Sort by
The Psycho-Somatic-Noetic Paradigm in Trauma Treatment: A Critical Review of Gaps and Integrative Solutions
Rachel Ooi Wei Gee
ReGEN Health Series — Paper II. Significance: Suicide is now the second leading cause of death among adolescents, with nearly 90% of youth suicidal behaviors attributable to adverse childhood experiences. Yet current trauma treatments fail 30–50% of patients, with dropout rates reaching 26–40%. This review addresses a critical gap by quantifying treatment failure and proposing a paradigm shift beyond cognitive-only approaches. Unlike previous reviews that examine individual modalities in isolation, this paper integrates evidence across biological, psychological, and noetic domains to argue for fundamentally reconceptualizing how we approach trauma healing—with direct implications for clinical practice, training curricula, and research priorities affecting millions of treatment-resistant survivors worldwide. Background: We have come a long way in treating trauma. And yet. Between a quarter and nearly half of patients walk away from first-line PTSD therapies before they finish. Medication brings full remission to barely thirty percent. Here is what troubles me most: somewhere between half and seventy percent of trauma therapists themselves carry signs of vicarious traumatization—which inevitably bleeds into the care they provide. Our training programs barely touch body-based approaches, even though the research keeps telling us trauma lives in the body as much as the mind. What I am arguing for here is what I call a psycho-somatic-noetic paradigm—treatment that works across body (the biological), soul (the psychological), and spirit (the noetic). Objective: This review is part of my ReGEN Health Series. I wanted to do something specific: identify and actually quantify seven gaps in how we treat trauma and train therapists. Then I looked at what might fill those gaps—established approaches like EMDR, contemplative practices, and neurofeedback, alongside newer cellular-level work including photobiomodulation, PEMF, and Somatic Experiencing. The thread connecting them? Restoring what I call tripartite coherence. Methods: I searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Web of Science for work published between 2017 and 2024, plus grey literature and clinical guidelines. Let me be clear: this is a critical narrative review, not a formal systematic review. I used structured synthesis, but the solution mapping relies on mechanistic reasoning and clinical judgment. Gaps needed support from at least two independent sources. Evidence ratings align conceptually with GRADE, though I did not conduct formal GRADE assessment. Results: Seven gaps kept emerging. Treatment-resistant populations (thirty to fifty percent non-response). The mismatch between cognitive interventions and somatic reality. Pre-verbal trauma that talk therapy cannot reach. Dropout rates that should alarm us (25.6% on average; CPT hits 40.1%, PE hits 34.7%). Training that ignores the body. Therapist burnout (seventy percent of UK trauma therapists score high-risk). And the complete absence of cellular-level targeting. The established interventions work: EMDR gets 77–90% remission in single-trauma cases; contemplative practices show d = 1.07 with 52% no longer meeting diagnostic criteria; neurofeedback meta-analyses report SMD of −1.76 with 79.3% remission. Emerging approaches show promise too—Somatic Experiencing at d = 0.94–1.26 with 44% remission, PBM with significant effects across 11 RCTs. But the evidence is uneven. The ELATED-3 trial found nothing for low-dose PBM. fMRI-neurofeedback with proper sham controls has come up empty. Conclusions: I think current approaches fail certain patients not because the treatments do not work, but because they work at the wrong level—mismatched to where trauma actually lives in the body. EMDR and contemplative practices already bridge multiple domains. Cellular interventions offer something different: direct access to biological roots. The path forward combines them. EMDR as established first-line. Contemplative practices for accessibility and low dropout. Phased cellular preparation for the treatment-resistant cases. This demands collaboration—psychologists, somatic therapists, neuroscientists, bioengineers—building protocols none of us could design alone.
