; et al. Dynamic optimal energy flow of integrated electricity and gas systems in continuous space. Applied Energy 2024, 375, 124052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Liu, C.; Zhou, X.; et al. Hierarchical optimal dispatch of active distribution networks considering flexibility auxiliary service of multi-community integrated energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2024, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ai, Q.; Hao, R. Key technologies and challenges for multi-energy complementary and integrated optimization energy systems. Automation of Electric Power Systems 2018, 42, 2-10+46. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Han, M.; Yang, Z.; et al. Coordinating flexible demand response and renewable uncertainties for scheduling of community integrated energy systems with an electric vehicle charging station: A bi-level approach. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2021, 12, 2321–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, H.; Wang, D.; Xu, X.; et al. Research on Several Issues of Regional Integrated Energy Systems. Automation of Electric Power Systems 2015, 39, 198–207. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J. Drivers and Current Status of Integrated Energy System Development in Europe. Automation of Electric Power Systems 2016, 40, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Sun, A.; Shi, W.; et al. Carbon-aware optimal power flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2024. [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Wei, Z.; Sun, G.; et al. Identifying optimal energy flow solvability in electricity-gas integrated energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2016, 8, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Government of Canada. Combining our energies-integrated energy systems for Canadian communities[R/OL]. (2009-06-01) [2020-03-19]. http://publications.gc.calcollections/collection_2009/parl/xc49-402-1-1-O1E.pdf.
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.The strategic energy plan of Japan[EB/OL]. (2010-06-O1) [2020-03-19].http://www.meti.go.jplenglish/press/data/pdf/20100618_08a. pdf.
- Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, G.; et al. Improving operational flexibility of integrated energy system with uncertain renewable generations considering thermal inertia of buildings. Energy Conversion and Management 2020, 207, 112526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, N. Development Context, Technical Characteristics, and Future Trends of Integrated Energy. China Energy 2019, 41, 18-22+43. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, C. Germany's adoption of power-to-gas technology for decarbonization. International Energy 2017, 22, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
- National Energy Administration. Public Announcement of the Selection Results of the First Batch of Multi-Energy Complementary Integrated Optimization Demonstration Projects [EB/OL]. (2016-12-26) [2020-03-19]. http://www.nea.gov.cn/2016-12/26/c_135933772.htm.
- Feng, H. Latest Developments, Trends, and Challenges in the Competitive Landscape of the Integrated Energy Service Market. Electrical Industry 2019, 51–61. [Google Scholar]
- Jiakun Fang, Qing Zeng, Xiaomeng Ai, et al. Dynamic optimal energy flow in the integrated natural gas and electrical power systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2018, 9, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M.; Shao, C.; Hu, B.; et al. Reliability assessment of integrated energy systems considering emergency dispatch based on dynamic optimal energy flow. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2022, 13, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Tang, Y.; Qiao, B.; et al. Optimal Power Flow and Its Environmental Enhancement Research in Gas-Electric Integrated Energy Systems. Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering 2018, 38, 111–120. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S.; Dai, S.; Hu, L.; et al. Research on Optimal Power Flow in Electric-Heating Combined Systems. Power System Technology 2018, 42, 285–290. [Google Scholar]
- Moeini-Aghtaie, M.; Abbaspour, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; et al. A decomposed solution to multiple-energy carriers optimal power flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2014, 29, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, W.; Jin, X.; Mu, Y.; et al. Multi-objective Optimal Hybrid Power Flow Algorithm for Regional Integrated Energy Systems. Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering 2017, 37, 5829–5839. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Han, M.; Shahidehpour, M.; et al. Data-driven distributionally robust scheduling of community integrated energy systems with uncertain renewable generations considering integrated demand response. Applied Energy 2023, 335, 120749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Ma, W.; Li, Y.; et al. Enhancing cyber-resilience in integrated energy system scheduling with demand response using deep reinforcement learning. Applied Energy 2025, 379, 124831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BOHM B, HA S, KIM W, et al. Simple models for operational optimisation[R]. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Fraunhofer-Institute for Environmental, Safety and Energy Technology (UMS- ICHT), Korea District Heating Corporation (KDHC) 2002, 3-6.
