Introduction
Sustainable human exploration and habitation of the Moon represent significant advancements for humanity, necessitating innovative solutions to overcome the unique environmental limitations of extraterrestrial ecosystems. Achieving semi-autonomous lunar ecosystems fundamentally depends on efficient microbial-driven nutrient cycling. Earth’s nutrient cycles, specifically nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon, provide natural models for developing regenerative life-support systems capable of sustaining human presence in space. However, translating these terrestrial processes to the unique lunar environment presents unprecedented scientific and engineering challenges (Harris et al., 2021).
Microbial nutrient cycling’s significance is twofold: firstly, microbes effectively transform complex organic waste into usable nutrients, vital for maintaining closed-loop life-support systems (Foster et al., 2014). Secondly, these microbial processes can significantly reduce dependency on Earth-based resupply missions, thus addressing logistical and economic constraints. Microbes contribute by decomposing organic wastes, synthesizing essential nutrients, and generating oxygen, aligning closely with closed-loop life-support system requirements. Utilizing microbial ecosystems, therefore, presents opportunities to establish robust bioreactors capable of recycling waste products from human activity into valuable resources essential for survival (Rainwater & Mukherjee, 2021). Sinorhizobium meliloti, a nitrogen-fixing bacterium renowned for its symbiotic relationships with legumes, stands out as a prime candidate for pioneering sustainable agricultural systems in lunar habitats (Harris et al., 2021).
This paper evaluates the technical considerations, recent scientific advancements, and challenges related to implementing microbial nutrient cycling, specifically using Sinorhizobium meliloti, in lunar agriculture. Key considerations include determining suitable microbes, optimizing microbial metabolic activities for lunar environmental constraints such as low gravity and radiation, and employing genetic and bioengineering strategies to ensure reliability and scalability. Addressing these scientific questions is not only crucial for extraterrestrial sustainability but also beneficial for advancing terrestrial biotechnology and ecological practices.
Why Lunar Agriculture is Necessary
Establishing lunar agriculture transcends experimental interest and is practically essential for supporting extended human missions on the Moon. The primary justification lies in the high economic and logistical burdens associated with transporting essential supplies from Earth. Sustainable lunar agriculture significantly reduces dependency on Earth-based resources, thus providing a viable economic strategy for prolonged missions (Christopher et al., 2021). Furthermore, lunar agriculture supports astronauts’ health by supplying fresh, nutrient-rich food that mitigates physiological challenges such as muscle loss, reduced bone density, and compromised immune responses commonly encountered during extended space travel (Poulet et al., 2022). Psychological benefits, including reduced stress and improved mental well-being through plant cultivation, further reinforce the critical role of sustainable agriculture systems on the Moon.
Current Research Status and Detailed Background
Recent research underscores the potential of Sinorhizobium meliloti as an effective nitrogen-fixing bacterium suitable for lunar agriculture. Integration of beneficial microbial consortia, such as radiation-resistant Deinococcus radiodurans and soil remediation microbes including Azospirillum brasilense and Pseudomonas stutzeri, has been explored to establish robust agricultural ecosystems on the Moon. These consortia collectively enhance agricultural productivity, offer radiation protection, facilitate soil remediation, and support sustainable biofuel production.
Several studies have investigated the performance and potential of S. meliloti in extraterrestrial agricultural contexts. For instance, NASA’s SyNRGE project onboard STS-135 examined Medicago (barrel clover) nodulation with S. meliloti under microgravity conditions. Results indicated successful bacterial colonization, normal root nodulation, and effective nitrogen fixation, comparable to terrestrial gravity conditions. These findings suggest viability of legume-rhizobium symbioses in bioregenerative life support systems in space, although longer-term spaceflight impacts on symbiotic function remain to be explored (Foster et al., 2014).
Additionally, simulated Martian regolith studies provide relevant insights for lunar regolith, given similar nutrient-deficient and inorganic conditions. Harris et al. (2021) grew sweet clover (Melilotus officinalis) in Mars soil simulant with and without S. meliloti inoculation, observing significant biomass increases in inoculated plants due to nitrogen fixation (Harris et al., 2021). Similarly, Rainwater and Mukherjee (2021) successfully demonstrated nodulation and active nitrogen fixation (nifH gene expression) by S. meliloti on various Mars regolith simulants, reinforcing the bacterium’s capability in nutrient-limited extraterrestrial soils (Rainwater & Mukherjee, 2021).