ReGEN Health Series — Paper II. Significance: Suicide is now the second leading cause of death among adolescents, with nearly 90% of youth suicidal behaviors attributable to adverse childhood experiences. Yet current trauma treatments fail 30–50% of patients, with dropout rates reaching 26–40%. This review addresses a critical gap by quantifying treatment failure and proposing a paradigm shift beyond cognitive-only approaches. Unlike previous reviews that examine individual modalities in isolation, this paper integrates evidence across biological, psychological, and noetic domains to argue for fundamentally reconceptualizing how we approach trauma healing—with direct implications for clinical practice, training curricula, and research priorities affecting millions of treatment-resistant survivors worldwide. Background: We have come a long way in treating trauma. And yet. Between a quarter and nearly half of patients walk away from first-line PTSD therapies before they finish. Medication brings full remission to barely thirty percent. Here is what troubles me most: somewhere between half and seventy percent of trauma therapists themselves carry signs of vicarious traumatization—which inevitably bleeds into the care they provide. Our training programs barely touch body-based approaches, even though the research keeps telling us trauma lives in the body as much as the mind. What I am arguing for here is what I call a psycho-somatic-noetic paradigm—treatment that works across body (the biological), soul (the psychological), and spirit (the noetic). Objective: This review is part of my ReGEN Health Series. I wanted to do something specific: identify and actually quantify seven gaps in how we treat trauma and train therapists. Then I looked at what might fill those gaps—established approaches like EMDR, contemplative practices, and neurofeedback, alongside newer cellular-level work including photobiomodulation, PEMF, and Somatic Experiencing. The thread connecting them? Restoring what I call tripartite coherence. Methods: I searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Web of Science for work published between 2017 and 2024, plus grey literature and clinical guidelines. Let me be clear: this is a critical narrative review, not a formal systematic review. I used structured synthesis, but the solution mapping relies on mechanistic reasoning and clinical judgment. Gaps needed support from at least two independent sources. Evidence ratings align conceptually with GRADE, though I did not conduct formal GRADE assessment. Results: Seven gaps kept emerging. Treatment-resistant populations (thirty to fifty percent non-response). The mismatch between cognitive interventions and somatic reality. Pre-verbal trauma that talk therapy cannot reach. Dropout rates that should alarm us (25.6% on average; CPT hits 40.1%, PE hits 34.7%). Training that ignores the body. Therapist burnout (seventy percent of UK trauma therapists score high-risk). And the complete absence of cellular-level targeting. The established interventions work: EMDR gets 77–90% remission in single-trauma cases; contemplative practices show d = 1.07 with 52% no longer meeting diagnostic criteria; neurofeedback meta-analyses report SMD of −1.76 with 79.3% remission. Emerging approaches show promise too—Somatic Experiencing at d = 0.94–1.26 with 44% remission, PBM with significant effects across 11 RCTs. But the evidence is uneven. The ELATED-3 trial found nothing for low-dose PBM. fMRI-neurofeedback with proper sham controls has come up empty. Conclusions: I think current approaches fail certain patients not because the treatments do not work, but because they work at the wrong level—mismatched to where trauma actually lives in the body. EMDR and contemplative practices already bridge multiple domains. Cellular interventions offer something different: direct access to biological roots. The path forward combines them. EMDR as established first-line. Contemplative practices for accessibility and low dropout. Phased cellular preparation for the treatment-resistant cases. This demands collaboration—psychologists, somatic therapists, neuroscientists, bioengineers—building protocols none of us could design alone.
Posted: 16 December 2025
Comparative Analysis of YOLOv8 and YOLOv11 Models for Phenotypic Traits of Edible Mushrooms
Doo-Ho Choi
,Youn-Lee Oh
,Minji Oh
,Eun-Ji Lee
,Sung-I Woo
,Minseek Kim
,Ji-Hoon Im
Posted: 16 December 2025
Mapping Local Governance and Social Dimensions of SDG Localization: A Meta-Analysis of Urban Sustainability Research (2018–2025)
Veli Ercan Çetintürk
,Hasan Sh. Majdi
,Meltem Akca
,Yunus Arinci
,Leyla Akbulut
,Atılgan Atilgan
Posted: 16 December 2025
Impact of Selenium and Vitamin E Deficiency on Zika Virus Pathogenesis and Immune Response in Mice
Olukunle O Oluwasemowo
,Monica Elaine Graham
,James B Thissen
,Aram Avila-Herrera
,Jeffrey A Kimbrel
,Deepa K Murugesh
,Dina R. Weilhammer
,Tanya Tanner
,Nicole M Collette
,Monica K Borucki
Posted: 16 December 2025
Reinterpreting Erdős’ Conjecture Through Informational Divergence and Coherence Collapse
Raoul Bianchetti
Posted: 16 December 2025
A Case of Herbal-Induced Liver Injury by Laurus nobilis. From Acute Hepatocellular Necrosis to Fibrosis Remodeling
Mihnea Soare
,Sabina-Florina Călugăr-Șolea
,Ciprian Brisc
,Marius Rus
,Teodora Maria Bodog
,Gabriel Becheanu
,Ciprian Mihai Brisc
,Mihaela Cristina Brisc
Posted: 16 December 2025
Robust Passive Mechanical Filter for Sub-Hertz Seismic Detection on Venus
Cheng-Fu Chen
,Mike Ophoff
,Nick Samuel
Posted: 16 December 2025
High-Dependency Border Fractures and National ‘Cascading Vulnerability’: A Framework for Identifying Critical Vulnerabilities, Intelligence-Driven Simulation, and Early Warning in Cambodia Based on Structured Knowledge Graphs, with a Discussion on Thailand's Compliance Economic Action Portfolio Amidst Border Conflict Spillover
Wei Meng
,Xinyuan Li
Posted: 16 December 2025
Bowling Alone in the Age of Screens: Social Media and the Erosion of Family Bonds in the Global South with a Focus on Bangladesh
Mustak Ahmed
Posted: 16 December 2025
Durable Resistance to PVY and PLRV in Transgenic Potato Under Greenhouse and Field Conditions
María Pilar Barrios Barón
,Natalia Inés Almasia
,Vanesa Nahirñak
,Diego Zavallo
,Deimer Daniel Rodriguez Diaz
,Sebastian Asurmendi
,Federico Fuligna
,Horacio Esteban Hopp
,Ana Julia Distéfano
,Cecilia Vazquez Rovere
Posted: 16 December 2025
Initial Growth and Stomatal Characteristics of Capsicum Accessions Under PEG-Induced Water Stress In Vitro
Maria Clara Alencar Rodrigues
,Antonia Maiara Marques do Nascimento
,Ruben Ruiz-Gonzalez
,Patrícia da Silva Rodrigues
,Artur Mendes Medeiros
,Silvokleio da Costa Silva
,Priscila Alves Barroso
Posted: 16 December 2025
Risk of Being Preyed Upon While Preying on Acorns Alters Collaborative Relationships in the Dispersal of Acorns by Rodents
Sergio Del Arco
,Jose María Del Arco
Posted: 16 December 2025
What Is the Radius of Convergence in the Sequence Space Seq(R) ?