- STEER KCB, WIRTH A, HALGAMUGE S K. Control period selection for improved operating performance in district heating networks. Energy and Buildings 2011, 43, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, B. Research on Fault Detection for Hospital Backup Power Systems Based on Hydrogen Fuel Engines. Grid and Clean Energy 2017, 33, 150–153. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Guo, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. Strategy for Smoothing Wind Power Fluctuations Using Energy Storage Batteries. Power System Protection and Control 2017, 45, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Younesi, A.; Liu, M.V.; et al. AC optimal power flow in power systems with renewable energy integration: A review of formulations and case studies. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 102681–102712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, C.; Yang, C.; Shi, Y.; et al. Research on Enhancing Wind Turbine Penetration through Coordinated Control of Photovoltaic Inverters. Grid and Clean Energy 2017, 33, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Yang, Z.; et al. Optimal scheduling of integrated demand response-enabled community-integrated energy systems in uncertain environments. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2021, 58, 2640–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y. Study on Analysis Methods for Hybrid Natural Gas-Electric Power Systems [D]. China Electric Power Research Institute, 2005.
- Li, Q.; An, s.; Gedram T.W. Solving natural gas load flow problems using electric load flow techniques[C]// Proceedings of the North American Power Symposium. Rolla, USA 2003; 1-7.
- Martinez-Mares, A.; Fuerte-Esquivel, C.R. A Unified gas and power flow analysis in natural gas and electricity coupled networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2012, 27, 2156–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Wang, D.; Jia, H.; et al. Steady-State Analysis of Electric-Gas Regional Integrated Energy Systems Considering Natural Gas Network Status. Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering 2017, 37, 1293–1305. [Google Scholar]
- Asl, D.K.; Seifi, A.R.; Rastegar, M.; et al. Optimal energy flow in integrated energy distribution systems considering unbalanced operation of power distribution systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2020, 121, 106132. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Bu, F.; Gao, J.; et al. Optimal dispatch of low-carbon integrated energy system considering nuclear heating and carbon trading. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 378, 134540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, S.; Li, Q.; Gedra, T.W. Natural gas and electricity optimal power flow[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition. Dallas, TX, USA:IEEE 2003, 138-143.
- Unsihuay, C.; Lima, J.W.M.; Souza, A.C.Z.D. Modeling the integrated natural gas and electricity optimal power flow [C]/Power Engineering Society General Meeting, IEEE 2007, 1-7.
- Sun, G.; Chen, S.; Wei, Z.; et al. Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow in Electric-Gas Interconnected Systems Considering Correlations. Automation of Electric Power Systems 2015, 39, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, J.; Dong, Z.Y.; Zhao, J.H.; et al. Low carbon oriented expansion planning of integrated gas and power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2015, 30, 1035–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhao, D.; et al. A two-stage approach for combined heat and power economic emission dispatch: Combining multi-objective optimization with integrated decision making. Energy 2018, 162, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, M.; Li, Y.; Cao, Y.; et al. Optimization Strategy for Multi-Energy Systems with AC/DC Hybrid Supply Considering Environmental Factors. Automation of Electric Power Systems 2018, 42, 128–134. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, S.; Gu, W.; Lu, S.; et al. Dynamic optimal energy flow in the heat and electricity integrated energy system. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2020, 12, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, K.; Yu, T.; Huang, L.; et al. Decentralized optimal multi-energy flow of large-scale integrated energy systems in a carbon trading market. Energy 2018, 149, 779–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; et al. PMU measurements-based short-term voltage stability assessment of power systems via deep transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2023, 72, 2526111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, T. Application Research on Environmental Cost Accounting in Thermal Power Enterprises[D]. Zhejiang University of Technology, 2013.
