Sort by
Essential Organizing and Evolving Atmospheric Mechanisms Affecting the East Bay Hills Fire in Oakland, CA (1991)
William Agyakwah,
Yuh-Lang Lin,
Michael L. Kaplan
Posted: 17 December 2024
Dipolar Brush Polymers: A Numerical Study of the Force Exerted onto a Penetrating Colloidal Particle Under an External Field
A. Fuster-Aparisi,
Antonio Cerrato,
Josep Batle,
Joan Josep Cerdà
Posted: 17 December 2024
Structural, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of Neutral Borometallic Molecular Wheel Clusters
Saira Perveen,
Nevill Gonzalez Szwacki
Posted: 17 December 2024
Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Biodetection Systems: Principles, Progress and Applications—A Comprehensive Review
Muhammad A. Butt
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)-based biodetection systems have emerged as powerful tools for real-time, label-free biomolecular interaction analysis, revolutionizing fields such as diagnostics, drug discovery, and environmental monitoring. This review highlights the foundational principles of SPR, focusing on the interplay of evanescent waves and surface plasmons that underpin its high sensitivity and specificity. Recent advancements in SPR technology, including enhancements in sensor chip materials, integration with nanostructures, and coupling with complementary detection techniques, are discussed to showcase their role in improving analytical performance. The paper also explores diverse applications of SPR biodetection systems, ranging from pathogen detection and cancer biomarker identification to food safety monitoring and environmental toxin analysis. By providing a comprehensive overview of technological progress and emerging trends, this review underscores the transformative potential of SPR-based biodetection systems in addressing critical scientific and societal challenges. Future directions and challenges, including miniaturization, cost reduction, and expanding multiplexing capabilities, are also presented to guide ongoing research and development in this rapidly evolving field.
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)-based biodetection systems have emerged as powerful tools for real-time, label-free biomolecular interaction analysis, revolutionizing fields such as diagnostics, drug discovery, and environmental monitoring. This review highlights the foundational principles of SPR, focusing on the interplay of evanescent waves and surface plasmons that underpin its high sensitivity and specificity. Recent advancements in SPR technology, including enhancements in sensor chip materials, integration with nanostructures, and coupling with complementary detection techniques, are discussed to showcase their role in improving analytical performance. The paper also explores diverse applications of SPR biodetection systems, ranging from pathogen detection and cancer biomarker identification to food safety monitoring and environmental toxin analysis. By providing a comprehensive overview of technological progress and emerging trends, this review underscores the transformative potential of SPR-based biodetection systems in addressing critical scientific and societal challenges. Future directions and challenges, including miniaturization, cost reduction, and expanding multiplexing capabilities, are also presented to guide ongoing research and development in this rapidly evolving field.
Posted: 17 December 2024
The Space-Time Membrane Model: Unifying Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity through Elastic Membrane Dynamics
Paul Swann
We present the Space-Time Membrane (STM) model, which treats our four-dimensional spacetime as thesurface of an elastic membrane, with a mirror universe on the opposite side. Gravitational curvature correspondsto membrane deformation induced by energy external to the membrane, while homogeneous internal energydoes not produce curvature. Particles emerge as oscillatory excitations on the membrane’s surface, with theirmirror antiparticles on the far side. These oscillations modulate the membrane’s local elastic properties, yieldinggravitational and quantum-like phenomena. A modified elastic wave equation, incorporating tension, bendingstiffness, and space-time-dependent elastic variations, reproduces key features of General Relativity (GR) andaspects of Quantum Field Theory (QFT). Identifying strain fields with metric perturbations recovers equationsstructurally identical to the Einstein Field Equations. Time dilation, gravitational effects, and non-singular blackhole interiors arise naturally from these mechanics. Moreover, stable standing waves and controlled stiffnessvariations produce interference patterns and entanglement analogues, resembling quantum experiments withina deterministic, continuum framework. Interpreting photons as composite particle–antiparticle oscillationspreserves their masslessness, correct polarisations, U(1) gauge symmetry, and Lorentz invariance, consistentwith QFT. High-energy processes converting photons into particle pairs support this view. By adjusting anintrinsic coupling constant, time-averaged stiffness variations match observed vacuum energy, reproducing thecosmological constant. Furthermore, spatial variations in persistent wave energy may explain dark matter-likedistributions and address the Hubble tension. The STM model thus offers a geometric, deterministic approach tolinking particle-scale dynamics with cosmological phenomena, potentially resolving long-standing conceptualissues such as the black hole information loss paradox.
We present the Space-Time Membrane (STM) model, which treats our four-dimensional spacetime as thesurface of an elastic membrane, with a mirror universe on the opposite side. Gravitational curvature correspondsto membrane deformation induced by energy external to the membrane, while homogeneous internal energydoes not produce curvature. Particles emerge as oscillatory excitations on the membrane’s surface, with theirmirror antiparticles on the far side. These oscillations modulate the membrane’s local elastic properties, yieldinggravitational and quantum-like phenomena. A modified elastic wave equation, incorporating tension, bendingstiffness, and space-time-dependent elastic variations, reproduces key features of General Relativity (GR) andaspects of Quantum Field Theory (QFT). Identifying strain fields with metric perturbations recovers equationsstructurally identical to the Einstein Field Equations. Time dilation, gravitational effects, and non-singular blackhole interiors arise naturally from these mechanics. Moreover, stable standing waves and controlled stiffnessvariations produce interference patterns and entanglement analogues, resembling quantum experiments withina deterministic, continuum framework. Interpreting photons as composite particle–antiparticle oscillationspreserves their masslessness, correct polarisations, U(1) gauge symmetry, and Lorentz invariance, consistentwith QFT. High-energy processes converting photons into particle pairs support this view. By adjusting anintrinsic coupling constant, time-averaged stiffness variations match observed vacuum energy, reproducing thecosmological constant. Furthermore, spatial variations in persistent wave energy may explain dark matter-likedistributions and address the Hubble tension. The STM model thus offers a geometric, deterministic approach tolinking particle-scale dynamics with cosmological phenomena, potentially resolving long-standing conceptualissues such as the black hole information loss paradox.