Mohsen Soltanifar
Posted: 16 December 2025
One Class of H∞ Cheap Control Problems: Asymptotic Solution
Valery Y. Glizer
,Vladimir Turetsky
Posted: 16 December 2025
Empirical Weakness of the Big Bang Theory and Evidence-Based Cosmology
Amrit Sorli
Posted: 16 December 2025
Necessary, Legendary and Detrimental Components of Human Colorectal Organoid Culture Medium: Raising Awareness to Reduce Experimental Bugs
Roberto Benelli
Posted: 16 December 2025
Trogocytosis and Allergy
Olga Sergeevna Boeva
,Veronika Sergeevna Abbasova
,Vladimir Aleksandrovich Kozlov
,Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Pashkina
Posted: 16 December 2025
Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training as an Effective Strategy for Improving Anaerobic Power in Young Men
Kyu-Seung Kim
,Gi Beom Kim
,Sunghoon Shin
Posted: 16 December 2025
Possibilities and Limitations of Prenatal Diagnosis of Rare Imprinting Syndromes: Prader–Willi Syndrome
Simona Anzhel
,Nikolinka Yordanova
,Emil Kovachev
,Darina Krumova
,Elis Ismail
Posted: 16 December 2025
TvAtg4.4 Autophagin Processes TvAtg8 Autophagy Proteins and Responds to Glucose in Trichomonas vaginalis
Miriam Guadalupe Mateo-Cruz
,Claudia Ivonne Flores-Pucheta
,Jaime Ortega-Lopez
,Lizbeth Iliana Salazar-Villatoro
,Martha Espinosa-Cantellano
,Rossana Arroyo
Autophagy is a conserved cellular degradation process involving ATG proteins, with ATG4 proteases essential for processing ATG8 family proteins during autophagosome formation. In Trichomonas vaginalis, the role of autophagin proteases in processing autophagy markers TvAtg8a and TvAtg8b has not been fully characterized. In this study, we expressed and purified recombinant TvAtg4.4 and demonstrated its cysteine protease activity in vitro. TvAtg4.4 rapidly processed TvAtg8aGST and, to a lesser extent, TvAtg8bGST. Enzymatic assays confirmed substrate specificity and inhibition by cysteine protease inhibitors. TvAtg4.4 mRNA expression increased under glucose restriction, and immunolocalization showed its presence in autophagic vesicles, cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, lysosomes, hydrogenosomes, and nucleus. Colocalization with TvAtg8a and TvAtg8b supports its functional role in autophagy. The localization of TvAtg4.4 in T. vaginalis autophagosomes and ER suggests its involvement in the cleavage of TvAtg8a and TvAtg8b after synthesis and in the delipidation or deconjugation of these proteins from the autophagosome outer membrane before autophagosome-lysosome fusion. These findings clarify the enzymatic function and cellular localization of TvAtg4.4, provide insight into autophagy mechanisms in T. vaginalis, and suggest potential novel roles for this protease in parasite biology.
Autophagy is a conserved cellular degradation process involving ATG proteins, with ATG4 proteases essential for processing ATG8 family proteins during autophagosome formation. In Trichomonas vaginalis, the role of autophagin proteases in processing autophagy markers TvAtg8a and TvAtg8b has not been fully characterized. In this study, we expressed and purified recombinant TvAtg4.4 and demonstrated its cysteine protease activity in vitro. TvAtg4.4 rapidly processed TvAtg8aGST and, to a lesser extent, TvAtg8bGST. Enzymatic assays confirmed substrate specificity and inhibition by cysteine protease inhibitors. TvAtg4.4 mRNA expression increased under glucose restriction, and immunolocalization showed its presence in autophagic vesicles, cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, lysosomes, hydrogenosomes, and nucleus. Colocalization with TvAtg8a and TvAtg8b supports its functional role in autophagy. The localization of TvAtg4.4 in T. vaginalis autophagosomes and ER suggests its involvement in the cleavage of TvAtg8a and TvAtg8b after synthesis and in the delipidation or deconjugation of these proteins from the autophagosome outer membrane before autophagosome-lysosome fusion. These findings clarify the enzymatic function and cellular localization of TvAtg4.4, provide insight into autophagy mechanisms in T. vaginalis, and suggest potential novel roles for this protease in parasite biology.
Posted: 16 December 2025
of 5,333