Sort by
Evaluation of the Quality of Results of Lung Cancer Surgery in France Using the PMSI National Database
Alain Bernard,
Jonathan Cottenet,
Catherine Quantin
Posted: 20 November 2024
Sestrin2 Enhances Mitochondrial Function to Alleviate Age-Related Hearing Loss
Liwen Wang,
Linlan Jiang,
Shuyi Gao,
Tianqi Nie,
Yuenong Jiao
Posted: 19 November 2024
Investigating the Effectiveness of Smoke Control Devices in Fire Emergency Scenario in Hospitals: A CFD Approach
Reza Mallaki,
Mohsen Omidvar
Posted: 19 November 2024
Status and Determinants of Anemia in Postpartum Women and Its Influence on Offspring
Mengjie He,
Lichun Huang,
Yan Zou,
Danting Su,
Dong Zhao,
Dan Han,
Peiwei Xu,
Ronghua Zhang
Posted: 19 November 2024
Functionality of the Upper Limb in Women with Breast Cancer
María Gracia Carpena-Niño,
Vanessa Altozano-Arroyo,
César Cuesta-García,
Miguel Gómez-Martínez,
Belén Dolores Zamarro -Rodríguez
Posted: 19 November 2024
Effectiveness of Infection Prevention and Control Measures in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Khalid Mohammed Alomari,
Bassam Abdulmohsen Alfehaid,
Wesam Faiz Bakhadlaq,
Abdullah Ali Alghamdi,
Ali Mohammed Alsahli,
Fawaz Ibrahim Alzahrani,
Abdullah Ibrahim Alzahrani,
Fatimah Mohammad Albalawi,
Ali Saeed Jumaan Alzahrani,
Ahmed abdullah Alghamdi
Introduction: Infection prevention and control (IPC) measures are essential to minimizing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), reducing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and safeguarding the well-being of patients and healthcare workers. Given the significance of IPC in healthcare settings, especially highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, this systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of various IPC strategies, including hand hygiene, personal protective equipment (PPE), isolation protocols, and patient education. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to a rigorous methodology, including a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Studies focusing on the impact of IPC measures on HAIs, AMR, and patient and healthcare worker safety in various healthcare settings were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Statistical analysis, including heterogeneity assessment using I², was conducted using STATA V.14.0, applying fixed-effect or random-effect models as appropriate. Results: A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning diverse healthcare settings such as hospitals, long-term care facilities, and resource-limited environments. The findings indicate that IPC measures significantly reduce HAIs and improve compliance among healthcare workers. Hand hygiene interventions and PPE use were especially effective in controlling infection transmission, though PPE use was sometimes associated with adverse effects on healthcare workers. Isolation measures, while effective, showed psychological impacts on patients, underscoring the need for supportive interventions. Economic evaluations revealed cost savings through IPC implementation, particularly in long-term care facilities, emphasizing the feasibility of IPC measures even in resource-limited settings. Conclusion: This review demonstrates that IPC measures are effective in reducing infection transmission, though challenges such as compliance, psychological impact, and ethical considerations must be addressed. Tailored strategies that account for specific healthcare settings and include patient education, psychosocial support, and ongoing staff training are recommended to optimize IPC outcomes. Further research should address limitations related to methodological diversity and potential publication bias to enhance the understanding of IPC effectiveness across diverse healthcare environments.
Introduction: Infection prevention and control (IPC) measures are essential to minimizing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), reducing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and safeguarding the well-being of patients and healthcare workers. Given the significance of IPC in healthcare settings, especially highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, this systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of various IPC strategies, including hand hygiene, personal protective equipment (PPE), isolation protocols, and patient education. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to a rigorous methodology, including a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Studies focusing on the impact of IPC measures on HAIs, AMR, and patient and healthcare worker safety in various healthcare settings were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Statistical analysis, including heterogeneity assessment using I², was conducted using STATA V.14.0, applying fixed-effect or random-effect models as appropriate. Results: A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning diverse healthcare settings such as hospitals, long-term care facilities, and resource-limited environments. The findings indicate that IPC measures significantly reduce HAIs and improve compliance among healthcare workers. Hand hygiene interventions and PPE use were especially effective in controlling infection transmission, though PPE use was sometimes associated with adverse effects on healthcare workers. Isolation measures, while effective, showed psychological impacts on patients, underscoring the need for supportive interventions. Economic evaluations revealed cost savings through IPC implementation, particularly in long-term care facilities, emphasizing the feasibility of IPC measures even in resource-limited settings. Conclusion: This review demonstrates that IPC measures are effective in reducing infection transmission, though challenges such as compliance, psychological impact, and ethical considerations must be addressed. Tailored strategies that account for specific healthcare settings and include patient education, psychosocial support, and ongoing staff training are recommended to optimize IPC outcomes. Further research should address limitations related to methodological diversity and potential publication bias to enhance the understanding of IPC effectiveness across diverse healthcare environments.