- Khamees, A.K.; Abdelaziz, A.Y.; Eskaros, M.R.; et al. Optimal power flow solution of wind-integrated power system using novel metaheuristic method. Energies 2021, 14, 6117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Y.; Zhang, F. Study on dual-layer optimization allocation of multi-energy storage under distributed wind power integration in regional integrated energy systems. Renewable Energy 2019, 37, 1524–1532. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Tang, Y.; Qiao, B.; et al. Research on Optimal Power Flow and Environmental Efficiency in Gas-Electric Integrated Energy Systems. Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering 2018, 38, 111–120. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Cao, J.; Xu, Y.; et al. Deep learning based on Transformer architecture for power system short-term voltage stability assessment with class imbalance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024, 189, 113913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, Z.; Xie, Q.; Liu, Y.; et al. Power cyber-physical system risk area prediction using dependent Markov chain and improved grey wolf optimization. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 82844–82854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Qu, N.; et al. Method for quantitative estimation of the risk propagation threshold in electric power CPS based on seepage probability. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 68813–68823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; et al. Method for extracting patterns of coordinated network attacks on electric power CPS based on temporal–topological correlation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 57260–57272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Gu, S.; Wang, Y.; et al. Stacked autoencoder framework of false data injection attack detection in smart grid. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2021, 2021, 2014345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alghamdi, A.S. Optimal power flow of renewable-integrated power systems using a Gaussian bare-bones levy-flight firefly algorithm. Frontiers in Energy Research 2022, 10, 921936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wei, X.; Li, Y.; et al. Detection of false data injection attacks in smart grid: A secure federated deep learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 2022, 13, 4862–4872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, Z.; Bo, X.; Yu, T.; et al. Active and passive hybrid detection method for power CPS false data injection attacks with improved AKF and GRU-CNN. IET Renewable Power Generation 2022, 16, 1490–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, Z.; et al. Localization of dummy data injection attacks in power systems considering incomplete topological information: A spatio-temporal graph wavelet convolutional neural network approach. Applied Energy 2024, 360, 122736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Jing, H.; et al. Optimal Energy Flow Calculation Methods Considering Heating System Modeling in Integrated Energy Systems. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society 2019, 34, 562–570. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, G.; et al. Two-stage multi-objective OPF for AC/DC grids with VSC-HVDC: Incorporating decisions analysis into optimization process. Energy 2018, 147, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Dai, S.; Hu, L.; et al. Research on Optimal Power Flow in Electric-Heating Combined Systems. Power System Technology 2018, 42, 285–290. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, L. Research on flow optimization methods for hybrid energy systems of electricity, gas, and heat[D]. Northeastern University, 2017.
- Xu, X. Research on modeling, simulation, and energy management of electric/gas/heat micro energy systems[D]. Tianjin University, 2014.
- Rahmani, S.; Amjady, N. A new optimal power flow approach for wind energy integrated power systems. Energy 2017, 134, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MOEINI-AGHTAIE M, ABBASPOUR A, FOTUHI- FIRUZABAD M, et al. A decomposed solution to multiple-energy carriers optimal power flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2014, 29, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, M.; et al. Optimal Power Flow Decoupling Algorithm Based on Integrated Energy Systems. Grid and Clean Energy 2018, 34, 80–86. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, W.; Jin, X.; Mu, Y.; et al. Multi-objective optimal hybrid power flow algorithm for regional integrated energy systems. Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering 2017, 37, 5829–5839. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, X.; Mu, Y.; Jia, H.; et al. Optimal hybrid power flow calculation considering distribution network reconstruction in regional integrated energy systems. Automation of Electric Power Systems 2017, 41, 18-24+56. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. Privacy-preserving spatiotemporal scenario generation of renewable energies: A federated deep generative learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2021, 18, 2310–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Z.; Lin, S.; Liu, M. A Synchronous ADMM Method for Solving Distributed Optimal Power Flow in Interconnected AC/DC Grids. Power System Protection and Control 2018, 46, 28–36. [Google Scholar]
- Mu, Y.; Wang, C.; Kang, G.; et al. Research on sensitivity analysis of wind power consumption capability of integrated energy system based on unified optimal power flow model. The Journal of Engineering 2019, 2019, 8471–8476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CHANG, Y.P. Integration of SQP and PSO for optimalplanning of harmonic filters. ExpertSystems withApplications 2010, 37, 2522–2530. [Google Scholar]
- PAN, Z.; GUO, Q.; SUN, H. Interactions of district electricity and heating systems considering time-scale characteristics based on quasi-steady multi-energy flow. Applied Energy 2016, 167, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajimiragha, A.; Canizares, C.; Fowler, M.; et al. Optimal energy flow of integrated energy systems with hydrogen economy considerations[C]//2007 iREP symposium-bulk power system dynamics and control-VII. Revitalizing operational reliability. IEEE, 2007: 1-11.