Posted: 17 December 2024
Quantum Collapse in an Isolated Laboratory
David Ring
Posted: 17 December 2024
Scalar Field Kantowski-Sachs Solutions in Teleparallel $f(t)$ Gravity
Alexandre Landry
Posted: 17 December 2024
A Version of Exclusively Perturbative Quantum field Theory
Sergey Larin
We suggest a version of renormalizable Quantum Field Theory which does not contain non-perturbative effects. This is otained by the proper use of the boundary conditions in the functional integral of the generating functional of Green functions. It is well known which boundary conditions are applied to the fields of the functional integral to get correct perturbation theory. We propose that these conditions should be used for all fields integrated in the generating functional integral. It is shown that in this case non-perturbative effects are absent. That is we assume that perturbation theory defines the complete generating functional integral. It allows, in particular, to formulate the generating functional integral in a unique way as an exact compact mathematical formula.
We suggest a version of renormalizable Quantum Field Theory which does not contain non-perturbative effects. This is otained by the proper use of the boundary conditions in the functional integral of the generating functional of Green functions. It is well known which boundary conditions are applied to the fields of the functional integral to get correct perturbation theory. We propose that these conditions should be used for all fields integrated in the generating functional integral. It is shown that in this case non-perturbative effects are absent. That is we assume that perturbation theory defines the complete generating functional integral. It allows, in particular, to formulate the generating functional integral in a unique way as an exact compact mathematical formula.
Posted: 17 December 2024
Natural Spacetime: Describing Nature in Natural Concepts
Markolf H. Niemz
Today’s physics describes nature in “empirical concepts” (concepts that are based on observation), such as coordinate space/time, wave/particle, force/field. There are coordinate-free formulations of special and general relativity (SR/GR), but there is no absolute time in SR/GR and thus no “holistic view” (view that is universal for all objects at the same instant in time). Here I show: A holistic view is required to solve the Hubble tension and 14 other mysteries. Euclidean relativity (ER) provides a holistic view by describing nature in “natural concepts” (concepts that are immanent in all objects). Proper space/time replaces coordinate space/time. “Pure energy” replaces wave/particle. I give one example where a process replaces force/field. An object’s proper space d1, d2, d3 and proper time τ span natural, Euclidean spacetime (ES) d1, d2, d3, d4 with d4 = cτ. The invariant is absolute, cosmic time θ. All energy moves through ES at the speed c. An observer’s reality is created by orthogonally projecting ES to his proper space and proper time. Information is lost in projections. This implies that ER goes beyond SR/GR and that we face mysteries if we ignore ES. I conclude: (1) ER describes the “master reality” ES. (2) SR/GR describe each observer’s reality. (3) Because of the different realities, ER does not compete with SR/GR. (4) ER provides new information that is hidden in absolute time and thus not available in SR/GR. (5) In ER, cosmic inflation, expanding space, dark energy, and non-locality are obsolete concepts. (6) ER solves 15 mysteries purely geometrically.
Today’s physics describes nature in “empirical concepts” (concepts that are based on observation), such as coordinate space/time, wave/particle, force/field. There are coordinate-free formulations of special and general relativity (SR/GR), but there is no absolute time in SR/GR and thus no “holistic view” (view that is universal for all objects at the same instant in time). Here I show: A holistic view is required to solve the Hubble tension and 14 other mysteries. Euclidean relativity (ER) provides a holistic view by describing nature in “natural concepts” (concepts that are immanent in all objects). Proper space/time replaces coordinate space/time. “Pure energy” replaces wave/particle. I give one example where a process replaces force/field. An object’s proper space d1, d2, d3 and proper time τ span natural, Euclidean spacetime (ES) d1, d2, d3, d4 with d4 = cτ. The invariant is absolute, cosmic time θ. All energy moves through ES at the speed c. An observer’s reality is created by orthogonally projecting ES to his proper space and proper time. Information is lost in projections. This implies that ER goes beyond SR/GR and that we face mysteries if we ignore ES. I conclude: (1) ER describes the “master reality” ES. (2) SR/GR describe each observer’s reality. (3) Because of the different realities, ER does not compete with SR/GR. (4) ER provides new information that is hidden in absolute time and thus not available in SR/GR. (5) In ER, cosmic inflation, expanding space, dark energy, and non-locality are obsolete concepts. (6) ER solves 15 mysteries purely geometrically.
Posted: 17 December 2024
Search for Sources of Systematic Error in Astrometric Measurements of the Cosmological Constant
Michael Overholt
Posted: 16 December 2024
of 427