A pivotal study by Paul et al. (2022) successfully grew plants (Arabidopsis) in genuine Apollo lunar regolith samples. While no microbes were involved, the experiment revealed substantial plant stress responses, including stunted growth and heightened expression of stress-related genes linked to ionic, metallic, and oxidative stress (Paul et al., 2022). These findings emphasize lunar regolith’s inherently hostile conditions (elevated pH, absence of organic matter, potential mineral toxicity), underscoring the necessity of microbial amendments,such as biofertilizers including S. meliloti,to improve soil chemistry and support plant health.
Further research by Xia et al. (2023) illustrated successful improvement of lunar soil simulants using phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, specifically Bacillus mucilaginosus, B. megaterium, and Pseudomonas fluorescens. These microbes increased phosphorus availability, resulting in enhanced plant growth relative to untreated controls . Although this study did not involve S. meliloti, it highlights the broader strategy of bioaugmentation, indicating that integrated microbial consortia,combining nitrogen-fixing and nutrient-mobilizing microbes,could effectively establish self-sustaining agricultural systems on the Moon (Xia et al., 2023).
Moreover, an experimental Martian greenhouse study in 2024 investigated intercropping of pea, carrot, and tomato using Mars regolith simulant with Rhizobium inoculation. Researchers reported minimal to no nodulation and impaired nitrogen fixation in the Mars simulant, attributed to unfavorable physical and chemical properties such as low organic matter content, high pH, compaction, and nutrient imbalance (Gonçalves et al., 2024). This result underscores the critical requirement for soil conditioning to create viable conditions for successful rhizobial symbiosis and effective nitrogen cycling in extraterrestrial agriculture.
Collectively, these studies confirm the functional viability of S. meliloti in space-like environments while highlighting critical environmental constraints that must be addressed for dependable nutrient cycling in lunar agricultural systems.
Research Gaps
Despite significant advancements, several critical research gaps remain that hinder the immediate application of Sinorhizobium meliloti in lunar agricultural systems. Studies utilizing authentic lunar regolith are limited, leaving uncertainties about microbial survival rates and nitrogen-fixation efficiency under actual lunar conditions, including challenges posed by electrostatic dust and heavy metal toxicity. Additionally, comprehensive research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects of partial gravity and space radiation on microbial genetic stability, metabolic efficiency, and overall symbiotic performance.
Current data on microgravity effects, such as NASA’s SyNRGE experiment conducted on Shuttle missions, provide insights into short-term nodulation success, yet longer-duration studies examining the full lifecycle of legume-rhizobium symbioses under prolonged microgravity or lunar gravity (1/6 g) are absent (Foster et al., 2014). Upcoming lunar plant growth experiments, such as NASA’s Artemis missions, present opportunities to address these gaps by integrating microbial symbionts into planned investigations. Additionally, genomic and transcriptomic analyses are necessary to reveal how extended exposure to microgravity influences gene expression, potentially impacting symbiotic functions (NASA Research and Education Support Services, 2023).
Another notable gap concerns microbial survival in the harsh lunar regolith environment. The abrasive, nutrient-poor lunar regolith presents challenges for microbes. As noted, lunar soil has virtually no fixed nitrogen, minimal available phosphorus, and can be chemically reactive (e.g., it has a basic pH and can generate peroxides), all of which can stress both plants and bacteria (Paul et al., 2022). There is a gap in understanding how well S. meliloti can survive and remain viable in regolith in the absence of a host plant. On Earth, rhizobia can persist in soil between crops, but lunar regolith is much harsher (no organic carbon, extreme dryness, etc.). It’s unclear how long inoculant bacteria would live in moon soil or how UV/cosmic radiation on the surface might affect them (assuming they are used inside a shielded habitat, radiation might be mitigated, but this hasn’t been explicitly tested for S. meliloti). Some studies have examined rhizobial stress resistance in extreme conditions, for example, S. meliloti relies on efficient DNA repair (RecA homologous recombination) for radiation tolerance and exhibits enhanced desiccation survival in certain stages or matrices, but applying this knowledge to lunar settings requires more research (Yáñez-Cuna et al., 2024 ; Vriezen et al., 2006). No published data yet exist on S. meliloti’s viability directly in lunar regolith or high-vacuum environments, which is a gap to fill. Researchers will need to test how factors like regolith grain size, compaction, mineral content, and water availability impact the bacteria. The failed nodulation in Mars regolith simulant noted above reveals that current strains may struggle unless the soil is amended. Identifying or engineering more robust rhizobial strains (e.g., tolerant to high pH, metal content, or low nutrient conditions) could be necessary.