- LIU X, JENKINS N, WU J, et al. Combined analysis of electricity and heat networks. Energy Procedia 2014, 61, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Li, G.; et al. Optimal scheduling of an isolated microgrid with battery storage considering load and renewable generation uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2019, 66, 1565–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kou, L.; et al. Review on monitoring, operation and maintenance of smart offshore wind farms. Sensors 2022, 22, 2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Li, P.; Yang, W.; et al. Optimal energy flow for integrated energy systems considering gas transients. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2019, 34, 5076–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Datta, U.; Kalam, A.; Shi, J. A review of key functionalities of battery energy storage system in renewable energy integrated power systems. Energy Storage 2021, 3, e224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Y.; Xiong, X.; Zhang, J.; et al. A prospective review on the design and operation of integrated energy system: The spotlight cast on dynamic characteristics. Applied Thermal Engineering 2024, 123751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, G.; et al. Optimal scheduling of integrated demand response-enabled integrated energy systems with uncertain renewable generations: A Stackelberg game approach. Energy Conversion and Management 2021, 235, 113996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Wei, Z.; Sun, G.; et al. Identifying optimal energy flow solvability in electricity-gas integrated energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2016, 8, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, H.; Zhao, H.; Xin, S.; et al. A mechanism-based data-driven interval energy flow calculation method for integrated energy systems via affine arithmetic-based optimization. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2024, 15, 1562–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Javaid, N.; Niaz, I.A.; et al. A bio-inspired heuristic algorithm for solving optimal power flow problem in hybrid power system. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 159809–159826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; He, S.; Li, Y.; et al. Probabilistic charging power forecast of EVCS: Reinforcement learning assisted deep learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2022, 8, 344–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amusat, O.O.; Shearing, P.R.; Fraga, E.S. Optimal integrated energy systems design incorporating variable renewable energy sources. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2016, 95, 21–37. [Google Scholar]
- Panda, A.; Tripathy, M. Optimal power flow solution of wind integrated power system using modified bacteria foraging algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2014, 54, 306–314. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. A multi-rate dynamic energy flow analysis method for integrated electricity-gas-heat system with different time-scale. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 2022, 38, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Li, B.; Zhang, W.; et al. An IES comprehensive profit model based on improved PSO algorithm[C]//8th Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG 2019). IET 2019, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; et al. Energy flow optimization of electric-gas-thermal integrated energy system based on improved particle swarm optimization[C]//2023 IEEE International Conference on Energy Internet (ICEI). IEEE, 2023: 57-62.
- Wang, L. Improved electrical coupling integrated energy system based on particle swarm optimization. Energy Informatics 2024, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Yang, Z.; et al. Hierarchical stochastic scheduling of multi-community integrated energy systems in uncertain environments via Stackelberg game. Applied Energy 2022, 308, 118392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, X.; et al. Collaborative response of data center coupled with hydrogen storage system for renewable energy absorption. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2024, 15, 986–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. Damping technique empowered robust energy flow calculation for integrated energy systems. Applied Energy 2023, 343, 121168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, L.; Ma, H.; Saha, T.K. A CVaR-constrained optimal power flow model for wind integrated power systems considering Transmission-side flexibility. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2023, 150, 109087. [Google Scholar]
- Ibrahim, A.; Jiang, F. The electric vehicle energy management: An overview of the energy system and related modeling and simulation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021, 144, 111049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. Adaptive-discretization based dynamic optimal energy flow for the heat-electricity integrated energy systems with hybrid AC/DC power sources. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 2022, 20, 1864–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghanemi, N.; Labed, D. Optimal Power Flow Solution of Hybrid AC–DC Network Using Particle Swarm Method. Periodica Polytechnica Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Kotowicz, J.; Uchman, W. Analysis of the integrated energy system in residential scale: Photovoltaics, micro-cogeneration and electrical energy storage. Energy 2021, 227, 120469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, J.; Crozier, C.; McCulloch, M.; et al. Optimal design and operation of a low carbon community based multi-energy systems considering EV integration. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 2018, 10, 1217–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; He, H.; Jing, R.; et al. Energy management in integrated energy system with electric vehicles as mobile energy storage: An approach using bi-level deep reinforcement learning. Energy 2024, 307, 132757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, K.; Yang, Z.; et al. Stochastic optimal scheduling of demand response-enabled microgrids with renewable generations: An analytical-heuristic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 330, 129840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabari, M.; Yazdani, A. An energy management strategy for a DC distribution system for power system integration of plug-in electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 2015, 7, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noorollahi, Y.; Golshanfard, A.; Aligholian, A.; et al. Sustainable energy system planning for an industrial zone by integrating electric vehicles as energy storage. Journal of Energy Storage 2020, 30, 101553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammad, A.; Zuhaib, M.; Ashraf, I.; et al. Integration of electric vehicles and energy storage system in home energy management system with home to grid capability. Energies 2021, 14, 8557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Zhou, D. Nonlinear Dynamic Energy Flow Calculation for Integrated Gas and Power System Based on Method of Lines. Journal of Energy Engineering 2023, 149, 04022048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, K. Incorporating demand response of electric vehicles in scheduling of isolated microgrids with renewables using a bi-level programming approach. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 116256–116266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atia, R.; Yamada, N. More accurate sizing of renewable energy sources under high levels of electric vehicle integration. Renewable Energy 2015, 81, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bo, X.; Chen, X.; Li, H.; et al. Modeling method for the coupling relations of microgrid cyber-physical systems driven by hybrid spatiotemporal events. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 19619–19631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; et al. Coordinated cyber-attack detection model of cyber-physical power system based on the operating state data link. Frontiers in Energy Research 2021, 9, 666130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Cui, Y.; et al. Collaborative optimization of multi-microgrids system with shared energy storage based on multi-agent stochastic game and reinforcement learning. Energy 2023, 280, 128182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Younesi, A.; Liu, M.V.; et al. AC optimal power flow in power systems with renewable energy integration: A review of formulations and case studies. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 102681–102712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; et al. Wind power forecasting considering data privacy protection: A federated deep reinforcement learning approach. Applied Energy 2023, 329, 120291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, B.; Huang, W.; Shi, Y. Federated learning from vision-language foundation models: Theoretical analysis and method. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, 37, 30590–30623. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.; Huang, W.; Wang, J.; et al. Global and local prompts cooperation via optimal transport for federated learning[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2024, 12151-12161. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; He, S.; et al. Federated multiagent deep reinforcement learning approach via physics-informed reward for multimicrogrid energy management. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 2024, 35, 5902–5914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, L.; Huang, T.; Kumar, P.R.; et al. On an information and control architecture for future electric energy systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 2022, 110, 1940–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juma, S.A.; Ayeng'o, S.P.; Kimambo, C.Z.M. A review of control strategies for optimized microgrid operations. IET Renewable Power Generation 2024, 18, 2785–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Feng, B.; Wang, B.; et al. Joint planning of distributed generations and energy storage in active distribution networks: A Bi-Level programming approach. Energy 2022, 245, 123226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magar, M.R.; Pandit, D.; Nguyen, D.; et al. DC Optimal Power Flow in Unit Commitment Using Quantum Computing: An ADMM Approach[C]//2024 56th North American Power Symposium (NAPS). IEEE, 2024: 1-6.
- Amani, F.; Kargarian, A. Quantum-inspired optimal power flow[C]//2024 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC). IEEE, 2024: 1-6.
