Although a growing number of evidence emphasizes superior of VATS over conventional thoracotomy, still is little known about early postoperative diaphragm muscle function after lobectomy via these two approahces. To fill the gap in existing literature, we conducted comparative study between VATS and conventional thoracotomy in terms of postoperative diaphragm muscle function, assessing its contractility, strength, magnitude of effort and potential risk of dysfunction such as: atrophy and paralysis. A total of 59 patients (30 after VATS), who underwent anatomical pulmonary resection at our institution, were enrolled into this study. The control group was consisted of 28 health subjects without medical condition could contribute to diaphragm dysfunction. Diaphragm muscle was assessed before and after surgery using ultrasonography. We found that both surgical approaches were associated with postoperative impairment of diaphragm muscle function - compared to baseline data. Postoperative reduction of diaphragm contraction was demonstrated in all of 59 patients. In case of control group, the differences between measurements were no observed. We noted that lobectomy via thoracotomy was linked with greater percentage of patients with diaphragm paralysis or/and atrophy that VATS. Similar findings were observed in refer to diaphragm magnitude effort, as well as, diaphragm contraction strength, where minimal invasive surgery was associated with better diaphragm function parameters - in comparison to thoracotomy. Disturbance of diaphragm work was reported both at operated and non-operated side. Upper right and left lobectomy was connected with greater diaphragm function impairment than other segments. In conclusion, VATS technique seems to be less invasive than conventional thoracotomy providing a better postoperative function of a main respiratory muscle.

Despite the diaphragm's direct connection with the heart through the phreno-pericardial ligament, little is still known about the role of this primary breathing muscle in the cardiovascular system. The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship of diaphragm muscle thickness, thickening, and strength with selected cardiovascular parameters. Thirty participants who qualified for a three-week post-COVID physiotherapy program were examined. Diaphragm muscle thickness on the left and right sides was assessed using ultrasound. Blood pressure and heart rate were evaluated by an automatic oscillometric device, while the rest of the cardiovascular parameters were calculated using standardized formulas from the literature. We found a relationship between the left diaphragm dome thickening ratio and systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, stroke volume, cardiac index, ejection fraction, and saturation level measured after the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT). Patients with better left diaphragm dome strength were characterized by a lower difference in systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, cardiac power output, ejection fraction, cardiac index, and pressure-heart rate product between pre- and post-6-MWT measurements. There was no correlation between right diaphragm dome function and cardiovascular parameters. There was no association of left and right hemidiaphragm function with resting cardiovascular parameters. In conclusion, the strength of the left hemidiaphragm plays an important role in the regulation and modulation of cardiovascular parameters during physical exertion.

Fatigue and dyspnea are the most commonly presented long-term complaints in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. The purpose of the study was to comprehensively evaluate diaphragm muscle function in COVID-19 survivors, as well as investigate whether potential diaphragm dysfunction will contribute to physical functioning impairment. 46 patients qualified to pulmonary rehabilitation were examined. Diaphragm muscle function parameters were evaluated using ultrasonography, while severity of dyspnea, aerobic capacity and amount of energy used by the body during physical activity were assessed by 6-minute walk test, mMRC scale and Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET), respectively. We identified 69.5% patients with diaphragm atrophy and 6.5% with diaphragm paralysis. Percentage of atrophy was not related to age, gender, BMI index, oxygen therapy use during COVID-19 infection course and severity of disease. Patients with presence of cough, fever and without loss of smell during COVID-19 course had a significantly greater values of diaphragm inspiratory thickness, while patients with cough and no smell disorders had a significantly lower percentage of diaphragm atrophy. Diaphragm functional parameters were strongly associated with selected variables of person's exercise tolerance, such as distance in 6-minute walk test, saturation level, fatigue and exertion in Borg scale. In conclusion, diaphragm muscle dysfunction is a serious long-term post-COVID aftermath and can be viewed as a major contributing factor of prolonged functional impairments.