Regolith conditioning and nutrient cycling integration constitute additional critical research areas. Effective strategies for converting lunar regolith into productive agricultural soil remain insufficiently investigated (Poulet et al., 2022). Key questions remain, such as: What pre-treatments or co-treatments does regolith require to support a rhizobium-legume system? Based on recent findings, likely answers include adjusting pH (lunar regolith is often ~pH 9-10, while rhizobia prefer near-neutral), adding organic matter (to provide carbon/energy for microbes and improve soil structure), and ensuring water retention. Indeed, a major gap is how to introduce an initial organic carbon source or “starter” soil for microbes on the Moon (Harris et al., 2021). S. meliloti in symbiosis gets carbon from its plant host, but free-living cells in soil need some available nutrients. One idea is to grow a first generation of plants hydroponically or with fertilizer, then use their biomass as compost to inoculate regolith. Harris et al. (2021) suggest tilling in nitrogen-rich plant material (green manure) and adding decomposer microbes to begin building organic matter and release nitrogen through mineralization (Harris et al., 2021). This kind of two-stage approach (initial crop to “biologically condition” the regolith, followed by planting with symbiotic microbes) has yet to be tested and is a fertile area for research. Additionally, complete nutrient cycling involves more than just N-fixation: for example, the conversion of ammonium to nitrate (nitrification) and eventual recycling of dead biomass back to inorganic forms. In sterile regolith, nitrifying bacteria (e.g., Nitrosomonas, Nitrobacter) are absent , so any ammonia produced by rhizobia might remain as NH₄⁺. It’s unknown whether the absence of nitrifiers would hinder plant uptake or not – many plants can take up ammonium, but nitrate is often preferred. Harris et al. propose that future experiments should test inoculating nitrifying bacteria to see if it benefits plants and helps establish a full nitrogen cycle in regolith. The interplay of different microbial guilds (N-fixers, decomposers, nitrifiers, perhaps mycorrhizal fungi for phosphorus) in a closed lunar soil loop is largely unstudied. Integrating these components to create a self-sustaining soil ecosystem is a critical research gap. In summary, we need experimentation on how best to ameliorate lunar regolith (chemically and biologically) to support S. meliloti, and how to maintain nutrient cycling processes (N, P, etc.) over multiple crop cycles in a lunar greenhouse.
Finally, there is limited research on host plant selection and microbial genetic adaptation tailored explicitly to lunar agricultural applications. Most space-focused studies with S. meliloti have used model or fodder legumes (e.g., Medicago, clover) (Harris et al., 2021). There is a gap in evaluating food legume crops (like beans, peas, lentils) with their specific rhizobia under space conditions, though the intercropping study attempted peas and faced issues in simulant (Gonçalves et al., 2024). Different rhizobial species (e.g., Rhizobium leguminosarum for peas/beans, Bradyrhizobium for soybeans) might have different tolerances; S. meliloti itself is primarily for alfalfa/clovers. For lunar agriculture, crop choice will be driven by dietary needs, so we should identify which legume + rhizobium pairs are most promising for lunar bases. Perhaps alfalfa or clover could be used not for direct food but as a cover crop to fix N and build soil (alfalfa is known on Earth to improve soil and could be cycled into compost). This kind of rotational system has not been tested in space analogs and represents a gap. Another open question is whether adaptive evolution or genetic engineering could improve S. meliloti’s performance under extraterrestrial stresses. Over many generations, rhizobia might adapt to low-gravity or high-radiation environments, however, the timeline or specific genetic changes that would occur are unknown. Targeted approaches (e.g., engineering strains with enhanced exopolysaccharide production for desiccation tolerance, or metal resistance genes to handle lunar soil chemistry) are conceivable but require foundational research. So far, the focus has been proving that unmodified Earth strains can function in space; moving forward, developing “space-ready” microbial strains is an area needing attention.
In conclusion, addressing these research gaps, particularly in microbial survival, long-term symbiotic viability, regolith conditioning strategies, integrated nutrient cycling, and targeted genetic adaptations is vital to fully leverage S. meliloti and develop sustainable, reliable lunar agricultural systems.
Key Microbial Functions and Future Directions for Lunar Applications
Despite existing challenges, Sinorhizobium meliloti presents several critical functions advantageous for lunar agriculture, each of which can be further optimized or engineered for improved performance on the Moon. Primarily, its capability for biological nitrogen fixation is fundamental. S. meliloti converts inert atmospheric nitrogen (N₂) into ammonia, providing a renewable nutrient source essential for plant growth in nitrogen-deficient lunar regolith. Establishing legume-S. meliloti symbiotic systems within lunar habitats, potentially using atmospheres analogous to Earth’s composition, could enable continuous replenishment of soil nitrogen, reducing dependency on Earth-supplied fertilizers (Harris et al., 2021). Future research efforts could aim to enhance fixation efficiency by selecting plant varieties and bacterial strains capable of high nitrogenase activity under modified atmospheric conditions, including lower pressures and varied oxygen levels typical of controlled lunar environments.
Additionally, S. meliloti significantly contributes to soil formation and organic matter accumulation, essential processes in transforming barren lunar regolith into productive agricultural substrate. Plants inoculated with S. meliloti generate substantial biomass, which upon decomposition, enriches the regolith with organic carbon and humus, gradually establishing improved soil structure and nutrient retention capacity(Harris et al., 2021). Moreover, the extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), notably succinoglycan, secreted by S. meliloti, are crucial for root infection and nodule formation and may further enhance soil aggregation, moisture retention, and regolith stabilization. Future research might involve developing microbial strains with heightened EPS production to effectively improve the physical characteristics of lunar regolith. Additionally, enhancing minor nutrient-mobilization functions through genetic modification or microbial co-cultures, such as phosphate solubilization and iron chelation, could further support comprehensive nutrient cycling.
The potential role of S. meliloti in plant stress tolerance is another critical aspect to investigate. Rhizobial inoculation on Earth is known to alleviate plant stress through hormonal modulation and stress response pathways, including the production of indole-acetic acid and ACC deaminase. Investigating whether similar protective effects could be conferred under lunar greenhouse conditions, where plants will face elevated radiation levels, temperature fluctuations, and intermittent environmental stresses, is essential. To enable these protective benefits, however, S. meliloti itself must exhibit enhanced resilience to lunar environmental stressors. Future research could focus on genetic strategies, such as overexpression of desiccation tolerance or DNA repair genes, or protective encapsulation techniques for bacterial inoculants, to ensure bacterial viability and functional stability in harsh lunar conditions (NASA Research and Education Support Services, 2023).
Furthermore, integrating S. meliloti into synergistic microbial communities offers promising future directions for sustainable lunar agriculture. Development of synthetic biosphere soil communities could combine nitrogen-fixing capabilities of S. meliloti with phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (e.g., Bacillus and Pseudomonas species), organic matter and oxygen-generating cyanobacteria, nutrient-extending mycorrhizal fungi, and decomposing microbes to facilitate comprehensive nutrient cycling (Xia et al., 2023 ; Poulet et al., 2022). Prior research has suggested that beneficial microbial partnerships, such as rhizobia combined with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, can stabilize symbiotic functions under simulated extraterrestrial conditions. Research can focus on how S. meliloti interacts with these other players. For example, a 2016 study found that co-inoculating plants with rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under simulated microgravity (clinorotation) helped maintain nodule size and number, suggesting the fungus mitigated some stress on the rhizobia (Dauzart et al., 2016). This indicates pairing S. meliloti with other beneficial microbes could enhance overall stability in suboptimal conditions. On the Moon, where every input is limited, having multi-functional microbial consortia could greatly boost plant growth. Thus, one future direction is developing inoculum “cocktails” that include S. meliloti plus complementary microbes, tailored to lunar soil deficiencies. Testing various combinations on regolith simulant (with and without plants) will help identify the best mixes for nutrient release and plant productivity.
Finally, practical operational and systems integration remains crucial for successful deployment of S. meliloti in lunar agriculture. Research into microbial storage and transport methodologies, including spore or dehydrated culture technologies, application techniques such as seed coating or soil inoculation packets, and in situ monitoring tools (e.g., genetic and fluorescent biosensors for nitrogen fixation activity), will be essential. Moreover, developing appropriate biocontainment and microbial management protocols will be necessary to mitigate potential contamination risks associated with engineered strains.
Opinion and Critical Analysis
The exploration and colonization of the Moon mark a critical milestone for human advancement, necessitating the development of sustainable life-support systems, prominently through lunar agriculture. The detailed examination presented herein underscores the viability and importance of microbial nutrient cycling, specifically leveraging Sinorhizobium meliloti, for establishing regenerative agricultural systems on the Moon. The research is indeed significant; understanding microbial interactions in extraterrestrial environments could provide essential insights into both space and terrestrial agricultural advancements. However, the fundamental question remains: is lunar agriculture genuinely practical and necessary given current technological, economic, and logistical limitations?
Establishing lunar agriculture is critical, primarily due to the prohibitive costs and logistical complexities associated with transporting continuous agricultural supplies from Earth. The significant reduction in resupply missions alone could justify initial investments in microbial-driven agricultural systems. Furthermore, sustainable food production in situ would considerably enhance astronaut health, addressing critical physiological and psychological challenges associated with prolonged space missions. However, practical skepticism is justified, particularly given the enormous investment required in initial setup, ongoing maintenance, and potential system vulnerabilities.
While the current research establishes that S. meliloti can enhance plant productivity significantly in simulated extraterrestrial conditions, the gap remains substantial when translating these findings to genuine lunar environments. Experimental validations conducted under actual lunar gravity, radiation, and regolith conditions remain minimal, leaving uncertainties regarding microbial resilience and efficacy. The real lunar environment is harsh, marked by high radiation levels, extreme temperatures, electrostatic lunar dust, abrasive regolith, and chemical toxicity. Each of these factors could severely limit microbial survivability and nutrient-cycling efficiency. Addressing these uncertainties demands rigorous experimentation on actual lunar missions rather than relying solely on simulations.
From an economic perspective, while microbial nutrient cycling significantly mitigates the cost of transporting materials from Earth, the initial development, deployment, and operationalization of these biotechnological systems will be resource-intensive. The practicality of scaling these systems to produce enough food for human sustenance remains questionable, particularly in initial phases. As current productivity estimates suggest, initial agricultural outputs might not suffice even for a single astronaut’s dietary needs, raising concerns about practicality and feasibility. A possible resolution lies in adopting phased, scalable agricultural frameworks, gradually expanding capability through genetically optimized microbial consortia, including nitrogen fixers, phosphate solubilizers, cyanobacteria, and complementary microbes capable of comprehensive nutrient cycling. Such staged approaches would balance immediate practical constraints against long-term productivity and sustainability goals.
Another consideration is whether lunar agriculture, even when fully developed, can truly sustain astronauts nutritionally without substantial supplementation from Earth. The nutritional quality and variety of lunar-grown produce will need careful assessment. Additionally, developing versatile synthetic biology solutions that significantly enhance nutrient bioavailability and agricultural productivity could help alleviate nutritional shortfalls. However, achieving this will require rigorous biotechnological advancements, precise genetic engineering, and significant initial investments.
The ethical dimension of deploying genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in extraterrestrial environments also merits serious attention. Implementing transparent and robust regulatory frameworks alongside rigorous containment measures is paramount to preventing unintended environmental contamination or genetic alterations that might propagate beyond controlled environments. Public acceptance and international cooperation will be critical, raising complex political and ethical considerations. Should lunar agriculture inadvertently introduce irreversible biological contamination, the repercussions could be profound, both practically and diplomatically.
Additionally, political considerations regarding the ownership and governance of extraterrestrial agricultural systems should be addressed. Who would regulate these systems, and how would competing international interests be managed? The potential commercialization of lunar agriculture also opens ethical questions regarding resource distribution, accessibility, and equity in benefiting from extraterrestrial resources.
Several crucial practical questions also remain unanswered: How resilient would these microbial systems be to unexpected catastrophic events, such as lunar seismic activities or habitat breaches? Could microbial systems adapt sufficiently to evolving lunar conditions over extended periods? Furthermore, how would lunar agricultural waste products be managed sustainably and safely without contaminating the lunar environment?
Conclusion
Establishing sustainable lunar agriculture through microbial nutrient cycling, particularly utilizing Sinorhizobium meliloti, represents a crucial strategy for supporting long-term human presence on the Moon. The significant reduction in Earth dependency, coupled with improvements in astronaut health and psychological well-being, strongly justify continued research and investment. However, substantial practical, technical, economic, ethical, and political challenges remain. Rigorous experimental validation under authentic lunar conditions, scalable agricultural frameworks, and advanced genetic engineering will be indispensable for overcoming these limitations. Furthermore, transparent regulatory frameworks and international cooperation must address ethical considerations and manage geopolitical complexities effectively. Addressing these multifaceted issues systematically will ensure that lunar agriculture contributes meaningfully toward sustainable and responsible extraterrestrial habitation, ultimately benefiting human exploration and terrestrial ecological understanding.
Conflicts of Interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Xia, Y., Yuan, Y., Li, C., & Sun, Z. (2023). Phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria improve the growth of Nicotiana benthamiana on lunar regolith simulant by dissociating insoluble inorganic phosphorus. Communications Biology, 6(1), 1039.
- Gonçalves, R., Wamelink, G., van der Putten, P., & Evers, J. (2024). Intercropping on Mars: A promising system to optimise fresh food production in future martian colonies. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0302149.
- Christopher, P., John, Z., Robert, N., Mera, H., & Kamrul, C. (2021). Novel hardware for a lunar plant experiment. Lunar Surface Science Workshop Virtual Meeting.
- NASA Research and Education Support Services. (2023). The NASA Task Book. FY 2023 Report.
- Dauzart, A., Vandenbrink, J., & Kiss, J. (2016). The effects of clinorotation on the host plant, Medicago truncatula, and its microbial symbionts. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 3, 3.
- Poulet, L., Engeling, K., Hatch, T., Stahl-Rommel, S., Velez Justiniano, Y., Castro-Wallace, S., Bunchek, J., Monje, O., Hummerick, M., & Khodadad, C. (2022). Large-scale crop production for the Moon and Mars: Current gaps and future perspectives. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8, 733944.
- Vriezen, J., De Bruijn, F., & Nüsslein, K. (2006). Desiccation responses and survival of Sinorhizobium meliloti USDA 1021 in relation to growth phase, temperature, chloride and sulfate availability. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 42(2), 172–178.
- Yáñez-Cuna, F., Aguilar-Gómez, D., Dávalos, A., & Romero, D. (2024). Prevalent role of homologous recombination in the repair of specific double-strand breaks in Rhizobium etli. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, 1333194.
- Paul, A., Elardo, S., & Ferl, R. (2022). Plants grown in Apollo lunar regolith present stress-associated transcriptomes that inform prospects for lunar exploration. Communications Biology, 5(1), 382.
- Harris, F., Dobbs, J., Atkins, D., Ippolito, J., & Stewart, J. (2021). Soil fertility interactions with Sinorhizobium-legume symbiosis in a simulated Martian regolith; effects on nitrogen content and plant health. PLOS ONE, 16(9), e0257053.
- Rainwater, R., & Mukherjee, A. (2021). The legume-rhizobia symbiosis can be supported on Mars soil simulants. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0259957.
- Foster, J., Wheeler, R., & Pamphile, R. (2014). Host-microbe interactions in microgravity: Assessment and implications. Life, 4(2), 250–266.
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).