- Hafshejani, S.F.; Uddin, M.M.; Neufeld, D.; et al. Quantum Algorithms for Optimal Power Flow. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2412.06177. [Google Scholar]
- Pareek, P.; Jayakumar, A.; Coffrin, C.; et al. Demystifying quantum power flow: Unveiling the limits of practical quantum advantage. arXiv arXiv:2402.08617, 2024.
- Ochi, A.R.; Mahmud, S.G.; Ghosh, B.C.; et al. Quantum-Inspired Evolutionary Programming for Economic FACTS Allocation in Power Systems: Advancing Quantum Computing Applications[C]//2024 IEEE 24th International Conference on Nanotechnology (NANO). IEEE, 2024: 375-380.
- Palensky, P.; Mancarella, P.; Hardy, T.; et al. Cosimulating integrated energy systems with heterogeneous digital twins: Matching a connected world. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 2024, 22, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, W.; Zhou, L. Resilient microgrid modeling in Digital Twin considering demand response and landscape design of renewable energy. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2024, 64, 103628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokila, M.L.S.; Sunitha, R.; Kalyanakumar, P.; et al. Blockchain-Enabled Energy Trading in Microgrids for Sustainable Computing Infrastructure[C]//2024 5th International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC). IEEE, 2024: 809-816.
- Shang, Y.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; et al. Explainable spatiotemporal multi-task learning for electric vehicle charging demand prediction. Applied Energy 2025, 384, 125460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boumaiza, A. Towards a blockchain-enabled transactive renewable energy trading market[C]//2024 12th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid). IEEE, 2024: 42-47.
- Huang, H.; Mao, Z.; Layton, A.; et al. An ecological robustness oriented optimal power flow for power systems’ survivability. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2022, 38, 447–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oskouei, M.Z.; Mehrjerdi, H.; Babazadeh, D.; et al. Resilience-oriented operation of power systems: Hierarchical partitioning-based approach. Applied energy 2022, 312, 118721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, L.; et al. Research on planning optimization of integrated energy system based on the differential features of hybrid energy storage system. Journal of Energy Storage 2022, 55, 105368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Feng, B.; Li, G.; et al. Optimal distributed generation planning in active distribution networks considering integration of energy storage. Applied energy 2018, 210, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.; Wang, X.; Zheng, Y. A new modeling and solution method for optimal energy flow in electricity-gas integrated energy system. International Journal of Energy Research 2019, 43, 4322–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Niu, D.; Wu, M.; et al. Research on battery energy storage as backup power in the operation optimization of a regional integrated energy system. Energies 2018, 11, 2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Li, G.; et al. Optimal scheduling of isolated microgrid with an electric vehicle battery swapping station in multi-stakeholder scenarios: A bi-level programming approach via real-time pricing. Applied energy 2018, 232, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Engo, J.; et al. Leveraging inter-firm influence in the diffusion of energy efficiency technologies: An agent-based model. Applied Energy 2020, 263, 114641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lund, H.; Münster, E. Integrated energy systems and local energy markets. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 1152–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, Y. Security-constrained multi-objective optimal power flow for a hybrid AC/VSC-MTDC system with lasso-based contingency filtering. IEEE Access 2019, 8, 6801–6811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siano, P. Assessing the impact of incentive regulation for innovation on RES integration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2014, 29, 2499–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agupugo, C.P.; Ajayi, A.O.; Nwanevu, C.; et al. Policy and regulatory framework supporting renewable energy microgrids and energy storage systems. Eng. Sci. Technol. J 2022, 5, 2589–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerscher, S.; Arboleya, P. The key role of aggregators in the energy transition under the latest European regulatory framework. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2022, 134, 107361. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, B.; Wu, W.; Guo, Q.; et al. An efficient optimal energy flow model for integrated energy systems based on energy circuit modeling in the frequency domain. Applied Energy 2022, 326, 119923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.S.; Sharma, A.; Joy, T.A.; et al. A comprehensive review of integrated energy management for future smart energy system. Control Systems and Optimization Letters 2024, 2, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).