Posted: 19 November 2024
Pathogens of Medical Importance Identified in Hospital-Collected Cockroaches: A Systematic Review
Ariel Crespo,
Yaxsier de Armas,
Virginia Capo,
Enrique Iglesias,
Jaime Palomares-Marín,
Luis Fonte,
Arturo Plascencia-Hernández,
Claudia Lizeth Cueto-Aragón,
Enrique José Calderón,
Héctor Raúl Pérez-Gómez
Posted: 19 November 2024
Exploring Literacy and Knowledge Gaps and Disparities in Genetics and Oncogenomics Among Cancer Patients and the General Population: A Scoping Review
Katerina Nikitara,
Maria Luis Cardoso,
Astrid Vicente,
Célia Maria Batalha Silva Rasga,
Roberta De Angelis,
Zeina Chamoun Morel,
Arcangela De Nicolo,
Maria Nomikou,
Christina Karamanidou,
Christina Kakalou
BACKGROUND: Genetic and genomic literacy is pivotal in empowering cancer patients and citizens to navigate the complexities of omics sciences, resolve misconceptions surrounding clinical research and genetic/genomic testing, and make informed decisions about their health. In a fast-evolving scenario where routine testing has become widespread in healthcare, this scoping review aimed to identify current literacy and knowledge gaps among cancer patients and citizens on matters related to genetics and genomics. METHODS: Adhering to the PRISMA framework, the review included 43 studies published between January 2018 and June 2024, which evaluated the understanding of genetics and genomics among cancer patients, caregivers, and citizens. RESULTS: Although the selected studies had significant heterogeneity in populations and evaluation tools, our findings indicate inadequate literacy levels, with citizens displaying lower proficiency than cancer patients and caregivers. The review highlighted consistent knowledge gaps in understanding the genetic and genomic underpinnings of diseases, encompassing misconceptions about mutation types and inheritance patterns, limited awareness of available genetic testing options, and difficulties in interpreting test results. Ethical and privacy concerns and the psychological impact of genetic testing were also common, highlighting the imperative need for effective communication between healthcare providers and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Given the dynamic nature of genomic science, the review underscores the need for continuously evolving educational programs tailored to diverse populations. Our findings could guide the development of educational resources addressed explicitly to cancer patients, caregivers, and the lay public.
BACKGROUND: Genetic and genomic literacy is pivotal in empowering cancer patients and citizens to navigate the complexities of omics sciences, resolve misconceptions surrounding clinical research and genetic/genomic testing, and make informed decisions about their health. In a fast-evolving scenario where routine testing has become widespread in healthcare, this scoping review aimed to identify current literacy and knowledge gaps among cancer patients and citizens on matters related to genetics and genomics. METHODS: Adhering to the PRISMA framework, the review included 43 studies published between January 2018 and June 2024, which evaluated the understanding of genetics and genomics among cancer patients, caregivers, and citizens. RESULTS: Although the selected studies had significant heterogeneity in populations and evaluation tools, our findings indicate inadequate literacy levels, with citizens displaying lower proficiency than cancer patients and caregivers. The review highlighted consistent knowledge gaps in understanding the genetic and genomic underpinnings of diseases, encompassing misconceptions about mutation types and inheritance patterns, limited awareness of available genetic testing options, and difficulties in interpreting test results. Ethical and privacy concerns and the psychological impact of genetic testing were also common, highlighting the imperative need for effective communication between healthcare providers and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Given the dynamic nature of genomic science, the review underscores the need for continuously evolving educational programs tailored to diverse populations. Our findings could guide the development of educational resources addressed explicitly to cancer patients, caregivers, and the lay public.
Posted: 19 November 2024
Exploring the Health Literacy and Patient Activation Levels Among Patients with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Study
Lοukia Tsichla,
Evridiki Patelarou,
Efstathios Detorakis,
Miltiadis Tsilibaris,
Athina Patelarou,
Antonios Christodoulakis,
Eleni Dokoutsidou,
Konstantinos Giakoumidakis
Posted: 19 November 2024
The Impact of COVID-19 on DTP3 Vaccination Coverage in Europe (2012-2023)
Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso,
Sara Guillen-Aguinaga,
Laura Guillen-Aguinaga,
Rosa Alas-Brun,
Miriam Guillen-Aguinaga,
Luc Onambele,
Enrique Aguinaga-Ontoso,
Esperanza Rayón-Valpuesta,
Francisco Guillen-Grima
Posted: 19 November 2024
of 320