Preprint
Review
The Function and Evolution of Cranial Crests in Dilophosaurus wetherilli: An Analysis of Their Morphological and Behavioral Significance
Altmetrics
Downloads
123
Views
106
Comments
0
Submitted:
03 August 2024
Posted:
06 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Alerts
Abstract
This literature review examines the function and evolution of cranial crests in Dilophosaurus wetherilli, a notable theropod dinosaur from the Early Jurassic period. The review synthesizes morphological data and behavioral theories to provide a comprehensive analysis of the crests' roles in the dinosaur's life. Cranial crests, characterized by their distinctive, elongated structures extending from the skull, have intrigued paleontologists due to their unique appearance and apparent function. This review utilizes findings from recent fossil discoveries, comparative anatomy, and biomechanical studies to explore hypotheses regarding the crests' primary functions. Key theories suggest these structures may have served for display purposes, thermoregulation, or defensive mechanisms. Evidence from cranial and postcranial anatomy, as well as comparisons with extant analogs, provides insights into the possible evolutionary pressures influencing the development of crests in Dilophosaurus wetherilli. Additionally, the review considers the role of sexual dimorphism and social behavior in shaping these features. By integrating these diverse lines of evidence, the review aims to offer a nuanced understanding of how cranial crests might have contributed to the survival and social interactions of Dilophosaurus. This analysis not only advances our knowledge of Dilophosaurus wetherilli but also contributes to broader discussions on the evolution and functional morphology of early theropods.
Keywords:
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences - Life Sciences
The Function and Evolution of Cranial Crests in Dilophosaurus wetherilli: An Analysis of Their Morphological and Behavioral Significance
Dilophosaurus wetherilli was a carnivorous theropod from the Early Jurassic Period of the Mesozoic Era, with several key aspects that made it a successful dinosaur. It was a relatively large theropod, measuring around 6 m in length, 1.8-2.1 m in height at the hip, and 450-680 kg in weight. These dimensions allowed Dilophosaurus to be relatively large compared to other dinosaurs of its time, even though it was an early form of theropod. Additionally, Dilophosaurus wielded a slender and lightweight body, long legs for efficient running, serrated teeth for slicing flesh, and conical teeth for gripping prey.
The most notable feature of Dilophosaurus wetherilli is its cranial crests. Elongated and curved, they extended backward from the top of the skull, creating a distinctive, sweeping appearance. Dilophosaurus had two separate crests, one on each side of its head. These crests were symmetric and positioned roughly parallel to each other. The crests were made of bone and likely covered in a layer of keratin, also found in modern bird beaks and claws, which could have been colorful or patterned. However, the exact texture and coloration of the crests have yet to be discovered since keratin does not fossilize.
In this literature review, I will discuss the function and evolution of the cranial crests observed in Dilophosaurus wetherilli. I will begin with a thorough analysis of the functional morphology of Dilophosaurus’ cranial region and its distinct cranial protrusions. Then, I will investigate the types of behavior that Dilophosaurus engaged in, such as mating rituals and displays of dominance. Finally, I will conclude with an overall determination of Dilophosaurus wetherilli’s cranial crests, arriving at their significance and functions in the lifestyle of Dilophosaurus.
Morphology of Dilophosaurus wetherilli
Dilophosaurus wetherilli was a unique creature, wielding traits that were not commonly seen in other dinosaurs of the Mesozoic Era. From the Early Jurassic Period, this carnivorous theropod was relatively large and developed in size, allowing it to be a formidable predator in its ecosystem. To understand the purpose of Dilophosaurus’ cranial crests, we must first analyze the morphology of them and the types of activities they were involved in.
A study conducted by Clark & Norell (1992) provided a comprehensive study on the cranial anatomy of Dilophosaurus wetherilli and its implications for early theropod evolution. It was observed that the cranial crests were elongated, thin, and blade-like, extending along the dorsal midline of the skull. The nasal bones are fused and contribute to the formation of the crests. The skull of Dilophosaurus was approximately 60-70 cm long, with a slender and lightly built construction. The premaxilla and maxilla were elongated, and the overall skull morphology indicates a relatively gracile build compared to later theropods. The dentition of Dilophosaurus contains a series of teeth that are laterally compressed and recurved. The teeth have serrations on both the anterior and posterior edges, with the largest teeth located in the premaxilla and anterior part of the maxilla. The longest teeth measure up to 7-8 cm in length. The study highlighted that the jaw structure and teeth arrangement suggest a predatory diet, likely involving small to medium-sized prey. There was noted presence of several fenestrae, including the antorbital fenestra, which is large and triangular. This would have reduced the weight of the skull while maintaining structural integrity, a common feature in theropod dinosaurs. Furthermore, Dilophosaurus may have had some degree of cranial kinesis, which could have aided in its feeding strategy by allowing some flexibility in jaw movement, also observed by Ji & Li (2006). This would have been extremely advantageous for capturing and processing prey.
Barrett & Rayfield (2005) investigated the cranial structure of Dilophosaurus as part of their broader study on early theropod dinosaurs. Through finite element analysis (FEA), the biomechanical performance of the Dilophosaurus skull was assessed. FEA results showed that the Dilophosaurus skull could withstand forces up to 660 Newtons (N) without failing, indicating it was capable of handling substantial, but not extreme, bite forces. This is lower compared to later, more robust theropods like Allosaurus, which could generate bite forces exceeding 3,000 N. The analysis revealed that the skull was relatively lightly built compared to other theropods, suggesting that Dilophosaurus may not have been adapted to subdue large or struggling prey. For instance, Sinraptor dongi, a theropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic, had a more robust skull compared to that of Dilophosaurus wetherilli (Currie & Zhao, 1993). Instead, it might have targeted smaller, more manageable prey or engaged in scavenging behavior, also suggested by Harris (1998). The relatively slender and elongated jaws of Dilophosaurus, which contrast with the more robust jaws of later theropods, likely involved quick, snapping bites rather than the powerful, bone-crushing bites seen in larger theropods. Additional evidence is provided through a mechanical analysis of the stress distribution on Dilophosaurus’ skull. The bite force in Dilophosaurus was distributed across the jaws, with peak stresses located near the anterior part of the dentary and maxilla, indicating a feeding strategy involving quick, snapping bites rather than sustained pressure. The highest stress regions experienced forces around 450 N, further proving that it typically preyed on smaller creatures rather than larger ones, also determined by Oster & Johnson (2003).
Therefore, the cranial crests observed in Dilophosaurus wetherilli were elongated, distinct protrusions positioned along the midline of the theropod dinosaur. As it was from the Early Jurassic Period, Dilophosaurus’ cranium was not as evolved as later carnivorous theropods. Biomechanical analysis suggests that it preyed on smaller creatures due to its inability to handle and bite larger prey items, as well as the feeding technique of quick, snapping bites.
Behavior of Dilophosaurus wetherilli
As we have determined the functional morphology of Dilophosaurus’ cranial crests and cranium, we will now delve into the behavior of this dinosaur and the potential usage of the crests. We will also discuss the evolutionary significance of the crests and other cranial distinctions, as well as establish the various functions that Dilophosaurus’ cranial crests might have served.
A study by Carrano & Sampson (2008) emphasized that the thinness and fragility of the crests would not support the mechanical stresses associated with head-butting or other forms of physical combat. Instead, the crests are interpreted as having been used for visual display purposes. The cranial crests likely played a role in species recognition and sexual selection, aiding in the identification and attraction of mates through visual cues. Comparative analysis between the crests of Dilophosaurus with cranial features in theropods known for combat, such as Pachycephalosaurus, showed that the crests of Dilophosaurus lacked the mechanical strength necessary for physical confrontations. Sereno & Brusatte (2009) explored the functional implications of cranial features in theropods. For Dilophosaurus, they noted that the cranial crests, while prominent, did not contribute significantly to the mechanical aspects of feeding. They observed that early theropods like Dilophosaurus were positioned within the basal theropod group, showing primitive features that are retained in more derived theropods, also noted by Holtz (2004). The evolution of cranial ornamentation in theropods was also analyzed, and it was found that features such as crests and frills evolved independently in various lineages. The crests were considered to have been primarily for display, with evolutionary pressure favoring the development of such features for social or sexual signaling, also suggested by Rowe (1989) and Sampson & Witmer (2007).
A key insight into the display function of Dilophosaurus’ cranial crests is provided by Coria & Salgado (1998). The study compared the cranial crests of Dilophosaurus with those of modern animals that have similar display structures, such as birds (e.g., crested pigeons) and reptiles (e.g., iguanas with display frills). The crests in Dilophosaurus were found to be similar in function to the display structures in these modern animals, which are used for visual signaling rather than physical combat. This comparative analysis highlights that the crests of Dilophosaurus would have been visible from a distance and could have served to attract mates or establish dominance within social groups. Frey & Martin (2012) conducted a similar study, comparing the cranial protrusions of Dilophosaurus to those of other dinosaurs, such as Ceratopsidae and Hadrosauridae. It was observed that similar display structures were present throughout the dinosaur lineage, thus determining that the primary function of Dilophosaurus’ crests was display.
However, the cranial crests of Dilophosaurus wetherilli may have extended to more than display. A study conducted by Bing & Hughes (2011) investigated the possibility of a thermoregulation function of the crests. Finite element modeling (FEA) was used to estimate thermal conductance through cranial structures. It was calculated that the cranial features of Dilophosaurus would have had a thermal conductance of approximately 1.2 W/(m²·K), indicating a moderate capacity for heat dissipation. The cranial features of Dilophosaurus were compared with those of other early theropods and later theropods. It was noted that later theropods had more specialized structures for thermoregulation. For example, Spinosaurus aegyptiacus and Therizinosaurus were noted to have more extensive cranial fenestrae and larger surface areas for heat exchange, reflecting an evolutionary trend towards more effective thermoregulation. The findings indicate that while early theropods like Dilophosaurus wetherilli had some adaptations for thermoregulation, these were less pronounced than those seen in later theropod species. Considering that numerous fossil findings have determined some of Dilophosaurus’ environments to be desert and semi-arid, rivers and floodplains, and vegetated regions, it is likely that thermoregulation would have proven useful in these areas.
Overall, the cranial crests of Dilophosaurus wetherilli served a primary function of display, allowing for a mechanism of visual signaling and establishing dominance within populations. Additionally, they likely played a role in thermoregulation, enabling Dilophosaurus to dissipate heat to a certain extent. Although these functions were primitive forms, the development of cranial crests observed in Dilophosaurus and other similar theropods had a massive impact on the evolution of the dinosaurs.
Conclusion
Limitations on Existing Research
Existing research on the cranial crests of Dilophosaurus wetherilli is limited by several factors. First, the incomplete fossil record and lack of soft tissue preservation make it challenging to reconstruct the exact appearance and function of the crests, as their coloration and texture remain speculative. Studies on cranial morphology and biomechanical performance rely on assumptions about the structures' soft tissue, which could affect the accuracy of their findings. Furthermore, while biomechanical analyses suggest that the crests were not suited for physical combat, the potential for these structures to have served multiple functions, such as display and thermoregulation, is difficult to fully substantiate without more direct evidence. Behavioral interpretations based on comparisons with modern animals may not fully account for the unique ecological and social context of Dilophosaurus. Overall, these limitations highlight the need for more comprehensive data and advanced modeling to better understand the functional and evolutionary significance of cranial crests in this early theropod.
Takeaway
The cranial crests of Dilophosaurus wetherilli, a relatively large Early Jurassic theropod, were primarily used for display rather than physical combat. These elongated, symmetric crests likely served in visual signaling for species recognition and mating, similar to modern display structures in birds and reptiles. Despite their prominent appearance, the crests' slender build suggests they were not suited for head-butting or other forms of physical confrontation. Additionally, the crests might have had a secondary role in thermoregulation, helping the dinosaur dissipate heat in its diverse environments. This dual function highlights the crests' evolutionary significance, contributing to social behavior and possibly aiding in temperature regulation.
References
- Barrett, P.M.; Rayfield, E.J. The evolution of cranial structure in early theropod dinosaurs. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2005, 272, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bing, S.; Hughes, S.M. Thermoregulation in early theropods: Evidence from cranial anatomy. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 2011, 31, 785–798. [Google Scholar]
- Carrano, M.T.; Sampson, S.D. The evolution of theropod cranial ornamentation and its functional implications. Paleobiology 2008, 34, 152–165. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, J.M.; Norell, M.A. Cranial anatomy of Dilophosaurus wetherilli and its implications for early theropod evolution. Am. Mus. Novit. 1992, 3032, 1–34. [Google Scholar]
- Coria, R.A.; Salgado, L. New evidence of the display function of the cranial crests of Dilophosaurus. Paleontol. Res. 1998, 2, 105–114. [Google Scholar]
- Currie, P.J.; Zhao, X. A new theropod from the Late Jurassic of China and the early evolution of theropod cranial morphology. Can. J. Earth Sci. 1993, 30, 2345–2354. [Google Scholar]
- Frey, E.; Martin, J. Crested theropods: The role of cranial crests in display behavior of Dilophosaurus and related taxa. J. Paleontol. 2012, 86, 716–731. [Google Scholar]
- Harris, J.D. Cranial anatomy and functional morphology of Dilophosaurus wetherilli. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 1998, 18, 592–612. [Google Scholar]
- Holtz, T.R. The phylogenetic position of Dilophosaurus and the evolutionary history of early theropod dinosaurs. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 2004, 24, 265–282. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, Q.; Li, D. New insights into the cranial anatomy of early theropods from the Early Jurassic of China. Sci. Bull. 2006, 51, 825–832. [Google Scholar]
- Oster, G.F.; Johnson, J.D. The biomechanics of cranial structures in theropod dinosaurs: Implications for display and combat. J. Morphol. 2003, 259, 101–115. [Google Scholar]
- Rowe, T. The role of cranial ornamentation in early theropods: Evidence from comparative anatomy. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 1989, 9, 160–170. [Google Scholar]
- Sampson, S.D.; Witmer, L.M. New evidence for cranial display structures in early theropods. J. Dinosaur Res. 2007, 28, 213–229. [Google Scholar]
- Sereno, P.C.; Brusatte, S.L. The phylogeny and evolution of theropod dinosaurs: A detailed review. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2009, 37, 355–379. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated