Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Multi-Objective Control of Air Conditioning Improves Cost, Comfort and System Energy Balance
Version 1
: Received: 6 August 2018 / Approved: 6 August 2018 / Online: 6 August 2018 (12:17:10 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 31 August 2018 / Approved: 31 August 2018 / Online: 31 August 2018 (12:09:40 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 7 September 2018 / Approved: 10 September 2018 / Online: 10 September 2018 (10:58:25 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 31 August 2018 / Approved: 31 August 2018 / Online: 31 August 2018 (12:09:40 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 7 September 2018 / Approved: 10 September 2018 / Online: 10 September 2018 (10:58:25 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Izawa, A.; Fripp, M. Multi-Objective Control of Air Conditioning Improves Cost, Comfort and System Energy Balance. Energies 2018, 11, 2373. Izawa, A.; Fripp, M. Multi-Objective Control of Air Conditioning Improves Cost, Comfort and System Energy Balance. Energies 2018, 11, 2373.
Abstract
A new model predictive control (MPC) algorithm is used to select optimal air conditioning setpoints for a commercial office building, considering variable electricity prices, weather, occupancy and lighting. This algorithm, Cost-Comfort Particle Swarm Optimization (CCPSO), is the first to combine a realistic, smooth representation of occupants’ willingness to pay for thermal comfort with a bottom-up, non-linear model of the building and air conditioning system under control. We find that using a quadratic preference function for temperature can yield solutions that are both more comfortable and lower-cost than previous work that used a ``brick wall'' preference function with no preference for further cooling within an allowed temperature band and infinite aversion to going outside the allowed band. Using historical pricing data for a summer month in Chicago, CCPSO provided a 3\% reduction in costs vs. a ``brick-wall'' MPC approach with similar comfort and 13\% reduction in costs vs. a standard night setback strategy. CCPSO also reduced peak-hours demand by 3\% vs. the ``brick-wall'' strategy and 15\% vs. standard night-setback. At the same time, the CCPSO strategy increased off-peak energy consumption by 15\% vs. the ``brick-wall'' strategy. This may be valuable for power systems integrating large amounts of renewable power, which can otherwise become uneconomic due to saturation of demand during off-peak hours.
Keywords
HVAC model predictive control, demand response, EnergyPlus, particle swarm optimization (PSO), renewable energy, smart grids
Subject
Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment